Prentice CLS, Milanese S, Flavell CA, Massy-Westropp N. A dose response analysis of exercise prescription variables for lateral abdominal muscle thickness and activation: A systematic review.
J Bodyw Mov Ther 2024;
38:24-41. [PMID:
38763566 DOI:
10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.01.016]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Various exercise programs are used to treat lateral abdominal muscle (LAM) impairments in people with low back pain. Factors comprising these programs include exercise type, session time, frequency, and program duration. However, specific clinical guidance about optimal exercise prescription is lacking.
OBJECTIVES
To perform a dose-response analysis on exercise prescription variables for LAM thickness and activation as measured by ultrasound imaging.
DESIGN
Systematic review METHOD: Databases were searched from their inception for studies examining the association between exercise interventions and LAM thickness/activation measured by ultrasound imaging in healthy individuals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Brigg's Institute critical appraisal tools. For each muscle, subgroup analyses were performed to determine the dose response of exercise prescription variables for LAM thickness and activation. Where there was insufficient data for subgroup analyses, data was narratively synthesised.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies comprising 395 participants were included. Statistical and narrative synthesis revealed specific local abdominal exercises, programs from four weeks duration, three sessions per week and sessions of ≥30 min were associated with greatest improvements to LAM thickness. Only the variables exercise type, program duration and session frequency showed a significant between groups difference for the subgroup analysis. The main limitation was inability to perform subgroup analyses for all variables across all muscles measured at rest and during contraction, due to non-reporting of data.
CONCLUSION
This review provides preliminary guidance to practitioners on how the LAM respond to different exercise dosages. Future research should trial these findings.
Collapse