1
|
Erickson CM, Chin NA, Johnson SC, Gleason CE, Clark LR. Disclosure of preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: Why, how, and what we still need to know. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 13:e12150. [PMID: 33665341 PMCID: PMC7896633 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Disclosure of personal disease-related information to asymptomatic adults has been debated over the last century in medicine and research. Recently, Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been conceptualized as a continuum that begins with a "preclinical" stage in which biomarkers are present in the absence of cognitive impairment. Studies have begun assessing the safety, psychological, and behavioral effects of disclosing both AD-related genetic and biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired older adults. Yet, debate continues over the appropriate circumstances and methods for returning such information. This article outlines concerns with and rationale for AD biomarker disclosure and summarizes findings from prior studies. Overall, this article aims to describe and respond to key questions concerning disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography scan results to asymptomatic adults in a research setting. Moving forward, such conditions are important to consider as interventions target the preclinical phase of AD and normalize disclosing biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire M. Erickson
- Neuroscience & Public Policy ProgramUniversity of Wisconsin‐Madison School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Nathaniel A. Chin
- Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Sterling C. Johnson
- Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans HospitalMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Carey E. Gleason
- Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans HospitalMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Lindsay R. Clark
- Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonWisconsinUSA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans HospitalMadisonWisconsinUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schicktanz S, Perry J, Herten B, Stock Gissendanner S. [Dementia prediction as an ethical challenge: stakeholders demand counselling standards for Germany]. DER NERVENARZT 2021; 92:66-68. [PMID: 32857230 PMCID: PMC7808989 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-020-00985-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Schicktanz
- Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland.
| | - Julia Perry
- Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Benjamin Herten
- IEGUS - Institut für europäische Gesundheits- und Sozialwirtschaft, Gesundheitscampus-Süd 29, Bochum, 44801, Deutschland
| | - Scott Stock Gissendanner
- Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, Göttingen, 37073, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Dementia poses important medical and societal challenges, and of all health risks people face in life, dementia is one of the most feared. Recent research indicates that up to about 40% of all cases of dementia might be preventable. A series of environmental, social, and medical risk-factors have been identified that should be targeted from midlife onwards when people are still cognitively healthy. At first glance, this seems not merely advisable, but even imperative. However, these new developments trigger a series of new ethical questions and concerns which have hardly been addressed to date. Pro-active ethical reflection, however, is crucial to ensure that the interests and well-being of those affected, ultimately all of us, are adequately respected. This is the goal of the current contribution. Against the background of a concrete case in primary dementia prevention, it provides a systematic overview of the current ethical literature and sketches an ethical research agenda. First, possible benefits of increased well-being must be balanced with the burdens of being engaged in particularly long-term interventions for which it is unclear whether they will ever pay out on a personal level. Second, while knowledge about one's options to maintain brain health might empower people, it might also undermine autonomy, put high social pressure on people, medicalize healthy adults, and stigmatize those who still develop dementia. Third, while synergistic effects might occur, the ideals of dementia prevention might also conflict with other health and non-health related values people hold in life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Horstkötter
- MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kay Deckers
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Advances in personal genomics have made predictive genetic testing increasingly popular. The purpose of this review is to examine and summarize recent literature regarding the ethical concerns and considerations surrounding genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease. RECENT FINDINGS Four basic bioethical principles can be applied in the context of genetic testing: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. The concepts of clinical validity, clinical utility and personal utility are also necessary for the ethical deliberation of genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease. Ethical considerations can differ among three distinct settings present in the literature: research, clinical and direct-to-consumer services. Studies have found that the negative psychosocial impact of genetic test results on the individual is limited, but emphasize the importance of pre/posttesting genetic counselling. SUMMARY The literature should ideally inform policy-making around genetic testing. There exists an urgent need for regulation, particularly in the direct-to-consumer (DTC) market, since interest for testing in this context is rapidly growing. Standardized protocols for disclosure should be developed, and there is a need to find ways to meet the growing need for genetic counselling. Importantly, comprehensive, evidence-based regulation requires that research be conducted in different contexts with more diverse participants.
Collapse
|
5
|
Isaacson RS, Ganzer CA, Hristov H, Hackett K, Caesar E, Cohen R, Kachko R, Meléndez-Cabrero J, Rahman A, Scheyer O, Hwang MJ, Berkowitz C, Hendrix S, Mureb M, Schelke MW, Mosconi L, Seifan A, Krikorian R. The clinical practice of risk reduction for Alzheimer's disease: A precision medicine approach. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:1663-1673. [PMID: 30446421 PMCID: PMC6373477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Like virtually all age-related chronic diseases, late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) develops over an extended preclinical period and is associated with modifiable lifestyle and environmental factors. We hypothesize that multimodal interventions that address many risk factors simultaneously and are individually tailored to patients may help reduce AD risk. We describe a novel clinical methodology used to evaluate and treat patients at two Alzheimer's Prevention Clinics. The framework applies evidence-based principles of clinical precision medicine to tailor individualized recommendations, follow patients longitudinally to continually refine the interventions, and evaluate N-of-1 effectiveness (trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03687710). Prior preliminary results suggest that the clinical practice of AD risk reduction is feasible, with measurable improvements in cognition and biomarkers of AD risk. We propose using these early findings as a foundation to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of personalized risk management within an international network of clinician researchers in a cohort study possibly leading to a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S Isaacson
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Christine A Ganzer
- School of Nursing, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hollie Hristov
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Randy Cohen
- Department of Cardiology, Crystal Run Healthcare, Middletown, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Aneela Rahman
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivia Scheyer
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Monica Mureb
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew W Schelke
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Mosconi
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Robert Krikorian
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berkowitz CL, Mosconi L, Scheyer O, Rahman A, Hristov H, Isaacson RS. Precision Medicine for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention. Healthcare (Basel) 2018; 6:healthcare6030082. [PMID: 30011822 PMCID: PMC6164450 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6030082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine is an approach to medical treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle and allows for personalization that is based on factors that may affect the response to treatment. Several genetic and epigenetic risk factors have been shown to increase susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). As such, it may be beneficial to integrate genetic risk factors into the AD prevention approach, which in the past has primarily been focused on universal risk-reduction strategies for the general population rather than individualized interventions in a targeted fashion. This review discusses examples of a "one-size-fits-all" versus clinical precision medicine AD prevention strategy, in which the precision medicine approach considers two genes that can be commercially sequenced for polymorphisms associated with AD, apolipoprotein E (APOE), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Comparing these two distinct approaches provides support for a clinical precision medicine prevention strategy, which may ultimately lead to more favorable patient outcomes as the interventions are targeted to address individualized risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Berkowitz
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Lisa Mosconi
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Olivia Scheyer
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Aneela Rahman
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Hollie Hristov
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Richard S Isaacson
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|