Postinterventional Assessment after Stent and Flow-Diverter Implantation Using CT: Influence of Spectral Image Reconstructions and Different Device Types

High-resolution vessel wall imaging for quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating in-stent stenosis of intracranial aneurysms

Background

It is critical to accurately and noninvasively evaluate the stented parent artery of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with endovascular treatment.

Objective

To investigate high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of in-stent stenosis (ISS) in IAs treated with stent placement (SP).

Methods

Fifty-five patients (58 aneurysms) underwent HR-VWI, contrast-enhanced (CE)-HR-VWI, CE-MR angiography (MRA), time-of-flight (TOF)-MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) six months after SP, and the reliability of quantitative stent lumen measurements was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Agreement and correlation of quantitative evaluation were estimated by comparing the four MR imaging modalities with DSA. The diagnostic performance for >0%, ≥25%, and ≥50% of ISS degrees and overall diagnostic accuracy for the ISS degrees of the four MR imaging modalities were calculated to qualitative evaluation.

Results

The reliability of CE-HR-VWI and HR-VWI for ISS quantitative measurements was excellent (ICC 0.955-0.989). The agreement and correlation of CE-HR-VWI, HR-VWI versus DSA for ISS quantitative measurements were better than those of CE-MRA and TOF-MRA (p < 0.05). The diagnostic performance for distinguishing the degree of ISS >0%, ≥25%, and ≥50% by CE-HR-VWI and HR-VWI was superior to CE-MRA and TOF-MRA, and their overall diagnostic accuracy was 96.55 and 94.83%, respectively. HR-VWI and CE-HR-VWI were not statistically significant in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of ISS performance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

HR-VWI and CE-HR-VWI have similar performance and value in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of ISS, and HR-VWI without contrast media could be used as an ideal long-term follow-up approach after SP treatment for IAs.

Utility of follow-up ultra-high-resolution CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction after flow diverter treatment for cerebral aneurysms

PURPOSE

Follow-up examinations after flow diverter (FD) treatment for cerebral aneurysms typically involve magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, MRI is prone to vascular defects due to metal artifacts from FD, and DSA carries a risk of ischemic complications. In the context of computed tomography angiography (CTA), this study compares the efficacy of ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) and novel reconstruction techniques, such as model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), against conventional methods such as filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), to determine if they are a viable alternative to DSA in clinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phantom study was conducted with the full-width half-maximum considered as the FD thickness. This study compared three reconstruction methods: MBIR, FBP, and hybrid IR. A clinical study was also conducted with 21 patients who underwent follow-up CTA after FD treatment. The FD's visibility was assessed using a 4-point scale in FBP, hybrid IR, and MBIR compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) with angiographic systems.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, FBP, hybrid IR, and MBIR visualized thinner FD thicknesses and improved detail rendering in that order. MBIR proved to be significantly superior in both the phantom and clinical study.

CONCLUSION

UHRCT with MBIR is highly effective for follow-up evaluations after FD treatment and may become the first-choice modality in the future.

The Use of Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction With Radial Acquisition MRA to Assess Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Pre- and Post-stent Angioplasty: Comparison With 3D Time-of-Flight MRA and DSA

Background and Purpose: 3D pointwise encoding time reduction magnetic resonance angiography (PETRA-MRA) is a promising non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique for intracranial stenosis assessment but it has not been adequately validated against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) relative to 3D-time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA. The aim of this study was to compare PETRA-MRA and 3D-TOF-MRA using DSA as the reference standard for intracranial stenosis assessment before and after angioplasty and stenting in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis. Materials and Methods: Sixty-two patients with MCA stenosis (age 53 ± 12 years, 43 males) underwent MRA and DSA within a week for pre-intervention evaluation and 32 of them had intracranial angioplasty and stenting performed. The MRAs' image quality, flow visualization within the stents, and susceptibility artifact were graded on a 1-4 scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) independently by three radiologists. The degree of stenosis was measured by two radiologists independently on DSA and MRAs. Results: There was an excellent inter-observer agreement for stenosis assessment on PETRA-MRA, 3D-TOF-MRA, and DSA (ICCs > 0.90). For pre-intervention evaluation, PETRA-MRA had better image quality than 3D-TOF-MRA (3.87 ± 0.34 vs. 3.38 ± 0.65, P < 0.001), and PETRA-MRA had better agreement with DSA for stenosis measurements compared to 3D-TOF-MRA (r = 0.96 vs. r = 0.85). For post-intervention evaluation, PETRA-MRA had better image quality than 3D-TOF-MRA for in-stent flow visualization and susceptibility artifacts (3.34 ± 0.60 vs. 1.50 ± 0.76, P < 0.001; 3.31 ± 0.64 vs. 1.41 ± 0.61, P < 0.001, respectively), and better agreement with DSA for stenosis measurements than 3D-TOF-MRA (r = 0.90 vs. r = 0.26). 3D-TOF-MRA significantly overestimated the stenosis post-stenting compared to DSA (84.9 ± 19.7 vs. 39.3 ± 13.6%, p < 0.001) while PETRA-MRA didn't (40.6 ± 13.7 vs. 39.3 ± 13.6%, p = 0.18). Conclusions: PETRA-MRA is accurate and reproducible for quantifying MCA stenosis both pre- and post-stenting compared with DSA and performs better than 3D-TOF-MRA.