1
|
McMurray J, Levy A, Pang W, Holyoke P. Psychometric Evaluation of a Tablet-Based Tool to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e56883. [PMID: 38640480 PMCID: PMC11069099 DOI: 10.2196/56883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the rapid aging of the global population, the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia is anticipated to surge worldwide. MCI serves as an intermediary stage between normal aging and dementia, necessitating more sensitive and effective screening tools for early identification and intervention. The BrainFx SCREEN is a novel digital tool designed to assess cognitive impairment. This study evaluated its efficacy as a screening tool for MCI in primary care settings, particularly in the context of an aging population and the growing integration of digital health solutions. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to assess the validity, reliability, and applicability of the BrainFx SCREEN (hereafter, the SCREEN) for MCI screening in a primary care context. We conducted an exploratory study comparing the SCREEN with an established screening tool, the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen. METHODS A concurrent mixed methods, prospective study using a quasi-experimental design was conducted with 147 participants from 5 primary care Family Health Teams (FHTs; characterized by multidisciplinary practice and capitated funding) across southwestern Ontario, Canada. Participants included health care practitioners, patients, and FHT administrative executives. Individuals aged ≥55 years with no history of MCI or diagnosis of dementia rostered in a participating FHT were eligible to participate. Participants were screened using both the SCREEN and Qmci. The study also incorporated the Geriatric Anxiety Scale-10 to assess general anxiety levels at each cognitive screening. The SCREEN's scoring was compared against that of the Qmci and the clinical judgment of health care professionals. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability assessments. RESULTS The study found that the SCREEN's longer administration time and complex scoring algorithm, which is proprietary and unavailable for independent analysis, presented challenges. Its internal consistency, indicated by a Cronbach α of 0.63, was below the acceptable threshold. The test-retest reliability also showed limitations, with moderate intraclass correlation coefficient (0.54) and inadequate κ (0.15) values. Sensitivity and specificity were consistent (63.25% and 74.07%, respectively) between cross-tabulation and discrepant analysis. In addition, the study faced limitations due to its demographic skew (96/147, 65.3% female, well-educated participants), the absence of a comprehensive gold standard for MCI diagnosis, and financial constraints limiting the inclusion of confirmatory neuropsychological testing. CONCLUSIONS The SCREEN, in its current form, does not meet the necessary criteria for an optimal MCI screening tool in primary care settings, primarily due to its longer administration time and lower reliability. As the number of digital health technologies increases and evolves, further testing and refinement of tools such as the SCREEN are essential to ensure their efficacy and reliability in real-world clinical settings. This study advocates for continued research in this rapidly advancing field to better serve the aging population. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/25520.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine McMurray
- Lazaridis School of Business & Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada
- Health Studies, Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada
| | - AnneMarie Levy
- Lazaridis School of Business & Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada
| | - Wei Pang
- Lazaridis School of Business & Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada
- Biomedical Informatics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schein J, Houle CR, Urganus AL, Jones E, Pike J, Husbands J, Willey CJ. The Impact of Agitation in Dementia on Caregivers: A Real-World Survey. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 88:663-677. [PMID: 35694920 PMCID: PMC9398061 DOI: 10.3233/jad-215670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Dementia patients frequently depend on caregivers. Agitation is a common behavioral dementia symptom particularly burdensome to patients and caregivers. Objective: To assess the association of agitation severity with non-professional caregiver hours, burden, health status, and productivity. Secondarily, to assess the association of agitation severity with these outcomes for patients receiving remote (not living with the patient) and proximate (living with the patient) caregiving. Methods: A retrospective analysis of physician and non-professional caregiver-reported data from a US point-in-time survey. Patients were aged ≥50 years, with early cognitive impairment or dementia. Regression analyses compared outcomes by agitation severity; covariates included age, sex, and clinical characteristics. Results: Data were included for 1,349 patients (non-agitated n = 656, agitated n = 693; no care n = 305, remote care n = 248, proximate care n = 691; unknown care n = 105). Greater agitation was significantly associated (p < 0.05) in all caregivers with increasing: Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Caregiver Burden, Personal Strain, Role Strain, and Guilt; Work Productivity and Activity Index (WPAI) presenteeism, overall work impairment, and total activity impairment. Higher ZBI Total Caregiver Burden, Personal Strain, and Role Strain were associated with greater agitation in proximate caregivers and higher ZBI Guilt associated with greater agitation in remote caregivers (p < 0.05). Higher WPAI presenteeism and total activity impairment were associated (p < 0.05) with greater agitation in proximate caregivers. Caregiving hours increased with increasing agitation for proximate caregiving (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Greater agitation severity was associated with higher caregiver burden and lower productivity, with higher indirect costs a likely outcome of agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Schein
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia J. Willey
- Division of Health Outcomes, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones E, Aigbogun MS, Pike J, Berry M, Houle CR, Husbands J. Agitation in Dementia: Real-World Impact and Burden on Patients and the Healthcare System. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:89-101. [PMID: 34250934 PMCID: PMC8461728 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: At least 90%of patients with dementia experience behavioral or neuropsychiatric symptoms including agitation, psychotic symptoms, apathy, depression, and sleep disturbances. Agitation has been reported to be experienced by 60%of patients with mild cognitive impairment and 76%of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of agitation in patients with dementia on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of physician-reported patient data from a point-in-time survey. Patients included were aged≥50 years, with early cognitive impairment or dementia. Agitated and non-agitated patients were compared. Regression analyses assessed the relationship of agitation score (calculated from number/severity of agitation symptoms) with outcomes, with covariates including age and Mini-Mental State Examination score. Sensitivity analyses compared patients with 0 and≥2 agitation symptoms following propensity score matching on the base-case covariates. Results: Data were included for 1,349 patients (agitated, n = 693; non-agitated, n = 656). Based on regression analyses, agitation score was correlated with proportion of patients with professional caregivers (p < 0.01), institutionalized (p < 0.01), hospitalized in a psychiatric ward (p < 0.05), and receiving an antipsychotic/antidepressant (both p < 0.001); number of consultations with a healthcare professional (HCP), psychiatrist, or psycho-geriatrician; number and cost of hospitalizations (p < 0.01); cost of HCP consultations (p < 0.001); and total direct healthcare costs (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses generally supported the base-case analysis. Conclusion: Agitation in dementia is associated with increased HCRU and healthcare costs. Effective therapies are needed to address agitation in dementia, with the potential to alleviate patient impact, HCRU, and healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
4
|
McMurray J, Levy A, Holyoke P. Psychometric Evaluation and Workflow Integration Study of a Tablet-Based Tool to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e25520. [PMID: 34018966 PMCID: PMC8178737 DOI: 10.2196/25520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the rapid aging of the global population, experts anticipate a surge in the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia worldwide. It is argued that developing more sensitive, easy to administer, and valid MCI screening tools for use in primary care settings may initiate timely clinical and personal care planning and treatment, enabling early access to programs and services. Including functional competence measures in screening tests makes them more ecologically valid and may help to identify cognitive deficits at an earlier stage. OBJECTIVE We aim to conduct a preliminary evaluative study comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the BrainFx Screen (referred to as SCREEN hereafter), a novel digital tool designed to assess functional competence and detect early signs of cognitive impairment, with the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment, a validated and highly sensitive tool that detects MCI in the older adult population. We will also investigate the perceived usefulness and integration of the SCREEN into primary care practice to identify demonstrable impacts on clinical workflow and health care providers' (HCP) perceptions of its success as a screening tool. Patients' perceptions of completing the SCREEN and its impact on their quality of life will also be explored. METHODS This study has a concurrent, mixed methods, prospective, and quasi-experimental design. Participants will be recruited from 5 primary care family health teams (FHTs; defined by multidisciplinary practice and capitated funding) across southwestern Ontario, Canada. Participants will include HCPs, patients, care partners, and FHT administrative executives. Patients 55 years and older with no history of diagnoses for MCI, dementia, or Alzheimer disease rostered in one of the FHTs participating in the study will be eligible to participate. Their care partners will help triangulate the qualitative data collected from patients. Participating FHTs will identify an occupational therapist from their site to participate in the study; this HCP will both administer the research protocol and participate in semistructured in-depth interviews and questionnaires. Principal component analysis will be conducted on the SCREEN data to understand the test components better. Tests comparing sensitivity, specificity, and test-retest reliability will assess the validity of SCREEN as a screening tool for MCI. RESULTS This paper describes the study protocol and its activities to date. Data collection was halted early because of COVID-19 restrictions on research activity, and data analysis is currently in progress. CONCLUSIONS At the end of the project, we anticipate having an initial comparative evaluation of the SCREEN as a tool for early detection of MCI in primary care older adult patient populations. Resource constraints on this research study limit our ability to conduct a randomized controlled trial; however, the results will assist developers of the SCREEN in determining whether rigorous controlled testing is warranted. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/25520.
Collapse
|
5
|
Quantifying the diagnostic pathway for patients with cognitive impairment: real-world data from Australia. Int Psychogeriatr 2020; 32:601-610. [PMID: 31762429 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610219001856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rapid diagnosis of dementia is essential to ensure optimum patient care. This study used real-world data to quantify the dementia diagnostic pathway in Australia. DESIGN A real-world, cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients. SETTING Clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS Primary care or specialist physicians managing patients with cognitive impairment (CI). MEASUREMENTS Descriptive analyses focused on key events in the diagnostic pathway. Regression modeling compared the duration between first consultation and formal diagnosis with various factors. RESULTS Data for 600 patients were provided by 60 physicians. Mean time from initial symptoms to first consultation was 6.1 ± 4.4 months; 20% of patients had moderate or severe CI at first consultation. Mean time from first consultation to formal diagnosis was 4.0 ± 7.4 months (1.2 ± 3.6 months if not referred to a secondary physician, and 5.3 ± 8.3 months if referred). Time from first consultation to diagnosis was significantly associated with CI severity at first consultation; time was shorter with more severe CI. There was no association of disease severity and referral to a secondary physician; 69.5% of patients were referred, the majority (57.1%) to a geriatrician. The highest proportion of patients were diagnosed by geriatricians (47.4%). Some form of test or scale was used to aid diagnosis in 98.8% of patients. CONCLUSIONS A substantial number of Australians experience cognitive decline and behavioral changes some time before consulting a physician or being diagnosed with dementia. Increasing public awareness of the importance of early diagnosis is essential to improve the proportion of patients receiving comprehensive support prior to disease progression.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cummings J, Passmore P, McGuinness B, Mok V, Chen C, Engelborghs S, Woodward M, Manzano S, Garcia-Ribas G, Cappa S, Bertolucci P, Chu LW. Souvenaid in the management of mild cognitive impairment: an expert consensus opinion. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2019; 11:73. [PMID: 31421681 PMCID: PMC6698334 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0528-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among an aging global population is a growing challenge for healthcare providers and payers. In many cases, MCI is an ominous portent for dementia. Early and accurate diagnosis of MCI provides a window of opportunity to improve the outcomes using a personalized care plan including lifestyle modifications to reduce the impact of modifiable risk factors (for example, blood pressure control and increased physical activity), cognitive training, dietary advice, and nutritional support. Souvenaid is a once-daily drink containing a mixture of precursors and cofactors (long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, uridine, choline, B vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium), which was developed to support the formation and function of neuronal membranes and synapses. Healthcare providers, patients, and carers require expert advice about the use of Souvenaid. Methods An international panel of experts was convened to review the evidence and to make recommendations about the diagnosis and management of MCI, identification of candidates for Souvenaid, and use of Souvenaid in real-world practice. This article provides a summary of the expert opinions and makes recommendations for clinical practice and future research. Summary of opinion Early diagnosis of MCI requires the use of suitable neuropsychological tests combined with a careful clinical history. A multimodal approach is recommended; dietary and nutritional interventions should be considered alongside individualized lifestyle modifications. Although single-agent nutritional supplements have failed to produce cognitive benefits for patients with MCI, a broader nutritional approach warrants consideration. Evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that Souvenaid should be considered as an option for some patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including those with MCI due to AD (prodromal AD). Conclusion Early and accurate diagnosis of MCI provides a window of opportunity to improve the outcomes using a multimodal management approach including lifestyle risk factor modification and consideration of the multinutrient Souvenaid. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0528-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Cummings
- Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, UNLV; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
| | - Peter Passmore
- Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bernadette McGuinness
- Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Vincent Mok
- Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Center for Prevention of Dementia, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Centre, Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Christopher Chen
- Departments of Pharmacology and Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Centre for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, Centre for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael Woodward
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Stefano Cappa
- University School for Advanced Studies IUSS, Pavia and IRCCS Istituto Centro, S. Giovanni di Dio, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paulo Bertolucci
- Service of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Leung-Wing Chu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong and Hong Kong Brain Memory Centre, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Diagnostic Pathway From Cognitive Impairment to Dementia in Japan: Quantification Using Real-World Data. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2019; 33:346-353. [PMID: 31135457 DOI: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to quantify the diagnostic pathway from cognitive impairment (CI) to dementia in Japan. METHODS This was a real-world, cross-sectional survey of patients with CI and their physicians. RESULTS Data for 1107 patients were provided by 106 physicians. Mean time from initial symptoms to the first consultation was 7.4±6.9 months; 42% of patients had moderate/severe CI at first consultation. Mean time from the first consultation to formal diagnosis was 2.9±11.0 months (1.9±8.8 mo if not referred to a secondary physician, and 5.1±14.6 mo if referred). Time from the first consultation to diagnosis was shorter with more severe CI at first consultation (P=0.0072). The highest proportion of patients were diagnosed by neurologists (45.8%). Tests or scales were used to aid diagnosis in 81.2% of patients. There was no association of disease severity and referral to a secondary physician; 30.9% of patients were referred, the majority (57.7%) to a neurologist. CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of patients with dementia in Japan experience CI for some time before consulting a physician. Government policy to increase public understanding and awareness of dementia, and a proposed dementia screening system, should increase the proportion of individuals consulting physicians before disease progression.
Collapse
|