Comparison of screw-home mechanism in the unloaded living knee subjected to active and passive movements

Three-dimensional joint surface orientation does not correlate with two-dimensional coronal joint line orientation in knee osteoarthritis: Three-dimensional analysis of upright computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional (2D) coronal joint line orientation on radiography under weight-bearing conditions has been widely used in evaluating knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the effects of tibial rotation remain unknown. The present study aimed to newly define three-dimensional (3D) joint surface orientation relative to the floor as an unchangeable 3D angle unaffected by tibial rotation using upright computed tomography (CT), and to investigate correlations between 3D and 2D parameters in knee OA.

METHODS

Sixty-six knees in 38 patients with varus knee OA underwent standing hip-to-ankle digital radiography and upright CT. The 2D parameters measured on radiographs included femorotibial angle (FTA), tibial joint line angle (TJLA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). The 3D inner product angle between vectors of the tibial joint surface and the floor from CT was defined as the 3D joint surface-floor angle.

RESULTS

Mean 3D joint surface-floor angle was 6.0 ± 3.6°. No correlation was identified between 3D joint surface-floor angle and 2D joint line parameters, even though FTA correlated substantially with 2D joint line parameters. No significant differences in 3D joint surface-floor angle were identified among Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D joint surface orientation did not correlate with 2D coronal joint line orientation and was unaffected by CPAK classification types. This finding suggests that current 2D evaluations should be reconsidered for a better understanding of true knee joint line orientation.

Effect of Tibiofemoral Rotation Angle on Graft Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Coronal and sagittal malalignment of the knee are well-recognized risk factors for failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). However, the effect of axial malalignment on graft survival after ACLR is yet to be determined.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether increased tibiofemoral rotational malalignment, namely, tibiofemoral rotation angle (TFA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, is associated with graft failure after ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In this retrospective matched control study of a single center's database, 151 patients who underwent revision ACLR because of graft failure (ACLR failure group, defined as symptomatic patients with anterior knee instability and an ACL graft tear appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and confirmed during arthroscopic surgery) were compared with a matched control group of 151 patients who underwent primary ACLR with no evidence of failure after ≥2-year follow-up (intact ACLR group). Patients were matched by sex, age, and meniscal injury during primary ACLR. Axial malalignment was assessed on preoperative MRI through the TFA and the TT-TG distance. Sagittal alignment was measured through the posterior tibial slope on MRI. The optimal TFA cutoff associated with graft failure was identified by a receiver operating characteristic curve. The Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of the TFA on ACLR longevity.

RESULTS

The mean age was 25.7 ± 10.4 years for the ACLR failure group and 25.9 ± 10.0 years for the intact ACLR group. Among all the included patients, 174 (57.6%) were male. In the ACLR failure group, the mean TFA was 5.8°± 4.5° (range, -5° to 16°), while it was 3.0°± 3.3° (range, -3° to 15°) in the intact ACLR group (P < .001). Neither the TT-TG distance nor the posterior tibial slope presented statistical differences between the groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve suggested an optimal TFA cutoff of 4.5° for graft failure (area under the curve = 0.71; P < .001; sensitivity, 68.2%; specificity, 75.5%). Considering this a threshold, patients who had a TFA ≥4.5° had 6.6 times higher odds of graft failure compared with patients with a TFA <4.5° (P < .001). Survival analysis demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 81% in patients with a TFA <4.5°, while it was 44% in those with a TFA ≥4.5° (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

An increased TFA was associated with increased odds of ACLR failure when the TFA was ≥4.5°. Measuring the TFA in patients with ACL tears undergoing reconstruction may inform the surgeon about additional factors that may require consideration before ACLR for a successful outcome.

Research on Knee Joint Load and Influencing Factors of Typical Tai Chi Movements

Background

Tai chi is recognized worldwide for its rehabilitation abilities and healthcare benefits. However, in recent years, some movements associated with tai chi have been shown to damage the lower limb joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of different movements, postures, center of mass (COM) movements, and range of knee movement of tai chi exercises on knee joint load.

Methods

Fourteen professional tai chi practitioners in two postures (high and low) were enrolled to perform the following four typical tai chi movements: wild horse's mane (WHM), repulse monkey (RM), wave-hand in cloud (WHIC), and grasp the bird's tail (GBT). Kinematic and kinetics data were synchronously collected using the Vicon infrared high-speed motion capture system and a three-dimensional (3D) force measurement platform. Variance analysis and partial correlation analysis were performed to investigate factors influencing peak knee joint moment and vertical ground reaction force (VGRF).

Results

The results showed that the peak knee extension and abduction moment were larger in WHM and RM than those in WHIC and GBT (p < 0.05). WHM was associated with greater rotation moment than the other typical movements (p < 0.05). VGRF and joint moment among different poses were significantly different. Low-pose tai chi typical movements were associated with greater VGRF, knee joint extension and abduction, and rotation moments than high-pose movements (p < 0.05). The anteroposterior and mediolateral COM displacements were strongly and positively associated with VGRF (p < 0.001), while the mediolateral COM displacement was negatively associated with knee extension moment (p < 0.001). The knee internal-external rotation ROM and anteroposterior and mediolateral COM displacements were positively associated with knee abduction moment (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

For long-term tai chi exercises, choosing a suitable posture based on an individual exercise level and reasonable control of knee ROM and COM displacement can reduce the risk of knee injury during exercise.