Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and magnetocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease using ST-segment fluctuation score

Accurate diagnosis of severe coronary stenosis based on resting magnetocardiography: a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of resting magnetocardiography in identifying severe coronary artery stenosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

METHODS

A total of 513 patients with angina symptoms were included and divided into two groups based on the extent of coronary artery disease determined by angiography: the non-severe coronary stenosis group (< 70% stenosis) and the severe coronary stenosis group (≥ 70% stenosis). The diagnostic model was constructed using magnetic field map (MFM) parameters, either individually or in combination with clinical indicators. The performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Calibration plots and decision curve analysis were performed to investigate the clinical utility and performance of the models, respectively.

RESULTS

In the severe coronary stenosis group, QR_MCTDd, S_MDp, and TT_MAC50 were significantly higher than those in the non-severe coronary stenosis group (10.46 ± 10.66 vs. 5.11 ± 6.07, P < 0.001; 7.2 ± 8.64 vs. 4.68 ± 6.95, P = 0.003; 0.32 ± 57.29 vs. 0.26 ± 57.29, P < 0.001). While, QR_MVamp, R_MA, and T_MA in the severe coronary stenosis group were lower (0.23 ± 0.16 vs. 0.28 ± 0.16, P < 0.001; 55.06 ± 48.68 vs. 59.24 ± 53.01, P < 0.001; 51.67 ± 39.32 vs. 60.45 ± 51.33, P < 0.001). Seven MFM parameters were integrated into the model, resulting in an area under the curve of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.765-0.855). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 71.7%, 80.4%, 93.3%, 42.8%, and 73.5%; respectively. The combined model exhibited an area under the curve of 0.845 (95% CI: 0.798-0.892). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 84.3%, 73.8%, 92.6%, 54.6%, and 82.1%; respectively. Calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observation. The decision curve analysis showed that the combined model provided greater net benefit compared to the magnetocardiography model.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel quantitative MFM parameters, whether used individually or in combination with clinical indicators, have been shown to effectively predict the risk of severe coronary stenosis in patients presenting with angina-like symptoms. Magnetocardiography, an emerging non-invasive diagnostic tool, warrants further exploration for its potential in diagnosing coronary heart disease.

Electromagnetic field and cardiovascular diseases: A state-of-the-art review of diagnostic, therapeutic, and predictive values

Despite encouraging advances in early diagnosis and treatment, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remained a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Increasing evidence has shown that the electromagnetic field (EMF) influences many biological processes, which has attracted much attention for its potential therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in multiple diseases, such as musculoskeletal disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Nonionizing EMF has been studied as a therapeutic or diagnostic tool in CVDs. In this review, we summarize the current literature ranging from in vitro to clinical studies focusing on the therapeutic potential (external EMF) and diagnostic potential (internal EMF generated from the heart) of EMF in CVDs. First, we provided an overview of the therapeutic potential of EMF and associated mechanisms in the context of CVDs, including cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. Furthermore, we investigated the diagnostic and predictive value of magnetocardiography in CVDs. Finally, we discussed the critical steps necessary to translate this promising approach into clinical practice.

Clinical magnetocardiography: the unshielded bet-past, present, and future

Magnetocardiography (MCG), which is nowadays 60 years old, has not yet been fully accepted as a clinical tool. Nevertheless, a large body of research and several clinical trials have demonstrated its reliability in providing additional diagnostic electrophysiological information if compared with conventional non-invasive electrocardiographic methods. Since the beginning, one major objective difficulty has been the need to clean the weak cardiac magnetic signals from the much higher environmental noise, especially that of urban and hospital environments. The obvious solution to record the magnetocardiogram in highly performant magnetically shielded rooms has provided the ideal setup for decades of research demonstrating the diagnostic potential of this technology. However, only a few clinical institutions have had the resources to install and run routinely such highly expensive and technically demanding systems. Therefore, increasing attempts have been made to develop cheaper alternatives to improve the magnetic signal-to-noise ratio allowing MCG in unshielded hospital environments. In this article, the most relevant milestones in the MCG's journey are reviewed, addressing the possible reasons beyond the currently long-lasting difficulty to reach a clinical breakthrough and leveraging the authors' personal experience since the early 1980s attempting to finally bring MCG to the patient's bedside for many years thus far. Their nearly four decades of foundational experimental and clinical research between shielded and unshielded solutions are summarized and referenced, following the original vision that MCG had to be intended as an unrivaled method for contactless assessment of the cardiac electrophysiology and as an advanced method for non-invasive electroanatomical imaging, through multimodal integration with other non-fluoroscopic imaging techniques. Whereas all the above accounts for the past, with the available innovative sensors and more affordable active shielding technologies, the present demonstrates that several novel systems have been developed and tested in multicenter clinical trials adopting both shielded and unshielded MCG built-in hospital environments. The future of MCG will mostly be dependent on the results from the ongoing progress in novel sensor technology, which is relatively soon foreseen to provide multiple alternatives for the construction of more compact, affordable, portable, and even wearable devices for unshielded MCG inside hospital environments and perhaps also for ambulatory patients.

Magnetocardiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) continues to be a significant global public health concern and ranks among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. However, the identification of myocardial ischemia in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a challenging issue. Functional or stress testing is widely recognized as the gold standard method for diagnosing myocardial ischemia, but it is hindered by low diagnostic accuracy and limitations such as radiation exposure. Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a non-contact, non-invasive method that records magnetic fields produced by the electrical activity of the heart. Unlike electrocardiography (EKG) and other functional or stress testing, MCG offers numerous advantages. It is highly sensitive and can detect early signs of myocardial ischemia that may be missed by other diagnostic tools. This review aims to provide an extensive overview of the available evidence that establishes the utility of MCG as a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying myocardial ischemia, accompanied by a discussion of potential future research directions in this domain.

Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain: A machine learning model based on magnetocardiography parameters

BACKGROUD

Patients with chest pain and suspected of coronary artery disease(CAD) need further test to confirm the diagnosis. Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a non-invasive and emission-free technology which can detect and measure the weak magnetic fields created by the electrical activity of the heart.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the 10 MCG parameters to detect CAD in patients with chest pain by means of a machine learning method of multilayer perceptron(MLP) neural network.

METHODS

209 patients who were suffering from chest pain and suspected of CAD were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In all patients, 12-lead electrocardiography(ECG) and MCG test were performed before percutaneous coronary angiography(PCA). 10 MCG parameters were analyzed by MLP neural networks.

RESULTS

11 diagnostic models(M1 to M11) were established after MLP analysis. The accuracies ranged from 71.2% to 90.5%. Two models(M10 and M11) were further analyzed. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, PLR and NLR were 89.5%, 89.8%, 88.9%, 92.7%, 84.7%, 11.10 and 0.11, of M10, and were 90.0%, 91.4%, 87.7%, 92.1%, 86.6%, 7.43 and 0.10, of M11.

CONCLUSIONS

By a method of MLP neural network, MCG is applicable in identifying CAD in patients with chest pain, which seems beneficial for detection of CAD.