A comparison between core exercises with Theraband and Swiss Ball in terms of core stabilization and balance performance

Effect of Swiss Ball Stabilization Training on Trunk Control, Abdominal Muscle Thickness, Balance, and Motor Skills of Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized, Superiority Trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of Swiss ball stabilization training (SBST) and stable surface stabilization training (SSST) on the trunk control, abdominal muscle thickness, balance, and motor skills of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CWSCP).

DESIGN

Single-blind, randomized superiority trial.

SETTING

General Community and Referral Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty CWSCP, aged 6-12 years, with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-III were randomly assigned to the SBST and SSST groups (N=30).

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomized to receive either SBST or SSST for 5 weeks, 3 days a week.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), abdominal muscle thickness, Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), standing and walking sections of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), and mobility section of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) were assessed.

RESULTS

After 5 weeks of the intervention and 9 weeks of follow-up, the SBST group showed statistically significant improvements in the TCMS, GMFM-88, PEDI, thickness of the internal oblique muscle at rest and contraction, and thickness of the transverse abdominis muscle at rest and contraction compared with the SSST group (P<.0001). Contrarily, the thickness of the external oblique muscle increased statistically significantly in the SSST group compared with the SBST group after 5 weeks of the intervention and 9 weeks of follow-up both at rest (P<.0001 and P=.0001, respectively) and contraction (P=.015 and P=.017, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding the PBS score after 5 weeks of intervention.

CONCLUSION

The SBST could improve the trunk control, balance, and motor skills of CWSCP and increase the thickness of local abdominal muscles. Also, SBST was more effective than SSST for CWSCP.

Effect of core training on athletic and skill performance of basketball players: A systematic review

A limited number of studies focus on the effect of core training on basketball players' athletic performance and skills. This systematic reviewaimed to comprehensively and critically review the available studies in the literature that investigate the impact of core training on basketball players' physical and skill performance, and then offer valuable recommendations for both coaches and researchers. Thedata collection, selection, and analysis adhered to the PRISMA protocol. English databases, including Ebscohost, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar,were searched until September 2022. A total of eight articles were included, with four studies comparing the effects of core training versus traditional strength training or usual basketball training. All studies investigated the impact of core training on athletic performance. The findings revealed that core training can help players improve their overall athletic and skill performance, particularly in the areas of strength, sprinting,jumping, balance, agility, shooting, dribbling, passing, rebounding, and stepping. In addition, core training, particularly on unstable surfaces,as well as combining static and dynamic core training,improvebasketball players' athletic and skill performance. Despite the relativelylittle evidence demonstrating the effect of core training on endurance, flexibility, and defensive skills, this review demonstrates that it should be incorporated into basketball training sessions.

Effects of stabilization exercises on disability, pain, and core stability in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many studies have emphasized the importance of stabilization exercises (SE) for the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), yet there is no study assessing all aspects of core stability in comparing SE and other exercises.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of SE on pain and core stability by using core stability tests that focus on all aspects of core stability in patients with NSLBP.

METHODS

Thirty-seven individuals with chronic NSLBP were randomly divided into two groups as SE and conventional exercises (CE). Both groups underwent the progressive exercise program three days per week for six weeks. The assessments were conducted before and after the exercise programs. The outcome measures included pain, disability, trunk strength, trunk flexor, extensor and lateral flexor endurance, function, flexibility, and motor control during eyes open/closed.

RESULTS

All assessment parameters except motor control during eyes open improved after SE (p < 0.05). Also, all assessment parameters except motor control during eyes open/closed and lateral trunk endurance improved after CE (p < 0.05). When comparing groups for gain scores, there were more significant improvements in pain during activity, endurance and function after SE (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SE is more effective than CE in reducing pain during activity and improving core stability regarding functionality and endurance.