Patterns of adverse drug reaction signals in NAFDAC Pharmacovigilance activities from September to November, 2014

A Retrospective Review of Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow Database from September 2004 to December 2016

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a source of concern in healthcare as they negatively affect patients. Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) have an even greater impact on patients and the system in terms of morbidity and financial burden. The establishment of National Pharmacovigilance Centers (NPCs) has enhanced ADR reporting in Africa. The Nigerian Pharmacovigilance Centre has been collecting ADR reports using VigiFlow since 2004.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify and analyze SADR reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow database in order to profile the patients with SADRs, the medicines most implicated, system organ classes (SOCs) affected, outcome of such reactions, including fatalities, and ADR reporting trends over the years. We also looked at the data elements provided in the reports as a proxy measure of report quality.

METHOD

We retrospectively assessed all individual case safety reports (ICSRs) received by the NPC in Nigeria and entered into VigiFlow as SADR reports between September 2004 and December 2016. We defined SADR as any untoward reaction to any medicine dose that resulted in death, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was life-threatening. The suspected SADRs were analyzed at the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities SOC and Preferred Term levels.

RESULTS

A total of 11,222 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow during the study period, of which 298 (3%) were classified as SADR reports. Adults were the most affected (244/282; 87%). The median number of medicines per report was 3 (interquartile range = 2-4.75). Nevirapine (36/336; 11%), as a single entity, was the most reported medicine. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affected 128/232 (55%) of those with SADRs. There was no statistically significant association between the number of reactions per report and sex of the patients (p = 0.280), their age groups (p = 0.670), or the number of medicines per report (p = 0.640). Hospitalization was the most frequently cited reason for classifying a report as serious (151/276; 53%) and death was reported in 48 cases (48/283; 17%). Based on the SOC, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (139/550; 25%) was the most affected, while anemia (55/550; 10%) was the most reported specific reaction. A substantial number of patients (107/256; 42%) either recovered fully or were recovering from the SADRs. The number of SADR reports received varied by year with no consistent trend.

CONCLUSION

There is under-reporting of ADRs in the Nigerian VigiFlow^® database, particularly SADRs and those involving pediatric and geriatric age groups. Given that over half of the SADR reports involved antiretroviral drugs, it is imperative to increase the surveillance of ADRs related to this class of drugs through regular clinical assessment of reports and provision of feedback on the findings to healthcare providers. Direct consumer reporting should also be encouraged as a means of increasing ADR reporting.

Patterns of adverse drug reaction signals in NAFDAC pharmacovigilance activities from January to June 2015: safety of drug use in Nigeria

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are expected to be associated with an economic drain on the healthcare systems. The study was carried out to determine the occurrence of ADRs reported to NAFDAC Pharmacovigilance from January to June 2015, to illustrate the pattern of organ system affected by ADRs, to assess the completeness of ADR report, to determine the relationship between the occurrence of ADRs with suspect drugs and the use of concomitant drugs as well as to generate possible signals from the reported ADRs. A total number of 921 ADR cases reported from January to June 2015 were analyzed using SPSS version 22. A higher percentage of ADR reports were seen in females (65.5%). The highest percentages of reports (45.6%) were from the age range of 21‐40 years, most of the suspected drugs reported had both NAFDAC (50.2%) and batch number identification (65.6%). HIV (56.9%) was the most prevalent indication reported for using the suspected drug; Zidovudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine combination (16.9%) was reported as the suspected drug with the highest occurrences of ADRs and generalized body itching (6.9%) as the most prevalent ADR. “General disorders” (47.3%) was the most predominant organ system affected by ADRs and Pharmacists were revealed as the highest reporters of ADRs (80.2%). Overall, patients on ARVs should be vigilantly followed up as they are mostly prone to ADRs. Adverse drug reaction reporting systems need to be robust and complete in order to be able to detect new drug alerts, possible signals and improve pharmacovigilance