Ge M, Li C, Zhang Z. SNP-Based and Kmer-Based eQTL Analysis Using Transcriptome Data.
Animals (Basel) 2024;
14:2941. [PMID:
39457872 PMCID:
PMC11503742 DOI:
10.3390/ani14202941]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Revised: 10/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Traditional expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping associates single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with gene expression, where the SNPs are derived from large-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data or transcriptome data. While WGS provides a high SNP density, it also incurs substantial sequencing costs. In contrast, RNA-seq data, which are more accessible and less expensive, can simultaneously yield gene expressions and SNPs. Thus, eQTL analysis based on RNA-seq offers significant potential applications. Two primary strategies were employed for eQTL in this study. The first involved analyzing expression levels in relation to variant sites detected between populations from RNA-seq data. The second approach utilized kmers, which are sequences of length k derived from RNA-seq reads, to represent variant sites and associated these kmer genotypes with gene expression. We discovered 87 significant association signals involving eGene on the basis of the SNP-based eQTL analysis. These genes include DYNLT1, NMNAT1, and MRLC2, which are closely related to neurological functions such as motor coordination and homeostasis, play a role in cellular energy metabolism, and function in regulating calcium-dependent signaling in muscle contraction, respectively. This study compared the results obtained from eQTL mapping using RNA-seq identified SNPs and gene expression with those derived from kmers. We found that the vast majority (23/30) of the association signals overlapping the two methods could be verified by haplotype block analysis. This comparison elucidates the strengths and limitations of each method, providing insights into their relative efficacy for eQTL identification.
Collapse