Clot Meniscus Sign: An Angiographic Clue for Choosing between Stent Retriever and Contact Aspiration in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

Can the clot meniscus and claw signs predict thrombectomy and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The angiographic shape of an occlusion, like the clot meniscus sign and the claw sign, has been reported to potentially impact the recanalization rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic strokes.

METHOD

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases. Patients were grouped into clot meniscus/claw sign positive and negative groups based on the definitions obtained from each study. Primary outcomes included technical success, with a meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model to calculate proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl).

RESULTS

We included seven studies recruiting 1572 patients. The results indicated that the positive and negative groups had comparable first-pass effect (OR 1.95; 95% CI 0.76 to 5.01; P=0.167) and final recanalization (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.81 to 2.27; P=0.248) rates. However, the rate of having a favorable functional outcome was significantly higher in the positive group than in the negative sign group (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.92; P<0.003). Within the sign-positive population, the use of contact aspiration was associated with a significantly higher rate of recanalization compared with using a stent retriever (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; P<0.001). This result did not translate into a clinical impact, as both stent retriever and contact aspiration showed comparable rates of functional independence at 3 months (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.02 to 2.33; P=0.210).

CONCLUSION

The presence of the clot meniscus/claw sign is not associated with recanalization outcomes after thrombectomy. However, it might be a good sign to predict which thrombectomy technique might be associated with better recanalization, although current evidence may need further confirmation.

Aspiration only versus stent retriever only thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of the German Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment has become the standard care for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Uncertainty persists about the optimal thrombectomy technique.

OBJECTIVE

To compare aspiration thrombectomy with stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with BAO in a multicenter real-world patient population.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET). Patients with isolated BAO who underwent either aspiration or stent retriever thrombectomy were compared, including propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale shift analysis at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), procedure complications, and metrics.

RESULTS

Of 13 082 patients in the GSR-ET, 387 patients (mean age 72.0±13.1 years; 45.0% female) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The thrombectomy technique was aspiration only in 195 (50.4%) and stent retriever only in 192 (49.6%) patients. Functional outcome did not differ between the groups, either before (common OR (cOR) 0.94; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.38) or after PSM (cOR=1.37; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.09). There was no significant difference in sICH (2.6 vs 5.5%; P=0.231; OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.47), but aspiration thrombectomy demonstrated fewer procedure-related complications (4.6% vs 12.5%; P=0.017), a shorter procedure duration (24 vs 48 min; P<0.001), and higher first pass recanalization rates (75.1% vs 44.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study both aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy showed equal efficacy in terms of functional outcome in patients with BAO. However, procedure complications and metrics might favor aspiration over stent retriever thrombectomy.

Angiographic demonstration of a cutoff sign as an unfavorable prognostic indicator for patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to investigate whether the angiographic demonstration of a cutoff sign on the initial angiogram could predict recanalization and prognosis in acute ischemic stroke patients treated by endovascular thrombectomy.

METHODS

The angiographic and clinical data of patients who underwent endovascular treatment from October 2018 to April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The pretreatment angiographic appearance of the thrombus's proximal part was assessed and classified as either the cutoff sign (+) or (-). Patients' baseline characteristics and angiographic and clinical outcomes between the two groups were analyzed using propensity score matching. Then, the two commonly used techniques, stent retrieval and contact aspiration, were compared in terms of successful reperfusion and clinical outcome in patients with the cutoff sign.

RESULTS

The cutoff sign was observed in 77 (36.2%) of 213 patients. Patients with the cutoff sign were younger and were less likely to have involvement of the anterior circulation. Compared with the cutoff sign (-) group, the cutoff sign (+) group had a significantly longer procedure time (103 versus 80 min, P =0.002) and a lower percentage of 3-month good functional outcomes (18.2% versus 36%, P =0.006). After propensity score matching, the procedure time (100 versus 75 min, P =0.002) and the 3-month good outcome (19.2% versus 41.4%, P =0.004) remained significantly different. No significant differences were observed in the radiological (OR 0.758, 95% CI 0.157 to 3.658; P =0.730) and clinical (OR 0.747, 95% CI 0.147 to 3.787; P =0.725) outcomes between the two techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The cutoff sign might be an unfavorable prognostic indicator in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, and the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy techniques does not differ in patients positive for the cutoff sign.

"The microcatheter contrast injection technique": A novel technique to detect the proximal end of a thrombus in mechanical thrombectomy

Background: An aspiration catheter needs to attach to a thrombus in order to achieve first-pass recanalization by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), particularly that using a direct aspiration first pass technique. The meniscus sign, which is defined as meniscoid contrast opacification indicating the proximal edge of a thrombus, has been suggested to contribute to successful recanalization. In some cases, the meniscus sign is not detected following an injection of contrast medium through a guiding catheter. To precisely identify the location of a thrombus, we use "the microcatheter contrast injection (MCI) technique," which accurately shows the proximal edge of a thrombus. We herein introduce this novel technique and discuss its efficacy in MT. Methods: In cases without the meniscus sign, a microcatheter was advanced to the distal end of contrast opacification, and contrast medium was injected through the microcatheter to detect the meniscus sign. An aspiration catheter was then advanced to the thrombus indicated by the meniscus sign and slowly withdrawn under aspiration. Results: 29 patients underwent MT for AIS using the MCI technique. Even in cases without the meniscus sign on initial angiography, the MCI technique accurately revealed the proximal edge of the thrombus. Moreover, middle cerebral artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic stenosis and displacement of the aspiration catheter and thrombus axis were detected using this technique. Conclusions: The MCI technique may effectively reveal the exact site of a thrombus and increase the success rate of first-pass recanalization.

Network meta-analysis of first-line thrombectomy strategy for acute posterior circulation strokes: a preliminary evaluation for combined approach

Objective

Thrombectomy may provide superior results compared to best medical care for acute posterior circulation strokes (PCS). Contact aspiration (CA), stent retriever (SR), and combined SR + CA (SRA) are commonly employed as first-line techniques. However, the optimal strategy and the role of SRA remain uncertain.

Methods

Systematic searching was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane). Network meta-analyzes were performed using random-effects models. The reperfusion and clinical outcomes were compared. Pooled outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rankograms with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated.

Results

Seventeen studies were included, involving a total of 645 patients who received first-line CA, 850 patients who received SR, and 166 patients who received SRA. Regarding final recanalization outcomes, both first-line SRA (OR = 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-11.0) and CA (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.7) demonstrated superiority over SR in achieving successful reperfusion [modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3], with values of SUCRA 91.1, 58.5, and 0.4%, respectively. In addition, first-line SRA showed an advantage in achieving final mTICI 2c/3 compared to CA (OR = 3.6, 95%CI 0.99-16.0) and SR (OR = 6.4, 95%CI 1.3-35.0), with SUCRA value of 98.0, 44.7, and 7.2%, respectively. Regarding reperfusion outcome after the first pass, SRA also achieved a higher rate of mTICI 3 than SR (OR = 4.1, 95%CI 1.3-14.0), while CA did not (SUCRA 97.4, 4.6, 48.0%). In terms of safety outcomes, first-line CA was associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to SR (OR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.1-1.0), whereas the SRA technique did not (SUCRA 15.6, 78.6, 55.9%). Regarding clinical prognosis, first-line CA achieved a higher proportion of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 90 days than SR (OR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9), whereas SRA did not (SUCRA 90.5, 17.4, 42.1%).

Conclusion

For acute PCS, a first-line CA strategy yielded better results in terms of final successful reperfusion and 90-day functional independence compared to SR. As the combined technique, first-line SRA was associated with superior first-pass and final reperfusion outcomes compared to SR. However, no significant difference was observed in functional independence achieved by first-line SRA compared to the other two strategies. Further high-quality studies are warranted.

Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line stent retriever versus direct aspiration

BACKGROUND

The best choice between first-line aspiration and stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion remains controversial. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the stent retriever and direct aspiration about reported recanalization rates and periprocedural complications.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials were searched for the studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line aspiration versus stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion. A standard software program (Stata Corporation) was used for end-point analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value less than .05.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were involved in the current study, including 1014 patients. Regarding postoperative recanalization, the pooled analysis identified a significant difference in successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR] = 1.642; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.099-2.453; p = .015) and complete recanalization (OR = 3.525; 95% CI: 1.306-2.872; p = .001) between the two groups in favor of the first-line aspiration. Concerning the complications, the first-line aspiration could achieve a lower rate of total complication (OR = .359; 95% CI: .229-.563; p < .001) and hemorrhagic complication (OR = .446, 95% CI: .259-.769; p = .004) than stent retriever. No significant difference was observed in postoperative mortality (OR = .966; p = .880), subarachnoid hematoma (OR = .171; p = .094), and parenchymal hematoma (OR = .799; p = .720). In addition, the pooled results revealed a significant difference in procedure duration between the two groups in favor of aspiration (WMD = -27.630, 95% CI: -50.958 to -4.302; p = .020). However, there was no significant difference in favorable outcome (OR = 1.149; p = .352) and rescue therapy (OR = 1.440; p = .409) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Given that the first-line aspiration was associated with a higher rate of postoperative recanalization, a lower risk of postoperative complication, and a faster duration of the procedure, these findings support the aspiration may be more secure than a stent retriever.

Meniscus Sign in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke does not Predict Outcome

PURPOSE

The angiographic appearance of the occlusion site was suggested to influence outcomes of stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to study the impact of the meniscus sign (MS) on outcomes of stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO.

METHODS

Based on two prospective registries of acute ischemic stroke, we selected patients with carotid‑T, M1 or M2 occlusion who underwent EVT. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected from the registries or from individual records. Two independent observers blinded to outcomes assessed the presence of MS in digital subtraction angiography before thrombectomy. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with and without MS were compared.

RESULTS

We included 903 patients, with median age of 78 years, 59.8% were male, median baseline NIHSS was 14 and 39.5% received intravenous thrombolysis. Patients with MS (n = 170, 18.8%) were more frequently female, presented with higher NIHSS scores and more frequently underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Presence of MS was significantly associated with cardioembolic etiology. Successful reperfusion, number of passes, first pass effect, procedural time, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality and favorable 3‑month functional outcome were similar in the groups of patients with and without MS. In the multivariable analyses, MS was not associated with successful reperfusion (odds ratio, OR = 1.08, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.76-1.55), first pass effect (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.48-1.92) or favorable 3‑month outcome (OR = 1.40, 95%CI = 0.88-2.24).

CONCLUSION

The presence of MS in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who undergo EVT does not appear to influence angiographic or clinical outcomes.

Aspiration versus stent retriever for posterior circulation stroke: A meta-analysis

AIMS

New thrombectomy strategies have emerged recently. Differences between posterior circulation stroke management via aspiration and stent retriever remain to be evaluated. We compared the safety and efficacy of aspiration and stent retriever in treating posterior circulation stroke.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for studies comparing aspiration and stent retriever in patients with posterior circulation stroke. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

Fifteen cohort studies with 1451 patients were included. Pooled results showed a significant difference in total complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.30, 0.76], p = 0.002). successful recanalization (1.85, [1.30, 2.64], p = 0.0006), favorable outcome (1.30, [1.02, 1.67], p = 0.04), procedure duration (-22.10, [-43.32, -0.88], p = 0.04), complete recanalization (4.96, [1.06, 23.16], p = 0.009), and first-pass effect (2.59, [1.55, 4.32], p = 0.0003) between the aspiration and stent retriever groups, and in favor of aspiration. There was no significant difference in the outcomes of rescue therapy (1.42, [0.66, 3.05], p = 0.37) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with posterior circulation stroke receiving treatment with aspiration achieved better recanalization, first-pass effect, and shorter procedure time. Aspiration may be more secure than a stent retriever.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Latest Findings and Critical Thinking on Future Study Design

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated powerful efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The effect of EVT for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) in the posterior circulation remains unproven. Here, we highlight the latest findings of observational studies and RCTs of EVT for BAO, with a focus on the predictors of functional outcomes, the limitations of recent RCTs, and critical thinking on future study design. Pooled data from large retrospective studies showed 36.4% favorable outcome at 3 months and 4.6% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher baseline NIHSS score, pc-ASPECTS < 8, extensive baseline infarction, large pontine infarct, and sICH were independent predictors of poor outcome. Two recent randomized trial BEST (Endovascular treatment vs. standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion) and BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study) failed to demonstrate significant benefit of EVT within 6 or 8 h after stroke symptom onset. The limitations of these studies include slow enrollment, selection bias, high crossover rate, and inclusion of patients with mild deficit. To improve enrollment and minimize risk of diluting the overall treatment effect, futile recanalization and re-occlusion, optimal inclusion/exclusion criteria, including enrollment within 24 h of last known well, NIHSS score ≥ 10, pc-ASPECTS ≥ 8, no large pontine infarct, and the use of rescue therapy for underlying atherosclerotic stenosis, should be considered for future clinical trials.

The claw sign predicts first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for cerebral large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation

Background:

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute cerebral large vessel occlusion (LVO). Complete recanalization of vessels in a single procedure is defined as the first-pass effect (FPE) and is associated with good prognosis. In this study, angiographic clot protruding sign termed the “claw sign,” was examined as candidate preoperative imaging factor for predicting the FPE.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed data from 91 consecutive patients treated for acute LVO in the anterior circulation by MT between January 2014 and December 2019. The claw sign was defined as a thrombus that protruded proximally by more than half of the diameter of the parent artery. Radiological findings such as claw sign, clinical and etiological features, and outcomes were compared between groups with and without successful FPE. Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate perioperative factors associated with FPE.

Results:

FPE was achieved in 26 of 91 (28.6%) patients and the claw sign was observed in 34 of 91 (37.4%) patients. The claw sign was significantly more frequent in the successful FPE group than in the failed FPE group (53.8% vs. 30.8%; P = 0.040). After the multivariate analysis, the claw sign was the only pretreatment parameter that could predict FPE (odds ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–7.06; P = 0.047).

Conclusion:

The claw sign is an angiographic imaging factor that might predict FPE after MT for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke.

Clot Meniscus Sign Is Associated With Thrombus Permeability and Choice of Mechanical Thrombectomy Technique in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Background and Purpose

The method of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is related to vascular anatomy and stroke etiology. Meniscus sign and thrombus permeability as imaging markers may be instructive for the selection of MT. This study aims to clarify the relationship among meniscus sign, thrombus permeability, and choice of MT in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Materials and Methods

A total of 111 patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) who underwent MT were retrospectively analyzed. Clot meniscus sign was defined as the appearance of meniscoid/edge-like or single- or double-wall contrast channels besides or around insular blood clots. The radiographic, clinical, and surgical data of patients with MCAO with or without meniscus sign were compared.

Results

The meniscus sign positive group (n = 26) has higher thrombus permeability (HUs) (26.92 ± 9.69 vs. 22.84 ± 7.88, p = 0.031) than those without it. Shorter puncture-to-recanalization (P2R) time (65.5 vs. 88, p = 0.012), higher complete recanalization rate (85.71 vs. 33.33%, p &lt; 0.01), and better clinical outcome (p &lt; 0.01) were obtained by selecting contact aspiration (CA) over stent retriever (SR) in patients with positive meniscus sign. In patients with negative meniscus sign, there was no significant difference in clinical outcome after receiving CA or SR.

Conclusion

Patients with MCAO with positive meniscus sign have higher thrombus permeability and are more suitable for CA to acquire better clinical outcomes.

First-Line Stent Retriever versus Direct Aspiration for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation stroke has been proven to be highly effective. In comparison, MT for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) continues to lack definitive evidence of efficacy. The main MT modalities are stent retriever (SR) and direct aspiration (DA). Several studies have been published comparing the 2 approaches.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to directly compare and synthesize safety and efficacy outcomes with SR versus DA for acute BAO.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 studies comprising 693 patients with BAO were included (SR: 457; DA: 236). The SR group was associated with statistically significant lower odds of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.94) and mTICI3 (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.23-0.95) compared with DA. Favorable outcome rates were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.60-1.16). The rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR: 3.57; 95% CI: 0.75-16.95), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (OR: 4.71; 95% CI: 0.82-26.90), and vessel perforation (OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 0.43-16.33) were higher in the SR group, but statistical significance was not reached. The rates of 90-day mortality were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.67-1.70). Procedure duration was significantly shorter when DA was used compared with SR (weighted mean difference: 26.10 minutes; 95% CI: 13.28-38.92).

CONCLUSIONS

SR is associated with statistically significant lower odds of mTICI 2b/3 and mTICI 3 recanalization rates compared with DA. SR appears to be associated with a higher complication rate, but significance was not reached.

Association of Regular Thrombus Surface Phenotype With Complete Recanalization in First-Line Contact Aspiration Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion

Objective: To assess whether angiographic thrombus surface phenotype has an impact on efficacy of contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Methods: From January 2016 to December 2019, consecutive stroke patients with a BAO and first-line CA were analyzed in this retrospective study. We assessed baseline and imaging characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes. We rated thrombus surface phenotype on pre-treatment digital subtraction angiography in a three-reader-consensus setting. Primary outcome was complete recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] 3 and arterial occlusive lesion [AOL] 3) after first-line CA without additionally stent retriever passes. Data analysis was stratified according to thrombus surface phenotype and complete first-line recanalization. Results: Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 74 years (IQR 64-80), 64% were male, and median baseline NIHSS score was 24 (IQR 7-32). Thirty patients had a regular and 16 patients had an irregular thrombus phenotype. Thrombus surface was not assessable in 32 patients. In patients with a regular phenotype, complete recanalization was more often achieved compared to irregular and non-ratable phenotypes (50 vs. 18.8% and 21.9%; p = 0.027). Patients with a regular phenotype [odds ratio [OR] 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-35.8; p = 0.005], cardioembolic stroke (OR 12.1, 95% CI: 2.0-72.8; p = 0.007), and proximal end of the thrombus in the middle basilar artery segment (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 1.0-26.6; p = 0.046) were more likely to achieve complete recanalization after first-line CA without rescue therapy. Conclusion: The efficacy of CA may differ according to the angiographic thrombus surface phenotype in patients with BAO. A regular phenotype is associated with higher rates of complete recanalization in first-line CA. However, assessment of thrombus phenotype is frequently not feasible in BAO.

First-line contact aspiration versus first-line stent retriever for acute posterior circulation strokes: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) are widely used as first-line strategies for acute posterior circulation strokes (PCS). However, it is still unclear how CA and SR compare as the first-line treatment of acute PCS. Several new studies have been published recently, so we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis.

METHODS

The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement. Random-effects models were performed to pool the outcomes and the value of I² was calculated to assess the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Ten observational studies with 1189 patients were included, among whom 492 received first-line CA and 697 received first-line SR. The pooled results revealed that first-line CA could achieve a significantly higher proportion of modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.71, I²=0%), mTICI 3 (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.31, I²=59.6%), first-pass effect (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.51 to 5.58, I²=0%), lower incidence of new-territory embolic events (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, I²=0%), and shorter procedure time (mean difference -29.4 min, 95% CI -46.8 to -12.0 min, I²=62.8%) compared with first-line SR. At 90-day follow-up, patients subjected to first-line CA showed a higher functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2; OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.87, I²=23.5%) and a lower mortality (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.00, p=0.050, I²=0%) than those subjected to first-line SR.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that the first-line CA strategy could achieve better recanalization and clinical outcomes for acute PCS than first-line SR. Limited by the quality of included studies, this conclusion should be drawn with caution.