Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study

Risk Factors for In-Stent Stenosis After Flow Diverter Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 2350 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent advances in flow diverter (FD) therapy for intracranial aneurysms have highlighted the need to evaluate risk factors for in-stent stenosis (ISS), a potentially serious complication. This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with an increased risk of ISS after FD treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched for studies reporting ISS rates and risk factors after FD therapy for intracranial aneurysms. Odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models to assess potential risk factors associated with ISS.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 2350 patients with 2441 aneurysms were included. Younger age (P = .006) and male sex (P = .003) were associated with higher ISS risk. Smoking also increased the risk (P = .02). Aneurysm location in the posterior circulation (P < .00001) and fusiform morphology (P < .00001) were significant risk factors for ISS, as were ruptured aneurysms (P = .05). Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, allergies, and alcohol abuse, as well as aneurysm size, neck width, and parent artery diameter, did not affect ISS risk. Procedural factors like balloon angioplasty, multiple FDs, or FD/coil combinations were not significantly associated with ISS.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identified both nonmodifiable (younger age, male sex) and modifiable (smoking) patient factors, as well as high-risk aneurysm characteristics (posterior circulation, fusiform, ruptured), associated with an increased risk of ISS after FD treatment. These findings highlight the importance of tailored monitoring and management approaches for optimizing outcomes in FD therapy.

Predictive Methods for Thrombus Formation in the Treatment of Aortic Dissection and Cerebral Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Review

Thrombus formation plays a crucial role in the clinical treatment of certain diseases. In conditions such as aortic dissection and cerebral aneurysm, complete thrombus occlusion in the affected region is desired to reduce blood flow into the false lumen or aneurysm sac, leading to a decrease in the tension exerted on the vascular wall and making it less likely to rupture. However, desired thrombosis sometimes fails to occur. Predicting thrombus formation can provide valuable information in such cases. This article offers a comprehensive review of conventional methods for predicting thrombus formation. In reviews conducted from the year 2000 to the present, the number of published related papers every five years has increased more than tenfold. We also found that the predictive methods can be classified into two categories: those based on the hemodynamic evaluation parameters and those based on hemodynamic and mathematical models that simulate the transport and reaction of blood components. Through our discussions, we identified several challenges that need to be resolved, including predictions based on patient-specific condition, model validation, multi-scale problems, the mechanisms of thrombus formation, and ensuring cost effectiveness. This review aims to guide researchers interested in exploring thrombus formation prediction within clinical treatments.

Treatment of large intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): a propensity score-matched analysis

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is primarily used for treating wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms under 10 mm. Limited data exists on its efficacy for large aneurysms. We aim to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of the WEB device in treating large versus small aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of the WorldWide WEB Consortium database, from 2011 to 2022, across 30 academic institutions globally. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare small and large aneurysms on baseline characteristics. A total of 898 patients were included. There was no significant difference observed in clinical presentations, smoking status, pretreatment mRS, presence of multiple aneurysms, bifurcation location, or prior treatment between the two groups. After PSM, 302 matched pairs showed significantly lower last follow-up adequate occlusion rates (81% vs 90%, p = 0.006) and higher retreatment rates (12% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the large aneurysm group. These findings may inform treatment decisions and patient counseling. Future studies are needed to further explore this area.

Flow Diversion for Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Past, Present, and Future Directions

Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms emerged as an efficacious and durable treatment option over the last two decades. In a paradigm shift from intrasaccular aneurysm embolization to parent vessel remodeling as the mechanism of action, the proliferation of flow-diverting devices has enabled the treatment of many aneurysms previously considered untreatable. In this review, we review the history and development of flow diverters, highlight the pivotal clinical trials leading to their regulatory approval, review current devices including endoluminal and intrasaccular flow diverters, and discuss current and expanding indications for their use. Areas of clinical equipoise, including ruptured aneurysms and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms, are summarized with a focus on flow diverters for these pathologies. Finally, we discuss future directions in flow diversion technology including bioresorbable flow diverters, transcriptomics and radiogenomics, and machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Predictors for a Collar Sign and its Association with Outcomes in Aneurysms after Pipeline Embolization

BACKGROUND

The collar sign has been previously described as an angiographic indicator of incomplete occlusion after deployment of a pipeline embolization device (PED) for intracranial aneurysms. In the present study, we explore the predictors for a collar sign in aneurysms treated with the PED.

METHODS

Aneurysms with a collar sign at the initial follow-up angiogram were identified in a retrospective review of single-center data. The predictors of a collar sign were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 492 cases of cerebral aneurysm treated with the PED were identified. Among them, 53 were found to have a collar sign on the initial follow-up angiogram. Univariate analysis showed that previous treatment of the same aneurysm (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; P = 0.01), a branch vessel from the aneurysm neck or dome (OR, 6.2; P < 0.001), and a smaller aneurysm neck size (OR, 0.75; P = 0.01) were all predictors for the presence of a collar sign. A larger diameter (OR, 0.92; P = 0.06), increased dome/neck ratio (OR, 1.38; P = 0.1), increased aspect ratio (OR, 1.14; 0 P =.17), and previous treatment showed a trend toward an association with a collar sign. However, after multivariate analysis, a branch from the aneurysm neck or dome (OR, 6.23; P < 0.001), aneurysm diameter (OR, 0.75; P = 0.032), an increased dome/neck ratio (OR, 4.62; P = 0.006), and previous treatment were the strongest predictors for a collar sign.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a branch vessel arising from the aneurysm neck or dome, an increased dome/neck ratio, aneurysm diameter, and previous treatment are the strongest predictive factors for a collar sign in the angiographic follow-up of PED-treated aneurysms.

Maxillary artery utilization in subcranial-intracranial bypass procedures: a comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis

The utilization of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) in subcranial-intracranial bypass for revascularization in complex aneurysms, tumors, or refractory ischemia shows promise. However, robust evidence concerning its outcomes is lacking. Hence, the authors embarked on a systematic review with pooled analysis to elucidate the efficacy of this approach. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Included articles used the IMAX as a donor vessel for revascularizing an intracranial area and reported at least one of the following outcomes: patency, complications, or clinical data. Favorable outcomes were defined as the absence of neurologic deficits or improvement in the baseline condition. Complications were considered any adverse event directly related to the procedure. Out of 418 retrieved articles, 26 were included, involving 183 patients. Among them, 119 had aneurysms, 41 experienced ischemic strokes (transient or not), 2 had arterial occlusions, and 3 had neoplasia. Furthermore, 91.8% of bypasses used radial artery grafts, and 87.9% revascularized the middle cerebral artery territory. The median average follow-up period was 12 months (0.3-53.1). The post-operation patency rate was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%; I2=0%), while the patency rate at follow-up was 82% (95% CI: 68-96%; I2=77%). Complications occurred in 21% of cases (95% CI: 9-32%; I2=58%), with no significant procedure-related mortality in 0% (95% CI: 0-2%; I2=0%). Favorable outcomes were observed in 88% of patients (95% CI: 81-96%; I2=0%), and only 3% experienced ischemia (95% CI: 0-6%; I2=0%). The subcranial-intracranial bypass with the IMAX shows excellent postoperative patency and considerable favorable clinical outcomes. While complications exist, the procedure carries a minimal risk of mortality. However, long-term patency presents heterogeneous findings, warranting additional research.

Safety and efficacy analysis of the off-label use of pipeline embolization devices for intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score matching study

Background and objective

The safety and efficacy of on-label use of pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) are well established; however, there is much controversy over their off-label use. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the off-label use of PEDs for treating intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

This single-center study retrospectively included patients with digital subtraction angiography, computed tomographic angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography confirmed intracranial aneurysms treated with PEDs who were admitted to our institution between 1 January 2018 and 1 July 2022. Patients were divided into on- and off-label groups according to the Food and Drug Administration criteria published in 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance disparities in baseline information between the two groups. Safety outcomes included postoperative mortality and complication rates, whereas effectiveness outcomes included aneurysm occlusion rate (O'Kelly-Marotta grading system C + D grades), retreatment rate within 12 months, and postoperative functional score [modified Rankin scale (mRS) score]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Scientific Research and Clinical Trial of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethics number: KY 2018-098-02). All patients provided informed consent.

Results

A total of 242 patients with 261 aneurysms (160 on-label and 101 off-label aneurysms) were included in this study. PSM yielded 81 pairs of patients matched for baseline information. Postoperative hemorrhagic, ischemic, and procedure-related complication rates did not reach statistical significance. In addition, no statistically significant differences in the aneurysm occlusion rate, retreatment rate within 12 months, postoperative functional score (mRS score), or mRS score deterioration rate were observed between the two groups. A higher incidence of in-stent stenosis was observed in the off-label (4.9% vs. 21%, p = 0.002) group than in the on-label group; however, all patients were asymptomatic.

Conclusion

Compared with on-label use, off-label use of PEDs for treating intracranial aneurysms did not increase the risk of complications, and the occlusion rates were comparable. Therefore, decisions regarding clinical management should not rely solely on on- or off-label indications.

Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI

Background and purpose

Although aneurysm shrinkage often occurs after flow diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms, no reports have addressed the factors associated with aneurysm shrinkage.

Materials and methods

This retrospective single-center study was performed to examine patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms who were treated using flow diversion and followed up by imaging for at least 12 months. The study outcome was aneurysm shrinkage (volume reduction of ≥10%) 12 months after treatment. Aneurysm volume was quantitatively assessed using the MRIcroGL software. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were statistically analyzed.

Results

This study involved 81 patients with 88 aneurysms. At the 6 months, 12 months, and last follow-ups, the proportion of aneurysms that had shrunk was 50, 64, and 65%, respectively. No adjunctive coiling (odds ratio, 56.7; 95% confidence interval, 7.03-457.21; p < 0.001) and aneurysm occlusion (odds ratio, 90.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.32-988.66; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage. In patients treated by flow diversion with adjunctive coiling, only the volume embolization rate was a factor significantly associated with aneurysm shrinkage (p < 0.001). Its cutoff value was 15.5% according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.83).

Conclusion

The rate of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion increased during the first 12 months after treatment, but not thereafter. No adjunctive coiling and aneurysm occlusion were predictors of aneurysm shrinkage, respectively. If adjunctive coiling is required, a volume embolization rate of ≤15.5% may be suggested for aneurysm regression.

Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, the delayed complications associated with flow diverter use are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, severity, clinical outcomes, risk factors, and dynamic changes associated with in-stent stenosis (ISS) after treatment with a Pipeline embolization device (PED).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PED treatment between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. The angiographic, clinical, and follow-up data of 459 patients were independently reviewed by four neuroradiologists to identify ISS. Binary logistic regression was conducted to determine ISS risk factors, and an ISS-time curve was established to demonstrate dynamic changes in ISS after PED implantation.

RESULTS

Of the 459 treated patients, 69 (15.0%) developed ISS. At follow-up, nine patients (2.0%) with ISS demonstrated reversal, while 18 (3.9%) developed parental artery occlusion. A total of 380 patients (82.8%) achieved complete aneurysm occlusion (O'Kelly-Marotta grade D). Patients with posterior-circulation aneurysm (OR=2.895, 95% CI (1.732 to 4.838; P<0.001) or balloon angioplasty (OR=1.992, 95% CI 1.162 to 3.414; P=0.037) were more likely to develop ISS. Patients aged >54 years (OR=0.464, 95% CI 0.274 to 0.785; P=0.006) or with a body mass index of >28 kg/m2 (OR=0.427, 95% CI 0.184 to 0.991; P=0.026) had a lower ISS risk. Intimal hyperplasia initiated by PED placement peaked within 1 year after the procedure, rarely progressed after 12 months, and tended to reverse within 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ISS is a common, benign, and self-limiting complication of PED implantation in the Chinese population.

Recurrence of a large intracranial fusiform aneurysm treated with overlapping Pipeline embolization devices: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion, specifically with the Pipeline embolization device (PED), represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy and at times superiority to conventional treatment modalities for aneurysms with a fusiform morphology, giant size, or wide neck. However, there may be a nonsignificant risk of recurrence after flow diversion of these historically difficult-to-treat aneurysms, relative to aneurysms with a more favorable morphology and size (i.e., saccular, narrow necked). To date, only three papers in the literature have demonstrated the recurrence of a completely occluded aneurysm on follow-up.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors describe a patient with a giant middle cerebral artery fusiform aneurysm treated with multiple telescoping PEDs. On the 3-month follow-up angiogram, there was complete occlusion of the aneurysm. The patient was lost to follow-up and presented 4 years later with a recurrence of the aneurysm between PED segments, requiring retreatment. The patient represented 3 years posttreatment with the need for repeat treatment of the fusiform aneurysm due to separation of the existing PEDs along with stent reconstruction. At the 20-month follow-up after the third treatment, the initial aneurysm target was found to be occluded.

LESSONS

This case illustrates the need for long-term follow-up, specifically for patients with giant wide-necked or fusiform aneurysms treated with overlapping PEDs.

Difference in the cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion by Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study

The introduction of flow diverters (FDs) has represented a paradigm shift in the management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCA). Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Devices (FREDs) and Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs) have gained widespread popularity. We aimed to investigate the cumulative incidence of aneurysm occlusion. A total of 195 patients with 199 UCAs were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes were aneurysmal occlusion during the follow-up, a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days, additional treatment, major stroke, and steno-occlusive events of FD. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, aneurysmal size, and location of the internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. Non-ICA aneurysms were excluded from matching. During the follow-up period (median, 366 days), complete and satisfactory aneurysmal occlusions were observed in 128 (68%) and 148 (78%) of 189 UCAs in the unmatched cohort. The 142 (71 each) propensity score-matched cohort was complied. The FRED group had a higher cumulative incidence of ICA aneurysm occlusion (complete: HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1, p = 0.0025; satisfactory: HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.2, p = 0.025). The proportion of additional treatment was significantly smaller in the FRED group (OR 0.077, 95% CI 0.010-0.57, p = 0.0007). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Propensity score-matched analysis indicated that FRED might have a higher cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion in the treatment of unruptured ICA aneurysms. Whether a cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion may differ by the type of FDs warrants further investigation.

Treatment of fusiform aneurysms with a pipeline embolization device: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intracranial fusiform aneurysms are less common than saccular aneurysms, but are associated with higher mortality and morbidity. We conducted this study to determine the safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device (PED) to treat intracranial fusiform aneurysms.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective, and observational study. Data for this study came from the PLUS study conducted from 2014 to 2019 across 14 centers in China. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of the occlusion rate and complication.

RESULTS

A total of 1171 consecutive patients with 1322 intracranial aneurysms participated in this study. Among the participants, 104 patients with 109 fusiform aneurysms were eligible for this analysis (mean age 49 years, 36.5% women, aneurysm mean size 14.7 mm, 55% in the posterior circulation, and 6% in the basilar artery). Mean follow-up time was 9.0 months (range 3-36 months). The last DSA angiographic follow-up was available for 85 patients, and 58 aneurysms (68.2%) were completely occluded. The overall complication rate and mortality were 17.3% and 2.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR=1.007, p=0.037) and cerebral atherosclerosis (OR=1.441, p=0.002) were associated with incomplete occlusion of fusiform aneurysms after PED treatment.

CONCLUSION

PEDs may be an effective treatment for intracranial fusiform aneurysms, with a favorable occlusion rate. However, because these treatments have a relatively high rate of complications, PED treatment for fusiform aneurysms should be carefully and strictly controlled. Our analysis showed that PEDs with adjunctive coiling did not significantly improve the occlusion rate of fusiform aneurysms.

Predictive Factors of Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Vertebrobasilar Fusiform Aneurysms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of recurrence after endovascular treatment (EVT) for unruptured vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms (VBFA).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 36 patients who underwent EVT of unruptured VBFA between 2008 and 2020. Variables influencing recurrence, such as size, type, thrombus, preoperative symptoms, and treatment methods, were analyzed. All patients were followed up using vessel imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 7 of 36 patients (19.4%) developed recurrence. The mean time from EVT to recurrence was 9.2 months (range 2-26.9 months). Maximum aneurysmal diameter on magnetic resonance imaging was decreased, increased, and remained unchanged in 1, 7, and 28 patients, respectively. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus significantly influenced the risk of recurrence. Post-EVT, 7 (19.4%) patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm on the immediate postoperative angiogram, and 22 (61.1%) patients showed complete occlusion on the 1‑year follow-up imaging. Good outcomes were observed in 32 patients (88.9%) at the last follow-up, with a mRS score of 0-1 after EVT.

CONCLUSION

EVT achieves good outcomes in unruptured VBFA. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative mRS score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus are risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after EVT.

Single-Center Case Series of Simple Proximal Clipping for Large Thrombosed Vertebral Artery Aneurysms: Preservation of Perforating Arteries and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical proximal parent artery occlusion (PAO) is one of the treatments for partially thrombosed vertebral artery aneurysms (PTVAs). However, whether long-term changes in size and perforating arteries through the blind end can be truly preserved remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical proximal PAO for PTVAs, focusing on the transition in size and preservation of perforating arteries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 consecutive cases of unruptured large PTVAs. The cases were treated with surgical proximal PAO without trapping or thrombectomy. Preservation of the perforating arteries was confirmed through intraoperative indocyanine green video angiography. The aneurysm size was evaluated by measuring the maximum diameter on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Post-treatment outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up examination.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (excluding 1 with morbidity) had a mean follow-up time of 33.2 months (range, 12-60 months) and a mean reduction rate of 71% (range, 32%-95%). Only 1 patient (7.2%) experienced postoperative stroke, and 13 patients (92.8%) showed no worsening of the modified Rankin Scale score at the final follow-up examination. The symptoms were improved in 5 of the 6 symptomatic patients (83.3%). In 10 patients (71.4%), a perforating branch that could not be identified on preoperative imaging was identified intraoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical proximal PAO without trapping or thrombectomy for PTVAs allows long-term reduction of aneurysm size and improves treatment safety by preserving the perforating artery, especially in cases wherein direct reconstruction is not feasible.

Initial experience with Pipeline embolization of intracranial pseudoaneurysms in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

Flow-diverting devices have been used successfully for the treatment of complex intracranial vascular injuries in adults, but the role of these devices in treating iatrogenic and traumatic intracranial vascular injuries in children remains unclear. The authors present their experience using the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for treating intracranial pseudoaneurysms in children.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients with traumatic and iatrogenic injuries to the intracranial vasculature that were treated with the PED between 2015 and 2021. Demographic data, indications for treatment, the number and sizes of PEDs used, follow-up imaging, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six patients with a median age of 12 years (range 7-16 years) underwent PED placement to treat intracranial pseudoaneurysms. There were 3 patients with hemorrhagic presentation, 2 with ischemia, and 1 in whom a growing pseudoaneurysm was found on angiography. Injured vessels included the anterior cerebral artery (n = 2), the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA, n = 2), the cavernous ICA (n = 1), and the distal cervical ICA (n = 1). All 6 pseudoaneurysms were successfully treated with PED deployment. One patient required re-treatment with a second PED within a week because of concern for a growing pseudoaneurysm. One patient experienced parent vessel occlusion without neurological sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the PED is feasible for the management of iatrogenic and traumatic pseudoaneurysms of the intracranial vasculature in children, even in the setting of hemorrhagic presentation.

Learning Curve for Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Long-Term International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion has gradually become a standard treatment for intracranial aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Recently, the off-label use of the flow diverters to treat posterior circulation aneurysms has also increased despite initial concerns of rupture and the suboptimal results. This study aimed to explore the change in complication rates and treatment outcomes across time for posterior circulation aneurysms treated using flow diversion and to further evaluate the mechanisms and variables that could potentially explain the change and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review using a standardized data set at multiple international academic institutions was performed to identify patients with ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diversion during a decade spanning January 2011 to January 2020. This period was then categorized into 4 intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 378 procedures were performed during the study period. Across time, there was an increasing tendency to treat more vertebral artery and fewer large vertebrobasilar aneurysms (P = .05). Moreover, interventionalists have been increasingly using fewer overlapping flow diverters per aneurysm (P = .07). There was a trend toward a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic complications from 15.8% in 2011-13 to 8.9% in 2018-19 (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter experience revealed a trend toward treating fewer basilar aneurysms, smaller aneurysms, and increased usage of a single flow diverter, leading to a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

North American multicenter experience with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Flow diverters have revolutionized the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here, the authors present the first large-scale North American multicenter experience using the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

Consecutive cerebral aneurysms treated with FRED at 7 North American centers between June 2020 and November 2021 were included. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics, aneurysm characteristics, periprocedural and long-term complications, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and radiological follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 133 aneurysms in 116 patients were treated with 123 FRED deployment procedures and included in this study. One hundred twenty-six aneurysms (94.7%) were unruptured, 117 (88.0%) saccular, and 123 (92.5%) located in anterior circulation. The mean (range) aneurysm maximal width and neck width sizes were 7.2 (1.5-42.5) mm and 4.1 (1.0-15.1) mm, respectively. Successful FRED deployment was achieved in 122 procedures (99.2%). Adjunctive coiling was used in 4 procedures (3.3%). Radiological follow-up was available for 101 aneurysms at a median duration of 7.0 months. At last follow-up, complete occlusion was observed in 55.4% of patients, residual neck in 8.9%, and filling aneurysm in 35.6%; among cases with radiological follow-up duration > 10 months, these values were 21/43 (48.8%), 3/43 (7.0%), and 19/43 (44.2%), respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, age (OR 0.93, p = 0.001) and aneurysm neck size (OR 0.83, p = 0.048) were negatively correlated with odds of complete occlusion at latest follow-up. The retreatment rate was 6/124 (4.8%). The overall complication rate was 31/116 (26.7%). Parent vessel occlusion, covered branch occlusion, and in-stent stenosis were detected in 9/99 (9.1%), 6/63 (9.5%), and 15/99 (15.2%) cases, respectively. The FRED-related, symptomatic, thromboembolic, and hemorrhagic complication rates were 22.4%, 12.9%, 6.9%, and 0.9% respectively. The morbidity rate was 10/116 patients (8.6%). There was 1 death due to massive periprocedural internal carotid artery stroke, and 3.6% of the patients had an mRS score > 2 at the last follow-up (vs 0.9% at baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

As the first large-scale North American multicenter FRED experience, this study confirmed the ease of successful FRED deployment but suggested lower efficacy and a higher rate of complications than reported by previous European and South American studies on FRED and other flow-diverting devices. The authors recommend judicious use of this device until future studies can better elucidate the long-term outcomes of FRED treatment.

Flow Diversion for ICA Aneurysms with Compressive Neuro-Ophthalmologic Symptoms: Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion is an effective treatment for aneurysms of the ICA with compression-related neuro-ophthalmologic symptoms, especially when treatment is initiated early after symptom onset and aneurysm occlusion is complete. However, non-negligible complication rates have been reported. Our aim was to identify risk factors for morbidity/mortality and incomplete aneurysm occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a previous publication, which included all patients treated with flow diversion for an unruptured aneurysm of the ICA with compression-related symptoms.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with 54 aneurysms (48 women, 88.9%; mean age, 59.2 [SD, 15.9] years; range, 21-86 years) treated with flow diversion were included. We observed morbidity and mortality rates of 7.4% and 3.7%. Increasing age (OR per decade, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.23-8.49; P = .02) and dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor (OR, 13.9; 95% CI, 1.16-165.97; P = .04) were significantly associated with morbidity/mortality. After a median follow-up of 13.3 [SD, 10.5] months, the rates of complete aneurysm occlusion, neck remnant, and aneurysm remnant were 74%, 14%, and 12%. Incomplete occlusion at follow-up was less frequently observed in aneurysms treated with additional coil embolization (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.01-0.86; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a promising treatment for compressive ICA aneurysms, flow diversion carries a relevant risk for complications and incomplete aneurysm occlusion. Our results may help identify patients in which flow diversion may not be the ideal treatment method. Additional coil embolization increased the likelihood of complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up.

Anterior Circulation Fusiform Aneurysms Have a Lower Occlusion Rate After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment Than Posterior Circulation Fusiform Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Objective:

Intracranial fusiform aneurysms are uncommon and can occur in vessels of the anterior circulation (AC) or posterior circulation (PC). While flow diversion is one treatment option, research into Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) treatment is lacking. This study explored the efficacy and safety of PED treatment for intracranial fusiform aneurysms, and compared therapeutic effects between AC and PC aneurysms.

Methods

In the post-market multi-center cohort study of embolization of intracranial aneurysms with PED in China (PLUS) registry study, we retrospectively analyzed 71 fusiform aneurysms in 67 patients among 1,171 patients treated with a PED from November 2014 to October 2019. The general characteristics, perioperative status, aneurysm occlusion rate at the last follow-up angiography, and changes in modified Rankin Scale scores were analyzed. Aneurysms were divided into AC and PC groups, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results

The study included 26 AC (25 patients) and 45 PC (42 patients) aneurysms. A total of 75 PEDs were used, an average of 1.1 PEDs were used, and the median follow-up was 6.7 months. Fifty aneurysms (71.4%) were occluded and twenty (28.5%) were incompletely occluded. There were significantly more occluded aneurysms in the PC group than in the AC group (12 vs. 38; P = 0.001). Risk factors for incomplete occlusion were AC aneurysms (P = 0.001) and a perforating artery originating from the aneurysm (P = 0.006). The mean modified Rankin Scale score was significantly lower at the last follow up than preoperatively (0.58 vs. 0.21; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Non-overlapping PED is a safe and effective treatment for both AC and PC fusiform aneurysms. The occlusion rate of AC fusiform aneurysms is lower than that of PC.

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Basilar Artery Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: Complications and Outcomes

Background

This study aimed to investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes of Pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment of large or giant basilar artery (BA) aneurysms and examine associated factors.

Methods

Clinical and angiographic data of 29 patients (18 men, 11 women) with large or giant BA aneurysms were retrospectively examined. Mean age was 44.1 ± 21.2 years (range, 30–68). Mean aneurysm size was 22.2 ± 8.3 mm (range, 12.0–40.1).

Results

Mean angiographic follow-up was 18.3 ± 3.4 months (range, 4.5–60). The rate of adequate aneurysmal occlusion (O'Kelly–Marotta grade C–D) was 87%. The overall complication rate was 44.8%; most complications (84.6%) occurred in the periprocedural period. Univariable comparison of patients who did and did not develop complications showed significant differences in aneurysm size (p < 0.01), intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.03), and mean number of PEDs used (p = 0.02). Aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.4; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for periprocedural complications in multivariable analysis. Mean clinical follow-up was 23.5 ± 3.2 months (range, 0.1–65). Nine patients (31%) had a poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score ≥3) at last follow-up, including 7 patients who died. Univariable comparisons between patients with favorable and unfavorable clinical outcomes showed that aneurysm size (p = 0.009) and intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.04) significantly differed between the groups. Multivariable analysis showed that aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for poor clinical outcome.

Conclusion

PED treatment of large or giant BA aneurysms is effective and can achieve a satisfactory long-term occlusion rate. However, the treatment complications are not negligible. Aneurysm size is the strongest predictor of perioperative complications and poor clinical outcome.

Repeated Aneurysm Intervention

Over the past 25 years the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms has gained preference in some countries over the traditional surgical procedures. The review part of the article clearly demonstrates that the clinical results of both modalities are similar and the difference is seen only in technical effectivity. Surgical techniques fail far less frequently than the endovascular ones. Incompletely occluded or growing aneurysms after the endovascular approach expose the patient to the risk of rebleeding with all possible consequences. Markedly repeated procedures are much more common for endovascularly treated aneurysms, again with all the risks.In the authors institution over the past 20 years, a total of 2032 aneurysms were treated. In 1263 endovascularly managed aneurysms the regrowth or inclomplete initial occlusion necessitated 159 repeated propcedures (12.6%). In surgical group the total of 27 aneurysms needed retreatment (3.5%). The difference is statistically significant. In nine patients in endovascular group the rebleeding was the reason for repeated procedures. No rebleeding was seen in the surgical group.This fact, also shown in the review part of the article, is important in patients counseling. Given the similar clinical results of both modalities the patient should be advised on the necessity of repeated follow-ups and of possible technical failure and eventual repeated procedure which is more likely if endovascular procedure is chosen.

Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

Posterior circulation aneurysms have a higher tendency to rupture and become symptomatic in comparison to anterior circulation aneurysms. Current treatment modalities for aneurysms in these locations vary widely including microsurgical clipping, trapping with bypass, wrapping, and various endovascular methods such as coiling, balloon or stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion, and vessel sacrifice, among others.Overall, surgical versus endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms continue to be a controversial topic in cerebrovascular neurosurgery. At our center, multi-disciplinary assessments including surgeons capable of both endovascular and microsurgical treatments of these aneurysms are employed to guide the treatment strategies. As advancements in both fields are made, this will continue to be a topic for debate. Anatomy and individual patient's characteristics will dictate the correct approach and therefore proficiency in the microsurgical techniques required to treat these aneurysms will continue to be both relevant and important.

Staged hybrid treatment for giant thrombosed fusiform aneurysm

Partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysm was difficult to treat because of higher recurrence rate compared to non-thrombosed saccular aneurysm. The author reports a case of partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysm causing transient ischemic symptom. A 40-year-old man presented with transient right hemiparesis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicted low-signal intensity target-like mass lesion on left sylvian fissure, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) showed aneurysm on left middle cerebral artery bifurcation (MCBF), suggested thrombosed aneurysm. On operative finding, aneurysm wall had thick and atherosclerotic change, and it was fusiform aneurysm not saccular type. We initially planned direct clip for the aneurysm, but it was failed due to collapse of parent artery after clipping on aneurysm neck. To prevent ischemia, extracranial-intracranial bypass was performed and then thrombectomy with clip reconstruction. To remodeling the fusiform aneurysm, stent-assisted coiling was performed for remnant portion of aneurysm. With staged hybrid technique, giant thrombosed fusiform aneurysm was completely obliterated and the patient did not suffer any neurologic symptoms no longer.

Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) with or without Adjunctive Coiling in Treatment of Very Large and Giant Cerebral Aneurysms

PURPOSE

Flow diverter stents are gaining wider use in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms; however, there are limited data on occlusion and complication rates of flow diverters in very large and giant aneurysms. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and FRED Jr. stents in aneurysms ≥ 20 mm.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all aneurysms ≥ 20 mm treated with FRED/FRED Jr. between January 2010 and June 2020 from three centers. Endpoints for clinical safety were absence of major stroke, aneurysmal rupture, or death and complete or near-complete occlusion for efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with very large (28 cases) and giant aneurysms (17 cases) were treated with FRED (41 cases), and FRED Jr. (4 cases) stents. The majority of the aneurysms (40/45, 88.9%) were in the anterior circulation. Adjunctive aneurysm coiling was performed in 21 aneurysms (46.7%). Technical complications were encountered in 4 procedures (8.9%). Ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates were 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. There was no case with major stroke. The mortality rate was 8.9%, and all cases were due to hemorrhagic complications from aneurysmal rupture. Median angiographic follow-up was 21.5 months (range 3-60 months). Complete occlusion was achieved in 32 aneurysms (71.1%), and near-complete occlusion in 5 cases (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

The use of FRED/FRED Jr. for the treatment of aneurysms ≥ 20 mm achieved a long-term aneurysm occlusion rate and a safety profile comparable to the large series reported with other flow diverter stents.

Intracranial Fusiform and Circumferential Aneurysms of the Main Trunk: Therapeutic Dilemmas and Prospects

Intracranial fusiform and circumferential aneurysms (IFCAs), especially those located on the main trunk, are uncommon and difficult to manage. Currently, literature focused on IFCAs on the main trunk of cerebral arteries is lacking. The treatment of IFCAs is still under debate. Therefore, in this review, we further explore the treatment of this complicated entity. In addition, we also present some interesting cases. Based on the literature review and our experience, we found that IFCAs are often located in the vertebrobasilar system and that ruptured or large symptomatic IFCAs are associated with increased mortality and higher rebleeding rates. The treatment strategies for IFCAs can be classified as deconstructive and reconstructive methods via open surgery and/or endovascular treatment (EVT). Currently, EVT is a popular method and the main therapeutic choice. In particular, flow diversion has revolutionized the treatment of IFCAs. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) with or without revascularization may still be considered a suitable choice. Complex IFCAs that cannot be resolved by EVT can also be treated via open surgery with or without extracranial–intracranial bypass. Targeted embolization for the weak points of IFCAs is a temporary or palliative choice that is rarely used. In summary, despite complications, both surgical treatment and EVT are effective options for appropriately selected cases. Due to the development of endovascular implants, EVT will have better prospects in the future.

Defective Endothelialization of Pipeline Embolization Device after Flow Diverter Therapy: An Autopsy Case Report

The authors report a rare autopsy case. A 59-year-old woman underwent flow diverter (FD) therapy using a pipeline embolization device (PED) for a large paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm. Follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were performed 6 months after the treatment. Although the T2-weighted images showed progressive thrombosis of the aneurysm, the silent MR angiography (MRA) clearly showed the residual blood flow within the aneurysm. The patient committed suicide 2 months after the follow-up MR examinations. An autopsy specimen showed a small section of the defective membranes with the PED that matched the entry point of residual blood flow seen clearly in the silent MRA. Macroscopic photograph and hematoxylin and eosin stained sections showed defective endothelialization. In contrast, complete endothelialization was observed in membranes covering the PED. The autopsy findings after FD therapy showed defective endothelialization that perfectly matched and corroborated the silent MRA findings.

Institutional experience of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diverter implantation: A retrospective analysis of 6 isolated cases out of 118 patients

Pipeline embolization devices (PLEDs) are flow diverting stents that have exhibited be safe and efficient in the treatment of complex aneurysms. Nevertheless, in-stent stenosis (ISS) has been reported as one of the cardinal complications associated with PLED. The association of wall malapposition and ISS in patient treated with PLED has not been reported.A retrospective study was conducted to identify patients with ISS after implantation of PLED as treatment for intracranial aneurysms from April 25, 2018 to April 24, 2019. Incidence of ISS and its associated causes such as sharp change of the PLED, distal wall malapposition, inconsistent compliance between parent artery as well as the PLED occlusion due to intimal hyperplasia and vessel tortuosity. Assessment of conservative treatment and retreatment outcomes of ISS were documented.In all, 6 ISS cases were identified by 2 independent neurointerventionalists out of 118 aneurysm patients treated with PLED. Thus, the incidence rate of ISS in patients treated with PLED was as low as 5% at our institution compared to other studies. The follow-up time for detection of ISS ranged from 6 to 12 months after implantation. Several combinations of reasons such as sharp change of the PLED, distal wall malapposition, inconsistent compliance between parent arteries as well as PLED occlusion due to intimal hyperplasia and vessel tortuosity accounted for the causes of ISS during our analysis. Conservative treatment with a combination of antiplatelet during follow-ups did not resolve the ISS in our study probably due to associated underlying factors above.

Neck Location on the Outer Convexity is a Predictor of Incomplete Occlusion in Treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the increasing use of the Pipeline Embolization Device for the treatment of aneurysms, predictors of clinical and angiographic outcomes are needed. This study aimed to identify predictors of incomplete occlusion at last angiographic follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our retrospective, single-center cohort study, 105 ICA aneurysms in 89 subjects were treated with Pipeline Embolization Devices. Patients were followed per standardized protocol. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were analyzed. We introduced a new morphologic classification based on the included angle of the parent artery against the neck location: outer convexity type (included angle,  <160°), inner convexity type (included angle,  >200°), and lateral wall type (160° ≤ included angle  ≤200°). This classification reflects the metal coverage rate and flow dynamics.

RESULTS

Imaging data were acquired in 95.3% of aneurysms persistent at 6 months. Complete occlusion was achieved in 70.5%, and incomplete occlusion, in 29.5% at last follow-up. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that 60 years of age or older (OR, 5.70; P = .001), aneurysms with the branching artery from the dome (OR, 10.56; P = .002), fusiform aneurysms (OR, 10.2; P = .009), and outer convexity-type saccular aneurysms (versus inner convexity type: OR, 30.3; P < .001; versus lateral wall type: OR, 9.71; P = .001) were independently associated with a higher rate of incomplete occlusion at the last follow-up. No permanent neurologic deficits or rupture were observed in the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The aneurysm neck located on the outer convexity is a new, incomplete occlusion predictor, joining older age, fusiform aneurysms, and aneurysms with the branching artery from the dome. No permanent neurologic deficits or rupture was observed in the follow-up, even with incomplete occlusion.

Overview of Different Flow Diverters and Flow Dynamics

Over the past decade, flow diverter technology for endocranial aneurysms has seen rapid evolution, with the development of new devices quickly outpacing the clinical evidence base. However, flow diversion has not yet been directly compared to surgical aneurysm clipping or other endovascular procedures. The oldest and most well-studied device is the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic), recently transitioned to the Pipeline Flex (Medtronic), which still has sparse data regarding outcomes. To date, other flow diverting devices have not been shown to outperform the PED, although information comes primarily from retrospective studies with short follow-up, which are not always comparable. Because of this lack of high-quality outcome data, no reliable recommendations can be made for choosing among flow diversion devices yet. Moreover, the decision to proceed with flow diversion should be individualized to each patient. In this work, we wish to provide a comprehensive overview of the technical specifications of all flow diverter devices currently available, accompanied by a succinct description of the evidence base surrounding each device.

Expanding the Indications for Flow Diversion: Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

Posterior circulation aneurysms are often associated with a higher risk of rupture and compressive symptoms compared to their anterior circulation counterpart. Due to high morbidity and mortality associated with microsurgical treatment of those aneurysms, endovascular therapy gained ascendance as the preferred method of treatment. Flow diversion has emerged as a promising treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms with a higher occlusion rate compared to other endovascular techniques and a lower complication rate compared to microsurgery. While treatment of saccular and dissecting aneurysms is often associated with comparatively good outcomes, fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms should be carefully selected prior to treatment to avoid devastating thromboembolic complications. Occlusion of covered posterior circulation branches showed no correlation with ischemic complications, and appropriate antiplatelet regimen and switching Clopidogrel nonresponders to different antiplatelet agents were associated with lower complication rates following flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms.

Long-Term Outcome of Endovascular Therapy for Large or Giant Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Large or giant thrombosed intracranial aneurysms (LGTIAs) are highly associated with poor prognosis and remain a challenging disease to treat by either surgery or endovascular treatment (EVT). EVT is considered more difficult for complicated aneurysm like LGTIAs. To understand long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of EVT for LGTIAs, we retrospectively analyzed our single-center data on multimodality EVT for patients with LGTIAs.

METHODS

From the data of 35 EVT procedures performed in 31 consecutive patients with LGTIAs at our institution between December 2004 and December 2018, the rate of periprocedural complications, clinical outcomes at 12 months after EVT, and the rate of aneurysm recurrence were analyzed, and their related factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Initial EVTs were performed by deconstructive (n = 10) or reconstructive (n = 21) techniques. Although 5 patients (16%) died during the periprocedural period, 23 (74%) had good outcome at 12 months after the procedures. Among 26 patients with long-term follow-up, aneurysm recurrence was observed in 6 patients (23.1%; median time from treatment, 33.2 months). Aneurysm recurrence was significantly higher in patients with basilar artery aneurysm (P = 0.0421) and stroke (P = 0.0307); however, there was no significant difference between the procedures and devices used.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality EVT for LGTIAs was performed with similar clinical outcomes and better radiologic outcomes compared with previous reports. New innovative techniques and devices are expected to be helpful for long-term aneurysm occlusion.

Endovascular treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using TuBridge flow diverters

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of the TuBridge flow diverter in treating middle cerebral artery aneurysms remains unknown. In this study, we report our preliminary experience treating complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using the TuBridge flow diverter.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of intracranial aneurysms treated with the TuBridge flow diverter was retrospectively reviewed, and patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms were included in this study. Demographics, aneurysm features, complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were assessed. Evaluation of the angiographic results included occlusion grade of aneurysm (O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale), patency of jailed branch(es), and in-stent stenosis.

RESULTS

Eight patients with eight middle cerebral artery aneurysms were included in this study. The mean aneurysm size was 11.8 ± 6.8 mm. There were no procedure-related complications and there was no morbidity or mortality at a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 3.6 months. All patients had follow-up angiograms at a mean of 7.5 ± 4.0 months after surgery. Of the eight patients, there was 1 (12.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale A, 3 (37.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale B, 1 (12.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale C, and 3 (37.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale D. Of the seven patients with jailed branch, the blood flow of jailed branch was unchanged in 4 (57.1%), decreased in 2 (28.6%), and occluded in 1 (14.3%). In-stent stenosis was mild in 2 (25%) patients and moderate in 1 (12.5%) patient.

CONCLUSION

Midterm results suggest that endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms using the TuBridge flow diverter is safe and associated with good outcomes. The TuBridge flow diverter may be an option for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms that are difficult to treat with either clipping or coiling.

Predictive factors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with the Pipeline embolization device

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a routine choice for the endovascular treatment of select intracranial aneurysms. Its success is based on the high rates of aneurysm occlusion, followed by near-zero recanalization probability once occlusion has occurred. Therefore, identification of patient factors predictive of incomplete occlusion on the last angiographic follow-up is critical to its success.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients treated with a PED for unruptured aneurysms in 3 academic institutions in the US. Patients with angiographic follow-up were selected to identify the factors associated with incomplete occlusion.

RESULTS

Among all 3 participating institutions a total of 523 PED placement procedures were identified. There were 284 procedures for 316 aneurysms, which had radiographic follow-up and were included in this analysis (median age 58 years; female-to-male ratio 4.2:1). Complete occlusion (100% occlusion) was noted in 76.6% of aneurysms, whereas incomplete occlusion (≤ 99% occlusion) at last follow-up was identified in 23.4%. After accounting for factor collinearity and confounding, multivariable analysis identified older age (> 70 years; OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.30-8.65, p < 0.001); higher maximal diameter (≥ 15 mm; OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.43-7.55, p = 0.005); and fusiform morphology (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.06-7.85, p = 0.038) to be independently associated with higher rates of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up. Thromboembolic complications were noted in 1.4% and hemorrhagic complications were found in 0.7% of procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete aneurysm occlusion following placement of a PED was independently associated with age > 70 years, aneurysm diameter ≥ 15 mm, and fusiform morphology. Such predictive factors can be used to guide individualized treatment selection and counseling in patients undergoing cerebrovascular neurosurgery.

Implications of the Collar Sign in Incompletely Occluded Aneurysms after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: A Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The angiographic collar sign has been recently described in patients with incompletely occluded aneurysms after Pipeline Embolization Device implantation. The long-term implications of this sign are unknown. We report angiographic outcomes of patients with the collar sign with follow-up of up to 45 months and the implications of this angiographic finding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained data base of patients who underwent Pipeline Embolization Device implantation for an intracranial aneurysm at our institution between January 2014 and December 2016. We included patients with a collar sign at the initial follow-up angiogram after Pipeline Embolization Device implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with 285 aneurysms were screened for the collar sign on initial and subsequent follow-up angiograms. There were 226 aneurysms (79.3%) with complete occlusion at the first follow-up. Of 59 incompletely occluded aneurysms, 19 (32.2%) aneurysms in 17 patients were found to have a collar sign on the first angiographic follow-up (median, 6 months; range, 4.2-7.2). Ten (52.6%) aneurysms underwent retreatment with a second Pipeline Embolization Device, which resulted in aneurysm occlusion in 1 (10%) patient. There were only 3 (15.8%) aneurysms with complete occlusion at the last follow-up, 2 (10.5%) of which had a single Pipeline Embolization Device implantation and another single (5.3%) aneurysm with a second Pipeline Embolization Device implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A collar sign on the initial angiogram after Pipeline Embolization Device placement is a predictor of poor aneurysm occlusion. Because the occlusion rates remain equally low regardless of retreatment in patients with a collar sign, radiologic follow-up may be more appropriate than retreatment.

Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

Flow diverters have drastically changed the landscape of intracranial aneurysm treatment and are now considered first-line therapy for select lesions. Their mechanism of action relies on intrinsic alteration in hemodynamic parameters, both at the parent artery and within the aneurysm sac. Moreover, the device struts act as a nidus for endothelial cell growth across the aneurysm neck ultimately leading to aneurysm exclusion from the circulation. In silico computational analyses and investigations in preclinical animal models have provided valuable insights into the underlying biological basis for flow diverter therapy. Here, we review the present understanding pertaining to flow diverter biology and mechanisms of action, focusing on stent design, induction of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis, endothelialization, and alterations in hemodynamics.

Predictors of Complications, Functional Outcome, and Morbidity in a Large Cohort Treated With Flow Diversion

BACKGROUND

A dramatic improvement in obliteration rates of large, wide-necked aneurysms has been observed after the FDA approved the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in 2011.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictors of complications, morbidity, and unfavorable outcomes in a large cohort of patients with aneurysms treated with PED.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database for subjects treated with flow diversion from 2010 to 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 598 aneurysms were treated during a period extending from 2010 to 2019 (84.28% females, mean age 55.5 yr, average aneurysm size 8.49 mm). Morbidity occurred at a rate of 5.8% and mortality at a rate of 2.2%. Ischemic stroke occurred at a rate of 3%, delayed aneurysmal rupture (DAR) at 1.2%, and distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage (DIPH) at 1.5%. On multivariate analysis, the predictor of stroke was aneurysm size &gt;15 mm. Predictors of DAR were previous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), increasing aneurysm size, and posterior circulation aneurysm. Predictors of DIPH were using more than 1 PED and baseline P2Y12 value. Predictors of in-stent stenosis were the increasing year of treatment and balloon angioplasty, whereas increasing age and previous treatment were negatively associated with in-stent stenosis. Predictors of morbidity were posterior circulation aneurysms, increasing aneurysm size, and hypertension, and incidental aneurysm diagnosis was protective for morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion is a safe and effective treatment option for aneurysms. A better understanding of predictive factors of complications, morbidity, and functional outcomes is of high importance for a more accurate risk assessment.

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Non-saccular Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms: Pipeline Embolization Devices Versus Conventional Stents

Background

Endovascular treatment of large or giant non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms (VBAs) by conventional stents is difficult and has unsatisfactory outcomes.

Object

This study was performed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of a flow diverter in treating large and giant non-saccular VBAs.

Methods

We identified 78 patients with 83 large or giant non-saccular VBAs who accepted endovascular treatment with a pipeline embolization device (PED) or conventional stent from January 2014 to June 2018. The technical details of the procedure, procedure-associated complications, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Forty-two patients (53.8%, 42/78) with 44 aneurysms (53.0%, 44/83) underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs. Thirty-six patients (46.2%, 36/78) with 39 aneurysms (47.0%, 39/83) underwent endovascular treatment with conventional stents. The complication rate of PED group and conventional stent group was 7.1% (3/42) and 5.6% (2/36), respectively (odds ratio, 0.765; 95% confidence interval, 0.121–4.851; P = 0.776). During a median follow-up time of 28.8 months, the complete occlusion rate in the PED group and conventional stent group was 90.2% (37/41) and 70.3% (26/37), respectively (odds ratio, 3.913; 95% confidence interval, 1.122–13.652; P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Endovascular treatment with a PED is a promising and safe modality for large and giant non-saccular VBAs, and the complication rate is acceptable, compared with conventional endovascular treatment.

Endovascular treatment of intracranial 'blister' and dissecting aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Blister and dissecting aneurysms may have a different pathological background but they are commonly defined by instability of the vessel wall and bear a high risk of fatal rupture and rerupture. Lack of aneurysm sack makes treatment challenging.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of endovascular treatment of intracranial blister and dissecting aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients with ruptured and unruptured blister and dissecting aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2004-2018. Procedural details, complications, morbidity/mortality, clinical favourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and aneurysm occlusion rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with endovascular treatment of 35 aneurysms (26 dissecting aneurysms and 9 blister aneurysms) were included. Five aneurysms were treated by parent vessel occlusion, and 30 aneurysms were treated by vessel reconstruction using stent monotherapy (n = 9), stent-assisted coiling (n = 7), flow diverting stents (n = 13) and coiling + Onyx embolization (n = 1). No aneurysm rebleeding and no procedure-related major complications or deaths occurred. There were five deaths in consequence of initial subarachnoid haemorrhage. Complete occlusion (79.2%) was detected in 19/24 aneurysms available for angiographic follow-up, and aneurysm recurrence in 2/24 (8.3%). The modified Rankin Scale ≤2 rate at mean follow-up of 15.1 months was 64.7%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of blister and dissecting aneurysms developed from coil embolization to flow diversion with multiple stents to the usage of flow diverting stents. Results using modern flow diverting stents encourage us to effectively treat this aneurysm entity endovascularly by vessel reconstruction. Therefore, we recommend preference of vessel reconstructive techniques to parent vessel occlusion.

A computational model for prediction of clot platelet content in flow-diverted intracranial aneurysms

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverting stents is a safe and minimally invasive technique. The goal is stable embolisation that facilitates stent endothelialisation, and elimination of the aneurysm. However, it is not fully understood why some aneurysms fail to develop a stable clot even with sufficient levels of flow reduction. Computational prediction of thrombus formation dynamics can help predict the post-operative response in such challenging cases. In this work, we propose a new model of thrombus formation and platelet dynamics inside intracranial aneurysms. Our novel contribution combines platelet activation and transport with fibrin generation, which is key to characterising stable and unstable thrombus. The model is based on two types of thrombus inside aneurysms: red thrombus (fibrin- and erythrocyte-rich) can be found in unstable clots, while white thrombus (fibrin- and platelet-rich) can be found in stable clots. The thrombus generation model is coupled to a CFD model and the flow-induced platelet index (FiPi) is defined as a quantitative measure of clot stability. Our model is validated against an in vitro phantom study of two flow-diverting stents with different sizing. We demonstrate that our model accurately predicts the lower thrombus stability in the oversized stent scenario. This opens possibilities for using computational simulations to improve endovascular treatment planning and reduce adverse events, such as delayed haemorrhage of flow-diverted aneurysms.

Single-center experience with the new-generation Derivo embolization device for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of the new-generation Derivo embolization device in complex ruptured (RIA) and unruptured (UIA) intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 32 patients with complex RIAs and UIAs treated with Derivo at our hospital from November 2015 to December 2018. Clinical safety was defined as absence of death, transient attack, absence of minor and major stroke, and Derivo associated hemorrhage. Treatment efficacy was assessed angiographically (DSA) immediately after treatment and at 6-month follow-up according to the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) Grading Scale (from A=total filling to D=no filling; prolongation of stasis 1=arterial to 3=venous phase).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with 39 aneurysms were treated with 42 Derivos. In five aneurysms, additional coiling was performed. Deployment was technically successful in all cases. Two patients developed a procedure related minor stroke (one transient). In one patient bleeding due to an inflammatory aneurysmatic wall process occurred 20 days after retreatment and in one patient a stroke due to in-stent thrombosis occurred when dual platelet inhibition (PI) was switched to permanent single PI 12 month after FD treatment. No treatment related deaths were observed. Initial DSA revealed three OKM D, six OKM C, five OKM B, and 25 OKM A. Six-month follow-up for DSA and clinical evaluation was available in 20/32 patients (62.5%), 26 of 39 aneurysms (66.7%) and revealed 73.1% complete and 3.8% subtotal occlusion (OKM D: 19 of 26, OKM C3: one of 26).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of complex RIAs and UIAs with the new-generation Derivo appeared to be safe and effective in this single-center case series for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Immediate DSA revealed a significant flow modulation; and 6-month follow-up showed a high occlusion rate.

Flow diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Mechanism and implications

Flow diverters are new generation stents that have recently garnered a large amount of interest for use in treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Flow diverters reduce blood flow into the aneurysm, with redirection along the path of the parent vessel. Flow stagnation into the aneurysm and neck coverage with subsequent endothelialization are the important synergistic mechanisms by which the therapy acts. Several studies have examined the mechanisms by which flow diverters subsequently lead to aneurysm occlusion. This review aims to provide a general overview of the flow diverters and their mechanism of action and potential implications. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:793-800.

Effect of Fetal Posterior Circulation on Efficacy of Flow Diversion for Treatment of Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion (FD) has emerged as an effective treatment modality for aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery (PCOM). Whether or not a fetal posterior circulation (FPC) affects PCOM aneurysm occlusion rates after FD remains undetermined.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in which treatment outcomes for FD of PCOM aneurysms from multiple institutions were reviewed. The primary outcome of interest was complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up. The presence of a FPC, defined as a PCOM diameter larger than that of the P1 segment, was noted and its relationship to complete aneurysm occlusion was investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 49 patients with 49 PCOM aneurysms treated with FD who met inclusion criteria for analysis. A FPC was present in 16 patients (32.7%). Complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 34 patients (69.4%). Complete occlusion was less common for patients with a FPC (43.7% vs. 81.8%; P = 0.007). For patients with and without a FPC, median time to occlusion was 51 and 6 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, a FPC was associated with reduced odds of complete occlusion on last follow-up (risk ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.89; P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate reduced efficacy of FD for the treatment of PCOM aneurysms associated with a FPC. These findings may influence treatment selection for aneurysms at this location.

Endothelialization following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The underlying mechanism of action of flow diverters is believed to be the induction of aneurysm thrombosis and simultaneous endothelial cell growth along the device struts, thereby facilitating aneurysm exclusion from the circulation. Although extensive attention has been paid to the role of altered cerebrovascular hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics analyses, relatively less emphasis has been placed on the role of the vascular endothelium in promoting aneurysm healing.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to systematically review all available literature investigating the mechanism of action of flow diverters in both human patients and preclinical models.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science electronic data bases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected articles assessing the role of endothelialization in flow-diverter treatment of cerebral aneurysms, including both preclinical and clinical studies.

DATA ANALYSIS

Ten articles were eligible for inclusion in this review. Two assessed endothelialization in human patients, while the other 8 used preclinical models (either rabbits or pigs).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Methods used to assess endothelialization included optical coherence tomography and scanning electron microscopy.

LIMITATIONS

A limitation was the heterogeneity of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data regarding the temporal relationship to flow-diverter placement has largely been derived from work in preclinical animal models. Whether these cells along the device struts originate from adjacent endothelial cells or are the result of homing of circulating endothelial progenitor cells is equivocal.

In vivo canine study of three different coatings applied to p64 flow-diverter stents: initial biocompatibility study

Background

Flow-diverter stents (FDSs) have revolutionised the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, associated dual antiplatelet treatment is mandatory. We investigated the biocompatibility of three proprietary antithrombogenic coatings applied to FDSs.

Methods

After Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, four domestic juvenile female dogs (weight 19.9 ± 0.9 kg, mean ± standard deviation) were commenced on three different oral antiplatelet regimes: no medication (n = 1), acetylsalicylic acid (n = 2), and acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel (n = 1). Four p64 FDSs were randomly implanted into the subclavian, common carotid, and external carotid arteries of each dog, including both uncoated p64 stents and p64 stents coated with three different antithrombogenic hydrophilic coating (HPC). Angiography and histological examinations were performed. Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA were used with p value < 0.05 considered as significant.

Results

Minimal inflammatory cell infiltration and no device-associated granulomatous cell inflammation were observed. No significant difference in adventitial inflammation (p = 0.522) or neointimal/medial inflammation (p = 0.384) between coated and uncoated stents as well as between the different stent groups regarding endothelial cell loss, surface fibrin/platelet deposition, medial smooth muscle cell loss, or adventitial fibrosis were found. Acute self-limiting thrombus formed on 6/16 implants (37.5%), and all of the thrombi were noted on devices implanted in the common or external carotid artery irrespective of the surface coating. Two of 12 p64 HPC-coated stents (16.7%) and 1/4 uncoated p64 stents (25%) showed severe or complete stenosis at delayed angiography.

Conclusions

In these preliminary in vivo experiments, HPC-coated p64 FDSs appeared to be biocompatible, without acute inflammation.

Posterior communicating artery occlusion and recanalization through a fusiform aneurysm after flow diversion

Occlusion of branch vessels is a known potential sequela of the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diversion. We present a case of occlusion and distal reconstitution of the origin of the posterior communicating artery through a fusiform aneurysm of the internal carotid artery after flow diversion. A 56-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a large fusiform aneurysm of the posterior communicating segment of the internal carotid artery incorporating the origin of the posterior communicating artery. The aneurysm was treated with placement of a Pipeline flow diverter. Follow-up computed tomography angiogram at 7 months demonstrated no change in aneurysm filling. A follow-up digital subtraction angiogram at 12 months demonstrated occlusion of the native origin of the posterior communicating artery with distal reconstitution through two accessory channels through the aneurysm. The remainder of the aneurysm was thrombosed. The patient had not had any clinical symptoms during this event. The unorganized nature of the thrombus within aneurysms after flow diversion may allow accessory vascular channels to form in the event of occlusion of a side branch.

Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device is increasingly used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to high reported obliteration rates and low associated morbidity. While obliteration of covered branches in the anterior circulation is generally asymptomatic, this has not been studied within the posterior circulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between branch coverage and occlusion, as well as associated ischemic events in a cohort of patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases at 8 academic institutions from 2009 to 2016 was performed to identify patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Branch coverage following placement was evaluated, including the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and posterior cerebral artery. If the Pipeline Embolization Device crossed the ostia of the contralateral vertebral artery, its long-term patency was assessed as well.

RESULTS

A cohort of 129 consecutive patients underwent treatment of 131 posterior circulation aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Adjunctive coiling was used in 40 (31.0%) procedures. One or more branches were covered in 103 (79.8%) procedures. At a median follow-up of 11 months, 11% were occluded, most frequently the vertebral artery (34.8%). Branch obliteration was most common among asymptomatic aneurysms (P < .001). Ischemic complications occurred in 29 (22.5%) procedures. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in ischemic complications in cases in which a branch was covered (P = .24) or occluded (P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a low occlusion incidence in end arteries following branch coverage at last follow-up. The incidence was higher in the posterior cerebral artery and vertebral artery where collateral supply is high. Branch occlusion was not associated with a significant increase in ischemic complications.