Electrocardiographic changes in spondyloarthritis and use of anti-TNF-α drugs: a retrospective study with 100 patients

Benefits of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for cardiovascular disease in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, with current guidelines recommending multiple CVD-related risk assessment strategies. CVD risk prediction using a scoring model with lipids might be another promising alternative, for which ultrasound screening for subclinical atherosclerosis may be considered together with surrogate markers. Theoretically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), which are known to inhibit endothelial activation and inflammation caused by the disease and underlying metabolic dysfunction, might prevent microvascular events. In this narrative review, we summarized the evidence of TNFi effects on CVD in AS. Although early case reports revealed that CVD occurred during TNFi treatment, more recent evidence shows that it could be successfully treated. Studies of TNFi on lipid changes and subclinical atherosclerosis have shown controversial results, possibly due to genetic predisposition, differences in affinity for membrane-bound TNF leading to insufficient inhibition of inflammation or primary failure response to TNFi, and not enough follow-up time to identify potential significance. Overall, patients vulnerable to CVD could benefit from long-term administration of TNFi when inflammation is under control. Besides healthy lifestyle modification, traditional CVD risk factors and metabolic syndrome-related diseases should be further assessed and treated if necessary.

Cardiovascular Morbidity in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Focus on Inflammatory Cardiac Disease

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is associated with an increase in cardiovascular (CV) morbidity when compared to the general population. The increased risk of CV involvement in AS is likely multifactorial including inflammation accelerating atherosclerosis and the cardiac inflammation itself in the form of aortitis and conduction anomalies. Establishing indisputable evidence linking AS and CV disease is challenging due to AS being relatively rare and it affects 1:1,000 and all studies analyzing the association between AS and CV disease involve a small sample size making long-term outcome measurements limited. The article reviews the literature studying the association between AS and CV disease as well as the impact of therapies for AS on the CV system (CVS).

The Prevalence of Cardiac Diseases in a Contemporary Large Cohort of Dutch Elderly Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients-The CARDAS Study

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of specific cardiac manifestations, i.e., conduction disorders, valvular disease and diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, in a large cross-sectional controlled cohort of elderly ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of valvular disease, conduction disorders and LV dysfunction in 193 randomly selected AS patients compared with 74 osteoarthritis (OA) controls aged 50–75 years. Patients underwent conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography in combination with clinical and laboratory assessments. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to compare the odds of mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) and aortic valve regurgitation (AVR) between AS patients and OA controls. Results: The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction was trivial and comparable in AS patients compared to controls (respectively, 4% and 3%) and had no further clinical relevance. In addition, the prevalence of conduction disturbances was similar in both groups, with little clinical relevance, respectively 23% vs. 24%. The prevalence of AVR was significantly higher in AS patients compared to the controls, respectively 23% (9% trace, 12% mild, 1% moderate, 1% severe, 1% prosthesis) vs. 11%, p = 0.04. After correcting for age, sex and CV risk factors, AS patients had an odds ratio of 4.5 (95% CI 1.1–13.6) for AVR compared to the controls. In contrast, the prevalence values of MVR were similar and mostly not clinically relevant in AS patients and controls, respectively 36% and 32% and p = 0.46. Conclusion: The prevalence of diastolic LV dysfunction and conduction disorders was mostly not clinically relevant, and similar in AS patients and controls. However, AS patients had an up to five times increased odds to develop AVR compared to controls. Therefore, echocardiographic screening of elderly (50–75 years) AS patients should be considered.