1
|
Richards TJ, Schmitt JE, Wolansky LJ, Nayate AP. Radiology Performed Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Punctures Decrease Volume of Diagnostic Study Interpretation - Impact on Resident Training and Potential Solutions. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11:39. [PMID: 34345529 PMCID: PMC8326109 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_2_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Lumbar punctures performed in radiology departments have significantly increased over the last few decades and are typically performed in academic centers by radiology trainees using fluoroscopy guidance. Performing fluoroscopy-guided lumbar punctures (FGLPs) can often constitute a large portion of a trainee’s workday and the impact of performing FGLPs on the trainee’s clinical productivity (i.e. dictating reports on neuroradiology cross-sectional imaging) has not been studied. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the number of FGLPs performed and cross-sectional neuroimaging studies dictated by residents during their neuroradiology rotation (NR). Material and Methods: The number of FGLPs and myelograms performed and neuroimaging studies dictated by radiology residents on our neuroradiology service from July 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The relationship between the number of FGLPs performed and neuroimaging studies (CT and MRI) dictated per day by residents was examined. Results: Radiology residents (n = 84) performed 3437 FGLPs and myelograms and interpreted 33402 cross-sectional studies. Poisson regression demonstrated an exponential decrease in number of studies dictated daily with a rising number of FGLPs performed (P = 0.0001) and the following formula was derived: Number of expected studies dictated per day assuming no FGLPs × e-0.25 x number of FGLPs = adjusted expected studies dictated for the day. Conclusion: We quantified the impact performing FGLPs can have on the number of neuroimaging reports residents dictate on the NR. We described solutions to potentially decrease unnecessary FGLP referrals including establishing departmental guidelines for FGLP referrals and encouraging bedside lumbar punctures attempts before referral. We also emphasized equally distributing the FGLPs among trainees to mitigate procedural burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler John Richards
- Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - James Eric Schmitt
- Department of Penn Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Leo J Wolansky
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, United States
| | - Ameya P Nayate
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masur JH, Schmitt JE, Lalevic D, Cook TS, Bagley LJ, Mohan S, Nayate AP. Am I Ready to Be an Independent Neuroradiologist? Objective Trends in Neuroradiology Fellows' Performance during the Fellowship Year. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:815-823. [PMID: 33664112 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Aside from basic Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education guidelines, few metrics are in place to monitor fellows' progress. The purpose of this study was to determine objective trends in neuroradiology fellowship training on-call performance during an academic year. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the number of cross-sectional neuroimaging studies dictated with complete reports by neuroradiology fellows during independent call. Monthly trends in total call cases, report turnaround times, relationships between volume and report turnaround times, and words addended to preliminary reports by attending neuroradiologists were evaluated with regression models. Monthly variation in frequencies of call-discrepancy macros were assessed via χ2 tests. Changes in frequencies of specific macro use between fellowship semesters were assessed via serial 2-sample tests of proportions. RESULTS From 2012 to 2017, for 29 fellows, monthly median report turnaround times significantly decreased during the academic year: July (first month) = 79 minutes (95% CI, 71-86 minutes) and June (12th month) = 55 minutes (95% CI, 52-60 minutes; P value = .023). Monthly report turnaround times were inversely correlated with total volumes for CT (r = -0.70, F = 9.639, P value = .011) but not MR imaging. Words addended to preliminary reports, a surrogate measurement of report clarity, slightly improved and discrepancy rates decreased during the last 6 months of fellowship. A nadir for report turnaround times, discrepancy errors, and words addended to reports was seen in December and January. CONCLUSIONS Progress through fellowship correlates with a decline in report turnaround times and discrepancy rates for cross-sectional neuroimaging call studies and slight improvement in indirect quantitative measurement of report clarity. These metrics can be tracked throughout the academic year, and the midyear would be a logical time point for programs to assess objective progress of fellows and address any deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Masur
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - J E Schmitt
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Lalevic
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - T S Cook
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - L J Bagley
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - S Mohan
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.M., J.E.S., D.L., T.S.C., L.J.B., S.M.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - A P Nayate
- Department of Radiology (A.P.N.), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|