Comparison of isometric cervical flexor and isometric cervical extensor system exercises on patients with neuromuscular imbalance and cervical crossed syndrome associated forward head posture

[Effect of the forward head syndrome in the development of temporomandibular disorders]

Bad habits, such as poor posture during the use of technological devices, poor abdominal control and oral breathing pattern can lead to a forward head position, which has important implications for the entire future of the individual, especially at the stomatognathic system. There is a strong association between temporomandibular disorders and forward head syndrome. Where the muscular component is the main affected, with the appearance of more trigger points at the level of the sternocleidomastoid muscles, upper trapezius, rectus capitis posterior and upper oblique capitis. Degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint have been observed, but evidence is still lacking to ensure that Forward Head Syndrome is the etiological factor.

Corrective exercises administered online vs at the workplace for pain and function in the office workers with upper crossed syndrome: randomized controlled trial

Objective

To evaluate the effects of online-supervised versus workplace corrective exercises on neck–shoulder pain (NSP), sick leave, posture, workability, and muscular activity among office workers with the upper crossed syndrome (UCS).

Methods

We performed a parallel-group randomized control trial at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran, assigning 36 office workers to online-supervised, workplace, and control groups (mean (SD) age 38.91 ± 3.87, 38.58 ± 7.34, 37.00 ± 8.12). Inclusion criteria were alignment alteration (forward head (≥ 45°), rounding shoulder (≥ 52°), rounding back (≥ 42°), and pain intensity ≥ 3 in neck and shoulder. The two intervention groups performed 8-week exercise program, while the control group continued usual activities. Primary (NSP and sick leave) and secondary outcomes [postural angles, workability, and muscular activity were measured by VAS, outcome evaluation questionnaire (OEQ), photogrammetry, workability index, and EMG, respectively, at the baseline and an 8-week follow-up].

Results

ANCOVA results revealed improvements for the online-supervised group versus control for NSP (P = 0.007), postural angles (P = 0.000, P = 0.001, P = 0.005), workability (P = 0.048, P = 0.042), and upper trapezius activation (P = 0.024, P = 0.016), respectively. Using paired t tests, both intervention groups improved from baseline to follow-up for NSP (P = 0.000, P = 0.002), forward head posture (P = 0.000, P = 0.000), round shoulders (P = 0.001, P = 0.031), and round back (P = 0.034, P = 0.008), respectively. Related parameters of workability (P = 0.041, P = 0.038), upper trapezius (P = 0.005, P = 0.005, P = 0.022), and serratus anterior (P = 0.020, P = 0.015) changed only in the online-supervised group.

Conclusion

Online-supervised corrective exercise seems to improve a range of parameters related to work performance. These findings are highly applicable in light of the ongoing COVID pandemic; many workers have to work from home.

Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effects of motor control training with pressure biofeedback on neck pain and disability of patients with neck pain is a field that has drawn a lot of research interest. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct, for the first time, a systematic review and meta-analysis for examining whether motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases PubMED, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Google scholar, SportDiscus, COCHRANE and EMBASE were searched for studies related to the research question. PEDro scale was used for examining methodological quality. A random effects model was used for data meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 10 were selected for further quantitative synthesis. Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback was found to have equal or better effectiveness on neck pain intensity and disability in comparison to other control interventions. The meta-analyses show that motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback is more effective than strength-endurance training of cervical muscles for improving pain (Hedges' g = 0.323, 95% CI 0.04-0.60, I² = 50.94%) and disability (Hedges g = 0.401, 95% CI 0.12-0.68, I² = 53.44%) in patients with neck pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback is an effective intervention for improving pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain and preferable to strength-endurance training of cervical muscles.

Impact of Cervical Sensory Feedback for Forward Head Posture on Headache Severity and Physiological Factors in Patients with Tension-type Headache: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Tension-type headache (TTH) decreases the ability to concentrate and function during daily activities in affected patients. As most patients with TTH exhibit forward head posture (FHP). Various interventions have been proposed to resolve TTH. However, research regarding the efficacy of these interventions remains lacking. The present study aimed to investigate the association between FHP and TTH, and to evaluate the efficacy of various intervention methods on headache symptoms and other clinical variables in patients with TTH induced by FHP. MATERIAL AND METHODS Participants were randomly allocated to 3 groups: biofeedback (BF, n₁=21), manual therapy (MT, n₂=20) and, stretching (ST, n₃=21). Interventions were conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Craniovertebral angle (CVA), electroencephalographic findings for attention, stress, and pressure-pain threshold (PPT), headache on activities of daily living (Henry Ford Headache Disability Inventory, HDI), and quality of life (QoL) assessments were obtained pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at the 2-week follow-up. RESULTS The correlation between CVA and HDI after intervention (R²=0.324, P<0.001), and at 2-week follow-up (R²=0.115, P<0.01) are significant. BF was associated with significant improvements in CVA (F₂,₅₉=3.393, P<0.001, η^2/P=0.130), attention (F₂,₅₉=5.186, P<0.01, η^2/P=0.150), stress [skin temperature (F₂,₅₉=6.005, P<0.001, η^2/P=0.169) and skin conductance (F₂,₅₉=4.900, P<0.01, η^2/P=0.142)], PPT (F₂,₅₉=5.050, P<0.01, η^2/P=0.146), HDI (F₂,₅₉=3.303, P<0.01, η^2/P=0.101), and QoL (F₂,₅₉=3.409, P<0.05, η^2/P=0.104). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that BF was more effective than MT and ST in the treatment of TTH due to FHP. Such findings highlight the need to develop and promote a controlled exercise program to facilitate a return to normal daily activities in patients with TTH due to FHP.

The Potential Role of the Cervical Spine in Sports-Related Concussion: Clinical Perspectives and Considerations for Risk Reduction

Sports-related concussion (SRC) occurs due to biomechanical forces to the head or neck that can result in pathophysiological changes in the brain. The musculature of the cervical spine has been identified as one potential factor in reducing SRC risk as well as for underlying sex differences in SRC rates. Recent research has demonstrated that linear and rotational head acceleration, as well as the magnitude of force upon impact, is influenced by cervical spine biomechanics. Increased neck strength and girth are associated with reduced linear and rotational head acceleration during impact. Past work has also shown that overall neck strength and girth are reduced in athletes with SRC. Additionally, differences in cervical spine biomechanics are hypothesized as a critical factor underlying sex differences in SRC rates. Specifically, compared to males, females tend to have less neck strength and girth, which are associated with increased linear and rotational head acceleration. Although our ability to detect SRC has greatly improved, our ability to prevent SRC from occurring and decrease the severity of clinical outcomes postinjury is limited. However, we suggest, along with others, that cervical spine biomechanics may be a modifiable factor in reducing SRC risk. In this commentary, we review the role of the cervical spine in reducing SRC risk, and how this risk differs by sex. We discuss clinical considerations for the examination of the cervical spine and the potential clinical relevance for SRC prevention. Additionally, we provide suggestions for future research examining cervical spine properties as modifiable factors in reducing SRC risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(3):202-208. Epub 15 Jan 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8582.