Dynamic changes in practical inflammation and immunity markers in cancer patients receiving immune-enhancing nutritional supplementation during concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Longitudinal measurements of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

We study factors affecting neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and its changes throughout the treatment (ΔNLR) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) underwent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and oncological outcomes including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS

Data from 81 NPC patients was retrospectively evaluated. NLRs were obtained from first week of CCRT (pre-CCRT), last week of CCRT (end-CCRT), and at last cycle of AC (end-AC). Pre-CCRT NLR was categorized into "low" and "high". End-CCRT and end-AC ΔNLRs were divided into "increased" and "decreased" based on NLR at these two timepoints relative to the value at pre-CCRT. Associations between sex, age, cancer stage and NLR, ΔNLRs were investigated. OS and DFS were reported.

RESULTS

Median NLR at pre-CCRT (2.47) was lower than NLR at end-CCRT (6.29) and end-AC (3.77) (P-value = 0.043). Advanced cancer stage associated with high pre-CCRT NLR (P-value = 0.047). Male gender was associated with "increased" end-CCRT ΔNLR, whereas male gender and age ≤51 were associated with "increased" end-AC ΔNLR. Three-year OS and DFS rates were 85.25% and 76.39%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences observed in OS and DFS among groups categorized by pre-CCRT NLR, ΔNLRs, gender, age, and cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR increases during NPC treatment. Advanced staging is associated with higher baseline NLR. Increased ΔNLR is associated with male gender at end-CCRT and male gender with age ≤51 years at end-AC. No relation between NLR and its dynamic change with either OS or DFS was demonstrated.

Mixed Treatments Comparison of Oral Nutrition Interventions for Blood Immune Cell Parameters in Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Oral nutrition interventions are commonly applied as an assistant therapeutic approach, which could affect the balance of the immunological response but with mixed evidence. The objective of this study is to identify the potential of different oral nutrition interventions for blood immune cell parameters in cancer patients. Randomized controlled trials, which were published in peer-reviewed journals in the language of English, and which identified the effects of different oral nutrition interventions on cancer patients, were screened and included in the databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. White blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte count, CD4/CD8, and neutrophil count were selected as outcome measures. For the result, 11 trials were included. The agreement between authors reached a kappa value of 0.78. Beta-carotene supplementation has a high potential in inducing a positive effect on blood immune cell parameters for cancer patients (first positive for WBC and CD4/CD8, second positive for lymphocyte count), as well as a combination of physical exercise and hypocaloric healthy eating intervention (first positive for lymphocyte and neutrophil count, second positive for WBC). Oral nutrition supplementations with a single substance have less potential to provide a positive effect on blood immune cell parameters for cancer patients (glutamine: 0.30 and 0.28 to be the last selection for WBCs and lymphocytes; Omega 3: 0.37 to be the last selection for WBCs; Protein: 0.44 to be the last selection for lymphocytes; Zinc: 0.60 to be the last selection for neutrophils). In conclusion, the programs of immunonutrition therapy for different cancer patients might be different. The past perception that mixed oral nutritional supplementations are superior to oral nutritional supplements with a single substance might be wrong and the selection of oral nutritional supplementation need cautiousness. A combination of physical exercise might have a positive effect but also needs a higher level of evidence. Registration Number: CRD42021286396.