Negative Predictive Value of NI-RADS Category 2 in the First Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Radiation Therapy for HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct disease from other head and neck tumors. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the critical decisions in its curative treatment, including both definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) management.

METHODS

ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions on the use of RT for management of HPV-associated OPSCC. These questions included indications for definitive and postoperative RT and chemoradiation; dose-fractionation regimens and treatment volumes; preferred RT techniques and normal tissue considerations; and posttreatment management decisions. The task force did not address indications for primary surgery versus RT. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Concurrent cisplatin is recommended for patients receiving definitive RT with T3-4 disease and/or 1 node >3 cm, or multiple nodes. For similar patients who are ineligible for cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab, carboplatin/5-fluorouracil, or taxane-based systemic therapy are conditionally recommended. In the postoperative setting, RT with concurrent cisplatin (either schedule) is recommended for positive surgical margins or extranodal extension. Postoperative RT alone is recommended for pT3-4 disease, >2 nodes, or a single node >3 cm. Observation is conditionally recommended for pT1-2 disease and a single node ≤3 cm without other risk factors. For patients treated with definitive RT with concurrent systemic therapy, 7000 cGy in 33 to 35 fractions is recommended, and for patients receiving postoperative RT without positive surgical margins and extranodal extension, 5600 to 6000 cGy is recommended. For all patients receiving RT, intensity modulated RT over 3-dimensional techniques with reduction in dose to critical organs at risk (including salivary and swallowing structures) is recommended. Reassessment with positron emission tomography-computed tomography is recommended approximately 3 months after definitive RT/chemoradiation, and neck dissection is recommended for convincing evidence of residual disease; for equivocal positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings, either neck dissection or repeat imaging is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The role and practice of RT continues to evolve for HPV-associated OPSCC, and these guidelines inform best clinical practice based on the available evidence.

Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Anatomic Considerations Based on Cancer Subsites

Posttreatment imaging surveillance of head and neck cancer is challenging owing to complex anatomic subsites and diverse treatment modalities. Early detection of residual disease or recurrence through surveillance imaging is crucial for devising optimal treatment strategies. Posttreatment imaging surveillance is performed using CT, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and MRI. Radiologists should be familiar with postoperative imaging findings that can vary depending on surgical procedures and reconstruction methods that are used, which is dictated by the primary subsite and extent of the tumor. Morphologic changes in normal structures or denervation of muscles within the musculocutaneous flap may mimic recurrent tumors. Recurrence is more likely to occur at the resection margin, margin of the reconstructed flap, and deep sites that are difficult to access surgically. Radiation therapy also has a varying dose distribution depending on the primary site, resulting in various posttreatment changes. Normal tissues are affected by radiation, with edema and inflammation occurring in the early stages and fibrosis in the late stages. Distinguishing scar tissue from residual tumor becomes necessary, as radiation therapy may leave behind residual scar tissue. Local recurrence should be carefully evaluated within areas where these postradiation changes occur. Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting and risk classification system with guidance for subsequent management. Familiarity with NI-RADS has implications for establishing surveillance protocols, interpreting posttreatment images, and management decisions. Knowledge of posttreatment imaging characteristics of each subsite of head and neck cancers and the areas prone to recurrence empowers radiologists to detect recurrences at early stages. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Diagnostic Performance of Response Assessment FDG-PET/CECT in HNSCC Treated With Definitive Radio(chemo)therapy Using NI-RADS

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance of response assessment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (FDG-PET/CECT) following definitive radio(chemo)therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained dataset.

SETTING

Tertiary-care comprehensive cancer center in a low-middle-income country.

METHODS

Adults with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, nonmetastatic HNSCC treated with definitive radio(chemo)therapy were included. Posttreatment response assessment FDG-PET/CECT scans were retrospectively assigned NI-RADS categories (1-3) for the primary site, neck, and both sites combined. Locoregional recurrence occurring within 2-years was defined as the event of interest. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated. Locoregional control stratified by NI-RADS categories was computed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Posttreatment FDG-PET/CECT scans were available in 190 patients constituting the present study cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of the NI-RADS template for the primary site was 73.5%, 81.4%, 46.3%, 93.4%, and 80.0%, respectively. Similar metrics for the neck were 72.7%, 87.5%, 43.2%, 96.1%, and 85.8%, respectively. Combining primary site and neck, the corresponding metrics of diagnostic accuracy were 84.4%, 69.7%, 46.3%, 93.5%, and 73.2%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 40 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year locoregional control were significantly higher for NI-RADS category 1 (94.2%) compared to NI-RADS category 2 (69.4%) and category 3 (20.4%), respectively (stratified log-rank p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CECT using the NI-RADS template is associated with good diagnostic performance and prognostic utility in HNSCC treated with definitive radio(chemo)therapy.

Personalizing Surveillance in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) encompasses a spectrum of heterogeneous diseases originating in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Within the United States, head and neck cancer (HNC) accounts for 66,470 new cases, or 3% of all malignancies, annually.¹ The incidence of HNC is rising, largely driven by increases in oropharyngeal cancer.^2-4 Recent molecular and clinical advancements, particularly with regard to molecular and tumor biology, reflect the heterogeneity of the subsites contained within the head and neck. Despite this, existing guidelines for post-treatment surveillance remain broad without much consideration given to different anatomic subsites and etiologic factors (such as human papillomavirus [HPV] status or tobacco exposure).⁵ Surveillance incorporating the physical examination, imaging, and emerging molecular biomarkers is an essential part of care for patients treated for HNC and allows for the detection of locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies aiming for better functional and survival outcomes. Additionally, it allows for evaluation and management of post-treatment complications.

Post-Treatment Neck Dissection of Tonsillar and Base of Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Era of PET-CT, HPV, and p16

Human-papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tonsillar and base of tongue carcinomas (TSCC/BOTSCC) are rising in incidence and treatments with radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT), and neck dissections (NDs) have several side effects. Therefore, an improved selection of patients needing salvage NDs would be beneficial. We examined the prevalence and localisations of viable tumour cells in neck lymph nodes in patients post-RT/CRT, identified by fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computer-tomography (FDG PET-CT), with a focus on HPV-associated tumours. Patients with 217 TSCC/BOTSCC with tumours assessed for HPV-DNA and p16^INK4a undergoing FDG PET-CT 12 weeks after treatment and/or an ND were included. The FDG PET-CT data were compared with the findings in the pathology report after the ND. In total, 36/217 (17%) patients were selected for an ND due to positive findings in post-treatment FDG PET-CT. Of these, 35/36 were HPV-associated, 10/36 (28%) had viable tumour cells in the pathology reports of the neck specimen, and 8/10 (80%) were consistent with the FDG PET-CT findings, while 2/36 (5%) were missed by FDG PET-CT. We conclude that FDG PET-CT 12 weeks after RT/CRT is useful, but not completely reliable for finding all the metastases of HPV-associated TSCC/BOTSCC. Nonetheless, our data indicate that an ND could be more selectively guided by FDG PET-CT.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-V. Head and Neck and Neuro Oncology

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT) has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate attenuation correction, so that radioactivity from deep or dense structures can be better visualized, but with head and neck malignancies it is critical to provide correlating detailed anatomic imaging. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging, and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging and interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fifth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in head and neck and neuro oncology.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging, and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In addition, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of oncology patients. Hundreds of different types of tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this series of articles focuses on the most common adult malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on FDA-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals, rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. The fifth review article in this series focuses on PET-CT imaging in head and neck tumors, as well as brain tumors. Common normal variants, key anatomic features, and benign mimics of these tumors are reviewed. The goal of this review article is to provide the imaging professional with guidance in the interpretation of PET-CT for the more common head and neck malignancies and neuro oncology, and to inform the referring providers so that they can have realistic expectations of the value and limitations of PET-CT for the specific type of tumor being addressed.

PET/MR Imaging in Evaluating Treatment Failure of Head and Neck Malignancies: A Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System-Based Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

PET/MR imaging is a relatively new hybrid technology that holds great promise for the evaluation of head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of simultaneous PET/MR imaging versus MR imaging in the evaluation of posttreatment head and neck malignancies, as determined by its ability to predict locoregional recurrence or progression after imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients who had posttreatment PET/MR imaging studies were reviewed, and after applying the exclusion criteria, we retrospectively included 46 studies. PET/MR imaging studies were independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists, who recorded scores based on the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (using CT/PET-CT criteria) for the diagnostic MR imaging sequences alone and the combined PET/MR imaging. Treatment failure was determined with either biopsy pathology or initiation of new treatment. Statistical analyses including univariate association, interobserver agreement, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed.

RESULTS

There was substantial interreader agreement among PET/MR imaging scores (κ = 0.634; 95% CI, 0.605-0.663). PET/MR imaging scores showed a strong association with treatment failure by univariate association analysis, with P < .001 for the primary site, neck lymph nodes, and combined sites. Receiver operating characteristic curves of PET/MR imaging scores versus treatment failure indicated statistically significant diagnostic accuracy (area under curve range, 0.864-0.987; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous PET/MR imaging has excellent discriminatory performance for treatment outcomes of head and neck malignancy when the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System is applied. PET/MR imaging could play an important role in surveillance imaging for head and neck cancer.

NI-RADS to Predict Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

American College of Radiology NI-RADS is a surveillance imaging template used to predict residual or recurrent tumor in the setting of head and neck cancer. The lexicon and imaging template provides a framework to standardize the interpretations and communications with referring physicians and provides linked management recommendations, which add value in patient care. Studies have shown reasonable interreader agreement and excellent discriminatory power among the different NI-RADS categories. This article reviews the literature associated with NI-RADS and serves as a practical guide for radiologists interested in using the NI-RADS surveillance template at their institution, highlighting frequently encountered pearls and pitfalls.

Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a radiology reporting system developed for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging, using standardized terminology, numeric levels of suspicion, and linked management recommendations. Through a multidisciplinary, interdepartmental quality improvement initiative, we implemented NI-RADS for the reporting of head and neck cancer surveillance CT. Our objective is to summarize our initial experience from the standpoints of head and neck cancer providers and radiologists.

STUDY DESIGN

Quality improvement study.

METHODS

Before and 3 months post-implementation, surveys were offered to referring physicians (n = 21 pre-adoption; 22 post-adoption) and radiologists (n = 17 pre- and post-adoption). NI-RADS utilization was assessed over time.

RESULTS

Survey response rates were 62% (13/21) and 73% (16/22) for referring physicians pre- and post-adoption, respectively, and 94% (16/17) for radiologists pre- and post-adoption. Among post-adoption provider respondents, 100% (16/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "I want our radiologists to continue using NI-RADS," "The NI-RADS numerical rating of radiologic suspicion is helpful," and "The language and style of NI-RADS neck CT reports are clear and understandable." Among radiologist respondents, 88% (14/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "NI-RADS improves consistency among our radiologists in the reporting of surveillance neck CTs." Radiologist NI-RADS utilization increased over time (46% month 1; 72% month 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Most referring physicians and radiologists preferred NI-RADS. Head and neck cancer providers indicated that NI-RADS reports are clear, understandable, direct, and helpful in guiding clinical management. Radiologists indicated that NI-RADS improves radiologist consistency in the reporting of surveillance neck CT, and radiologists increasingly used NI-RADS over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

MRI Posttreatment Surveillance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Proposed MR NI-RADS Criteria

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The current Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) criteria were designed for contrast-enhanced CT with or without PET. Prior studies have revealed the capability of DWI and T2 signal intensity in distinguishing locoregional tumor residual and recurrence from posttreatment benign findings in head and neck cancers. We aimed to propose MR imaging NI-RADS criteria by adding diffusion criteria and T2 signal intensity to the American College of Radiology NI-RADS template.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 69 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent posttreatment contrast-enhanced MRI imaging surveillance using a 1.5T scanner. The scans were interpreted by 2 neuroradiologists. Image analysis assessed the primary tumor site using the current American College of Radiology NI-RADS morphologic lexicon (mainly designed for contrast-enhanced CT with or without PET). NI-RADS rescoring was then performed based on our proposed criteria using T2 signal and diffusion features. The reference standard was a defined set of criteria, including clinical and imaging follow-up and pathologic assessment.

RESULTS

Imaging assessment of treated HNSCC at the primary tumor site using T2 signal intensity and diffusion features as modifying rules to NI-RADS showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy (92.3%, 90.7%, 85.7%, 95.1%, and 91.3%, respectively) compared with the current NI-RADS lexicon alone (84.6%, 81.4%, 73.3%, 89.8%, and 82.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of diffusion features and T2 signal to the American College of Radiology NI-RADS criteria for the primary tumor site enhances the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and NI-RADS accuracy.

Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose To evaluate the interrater reliability among radiologists examining posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fluorodeoxyglucose PET/contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images in 80 patients with HNSCC who underwent posttreatment surveillance PET/CECT and immediate prior comparison CECT or PET/CECT (from June 2014 to July 2016) were uploaded to the American College of Radiology's cloud-based website, Cortex. Eight radiologists from seven institutions with variable NI-RADS experience independently evaluated each case and assigned an appropriate prose description and NI-RADS category for the primary site and the neck site. Five of these individuals were experienced readers (> 5 years of experience), and three were novices (< 5 years of experience). In total, 640 lexicon-based and NI-RADS categories were assigned to lesions among the 80 included patients by the eight radiologists. Light generalization of Cohen κ for interrater reliability was performed. Results Of the 80 included patients (mean age, 63 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), there were 58 men (73%); 60 patients had stage IV HNSCC (75%), and the most common tumor location was oropharynx (n = 32; 40%). Light κ for lexicon was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.36) at the primary site and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.37) at the neck site. Light κ for NI-RADS category was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.63) at the primary site and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.69) at the neck site. Percent agreement between lexicon and correlative NI-RADS category was 84.4% (540 of 640) at the primary site and 92.6% (593 of 640) at the neck site. There was no significant difference in interobserver agreement among the experienced versus novice raters. Conclusion Moderate agreement was achieved among eight radiologists using NI-RADS at posttreatment HNSCC surveillance imaging. Keywords: CT, PET/CT, Head/Neck, Neck, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Best Practices: Application of NI-RADS for Posttreatment Surveillance Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer

Imaging surveillance is an important component of posttreatment management of head and neck cancers. There is variability in the surveillance regimen used by various practitioners and institutions, with no official National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for patients showing no symptoms beyond 6 months posttreatment. Moreover, imaging of the neck after treatment is a complex examination with significant interreader heterogeneity, particularly in terms of the manner in which degree of suspicion for disease recurrence is expressed. The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) was introduced by the American College of Radiology (ACR) in 2018 as a practical guide for the interpreting radiologist. NI-RADS is a proposed interpretive framework that can be applied to any standardized or institutional surveillance imaging protocol. NI-RADS simplifies communication between radiologists and referring clinicians and provides management guidance linked to specific levels of suspicion. The ACR NI-RADS Committee also provided general best practice recommendations for imaging surveillance modality and timing in the 2018 white paper. This article will review existing literature regarding choice of modality and timeline for surveillance in treated cancer of the head and neck. NI-RADS will then be presented as an approach to imaging reporting, interpretation, and design of next steps in management.

Interreader reproducibility of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data system (NI-RADS) lexicon for the detection of residual/recurrent disease in treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

Background

To evaluate the inter- and intrareader agreement and reproducibility of the NI-RADS scoring system and lexicon with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI).

Methods

This retrospective study included 97 CECT and CEMRI scans from 58 treated cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after the exclusion of head and neck cancers (HNCs) other than SCC and noncontrast and poor quality CT and MRI scans, with a total of 111 primary targets and 124 lymph node (LN) targets. Two experienced readers independently scored the likelihood of residual/recurrence for these targets based on the NI-RADS criteria and filled in report templates for NI-RADS lexicon diagnostic features. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was assessed with Cohen’s kappa, and the percent agreement was calculated.

Results

Almost perfect interreader agreement was found for the final NI-RADS category of the primary lesions and LNs, with K = 0.808 and 0.806, respectively. Better agreement was found for CT than for MRI (K = 0.843 and 0.77, respectively, P value 0.001). There was almost perfect agreement for excluding tissue enhancement (K = 0.826, 95% CI = 0.658–0.993, P value 0.001), with a percent agreement of 96.4%, and substantial agreement for discrete nodular and diffuse mucosal enhancement (K = 0.826, 95% CI = 0.658–0.993, P value 0.001), with a percent agreement of 96.4%. There was fair agreement for focal mucosal nonmass and deep ill-defined enhancement. The intrareader agreement was almost perfect for most of the rated features (K ranging from 0.802 to 1), with the exception of enlarging discrete nodule/mass and focal mucosal nonmass-like enhancement, which had substantial intraobserver agreement (K ranging from 0.768 to 0.786).

Conclusion

The individual features of NI-RADS show variable degrees of confidence; however, the overall NI-RADS category was not significantly affected.

Imaging of the post-treatment neck

Post-treatment imaging of the neck is complex. It is important to have an understanding of the expected treatment related appearances as well as the possible complications. Common findings after radiation therapy include generalised soft-tissue oedema and thickening of the skin and platysma muscle. There are a number of complications of radiation that may be seen on imaging, including osteoradionecrosis, chondronecrosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. Surgical procedures are variable depending on the primary tumour site and extent. The use of flap reconstructions can further complicate the imaging appearances. Any new nodule of enhancement or bone/cartilage erosion should raise concern for tumour recurrence. It is also important to assess for nodal recurrence. A standardised approach to reporting may help to increase accuracy and guide treatment decisions.

Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Early detection of residual or recurrent disease is important for effective salvage treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend standard surveillance imaging beyond 6 months unless there are worrisome signs or symptoms on clinical examination and offer vague guidelines for imaging of high-risk patients beyond that timeframe. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency of clinically occult recurrence in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positive imaging findings (Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2-4), especially after 6 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved, retrospective data base search queried neck CT reports with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2-4 from June 2014 to March 2018. The electronic medical records were reviewed to determine outcomes of clinical and radiologic follow-up, including symptoms, physical examination findings, pathologic correlation, and clinical notes within 3 months of imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 255 cases, all with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2 or 3, met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-nine patients (23%) demonstrated recurrence (45 biopsy-proven, 14 based on clinical and imaging progression), and 21 patients (36%) had clinically occult recurrence (ie, no clinical evidence of disease at the time of the imaging examination). The median overall time to radiologically detected, clinically occult recurrence was 11.4 months from treatment completion.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging surveillance beyond the first posttreatment baseline study was critical for detecting clinically occult recurrent disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. More than one-third of all recurrences were seen in patients without clinical evidence of disease; and 81% of clinically occult recurrences occurred beyond 6 months.

Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System: Principles and Implementation

Head and neck cancer surveillance imaging is diagnostically challenging, often with highly distorted anatomy after surgery and chemoradiation therapy. In the era of standardized reporting, the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) was developed as a numerical classification system to provide clear and concise radiology reports and recommend next management step. There are 5 categories, each conveying a certain level of suspicion for the presence of persistent or recurrent disease. This article reviews the goals of NI-RADS, NI-RADS categories and lexicon, current research, and the future direction of NI-RADS in posttreatment head and neck cancer surveillance.

Positive Predictive Value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 3 and 4 Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System is a standardized reporting system intended to risk stratify patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the positive predictive value of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 3 and 4 on posttreatment PET/CT in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2018. Patients whose posttreatment PET/CT scans were interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 (suspicious) or 4 (definitive recurrence) at the primary site, regional nodes, or at distant sites were included. The reference standard was histopathology or unequivocal imaging or clinical evidence of treatment failure. The positive predictive values of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 and 4 posttreatment PET/CT were calculated.

RESULTS

Seventy-two of 128 patients with posttreatment PET/CT interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 at the primary site, regional nodes, or distant sites were proved to have treatment failure at the suspicious sites, yielding an overall positive predictive value of 56% (95% CI, 48%-65%). The positive predictive values of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 by subsite were as follows: primary site, 56% (44/79); regional nodes, 65% (34/52); and distant sites, 79% (42/53). All 69 patients with posttreatment PET/CT interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 had true treatment failure, yielding a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 96%-100%): primary site, 100% (28/28); regional nodes, 100% (32/32); and distant sites, 100% (29/29).

CONCLUSIONS

The positive predictive value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 on posttreatment PET/CT is relatively low. Thus, Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 findings should be confirmed with tissue sampling before instituting new salvage treatment regimens to avoid unnecessary overtreatment and its associated toxicities. Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 reliably indicates recurrent disease.

Inter- and Intrareader Agreement of NI-RADS in the Interpretation of Surveillance Contrast-Enhanced CT after Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System was introduced to assess the probability of recurrence in surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer. This study investigated inter- and intrareader agreement in interpreting contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed CT datasets of 101 patients. Four radiologists provided the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System reports for the primary site and neck (cervical lymph nodes). The Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W), Fleiss κ (κ_F), the Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τ_B), and weighted κ statistics (κ_w) were calculated to assess inter- and intrareader agreement.

RESULTS

Overall, interreader agreement was strong or moderate for both the primary site (W = 0.74, κ_F = 0.48) and the neck (W = 0.80, κ_F = 0.50), depending on the statistics applied. Interreader agreement was higher in patients with proved recurrence at the primary site (W = 0.96 versus 0.56, κ_F = 0.65 versus 0.30) or in the neck (W = 0.78 versus 0.56, κ_F = 0.41 versus 0.29). Intrareader agreement was moderate to strong or almost perfect at the primary site (range τ_B = 0.67-0.82, κ_w = 0.85-0.96) and strong or almost perfect in the neck (range τ_B = 0.76-0.86, κ_w = 0.89-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System used for surveillance contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provides acceptable score reproducibility with limitations in patients with posttherapeutic changes but no cancer recurrence.

Extra-nodal extension in head and neck cancer: how radiologists can help staging and treatment planning

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a significant prognostic factor in p16-negative head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma and is classified as N3b by the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition. While most previous radiological studies have focused on the diagnostic performance of pathological ENE, radiologists should be able to provide more clinically relevant information on this entity. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical implications of ENE, to describe key imaging features of ENE with clinical and histopathological correlations and to discuss evaluation of ENE for clinical staging, treatment planning, and predicting the response to treatment. First, we discuss the basics of ENE, including definitions of pathological and clinical ENE and its association with imaging findings. Second, we describe the ENE extension pattern at each location according to level system. The crucial structures determining the choice of treatment include the deep fascia in the deep cervical layer, internal and common carotid arteries, and mediastinal structures. Invasion of the muscles, internal jugular vein, nerves, or mandible also affect the surgical procedure. Finally, we discuss assessment of nodal metastasis after chemoradiotherapy.

Outcomes and Predictive Value of Post-adjuvant Therapy PET/CT for Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

For locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated by surgery and adjuvant therapy, consensus has yet to be reached on whether the optimal time to initiate surveillance positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan is before or after adjuvant therapy. In this study, we characterize the utility of PET/CT scans obtained 3 months after adjuvant therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

PET/CT scans were obtained for 220 patients with stage III, IVA, or IVB OSCC who underwent resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Using the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System, PET/CT scans were dichotomized as suspicious (primary or neck category ≥3, or distant lesion present) versus nonsuspicious. We then computed differences in locoregional progression, distant progression, and overall survival; positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity; and success rate of salvage.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (30%) had suspicious PET/CT scans, which were significantly associated with local failure (hazard ratio [HR] 14.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3-26.6), distant failure (HR 18.4, 95% CI 9.6-35.3), and poorer overall survival (HR 9.5, 95% CI 5.0-17.9). Overall PPV, locoregional PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity were 85%, 79%, 73%, 58%, and 92%, respectively. Among those with biopsy-confirmed progression, 37 patients (65%) underwent salvage therapy; four (11%) were without evidence of disease at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

For locally advanced OSCC, PET/CT scan 3 months after adjuvant therapy is strongly predictive of disease recurrence and survival, demonstrating improved performance over postoperative imaging in previous studies. Following a suspicious post-adjuvant therapy PET/CT scan, cure of locoregional recurrence is possible but unlikely.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2020.

RESISTing the Need to Quantify: Putting Qualitative FDG-PET/CT Tumor Response Assessment Criteria into Daily Practice

Tumor response assessments are essential to evaluate cancer treatment efficacy and prognosticate survival in patients with cancer. Response criteria have evolved over multiple decades, including many imaging modalities and measurement schema. Advances in FDG-PET/CT have led to tumor response criteria that harness the power of metabolic imaging. Qualitative PET/CT assessment schema are easy to apply clinically, are reproducible, and yield good prognostic results. We present 3 such criteria, namely, the Lugano classification for lymphoma, the Hopkins criteria, and the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria for head and neck cancers. When comparing baseline PET/CTs with interim or end-of-treatment PET/CTs, radiologists can classify the tumor response as complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, no metabolic response, or progressive disease, which has important implications in directing further cancer management and long-term patient prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review the progression of tumor response assessments from CT- and PET/CT-based quantitative and semi-quantitative systems to PET/CT-based qualitative systems; introduce the classification schema for these systems; and describe how to use these rapid, powerful, and qualitative PET/CT-based systems in daily practice through illustrative cases.