Shenfu injection improves cerebral microcirculation and reduces brain injury in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock

Ginseng aconitum decoction (Shenfu Tang) provides neuroprotection by ameliorating impairment of blood-brain barrier in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury

Ischemic stroke (IS) remains one of the most serious threats to human life. Early blood-brain barrier damage (BBB) is the cause of parenchymal cell damage. Repair of the structure and function of the BBB is beneficial for the treatment of IS. The traditional prescription ginseng aconitum decoction (GAD) has a long history in the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, however, the effect of GAD on the BBB disruption and underlying mechanisms remains largely unknown. To address these issues, in vitro models of BBB were established with brain endothelial cells (bEnd.3). We found that GAD reduced the leakage of the fluorescent probe FITC-dextran (P < 0.01) and increased the expression of tight junction proteins (Claudin-5, ZO-1) (P < 0.05) in the BBB model in vitro. Furthermore, to investigate the BBB protective effects of GAD in vivo. A total of 25 male C57/BL6 mice (20 - 22 g) were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5 per group): (1) Sham group (saline), (2) MCAO group (saline), (3) MCAO + CG group (Chinese ginseng 8 mg/kg/day), (4) MCAO + AC group (aconite 8 mg/kg/day), (5) MCAO + GAD group (GAD 8 mg/kg/day).We constructed IS model in mice and found that GAD treatment reduced IgG leakage (P < 0.05), up-regulated the expression of tight junction proteins Claudin-5, Occludin, and ZO-1 (P < 0.05). Further mechanism study showed that fatty acid oxidation (FAO) of vascular endothelial cells is involved in the protection of the BBB after IS, and GAD regulates FAO (P < 0.05) to protect BBB. In addition, we found the effect of GAD was stronger than that of Chinese ginseng (CG) (P < 0.05) and aconite (AC) (P < 0.01) alone. We concluded that GAD ameliorated the BBB dysfunction by regulating FAO involving vascular endothelial cells after IS. At the same time, the prescription is more effective than single traditional Chinese medicine.

Shenfu injection alleviate gut ischemia/reperfusion injury after severe hemorrhagic shock through improving intestinal microcirculation in rats

Background

Shenfu (SF) injection, a traditional Chinese medication, would improve microcirculation in cardiogenic shock and infectious shock. This study was aimed to explore the therapeutic potential of the SF injection in gut ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury after severe hemorrhagic shock (SHS) and resuscitation. Furthermore, we also investigated the optimal adm？ inistration timing.

Methods

Twenty-four male SD rats were randomly divided into four groups: Sham group (sham, n = 6), Control group (n = 6), SF injection group (SF, n = 6), and Delayed Shenfu injection administration group (SF-delay, n = 6). In SHS and resuscitation model, rats were induced by blood draw to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 ± 5 mmHg within 1 h and then maintained for 40 min; HR, MAP 'were recorded, microcirculation index [De Backer score, perfused small vessel density (PSVD), total vessel density (TVD), microcirculation flow index score (MFI), flow heterogeneity index (HI)] were analyzed. The blood gas index was detected, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), diamine oxidase (DAO), malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured by ELISA; ZO-1, and claudin-1 were measured by Western blotting. In addition, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and periodic acid schiff (PAS) staining pathological sections of the intestinal mucosal tissues were also performed.

Results

SF injection increased the MAP, relieved the metabolic acidosis degree associated with the hypoperfusion, and improved the intestinal microcirculatory density and perfusion quality after I/R injury. The expression of DAO, MDA in intestinal tissue, and plasma IL-6, TNF-α significantly decreased in the SF injection group compared to the control group. The concentration of ZO-1 and claudin-1 is also higher in the SF injection group. In addition, the HE and PAS staining results also showed that SF injection could decrease mucosal damage and maintain the structure. In the SF-delay group, the degree of intestinal tissue damage was intermediate between that of the control group and SF injection group.

Conclusions

SF injection protect the intestine from I/R injury induced by SHS and resuscitation, the mechanism of which might be through improving intestinal microcirculation, reducing the excessive release of inflammatory factors and increasing intestinal mucosal permeability. Furthermore, the protection effect is more pronounced if administration during the initial resuscitation phase.

Effects of fluids vs. vasopressors on spinal cord microperfusion in hemorrhagic shock induced ischemia/reperfusion

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion is a devastating complication of aortic repair. Despite developments for prevention and treatment of spinal cord injury, incidence is still considerably high majorly impacting patient outcome. Microcirculation is paramount for tissue perfusion and oxygen supply and often dissociated from macrohemodynamic parameters used to guide resuscitation. Effects of fluids vs. vasopressors in the setting of hemodynamic resuscitation on spinal cord microperfusion are unknown. Aim of this study was to compare the effects of vasopressor and fluid resuscitation on spinal cord microperfusion in a translational acute pig model of hemorrhagic shock induced ischemia/reperfusion injury.

METHODS

We designed this study as prospective randomized explorative large animal study. We induced hemorrhagic shock in 20 pigs as a model of global ischemia/reperfusion injury. We randomized animals to receive either fluid or vasopressor resuscitation. We measured spinal cord microperfusion using fluorescent microspheres as well as laser-Doppler probes. We monitored and analyzed macrohemodynamic parameters and cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

RESULTS

Spinal cord microperfusion decreased following hemorrhagic shock induced ischemia/reperfusion injury. Both fluids and vasopressors sufficiently restored spinal cord microperfusion. There were no important changes between groups (percentage changes compared to baseline: fluids 14.0 (0.31-27.6) vs. vasopressors 24.3 (8.12-40.4), p = .340). However, cerebrospinal fluid pressure was higher in animals receiving fluid resuscitation (percentage changes compared to baseline: fluids 27.7 (12.6-42.8) vs. vasopressors -5.56 ((-19.8)-8.72), p = .003). Microcirculatory resuscitation was in line with improvements of macrohemodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Both, fluids and vasopressors, equally restored spinal cord microperfusion in a porcine acute model of hemorrhagic shock induced ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, significant differences in cerebrospinal fluid pressure following resuscitation were present. Future studies should evaluate these effects in perfusion disruption induced ischemia/reperfusion conditions of microcirculatory deterioration.