Vocational rehabilitation as a public health intervention for young African American men with substance use disorders

The role of employment status, change, and satisfaction for people who have completed substance use disorder treatment

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorder (SUD) is a complex disabling condition that is not often well understood. Despite decades of SUD research and intervention, prevalence rates remain stable and many traditional treatment options are largely ineffective in helping individuals with SUDs attain long-term abstinence and recovery. One avenue that shows promise in facilitating higher recovery and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in people with SUD is employment that occurs alongside traditional treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to understand the role that meaningful and satisfying employment has in SUD outcomes for treatment completers.

METHODS

Employing a quasi-experimental, cross-sectional, nonequivalent group design, this study examined 197 individuals with SUDs who completed treatment to explore how their employment status during treatment, employment status change from their treatment to the time of the survey, and job satisfaction influenced their recovery and QOL.

RESULTS

Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) revealed that those who made the transition from unemployed at treatment to employed at time of survey and those who were employed in "very satisfying" jobs had higher rates of recovery and QOL than those who were in "very dissatisfying" jobs or made the transition from employed during treatment to unemployed at time of survey.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study are promising in that employment and job satisfaction seem to be facilitative of recovery and QOL outcomes for this population of SUD treatment completers.

Identifying factors that promote successful vocational rehabilitation case closure: Comparison of individual characteristics, VR experiences and state economic conditions

BACKGROUND: Despite the series of public policies being implemented to strengthen vocational rehabilitation (VR) services, individuals with disabilities remained at the substantial deficit in employment outcomes compared with individuals without disabilities. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine effects of vocational rehabilitation services on the employment outcomes for people with disabilities while accounting for individual characteristics and state economic conditions. Findings had implications for VR program improvement. METHODS: We used the RSA-911 data covering cases from 2015 to 2017, in addition to state unemployment rate and poverty rate in 2017 to address the research questions. A logistic regression model was estimated with Generalized Estimating Equations to predict the probability of successful case closure by individual demographic characteristics, number of VR services received, and state economic conditions. RESULTS: State economic conditions were not associated with employment outcomes among VR participants. Being female, Black, having physical disabilities, and not having a job at application were disadvantageous in employment outcomes. The more varieties of vocational services that individuals received, the higher odds of successful case closure. CONCLUSIONS: VR services have significant beneficial impact on individual employment outcomes. The strongest beneficial impact may be achieved by providing a combination of different types of services that are designed to help individuals find or sustain employment.

The employment discrimination experiences of younger and older Americans with cancer under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act

PURPOSE

The goal of the research was to describe discrimination, both actual and perceived, that has occurred against younger individuals with cancer (i.e., 35 years of age and under) in comparison with older individuals with cancer (i.e., over age 35) through analysis of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Integrated Mission System (IMS) database.

METHODS

An ex post facto, causal comparative quantitative design was used to examine Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) Title I complaints received by the EEOC from younger people with cancer from 2009 through 2016 (n = 1001) in comparison with older people with cancer over the same time period (n = 8874).

RESULTS

Results revealed statistically significant differences in the patterns of issues alleged by the two groups. When compared with older charging parties with cancer, the younger charging parties with cancer had proportionally more individuals who were male and who identified as African American and proportionally fewer individuals who identified as Caucasian.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger people with cancer were more likely to allege discrimination in the areas of promotion, training, reinstatement, and referrals to other employers. They were less likely to allege discrimination in the area of benefits. The younger group was also significantly less likely than the older group to find that EEOC investigations of their allegations resulted in merit-based case resolutions, that is, discrimination had indeed occurred.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Psychosocial programs and vocational programming assisting young adults with career development should focus on the types of discrimination that young adults experience, which is unique compared with older adult cancer survivors.

State-Federal Vocational Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury: What Predictors Are Associated With Employment Outcomes?

This study identified predictors of employment for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Data from 4,923 individuals with TBI were extracted from the Rehabilitation Services Administration’s Case Service Report (RSA-911) database. A multiple logistic regression model using demographics, disability-related variables, vocational rehabilitation (VR) service variables, and their interactions correctly classified 69.5% of the cases as successfully employed or not successfully employed. The model explained approximately 27.1% of the variance in employment outcomes. Results indicated that level of education, race/ethnicity, age at application, preemployment status, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), comorbid depression, and case expenditure were significantly associated with employment outcomes (all p ≤ .05). VR variables that showed the most significant positive effect on employment outcomes were on-the-job support, job placement, and on-the-job training. Race/ethnicity moderated the effect of college training, supported employment, transportation, and extended evaluation or work trial assessment services on employment outcomes. The findings have implications for promoting the use of those VR services that are strongly related to employment outcomes for persons with TBI. They also point to the need for rehabilitation personnel to address some of the demographic and disability-related barriers to successful employment.