1
|
Frenken MWE, Thijssen KMJ, Vlemminx MWC, van den Heuvel ER, Westerhuis MEMH, Oei SG. Clinical evaluation of electrohysterography as method of monitoring uterine contractions during labor: A propensity score matched study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 259:178-184. [PMID: 33684672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrohysterography is a non-invasive technique to monitor uterine activity and has a significantly higher sensitivity compared to conventional external tocodynamometry. Whether this technique could lead to improved obstetrical outcomes is still unknown. In this propensity score matched study, clinical results of the first pilot implementing electrohysterography during labor were evaluated. The hypothesis tested is that electrohysterography will help to optimize uterine activity and thereby lead to fewer obstetric interventions. Secondary outcomes were Apgar score, arterial umbilical pH values, first stage labor duration, episiotomy rate and postpartum vaginal blood loss. STUDY DESIGN From November 2017 until October 2018, electrohysterography was introduced as a standard alternative for monitoring uterine activity in high-risk deliveries. It could be applied in case of induced labor, previous cesarean delivery, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 or an inadequate external tocodynamometry monitoring. Outcomes were compared to a matched group of women in which external tocodynamometry was applied for uterine activity monitoring during labor. These women were identified using propensity scores. RESULTS A total of 348 women received electrohysterography as standard method of uterine monitoring during labor. A match (1:1 ratio) was found for 317 women, resulting in a total population of 634 women. No significant differences were seen in obstetric interventions (i.e. cesarean deliveries and assisted vaginal deliveries) between the electrohysterography and tocodynamometry group (P = 0.80). No statistically significant differences were seen regarding the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This first pilot study implementing electrohysterography as monitoring method during labor in a high-risk population did not result in statistically significant differences regarding obstetric interventions, low Apgar scores or low umbilical artery pH values. Therefore, we suggest that electrohysterography causes no harm and we recommend further implementation and evaluation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria W E Frenken
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center (e/MTIC), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Kirsten M J Thijssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center (e/MTIC), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Maria W C Vlemminx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center (e/MTIC), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Edwin R van den Heuvel
- Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center (e/MTIC), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michelle E M H Westerhuis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - S Guid Oei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center (e/MTIC), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of fetal heart rate variability by symbolic dynamics at the third trimester of pregnancy and low-risk parturition. Heliyon 2020; 6:e03485. [PMID: 32195385 PMCID: PMC7075801 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Fetal heart rate variability (fHRV) is an essential source of information to monitor fetal well-being during pregnancy. This study aimed to apply a nonlinear approach, known as symbolic dynamics (SD), for comparing human fHRV in the third trimester of pregnancy during active fetal state (TT) and active labor at term (P). We performed a longitudinal, prospective, descriptive, and comparative study composed of 42 longitudinal recordings of 5-minutes of fetal heartbeat interval series. Recordings were collected from 21 low-risk, healthy, pregnant women attending the Maternal and Child Research Center (CIMIGen), Mexico City. We calculated relevant linear parameters of fHRV between TT and P stages, such as the percentage of differences between adjacent RR intervals >5 ms (PRR5, related to vagal modulations) and other SD parameters such as the percentage of no variations between three successive symbols (%0V, reflects sympathetic modulations) and the probability of low variability with a threshold of 4 ms (POLVAR4, associated with a low variability). We identified statistical differences for PRR5 between TT and P (37.13% [28.47-47.60%] vs. 28.84% [19.36-36.76%], p = 0.03), respectively. Also, for 0V% (65.66% [59.01-71.80%] vs. 71.14% [65.94-75.87%], p = 0.03) and for POLVAR4 values (0.06 [0.04-0.11] vs. 0.15 [0.09-0.24], p = 0.002), respectively. Our results indicate that during parturition, the short-term fetal fHRV is decreased, showing a decreased vagal modulations and higher adrenergic response of the heart. These autonomic modifications may result from the fetal response to the stressful inflammatory challenge of labor. We thus confirmed that the analysis of the SD applied to fHRV time series could be a potential clinical biomarker to differentiate the fetal autonomic cardiac condition at different stages of pregnancy.
Collapse
|