Long Term Response to Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease

[Tremor-dominant form of Parkinson's disease]

The article is of a review nature and is devoted to tremor, one of the maladaptive and difficult-to-treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Along with the classic rest tremor, patients with PD may experience tremor of other modalities: postural tremor, kinetic tremor, which reflects a multimodal mechanism of tremor formation involving multiple neurotransmitter systems. The unpredictable response to therapeutic options, the ambiguous response to levodopa, also reflects the role of multiple underlying pathophysiological processes. Among the drug methods of tremor correction, preference is given to dopamine receptor agonists - due to the spectrum of their pharmaceutical action, high efficiency in relation to all leading motor and a number of non-motor manifestations. The evidence for advanced neurosurgical, non-invasive modalities is mixed, and there are insufficient comparative studies to assess their efficacy in patients with tremor-dominant forms of PD.

Response to levodopa in Parkinson's disease over time. A 4-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A good response to levodopa is a key factor to indicate device-aided therapies in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). The aim of the present study was to analyze the response to levodopa in PwPD with motor fluctuations followed for 4 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PwPD with motor fluctuations recruited from January 2016 to November 2017 from the COPPADIS cohort and assessed annually (from baseline to 4-year follow-up) during the OFF and ON states were included in this analysis. At each visit, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - part III (UPDRS-III) was applied during the OFF state (without medication during the last 12 h) and during the ON state. General linear model repeated measures were used to test for changes in the mean UPDRS-III-OFF, UPDRS-III-ON, and ΔUPDRS-III (UPDRS-III-OFF - UPDRS-III-ON) between visits. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was included as covariate.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (63.94 ± 8.42 years old; 68.3% males) were included. Mean disease duration was 7.81 ± 3.64 years. From baseline to 4-year follow-up visit, a significant increase in both the UPDRS-III-OFF (from 27.98 ± 9.58 to 31.75 ± 12.39; p = 0.003) and the UPDRS-III-ON (from 15.92 ± 7.93 to 18.84 ± 8.17; p = 0.006) was observed despite the significant increase in the LEDD (from 896.35 ± 355.65 to 1085.51 ± 488.29; p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were detected between visits in the ΔUPDRS-III.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of PwPD with motor fluctuations, the response to levodopa did not weaken after a 4-year follow-up.

Effect of Carbidopa Dose on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics With and Without Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Inhibition in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is still symptomatic since disease-modifying treatments for PD are not available. Oral levodopa is the gold standard for the treatment of PD motor symptoms. However, incomplete and fluctuating plasma exposure of levodopa leads to suboptimal treatment of the symptoms. The main objective of this study was to investigate to what extent increased carbidopa doses (50 and 100 mg) increase the plasma levels of 100-mg immediate-release (IR) levodopa compared to a 25-mg carbidopa dose with and without co-administration of 200 mg entacapone.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, phase I, pharmacokinetic study with 25 healthy volunteers was conducted. In addition, a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model was built to theoretically evaluate the effect of inhibiting aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) mediated metabolism of levodopa on the exposure of levodopa.

RESULTS

The effect of increased carbidopa doses 50 and 100 mg on the total exposure (AUC) of 100 mg IR levodopa was +29% and +36%, respectively, when entacapone was co-administered. Without entacapone, the corresponding increases were +13% and +17%. With entacapone co-administration, the increased carbidopa dose also clearly increased levodopa trough concentration. There was no significant effect on the peak concentrations of levodopa.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing carbidopa doses significantly increased the exposure and reduced the fluctuation of IR levodopa in plasma during simultaneous COMT inhibition with entacapone. Theoretical pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that the plasma profile of oral IR levodopa can be even further improved by optimizing AADC and COMT inhibition.

Tremor in Parkinson's Disease: From Pathophysiology to Advanced Therapies

Background

Tremor is one of the most prevalent symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD). The progression and management of tremor in PD can be challenging, as response to dopaminergic agents might be relatively poor, particularly in patients with tremor-dominant PD compared to the akinetic/rigid subtype. In this review, we aim to highlight recent advances in the underlying pathogenesis and treatment modalities for tremor in PD.

Methods

A structured literature search through Embase was conducted using the terms "Parkinson's Disease" AND "tremor" OR "etiology" OR "management" OR "drug resistance" OR "therapy" OR "rehabilitation" OR "surgery." After initial screening, eligible articles were selected with a focus on published literature in the last 10 years.

Discussion

The underlying pathophysiology of tremor in PD remains complex and incompletely understood. Neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the retrorubral area, in addition to high-power neural oscillations in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia, play a major role. Levodopa is the first-line therapeutic option for all motor symptoms, including tremor. The addition of dopamine agonists or anticholinergics can lead to further tremor reduction. Botulinum toxin injection is an effective alternative for patients with pharmacological-resistant tremor who are not seeking advanced therapies. Deep brain stimulation is the most well-established advanced therapy owing to its long-term efficacy, reversibility, and effectiveness in other motor symptoms and fluctuations. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound is a promising modality, which has the advantage of being incisionless. Cortical and peripheral electrical stimulation are non-invasive innovatory techniques that have demonstrated good efficacy in suppressing intractable tremor.

Mechanisms of peripheral levodopa resistance in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an increasingly common neurodegenerative condition. The disease has a significant negative impact on quality of life, but a personalized management approach can help reduce disability. Pharmacotherapy with levodopa remains the cornerstone of treatment, and a gratifying and sustained response to this treatment is a supportive criterion that argues in favor of an underlying diagnosis of PD. Yet, in daily practice, it is not uncommon to encounter patients who appear to have true PD, but who nevertheless seem to lose the responsiveness to levodopa (secondary non-responders). Some patients may even fail to respond altogether (primary non-responders). Here, we address how two mechanisms of “peripheral resistance” may underlie this failing response to levodopa in persons with PD. The first explanation relates to impaired bowel motility leading to secondary bacterial overgrowth, and more specifically, to the excessive bacterial production of the enzyme tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC). This enzyme may convert levodopa to dopamine in the gut, thereby hampering entry into the circulation and, subsequently, into the brain. The second explanation relates to the systemic induction of the enzyme aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), leading to premature conversion of levodopa into dopamine, again limiting the bioavailability within the brain. We discuss these two mechanisms and focus on the clinical implications, potential treatments and directions for future research.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pramipexole and levodopa vs levodopa monotherapy in patients with Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pramipexole (P) or levodopa (L) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic method for Parkinson disease (PD) in many clinical studies. Nonetheless, the combined effects of 2 drugs for PD patients are not completely understood.The aim of this research was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of P plus L (P+L) combination therapy in the treatment of PD compared to that of L monotherapy, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of P+L for PD published up to April, 2020 were retrieved. Standardized mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was measured with the I2 test. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The outcomes of interest were as follows: the efficacy, unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores, Hamilton depression rating scale score or adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs with 2171 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of P+L combination therapy was significantly better than L monotherapy (9 trials; OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.78 to 6.64, P < .00001). Compared with L monotherapy, the pooled effects of P+L combination therapy on UPDRS score were (22 trials; SMD -1.31, 95% CI -1.57 to -1.04, P < .00001) for motor UPDRS score, (16 trials; SMD -1.26, 95% CI -1.49 to -1.03, P < .00001) for activities of daily living UPDRS score, (12 trials; SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.77, P < .00001) for mental UPDRS score, (10 trials; SMD -1.54, 95% CI -1.93 to -1.15, P < .00001) for complication UPDRS score. The Hamilton depression rating scale score showed significant decrease in the P+L combination therapy compared to L monotherapy (12 trials; SMD -1.56, 95% CI -1.90 to -1.22, P < .00001). In contrast to L monotherapy, P+L combination therapy reduced the number of any adverse events obviously in PD patients (16 trials; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.50, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

P+L combination therapy is superior to L monotherapy for improvement of clinical symptoms in PD patients. Moreover, the safety profile of P+L combination therapy is better than that of L monotherapy. Further well-designed, multicenter RCTs needed to identify these findings.

Nrf2 as a potential target for Parkinson's disease therapy

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder featuring both motor and nonmotor symptoms associated with a progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Conventionally, PD treatment options have focused on dopamine replacement and provide only symptomatic relief. However, disease-modifying therapies are still unavailable. Mechanistically, genetic and environmental factors can produce oxidative stress which has been implicated as a core contributor to the initiation and progression of PD through the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Importantly, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is essential for maintaining redox homeostasis by binding to the antioxidant response element which exists in the promoter regions of most genes coding for antioxidant enzymes. Furthermore, protein kinase C, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase have been implicated in the regulation of Nrf2 activity during PD. Here, we review the evidence supporting the regulation of Nrf2 through Keap1-dependent and Keap1-independent mechanisms. We also address that targeting Nrf2 may provide a therapeutic option to mitigate oxidative stress-associated PD. Finally, we discuss currently known classes of small molecule activators of Nrf2, including Nrf2-activating compounds in PD.

Role of Genes and Treatments for Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that mainly results due to the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain. It is well known that dopamine is synthesized in substantia nigra and is transported to the striatumvianigrostriatal tract. Besides the sporadic forms of PD, there are also familial cases of PD and number of genes (both autosomal dominant as well as recessive) are responsible for PD. There is no permanent cure for PD and to date, L-dopa therapy is considered to be the best option besides having dopamine agonists. In the present review, we have described the genes responsible for PD, the role of dopamine, and treatment strategies adopted for controlling the progression of PD in humans.