Application of a Novel Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Endovascular Grading Scale for Transarterial Embolization

Quantitative Assessment of Hemodynamics Associated With Embolization Degree in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Grading systems, including the novel brain arteriovenous malformation endovascular grading scale (NBAVMES) and arteriovenous malformation embocure score (AVMES), predict embolization outcomes based on arteriovenous malformation (AVM) morphological features. The influence of hemodynamics on embolization outcomes remains unexplored. In this study, we investigated the relationship between hemodynamics and embolization outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 99 consecutive patients who underwent transarterial embolization at our institution between 2012 and 2018. Hemodynamic features of AVMs were derived from pre-embolization digital subtraction angiography sequences using quantitative digital subtraction angiography. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the significant factors associated with embolization outcomes.

RESULTS

Complete embolization (CE) was achieved in 17 (17.2%) patients, and near-complete embolization was achieved in 18 (18.2%) patients. A slower transnidal relative velocity (TRV, odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, P = .002) was significantly associated with CE. Moreover, higher stasis index of the drainage vein (OR = 16.53, P = .023), shorter transnidal time (OR = 0.15, P = .013), and slower TRV (OR = 0.9, P = .049) were significantly associated with complete or near-complete embolization (C/nCE). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting CE was 0.87 for TRV, 0.72 for NBAVMES scores (ρ = 0.287, P = .004), and 0.76 for AVMES scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting C/nCE was 0.77 for TRV, 0.61 for NBAVMES scores, and 0.75 for AVMES scores. Significant Spearman correlation was observed between TRV and NBAVMES scores and AVMES scores (ρ = 0.512, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative hemodynamic factors have the potential to predict the outcomes of AVM embolization. A higher stasis index of the drainage vein, slower TRV, and shorter transnidal time may indicate a moderate blood flow status or favorable AVM characteristics that can potentially facilitate embolization.

Brain arteriovenous malformations of the middle cerebral artery region: image characteristics and endovascular treatment based on a new classification system

BACKGROUND

To date, few studies have investigated the use of endovascular treatment (EVT) for brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) in the supplying area of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Moreover, no suitable classification was aimed at EVT for MCA-BAVMs. Therefore, this study proposed a new classification.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected 135 MCA‑BAVMs. They were classified into four types: Type I BAVMs located above the M1 segment; Type II BAVMs located in the region around the Sylvian fissure; and Type III BAVMs located in the supplying region of the M4 segment and subdivided into types IIIa and IIIb. The relevance of various types of MCA-BAVMs and their imaging characteristics and EVT outcomes was analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons test and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The 135 patients averaged 33.8 ± 14.7 years and included 75 females (55.6%, 75/135). Among them, 15 (11.1%, 15/135), 16 (11.9%, 16/135), 54 (40%, 54/135), and 50 (37%, 50/135) MCA-BAVMs were type I, II, IIIa and IIIb, respectively. After EVT, a good outcome was achieved in 97% of patients. Statistical analysis showed that type I BAVMs were smaller than type II and IIIb BAVMs (P value < 0.05), and type IIIb BAVMs were larger than type I and IIIa BAVMs (P value < 0.05). Deep vein involvement in type I and IIIb BAVMs was more common than in other types (P value < 0.05), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was also more common (P value < 0.05). The normal morphology in type IIIb was less than that in the other types (P value < 0.05). Type IIIa BAVMs had a higher degree than other types (P value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the new classification of MCA-BAVMs can be used to evaluate imaging characteristics and EVT outcomes in different types. In addition, EVT may be a safe treatment modality for MCA‑BAVMs.

Endovascular treatment in the multimodality management of brain arteriovenous malformations: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to summarize the data available for the role of angiography and embolization in the comprehensive multidisciplinary management of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs METHODS: We performed a structured literature review for studies examining the indications, efficacy, and outcomes for patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the context of brain AVM management. We graded the quality of the evidence. Recommendations were arrived at through a consensus conference of the authors, then with additional input from the full Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors.

RESULTS

The multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment of brain AVMs continues to evolve. Recommendations include: (1) Digital subtraction catheter cerebral angiography (DSA)-including 2D, 3D, and reformatted cross-sectional views when appropriate-is recommended in the pre-treatment assessment of cerebral AVMs. (I, B-NR) . (2) It is recommended that endovascular embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations be performed in the context of a complete multidisciplinary treatment plan aiming for obliteration of the AVM and cure. (I, B-NR) . (3) Embolization of brain AVMs before surgical resection can be useful to reduce intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, and surgical complexity. (IIa, B-NR) . (4) The role of primary curative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations is uncertain, particularly as compared with microsurgery and radiosurgery with or without adjunctive embolization. Further research is needed, particularly with regard to risk for AVM recurrence. (III equivocal, C-LD) . (5) Targeted embolization of high-risk features of ruptured brain AVMs may be considered to reduce the risk for recurrent hemorrhage. (IIb, C-LD) . (6) Palliative embolization may be useful to treat symptomatic AVMs in which curative therapy is otherwise not possible. (IIb, B-NR) . (7) The role of AVM embolization as an adjunct to radiosurgery is not well-established. Further research is needed. (III equivocal, C-LD) . (8) Imaging follow-up after apparent cure of brain AVMs is recommended to assess for recurrence. Although non-invasive imaging may be used for longitudinal follow-up, DSA remains the gold standard for residual or recurrent AVM detection in patients with concerning imaging and/or clinical findings. (I, C-LD) . (9) Improved national and international reporting of patients of all ages with brain AVMs, their treatments, side effects from treatment, and their long-term outcomes would enhance the ability to perform clinical trials and improve the rigor of research into this rare condition. (I, C-EO) .

CONCLUSIONS

Although the quality of evidence is lower than for more common conditions subjected to multiple randomized controlled trials, endovascular therapy has an important role in the management of brain AVMs. Prospective studies are needed to strengthen the data supporting these recommendations.

Single-center experience with endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with intent to cure in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the incidence of technical complications and immediate complete angiographic occlusion, identify associated factors with failure of complete occlusion and identify predictors of technical complications in a single-center experience of pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVM) treated with endovascular treatment with intent to cure.

METHODS

Patients between 1 and 18 years of age undergoing endovascular embolization between 2011 and 2020 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 120 embolizations were performed in 69 patients. The most frequent clinical presentation was intracerebral hemorrhage (76.8%). Immediate obliteration of the malformations was achieved in 40 (58%) cases. The technical complication rate was 15%. AVM nidus size between 3 and 6 cm (OR: 3.91; 95% CI 1.1-13.85; p = 0.035) and the presence of multiple feeders (OR: 5.08; 95% CI 1.41-18.28; p = 0.074) were predictive of failure of immediate complete occlusion. The location of the temporal lobe (OR: 7.83; p = 0.048), deep venous drainage (OR: 4.67; p = 0.112), and the presence of an intranidal aneurysm (OR: 3.58; p = 0.134) were predictors of technical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Embolization of pediatric AVMs with intent to cure shows a high rate of technical complications and acceptable immediate occlusion rates. Nidus size and the presence of multiple feeders were predictive of failure of complete occlusion, while temporal lobe location, deep venous drainage, and the presence of an intranidal aneurysm were predictors of technical complications. Further studies are needed to determine the best therapeutic approach in the pediatric population.

Brain arteriovenous malformations

Brain arteriovenous malformations are an important cause of intracerebral hemorrhage in the young. Ruptured AVM's are often treated, as the risk of rebleeding is high. The treatment of incidentally discovered, unruptured AVMs is controversial as the morbidity and mortality of treatment may exceed that of the AVM's natural history. Management is multimodal and includes observation with follow up, as well as microsurgical resection, endovascular embolization, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Multidisciplinary teams are important in evaluating patients for treatment. The goal of treatment is complete AVM obliteration while preserving neurologic function.

Complications of Endovascular Treatments for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Nationwide Surveillance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Embolization is widely performed to treat brain arteriovenous malformations, but little has been reported on factors contributing to complications. We retrospectively reviewed a nationwide surveillance to identify risk factors contributing to complications and short-term clinical outcomes in the endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations were extracted from the Japanese nationwide surveillance. Patient characteristics, brain arteriovenous malformation features, procedures, angiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes at 30 days postprocedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1042 endovascular procedures (788 patients; mean, 1.43 ± 0.85 procedures per patient) performed in 111 institutions from 2010 to 2014 were reviewed. Liquid materials were used in 976 procedures (93.7%): to perform presurgical embolization in 638 procedures (61.2%), preradiosurgical embolization in 160 (15.4%), and as sole endovascular treatment in 231 (22.2%). Complete or near-complete obliteration of brain arteriovenous malformations was obtained in 386 procedures (37.0%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 136 procedures (13.1%), including hemorrhagic complications in 59 (5.7%) and ischemic complications in 57 (5.5%). Univariate analysis identified deep venous drainage, associated aneurysms, infratentorial location, and preradiosurgical embolization as statistically significant risk factors for complications. Multivariate analysis showed that embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations in the infratentorial location was significantly associated with complications. Patients with complications due to endovascular procedures had worse clinical outcomes 30 days after the procedures than those without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications arising after endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations are not negligible even though they may play a role in adjunctive therapy, especially in the management of infratentorial brain arteriovenous malformations.

Endovascular Therapy for Brainstem Arteriovenous Malformations

Brainstem arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) represent ∼5% of all intracranial AVMs and carry a higher risk of hemorrhage than their supratentorial counterparts. There is a high and near-uniform mortality with initial and recurrent episodes of hemorrhage. Brainstem AVMs may also present symptomatically with focal neurologic deficits or hydrocephalus. Treatment is indicated for ruptured and symptomatic brainstem AVMs, as well as those possessing high-risk angioarchitectural features. Microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery are ideal therapeutic options when feasible. Embolization is most commonly used as adjunctive treatment before surgery or stereotactic radiosurgical irradiation. Preoperative embolization facilitates microsurgical resection and reduces intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage rates. Use of embolization preradiosurgically helps to reduce nidal size, transforming a large lesion to a size amenable to radiosurgical intervention, increasing the probability of obliteration, decreasing procedural hemorrhage risk, stabilizing the lesion until radiotherapeutic effect achieves obliteration, and providing interval symptomatic resolution. Embolization may also be used effectively as stand-alone monotherapy for small lesions with 1 or 2 arterial feeders not supplying eloquent parenchyma. Although an extensive evidence base exists for clinical usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery as monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic modalities, only a few studies have reported specifically on obliteration and complication rates with monotherapeutic embolization in the treatment of brainstem AVMs. The potential role of embolization as monotherapy for brainstem AVMs is reviewed and discussed.

Modern radiosurgical and endovascular classification schemes for brain arteriovenous malformations

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and endovascular techniques are commonly used for treating brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). They are usually used as ancillary techniques to microsurgery but may also be used as solitary treatment options. Careful patient selection requires a clear estimate of the treatment efficacy and complication rates for the individual patient. As such, classification schemes are an essential part of patient selection paradigm for each treatment modality. While the Spetzler-Martin grading system and its subsequent modifications are commonly used for microsurgical outcome prediction for bAVMs, the same system(s) may not be easily applicable to SRS and endovascular therapy. Several radiosurgical- and endovascular-based grading scales have been proposed for bAVMs. However, a comprehensive review of these systems including a discussion on their relative advantages and disadvantages is missing. This paper is dedicated to modern classification schemes designed for SRS and endovascular techniques.

Comparison of Grading Scales Regarding Perioperative Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations After Endovascular Therapy-Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES

Several scales have been proposed for risk assessment and outcome determination in brain arteriovenous malformations treated by endovascular therapy. We aim to validate and compare the efficacy of these scales in predicting perioperative complications and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed brain arteriovenous malformations patients who underwent endovascular therapy at 4 centers in China from January 2012 to December 2015. The primary outcomes were complications, unfavorable outcome (mRS ≥ 3), and complete obliteration. Each patient was assessed using the Spetzler-Martin grading system (SM), Puerto Rico scale, Buffalo score, and arteriovenous malformation embocure score (AVMES). Correlation analysis was performed between primary outcomes incidence rate and the grades of each scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of these scales was calculated. Pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves was performed to compare the efficacy of the scales.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were included. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the complication rate increased with increasing grade in SM (P = 0.002), Puerto Rico scale (P = 0.014), and Buffalo score (P = 0.001); complete obliteration rate decreased with increasing grade in AVMES (P = 0.017); unfavorable outcome rate increased with increasing grade in the Puerto Rico scale (P = 0.005). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed statistical differences between the Puerto Rico score and SM (P = 0.047) in predicting complications and between the Puerto Rico score and SM (P = 0.008) in predicting unfavorable outcomes. The area under the curve of the AVMES in predicting complete obliteration was 0.757.

CONCLUSIONS

The Puerto Rico score predicts complications and unfavorable outcomes better than the SM. The AVMES scale has medium efficacy in predicting complete obliteration.

Advances in Embolization of bAVMs

Brain AVMs are complex malformations, usually congenital, that need a deep understanding of anatomy and pathophysiology to be safely treated. Nowadays, embolization and radiosurgery are carried out more frequently due to their reduced invasiveness as compared to conventional neurosurgery. This paper aims to describe different and new endovascular approaches that allow the interventionalist to treat almost all the small AVMs and to reduce the nidus of the bigger ones in order to facilitate the surgical or radiosurgical intervention.