A European Observational Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Effectiveness of Safinamide in Routine Clinical Practice: The SYNAPSES Trial

The state of the art in secondary pharmacology and its impact on the safety of new medicines

Secondary pharmacology screening of investigational small-molecule drugs for potentially adverse off-target activities has become standard practice in pharmaceutical research and development, and regulatory agencies are increasingly requesting data on activity against targets with recognized adverse effect relationships. However, the screening strategies and target panels used by pharmaceutical companies may vary substantially. To help identify commonalities and differences, as well as to highlight opportunities for further optimization of secondary pharmacology assessment, we conducted a broad-ranging survey across 18 companies under the auspices of the DruSafe leadership group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development. Based on our analysis of this survey and discussions and additional research within the group, we present here an overview of the current state of the art in secondary pharmacology screening. We discuss best practices, including additional safety-associated targets not covered by most current screening panels, and present approaches for interpreting and reporting off-target activities. We also provide an assessment of the safety impact of secondary pharmacology screening, and a perspective on opportunities and challenges in this rapidly developing field.

Real-world use of Safinamide in motor fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Safinamide is a recent antiparkinsonian drug that modulates both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems with positive effects on motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of safinamide in the Italian PD patients in real-life conditions.

METHODS

We performed a sub-analysis of the Italian cohort of the SYNAPSES study, a multi-country, multi-center, retrospective-prospective cohort observational study, designed to investigate the use of safinamide in routine clinical practice. Patients received for the first time a treatment with safinamide and were followed up for 12 months. The analysis was conducted on the overall population and in subgroups of interest: i) patients > 75 years, ii) patients with relevant comorbidities and iii) patients affected by psychiatric symptoms.

RESULTS

Italy enrolled 616/1610 patients in 52 centers, accounting for 38% of the entire SYNAPSES cohort. Of the patients enrolled, 86.0% were evaluable at 12 months, with 23.3% being > 75 years, 42.4% with psychiatric conditions and 67.7% with relevant comorbidities. Safinamide was effective on motor symptoms and fluctuations as measured through the Unified PD rating scale III and IV scores, and on the total score, without safety issues in none of the subgroups considered.

CONCLUSION

The SYNAPSES data related to Italian patients confirms the good safety profile of safinamide even in special groups of patients. Motor fluctuations and motor impairment improved at the follow-up suggesting the significant role of safinamide in managing motor symptoms in PD patients.

Type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitors in neurological diseases: clinical applications based on preclinical findings

Type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitors, encompassing selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, are available to treat Parkinson's disease. These drugs ameliorate motor symptoms and improve motor fluctuation in the advanced stages of the disease. There is also evidence supporting the benefit of type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitors on non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, such as mood deflection, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, and fatigue. Preclinical studies indicate that type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitors hold a strong neuroprotective potential in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases for reducing oxidative stress and stimulating the production and release of neurotrophic factors, particularly glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, which support dopaminergic neurons. Besides, safinamide may interfere with neurodegenerative mechanisms, counteracting excessive glutamate overdrive in basal ganglia motor circuit and reducing death from excitotoxicity. Due to the dual mechanism of action, the new generation of type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitors, including safinamide, is gaining interest in other neurological pathologies, and many supporting preclinical studies are now available. The potential fields of application concern epilepsy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, and above all, ischemic brain injury. The purpose of this review is to investigate the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide in Parkinson's disease and beyond, focusing on possible future therapeutic applications.

Setting the clinical context to non-motor symptoms reflected by Park-pain, Park-sleep, and Park-autonomic subtypes of Parkinson's disease

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson's disease (PD) are well described in both clinical practice and the literature, enabling their management and enhancing our understanding of PD. NMS can dominate the clinical pictures and NMS subtypes have recently been proposed, initially based on clinical observations, and later confirmed in data driven analyses of large datasets and in biomarker-based studies. In this chapter, we provide an update on what is known about three common subtypes of NMS in PD. The pain (Park-pain), sleep dysfunction (Park-sleep), and autonomic dysfunction (Park-autonomic), providing an overview of their individual classification, clinical manifestation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and potential treatments.

Real world data of a German Parkinson's disease population: effectiveness and safety of safinamide in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a common progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to an imbalance of various neurotransmitters and affects cognitive, motor and non-motor function. Safinamide inhibits monoamine oxidase B in a highly selective and reversible manner and beyond that has anti-glutamatergic properties, with positive effects on motor and non-motor symptoms. The aim of the study was to obtain data about the effectiveness and tolerability of safinamide under routine clinical practice conditions in unselected patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of the German cohort of the European SYNAPSES study (a non-interventional cohort study). Patients were treated with safinamide as an add-on to levodopa and followed-up for 12 months. Analyses were done in the total cohort and in clinically relevant subgroups (patients older than 75 years; with relevant comorbidities; with psychiatric conditions).

RESULTS

181 PD patients were eligible for analysis. Motor symptoms included bradykinesia (76.8%), rigidity (77.3%), tremor (58.6%), and postural instability (27.1%). Non-motor symptoms were reported in 161 patients (89.0%), mainly psychiatric symptoms (43.1%), sleep disorders (35.9%), fatigue (30.9%), and pain (27.6%). 28.7% of patients were aged 75 years or older, 84.5% had relevant comorbidities, and 38.1% had psychiatric conditions. During treatment, the rate of motor complications decreased from 100.0% to 71.1%. UPDRS scores improved under safinamide, with a clinically important effect in 50% in the total score and 45% in the motor score. The positive effect on motor complications occurred already at the 4-month visit and was maintained over 12 months. At least one adverse event (AE)/adverse drug reaction (ADR) was reported by 62.4%/25.4% of patients, AEs were generally mild or moderate, and completely resolved. Only 5 (1.5%) AEs had a definite relationship to safinamide.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit-risk profile of safinamide was favourable and consistent with the total cohort of the SYNAPSES study. In the subgroups, findings were congruent with the total population, which allows the clinical utilisation of safinamide also in more vulnerable patient groups.

Impact of GAMP 5, data integrity and QbD on quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry: How obvious is it?

In the pharmaceutical industry, it is essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of medicinal products. Therefore a robust quality assurance framework is needed. This manuscript examines the impact of GAMP 5 and data integrity (DI) on quality assurance, while also highlighting the role of quality by design (QbD) principles. GAMP 5 is a widely used framework for validating automated systems that establishes quality assurance practices. DI guarantees the reliability of data collected throughout various stages of drug development. The integration of QbD principles promotes a systematic approach to development that emphasizes a deep understanding of critical quality attributes, risk management, and continuous improvement. With their implementation, organizations are able to meet regulatory requirements and provide safe medications to patients worldwide.

Effectiveness and safety of safinamide in the Toledo Movement Disorders Unit

INTRODUCTION

The management of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD) can be challenging, and current therapeutic options include the use of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-B inhibitors), among others. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of safinamide in the clinical practice carried out in the Toledo Movement Disorders Unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study in which data were collected at baseline and at six months from PD patients who were started on safinamide as an add-on therapy with a stable dose of levodopa in line with standard clinical practice. An analysis was performed by subgroups: patients who were given low-dose safinamide and patients who previously received rasagiline.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (47 previously received rasagiline) completed the six-month follow-up. A statistically significant decrease in morning akinesia, nocturnal akinesia, wearing off, unpredictable off phenomenon and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III was observed both in those who previously received rasagiline and in those treated with low doses of safinamide. No variation was found in the dyskinesias. The adverse events described were mild, with generalised weakness, dizziness, nausea, headache and alopecia.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide has been shown to be effective and safe in improving motor fluctuations, motor symptoms and the subjective perception of disease severity in PD patients previously receiving rasagiline and in those receiving low-dose safinamide, all of which is accompanied by a good safety profile.

SYNAPSES. A European observational study to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of safinamide in routine clinical practice: post-hoc analysis of the Spanish study population

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive age-related neurodegenerative condition requiring new therapeutic alternatives. Safinamide, a novel levodopa add-on therapy, positively affects disease fluctuations by modulating both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. To further investigate the use of safinamide in European routine clinical practice, the present post-hoc analysis aimed to understand safinamide's safety profile within the Spanish study population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred eleven Spanish patients with PD were evaluated at baseline, four (±1), eight (±1), and 12 (±1) months after initiating safinamide treatment. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score and UPDRS part III score during on time were used to measure the overall severity of PD and motor complications, respectively, while the severity of adverse events was evaluated following the investigators' criteria.

RESULTS

Safinamide showed a favourable safety profile within the Spanish study population, although prescription to patients with psychiatric conditions and off-label use were more frequent than in the European study population. In Spain, clinically meaningful improvements were observed in UPDRS scores when safinamide was used as the only add-on therapy to levodopa (57.4% and 53.7% of patients) and when switching from rasagiline (55.1% of patients). Motor complications were reduced from 83.2% to 63.3% after the study period. Increased safety concerns were undetected in any patient subgroup, although patients with cognitive impairment showed a slightly higher frequency of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This subanalysis further supports safinamide use as a safe and efficacious option for the management of motor fluctuations in different subgroups of levodopa-treated patients. However, safinamide should be used with caution in patients with cognitive impairment.

Impact of Safinamide on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative condition due to the degeneration of nigral dopaminergic cells. Both motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS) of PD produce a marked impairment in PD patients' quality of life (QoL), but contrary to motor features, NMS do not improve with dopamine replacement. Novel therapeutic interventions for PD have successfully controlled most motor manifestations of PD, but the management of NMS is still challenging. Since NMS have a negative impact on the QoL of PD patients, researchers are currently looking for drugs that can modulate the activity of neurotransmitter systems other than dopamine in the hope that can alleviate NMS in PD. Among the recently approved drugs for patients experiencing fluctuations in motor symptoms, safinamide stands out as an effective add-on therapy to levodopa. Safinamide is a monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitor (MAOB-I), with proven efficacy in reducing motor fluctuations. Its distinctive mechanism of action impacts dopaminergic pathways via MAOB inhibition and glutamatergic pathways by blocking sodium and calcium channels. Findings from Phase III clinical trials, meta-analysis, post-hoc analysis, and real-life experiences indicate that safinamide benefits motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and gait. Additionally, it shows promise for improving NMS like fatigue, pain, mood, and sleep disturbances in patients with PD.

Areas Covered

In this article, the authors explore the impact of safinamide on patient-reported outcomes in PD. A thorough search was conducted on PubMed focusing on studies published between 2018 and 2023 in English. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews. The search strategy revolved around the implementation of MeSH terms related to safinamide and its impact on the quality of life in PD.

Conclusion

Our data strongly support the improving effect on QoL, reducing the disabling NMS reported in patients with PD.

Clinical benefit of MAO-B and COMT inhibition in Parkinson's disease: practical considerations

Inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) are major strategies to reduce levodopa degradation and thus to increase and prolong its effect in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in Parkinson's disease patients. While selegiline/rasagiline and tolcapone/entacapone have been available on the market for more than one decade, safinamide and opicapone have been approved in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Meanwhile, comprehensive data from several post-authorization studies have described the use and specific characteristics of the individual substances in clinical practice under real-life conditions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on both medication classes, with a focus on the added clinical value in Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we outline practical considerations in the treatment of motor fluctuations and provide an outlook on ongoing studies with MAO-B and COMT inhibitors.

Monoamine-oxidase Type B Inhibitors and Cognitive Functions in Parkinson's Disease: Beyond the Primary Mechanism of Action

Symptoms of cognitive impairment are rather common since the early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD); they aggravate with disease progression and may lead to dementia in a significant proportion of cases. Worsening of cognitive symptoms in PD patients depends on the progression of subcortical dopaminergic damage as well as the involvement of other brain neurotransmitter systems in cortical and subcortical regions. Beyond the negative impact on disability and quality of life, the presence and severity of cognitive symptoms may limit adjustments of dopamine replacement therapy along the disease course. This review focuses on the consequences of the administration of monoamine-oxidase type Binhibitors (MAOB-I) on cognition in PD patients. Two drugs (selegiline and rasagiline) are available for the treatment of motor symptoms of PD as monotherapy or in combination with L-DOPA or dopamine agonists in stable and fluctuating patients; a further drug (safinamide) is usable in fluctuating subjects solely. The results of available studies indicate differential effects according to disease stage and drug features. In early, non-fluctuating patients, selegiline and rasagiline ameliorated prefrontal executive functions, similarly to other dopaminergic drugs. Benefit on some executive functions was maintained in more advanced, fluctuating patients, despite the tendency of worsening prefrontal inhibitory control activity. Interestingly, high-dose safinamide improved inhibitory control in fluctuating patients. The benefit of high-dose safinamide on prefrontal inhibitory control mechanisms may stem from its dual mechanism of action, allowing reduction of excessive glutamatergic transmission, in turn secondary to increased cortical dopaminergic input.

[Effect of safinamide on morning-off phenomenon in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease]

AIM

Morning-off is a symptom experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), which markedly reduces patients' quality of life. The present study evaluated the effect of safinamide on morning-off in elderly PD patients.

METHODS

This observational study included 30 PD patients treated with 50 or 100 mg/day of safinamide in the evening. Using patient-reported outcomes, we evaluated the effect of safinamide on daily/morning ON-time, daily/morning OFF-time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III score, and non-motor symptoms. Data at baseline (treatment start) and at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after baseline were recorded.

RESULTS

The PD patients (75.8±7.5 years old) in this study, who tended to be older than in previous phase 2/3 or 3 studies, may represent real-world Japanese PD patients. Compared with baseline, safinamide significantly increased the daily ON-time at eight weeks and morning ON-time at four weeks. Safinamide significantly reduced the daily OFF-time and morning OFF-time at four weeks. The UPDRS Part III score was significantly reduced by 1 point at 12 weeks. Safinamide showed a tendency to reduce non-motor symptoms, such as anxiety, pain, and depressive feelings. There was no marked difference in these parameters between patients treated with 50 and 100 mg of safinamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that safinamide administered in the evening can benefit elderly patients who experience wearing off, especially morning off, and non-motor symptoms.

Pharmacological management of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms: update and recommendations from an expert

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative multisystemic disorder that affects approximately 1% of the population over 55 years old, with the mean age of onset at 60 years old, and the prevalence of the disease constantly growing.

DEVELOPMENT

PD is a progressive disease characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms that compromise patients' daily activities. It has a variable profile of onset and clinical evolution. Although currently available treatments have failed to clinically demonstrate neuroprotective properties, most motor symptoms are acceptably managed with dopaminergic medication. More than 50 years after launching levodopa, it remains the most effective treatment of motor symptoms in PD, able to provide sustained benefit throughout the entire course of the disease. Nevertheless, after two to three years of treatment, certain fluctuations start to appear in motor and non-motor responses to different doses of levodopa. Early identification and treatment of these fluctuations have a strong positive impact on the quality of life of the patient. Frequently accompanied by involuntary movements, proper control of fluctuations requires periodical adjustments of the medication and expert supplementation with dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic adjuvants.

CONCLUSIONS

The main purpose of this work is to offer a practical, updated guideline for neurologists regarding the use of dopaminergic agents from the initial stages of PD. Special emphasis is placed on the critical period after the end of the 'honeymoon' phase when variations in the symptomatology presented by each patient appear, forcing re-adjustment of the medication to fit their individual needs.

Effectiveness and safety of safinamide in routine clinical practice in a Belgian Parkinson's disease population: an open-label, levodopa add-on study

BACKGROUND

Safinamide is a recent multimodal antiparkinsonian drug that inhibits monoamine oxidase B and modulates the glutamatergic system with positive effects on motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). This post-hoc analysis of the European SYNAPSES study provides first-time data on the use of safinamide in routine clinical practice in Belgium.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the efficacy and safety of safinamide in Belgian PD patients in real-life conditions.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of the Belgian cohort from the European SYNAPSES trial, which was an observational, multicenter, retrospective-prospective cohort study. Patients were followed up to 12 months. Analyses were performed in the overall population and according to different criteria such as the age limit (> 75 years), presence or absence of relevant comorbidities, presence or absence of psychiatric conditions such as depression and anxiety, patients on levodopa monotherapy or levodopa in combination with other treatments, patients on rasagiline before inclusion or not.

RESULTS

Of the 172 patients included, 29.2% were > 75 years, 58.9% had relevant comorbidities and 32.7% had psychiatric conditions. Almost all the patients reported motor (98.8%) or non-motor (86.3%) symptoms. During the study, 36.3% of patients reported drug-related reactions. The adverse drug reactions were those already described in the patients' information leaflet. The majority were mild or moderate and completely resolved and no differences were detected between the subgroups of patients. Almost 35% of the patients demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in the UPDRS and 50% of the patients with wearing-off at baseline, did not report wearing-off anymore after one year of treatment. Patients under levodopa monotherapy compared to patients receiving levodopa combined with other antiparkinsonian treatments benefit more from safinamide treatment. Patients switched from rasagiline to safinamide seemed also to benefit more from safinamide treatment.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the excellent safety and efficacy profile of safinamide, particularly in more vulnerable groups of patients such as the elderly and patients with significant comorbidities or psychiatric conditions such as depression or anxiety.

The Efficacy of Safinamide in the Management of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that is challenging to treat due to its progressive nature and its weaning response to therapy. Safinamide, a monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitor (MAOB-I), has shown promise in managing dyskinesias caused by levodopa (L-dopa), carbidopa, and PD features such as pain and depression. This systematic review aimed to evaluate safinamide's efficacy as a monotherapy and an add-on in tackling these issues. We composed this systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Our group searched the following databases: Manchester University Library, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MedLine for articles produced in the last ten years using various search terms and criteria, which we outlined in the search strategy and eligibility criteria sections. We excluded 722 out of the initially screened 730 records for multiple reasons, such as titles and abstracts being irrelevant to the topic, articles without free full access, articles originally not in the English language, and articles that did not score 70% or above on their respective quality assessment tools. The studies explored supported safinamide's use in managing motor fluctuations, pain, depression, and improving patients' quality of life.

Prescription Pattern of Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors Combined with Levodopa: A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease is still incurable, and several factors are considered when defining pharmacological therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the prescription pattern of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs) marketed in Italy (selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide) as an add-on to levodopa among new users of MAO-BIs, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through cross-linkage of administrative healthcare data in the Ricerca e Salute (ReS) database, adults with a supply of one or more MAO-BIs in 2017, and with no other MAO-BI use since 2013, were selected. Levodopa had to be supplied within 30 days before/after the MAO-BI. The incidence, use, sex, age, comorbidities, 2-year prescription patterns (i.e., switches, proportion of treated patients per semester/year, mean daily milligrams/monthly tablets supplied, discontinuation, change to other anti-Parkinson drug) of patients taking MAO-BIs were provided.

RESULTS

In 2017, 1059 new users received an MAO-BI (incidence 22.6 × 100,000 adults) combined with levodopa: 502 subjects (10.7 × 100,000) were treated with selegiline, 161 (3.4 × 100,000) were treated with rasagiline, and 396 (8.4 × 100,000) were treated with safinamide. The cohorts mainly consisted of males with a median age of ≥ 74 years. Treatment incidences increased with age. Switches occurred in 18.0%, 11.0%, and 4.3% of the selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide cohorts, respectively. Most of the patients switching from selegiline/safinamide changed to rasagiline, while most of the patients switching from rasagiline changed to safinamide. From the first to second years, patient numbers reduced by ≤ 50%, and the daily milligrams/monthly tablets slightly increased. Six-month discontinuation occurred in > 50% of all cohorts, and ≥ 65% of discontinuing patients changed to another anti-Parkinson drug.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis described the heterogeneous use of MAO-BIs as an add-on to levodopa in Italy. Further clinical trials and real-world studies are encouraged to update the few existing guidelines and to align clinical practice strategies.

Long-term effects of safinamide adjunct therapy on levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease: post-hoc analysis of a Japanese phase III study

This post-hoc analysis investigated the long-term effects of safinamide on the course of dyskinesia and efficacy outcomes using data from a phase III, open-label 52-week study of safinamide 50 or 100 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) with wearing-off. Patients (N = 194) were grouped using the UPDRS Part IV item 32: with and without pre-existing dyskinesia (pre-D subgroup; item 32 > 0 at baseline [n = 81], without pre-D subgroup; item 32 = 0 at baseline [n = 113]). ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia (ON-TD) increased significantly from baseline to Week 4 in the pre-D subgroup (+ 0.25 ± 0.11 h [mean ± SE], p = 0.0355) but gradually decreased up to Week 52 (change from baseline: − 0.08 ± 0.17 h, p = 0.6224); ON-TD did not change significantly in the Without pre-D subgroup. UPDRS Part IV item 32 score increased significantly at Week 52 compared with baseline in the Without pre-D subgroup, but no UPDRS Part IV dyskinesia related-domains changed in the pre-D subgroup. Both subgroups improved in ON-time without TD, UPDRS Part III, and Part II [OFF-phase] scores. The cumulative incidence of new or worsening dyskinesia (adverse drug reaction) at Week 52 was 32.5 and 5.0% in the pre-D and Without pre-D subgroups, respectively. This study suggested that safinamide led to short-term increasing dyskinesia but may be not associated with marked dyskinesia at 1-year follow-up in patients with pre-existing dyskinesia, and that it improved motor symptoms regardless of the presence or absence of dyskinesia at baseline. Further studies are warranted to investigate this association in more details.

Trial registration: JapicCTI-153057 (Registered: 2015/11/02).

Collective Expert Perspectives on the Use of Safinamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Online-Based Delphi Survey

Background. Safinamide is a selective, reversible monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor with a sodium channel inhibitory effect. Published clinical evidence supports safinamide as an effective therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) with wearing-off. However, to date, no consensus recommendations have been available to guide physicians in Asia on the optimal use of safinamide in clinical practice. To summarize opinions on the optimal patient profile and methods of using safinamide in common clinical scenarios, Japanese movement disorder specialists with expertise in PD investigated the perspectives of neurologists and neurosurgeons. Methods. The Delphi panel approach was used to summarize the opinions of panelists. The panel comprised doctors from Japan with extensive clinical practice experience in the use of safinamide (n = 46 at the final round). The consensus was defined as 80% or more agreement between panelists for each scenario at the final round. Results. There was a high level of agreement that patients with the following symptoms are suitable for safinamide treatment such as bradykinesia (100%), rigidity (95.7%), and/or gait disorder (89.1%) based on motor symptoms and PD-related pain (97.8%) and/or depression or apathy (93.5%) based on non-motor symptoms. Morning-off (95.7%), but not dyskinesia (71.7%), also reached consensus. The use of high-dose safinamide (100 mg/day) was recommended when the improvement in PD symptoms is insufficient and increasing the doses of other anti-PD medications is difficult (97.8%) or when the abovementioned non-motor symptoms adversely affect daily life (93.5%). Conclusions. This report provides expert perspectives on the use of safinamide for a wide range of clinical scenarios in Japan.

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Safinamide on Apathetic Non-demented Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Background

Apathy is highly prevalent and disabling in Parkinson's disease (PD). Pharmacological options for its management lack sufficient evidence.

Objective

We studied the effects of safinamide on apathy in PD.

Methods

Prospective, 24-week, two-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group exploratory study in non-demented PD on stable dopaminergic therapy randomized 1:1 to adjunct safinamide (50 mg/day for 2 weeks and 100 mg/day for 22 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to week 24 on the Apathy Scale (AS) total score. Secondary endpoints included changes in cognition, activities of daily living, motor scores, the impression of change, and safety and tolerability measures.

Results

In total, 30 participants (active treatment = 15; placebo = 15; 80% showing clinically significant apathetic symptoms according to the AS) were enrolled, and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Change in AS (ANOVA) showed a trend to significance [p = 0.059] mediated by a more marked decrease in AS score with safinamide (−7.5 ± 6.9) than with placebo (−2.8 ± 5.7). Post-hoc analysis (paired t-test) showed a significant positive change in the AS score between 12-week and 24-week [p = 0.001] only in the active group. No significant or trend changes were found for any of the secondary outcome variables. Adverse events were few and only mild in both treatment groups.

Conclusions

Safinamide was safe and well-tolerated, but failed to provide evidence of improved apathy. The positive trend observed in the post-hoc analyses deserves to be studied in depth in larger studies.

Trial Registration

EudraCT 2017-003254-17.

Safinamide in the treatment pathway of Parkinson's Disease: a European Delphi Consensus

Safinamide is a highly selective, reversible MAO B-inhibitor recently marketed in European and North American countries. To better define clinical indications regarding motor and non-motor symptoms, targeted population and safety of this compound, ten movement disorders specialists, experts in their field, convened and developed a panel of statements on: the role of glutamate in Parkinson's disease, introduction to fluctuations, efficacy of safinamide on motor symptoms, motor complications and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, safety of safinamide and target population for use. Strong consensus was reached for all the statements on the efficacy of safinamide on motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, quality of life and safety. Among non-motor symptoms, a positive consensus was reached for the symptoms sleep/fatigue, mood, and pain while there was a lack of consensus for the statements regarding the efficacy of safinamide in improving cognition, urinary and sexual functions. The statement on orthostatic hypotension obtained a negative consensus. The consistent and large agreement reached in this Delphi panel perfectly reflects the perception of efficacy, safety and tolerability of safinamide as evident from pivotal trials and clinical practice and shows how these findings may guide movement disorders specialists in their clinical therapeutic approach. The impact of non-motor symptoms in PD is considerable, and management remains an unmet need. In this context, the ability of safinamide to impact some non-motor symptoms may represent the most promising and distinctive feature of this compound and deserves further investigations.

A critical appraisal of MAO-B inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Since the 1980s, the MAO-B inhibitors have gained considerable status in the therapy of the Parkinson's disease. In addition to the symptomatic effect in mono- and combination therapies, a neuroprotective effect has repeatedly been a matter of some discussion, which has unfortunately led to a good many misunderstandings. Due to potential interactions, selegiline has declined in significance in the field. For the MAO-B inhibitor safinamide, recently introduced to the market, an additional inhibition of pathological release of glutamate has been postulated. At present, rasagiline and selegiline are being administered in early therapy as well as in combination with levodopa. Safinamide has been approved only for combination therapy with levodopa when motor fluctuations have occurred. MAO-B inhibitors are a significant therapeutic option for Parkinson's disease, an option which is too often not appreciated properly.

Efficacy of Safinamide and Gender Differences During Routine Clinical Practice

Background: There is increasing evidence of gender differences in the epidemiology and clinical manifestation of both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, few data are available on gender differences in the response to antiparkinsonian drugs. Safinamide is a multimodal drug with positive effects on motor and non-motor fluctuations that might improve patients' care and quality of life. Objective: To analyze gender differences on clinical effects of safinamide in PD patients treated in real-life conditions during the SYNAPSES trial. Methods: SYNAPSES was a multinational, multicenter, observational study. At baseline, patients with PD diagnosis received safinamide as an add-on to levodopa and were followed up for 12 months, with visits performed every 4 months. A new statistical analysis was performed to describe the efficacy of safinamide in men and women on motor complications, motor symptoms, and adverse events. Results: Six hundred and sixteen (38%) out of 1,610 patients enrolled in the SYNAPSES study were women and 994 (62%) men. Safinamide improved motor symptoms and motor complications (fluctuations and dyskinesia) in both genders, with a good safety profile and without requiring any change in the concomitant dopaminergic therapy. Clinically significant improvements, according to the criteria developed by Shulman et al., were seen in 46% of male and female patients for the UPDRS motor score and 43.5% of men vs. 39.1% of women for the UPDRS total score. Conclusions: Safinamide was effective in improving motor fluctuations and dyskinesia and proved to be safe in both male and female patients with PD. Further prospective studies, specifically addressing potential gender differences in response to PD therapies, are needed to develop tailored management strategies.

The XINDI Study: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide as Add-On Therapy to Levodopa in Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease with Motor Fluctuations

BACKGROUND

Levodopa remains the gold standard for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but its long-term use is associated with motor complications whose management is still a significant challenge. Safinamide is a multimodal drug with proven efficacy as an adjunct to levodopa.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of safinamide as an add-on to levodopa in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.

METHODS

The XINDI study was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, with a 2-week screening period and a 16-week treatment period. The starting dose of safinamide (or placebo) was 50 mg once daily, increased to 100 mg once daily at day 15. Patients aged ≥  18 years, with idiopathic Parkinson's disease of >3 years duration, Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-4, and daily OFF time ≥  1.5 h, were eligible. Patients should follow a stable oral levodopa regimen and may receive concomitant treatment with stable doses of other anti-Parkinson drugs, except monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors. Patients with severe disabling peak-dose or biphasic dyskinesia, unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations, other forms of parkinsonism, a history of dementia or severe cognitive dysfunction, major psychiatric illnesses, and/or clinically significant medical illnesses were excluded. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 16 in the mean daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Numerical Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression scale, and the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire scale. The statistical analysis of the efficacy parameters was conducted using an analysis of co-variance, except for the Clinical Global Impression scale scores that were assessed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Safety was evaluated through the frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and laboratory exams. All safety endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 307 patients. At week 16, the difference in the change of the mean total daily OFF time between safinamide and placebo groups was 1.10 h (p < 0.0001). This change was significantly greater in the safinamide group starting from week 2, suggesting a rapid onset of drug efficacy. ON time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale, and the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire showed statistically significant improvements. There were no significant between-group differences for adverse events or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide, as add-on therapy to levodopa, significantly reduced motor fluctuations and improved motor symptoms and quality of life of Chinese patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The improvements observed in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total and motor scores were also clinically significant. No safety concerns were identified, confirming the good tolerability profile of the drug.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03881371, registered on 19 March, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03881371 .

Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Past, Present, and Future

Monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors are commonly used for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). MAO-B inhibitor monotherapy has been shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of early-stage PD, while MAO-B inhibitors as adjuvant drugs have been widely applied for the treatment of the advanced stages of the illness. MAO-B inhibitors can effectively improve patients' motor and non-motor symptoms, reduce "OFF" time, and may potentially prevent/delay disease progression. In this review, we discuss the effects of MAO-B inhibitors on motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, their mechanism of action, and the future development of MAO-B inhibitor therapy.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of safinamide as an add-on treatment to levodopa for parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

While levodopa is still the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, concerns about long-term complications such as wearing-off and dyskinesia with levodopa usage remain.

AREAS COVERED

Safinamide is a highly selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor introduced in the European Union, Japan, and the United States as an adjunctive agent to levodopa in PD patients with motor fluctuation. This review outlines the pharmacological properties, therapeutic effects, and tolerability of safinamide as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with advanced PD. Efficacy and safety findings from double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials for safinamide as an adjunct therapy to levodopa for PD are summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

Safinamide was well tolerated as a treatment for PD, and there was no significant difference in the frequency and severity of adverse events between the safinamide and placebo groups. It was also suggested that safinamide had a beneficial effect on the accompanying non-motor symptoms such as PD-related pain. Safinamide may exhibit neuroprotective effects through antioxidant and anti-glutamate effects, and research on the disease-modifying effect of PD is desired in the future.

Diagnosis and Management of Pain in Parkinson's Disease: A New Approach

Pain is a frequent and disabling non-motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). The recently proposed PD Pain Classification System (PD-PCS) allows for an association of pain with PD to be determined before being allocated to the main pain mechanism (i.e. nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic). In this article, previous studies on treatments for pain in PD are summarized according to the pain mechanisms. A mechanistic approach to treatment is discussed. We suggest that the first step should be optimizing dopaminergic therapy before other therapy is started. When these treatments remain unsuccessful, further causes of pain must be considered. The role of drugs, invasive treatments, and physiotherapeutic interventions are discussed with a focus on older PD patients and considering polypharmacy, altered pharmacokinetics, and comorbidities.

Frequency of Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Patients With Motor Fluctuations

Background: Non-motor symptoms (NMS), including neuropsychiatric, sleep, autonomic, and sensory domains, are an integral aspect of the clinical presentation of Parkinson disease (PD) and affect neurocognitive functioning as well as patients' and caregivers' well-being.

Objective: To describe the occurrence of NMS in PD patients with motor fluctuations in real-life condition.

Methods: The present study is a secondary analysis of a previous multinational, multicenter, retrospective-prospective cohort observational study (SYNAPSES). Patients with PD diagnosis and motor fluctuations aged ≥18 years were included. Data collected at the baseline visit were used for this study, and descriptive analyzes were conducted to describe the distribution of NMS in motor-fluctuating PD patients distributed according to different clinical characteristics.

Results: Of the 1,610 patients enrolled, 1,589 were included for the analysis (978 males and 611 females), with a mean age of 68.4 (SD = 9.6). Most patients had at least one NMS (88.5%). Sleep problems and psychiatric symptoms were the most prevalent NMS in motor fluctuating PD patients in all H and Y stages. Psychiatric disorders were more frequent in older patients and in patients with a larger number of years of PD diagnosis, while sleep problems were more preeminent in younger patients and with inferior disease duration.

Conclusions: The present findings further support the high prevalence of NMS in PD patients with motor fluctuations, thus reinforcing the need for assessing them for diagnostic accuracy and for delivering holistic care.

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared to placebo in PD patients on multiple outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and trial databases were searched up to 23 December 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing safinamide to placebo, alone or as add-on therapy in PD. Data were extracted from literature and regulatory agencies. Primary outcomes were ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, OFF-time, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included any dyskinesia rating scale (DRS), ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS-II, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). In order to estimate mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), generic inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods were used for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Analyses were performed grouping by PD with (PDwMF) or without (PDwoMF) motor fluctuations, safinamide dose, and concomitant dopaminergic treatment. Summary of findings with GRADE were performed.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 2792 participants were identified. In PDwMF patients, safinamide 100 mg as add-on to levodopa (L-dopa) significantly increased ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD = 0.95 h; 95% CI from 0.41 to 1.49), reduced OFF-time (MD = - 1.06 h; 95% CI from - 1.60 to - 0.51), and improved UPDRS-III (MD = - 2.77; 95% CI from - 4.27 to - 1.28) with moderate quality of evidence. Similar results were observed for the 50 mg dose. However, the quality of evidence was moderate only for ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, whereas for OFF-time and UPDRS-III was low. In PDwoMF patients taking a single dopamine agonist, safinamide 100 mg resulted in little to no clinically significant improvement in UPDRS-III (MD = - 1.84; 95% CI from - 3.19 to - 0.49), with moderate quality of evidence. Conversely, in PDwoMF patients, the 200 mg and 50 mg doses showed nonsignificant improvement in UPDRS-III, with very low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively. In PDwMF patients taking safinamide 100 mg or 50 mg, nonsignificant differences were observed for ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia and DRS, with high and low quality of evidence, respectively. In the same patients, UPDRS-II was significantly improved at the 100 mg and 50 mg dose, with high and moderate quality of evidence. In PDwoMF, UPDRS-II showed a little yet significant difference only at 100 mg, with low quality of evidence. PDQ-39 resulted significantly improved only with the 100 mg dose in PDwMF, with low quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Overall, safinamide is effective in PDwMF patients taking L-dopa both at 100 and 50 mg daily. Evidence for efficacy in early PD is limited. Further trials are needed to better evaluate the anti-dyskinetic properties of safinamide.

Safinamide Improves Non-Motor Symptoms Burden in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Label Prospective Study

Some studies observed a benefit of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after treatment with safinamide in some non-motor symptoms (NMSs). The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of safinamide on NMS burden in PD. SAFINONMOTOR (an open-label study of the effectiveness of safinamide on non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients) is a prospective open-label single-arm study conducted in five centers from Spain. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline (V1) to the end of the observational period (6 months) (V4) in the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) total score. Between May/2019 and February/2020 50 patients were included (age 68.5 ± 9.12 years; 58% females; 6.4 ± 5.1 years from diagnosis). At 6 months, 44 patients completed the follow-up (88%). The NMSS total score was reduced by 38.5% (from 97.5 ± 43.7 in V1 to 59.9 ± 35.5 in V4; p < 0.0001). By domains, improvement was observed in sleep/fatigue (-35.8%; p = 0.002), mood/apathy (-57.9%; p < 0.0001), attention/memory (-23.9%; p = 0.026), gastrointestinal symptoms (-33%; p = 0.010), urinary symptoms (-28.3%; p = 0.003), and pain/miscellaneous (-43%; p < 0.0001). Quality of life (QoL) also improved with a 29.4% reduction in the PDQ-39SI (from 30.1 ± 17.6 in V1 to 21.2 ± 13.5 in V4; p < 0.0001). A total of 21 adverse events in 16 patients (32%) were reported, 5 of which were severe (not related to safinamide). Dyskinesias and nausea were the most frequent (6%). Safinamide is well tolerated and improves NMS burden and QoL in PD patients with severe or very severe NMS burden at 6 months.

Impact of SAfinamide on Depressive Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Patients (SADness-PD Study): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the effects of safinamide on depression, motor symptoms, and the serotonin syndrome related to its co-administration with antidepressants in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients at 1 and 3 months of follow-up compared to baseline.

RESULTS

n = 82 (safinamide 50 mg = 22, 100 mg = 60, with antidepressants = 44). First, we found improvement in depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -6 ± 5.10 at 1 month and -7.27 ± 5.10 at 3 months, p < 0.0001; Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale: 60.3% and 69.5% of patients at 1 and 3 months reported some improvement). Second, safinamide improved the daily life activities and motor symptoms/motor complications (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-II): -2.51 ± 6.30 and -2.47 ± 6.11 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; III: -3.58 ± 8.68 and -4.03 ± 8.95 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; IV: -0.61 ± 2.61 and -0.8 ± 2.53 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001). Third, 7.31% and 8.53% of patients developed non-severe adverse events related to safinamide at 1 and 3 months. Serotonin syndrome was not observed in the patients treated with antidepressants; some isolated serotonin syndrome symptoms were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide could be useful for treating depression in PD; it was effective for motor symptoms and motor complications and safe even when co-administered with antidepressants.