Lower connectivity of tumor coexpression networks is not specific to cancer

A Novel Strategy to Identify Prognosis-Relevant Gene Sets in Cancers

Molecular prognosis markers hold promise for improved prediction of patient survival, and a pathway or gene set may add mechanistic interpretation to their prognostic prediction power. In this study, we demonstrated a novel strategy to identify prognosis-relevant gene sets in cancers. Our study consists of a first round of gene-level analyses and a second round of gene-set-level analyses, in which the Composite Gene Expression Score critically summarizes a surrogate expression value at gene set level and a permutation procedure is exerted to assess prognostic significance of gene sets. An optional differential coexpression module is appended to the two phases of survival analyses to corroborate and refine prognostic gene sets. Our strategy was demonstrated in 33 cancer types across 32,234 gene sets. We found oncogenic gene sets accounted for an increased proportion among the final gene sets, and genes involved in DNA replication and DNA repair have ubiquitous prognositic value for multiple cancer types. In summary, we carried out the largest gene set based prognosis study to date. Compared to previous similar studies, our approach offered multiple improvements in design and methodology implementation. Functionally relevant gene sets of ubiquitous prognostic significance in multiple cancer types were identified.

Conditional transcriptional relationships may serve as cancer prognostic markers

BACKGROUND

While most differential coexpression (DC) methods are bound to quantify a single correlation value for a gene pair across multiple samples, a newly devised approach under the name Correlation by Individual Level Product (CILP) revolutionarily projects the summary correlation value to individual product correlation values for separate samples. CILP greatly widened DC analysis opportunities by allowing integration of non-compromised statistical methods.

METHODS

Here, we performed a study to verify our hypothesis that conditional relationships, i.e., gene pairs of remarkable differential coexpression, may be sought as quantitative prognostic markers for human cancers. Alongside the seeking of prognostic gene links in a pan-cancer setting, we also examined whether a trend of global expression correlation loss appeared in a wide panel of cancer types and revisited the controversial subject of mutual relationship between the DE approach and the DC approach.

RESULTS

By integrating CILP with classical univariate survival analysis, we identified up to 244 conditional gene links as potential prognostic markers in five cancer types. In particular, five prognostic gene links for kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma tended to condense around cancer gene ESPL1, and the transcriptional synchrony between ESPL1 and PTTG1 tended to be elevated in patients of adverse prognosis. In addition, we extended the observation of global trend of correlation loss in more than ten cancer types and empirically proved DC analysis results were independent of gene differential expression in five cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the power of CILP and the classical survival analysis, we successfully fetched conditional transcriptional relationships that conferred prognosis power for five cancer types. Despite a general trend of global correlation loss in tumor transcriptomes, most of these prognosis conditional links demonstrated stronger expression correlation in tumors, and their stronger coexpression was associated with poor survival.

Network analysis with biological data of cancer patients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Network Analysis (NA) is a mathematical method that allows exploring relations between units and representing them as a graph. Although NA was initially related to social sciences, the past two decades was introduced in Bioinformatics. The recent growth of the networks' use in biological data analysis reveals the need to further investigate this area. In this work, we attempt to identify the use of NA with biological data, and specifically: (a) what types of data are used and whether they are integrated or not, (b) what is the purpose of this analysis, predictive or descriptive, and (c) the outcome of such analyses, specifically in cancer diseases.

METHODS & MATERIALS

The literature review was conducted on two databases, PubMed & IEEE, and was restricted to journal articles of the last decade (January 2010 - December 2019). At a first level, all articles were screened by title and abstract, and at a second level the screening was conducted by reading the full text article, following the predefined inclusion & exclusion criteria leading to 131 articles of interest. A table was created with the information of interest and was used for the classification of the articles. The articles were initially classified to analysis studies and studies that propose a new algorithm or methodology. Each one of these categories was further screened by the following clustering criteria: (a) data used, (b) study purpose, (c) study outcome. Specifically for the studies proposing a new algorithm, the novelty presented in each one was detected.

RESULTS

& Conclusions: In the past five years researchers are focusing on creating new algorithms and methodologies to enhance this field. The articles' classification revealed that only 25% of the analyses are integrating multi-omics data, although 50% of the new algorithms developed follow this integrative direction. Moreover, only 20% of the analyses and 10% of the newly developed methodologies have a predictive purpose. Regarding the result of the works reviewed, 75% of the studies focus on identifying, prognostic or not, gene signatures. Concluding, this review revealed the need for deploying predictive and multi-omics integrative algorithms and methodologies that can be used to enhance cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.

3'-UTR Shortening Contributes to Subtype-Specific Cancer Growth by Breaking Stable ceRNA Crosstalk of Housekeeping Genes

Shortening of 3'UTRs (3'US) through alternative polyadenylation is a post-transcriptional mechanism that regulates the expression of hundreds of genes in human cancers. In breast cancer, different subtypes of tumor samples, such as estrogen receptor positive and negative (ER+ and ER-), are characterized by distinct molecular mechanisms, suggesting possible differences in the post-transcriptional regulation between the subtype tumors. In this study, based on the profound tumorigenic role of 3'US interacting with competing-endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network (3'US-ceRNA effect), we hypothesize that the 3'US-ceRNA effect drives subtype-specific tumor growth. However, we found that the subtypes are available in different sample sizes, biasing the ceRNA network size and disabling the fair comparison of the 3'US-ceRNA effect. Using normalized Laplacian matrix eigenvalue distribution, we addressed this bias and built tumor ceRNA networks comparable between the subtypes. Based on the comparison, we identified a novel role of housekeeping (HK) genes as stable and strong miRNA sponges (sponge HK genes) that synchronize the ceRNA networks of normal samples (adjacent to ER+ and ER- tumor samples). We further found that distinct 3'US events in the ER- tumor break the stable sponge effect of HK genes in a subtype-specific fashion, especially in association with the aggressive and metastatic phenotypes. Knockdown of NUDT21 further suggested the role of 3'US-ceRNA effect in repressing HK genes for tumor growth. In this study, we identified 3'US-ceRNA effect on the sponge HK genes for subtype-specific growth of ER- tumors.