Neonatal intensive care unit discharge of infants with cardiorespiratory events: Tri-country comparison of academic centers

Criteria for discharge of preterm infants from Canadian neonatal intensive care units

Initial discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to home is a crucial milestone that impacts preterm infants, their families, and NICUs. Standardized discharge programs individualized for family needs can ensure a safe transfer of care to parents, decrease the length of stay and hospital costs, and improve parents' satisfaction. To assess the degree of variability in the current discharge criteria of preterm infants less than 34 weeks' gestation among Canadian NICUs, explore different institution-specific guidelines and degree of adherence to the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) guidelines. A clinical representative of each of the 117 level 2-4 Canadian NICUs was contacted via email to participate in an anonymous survey link regarding the discharge criteria of preterm infants. Responders from ninety-eight NICUs (84%), representing all Canadian provinces, completed the survey. Most were nurse practitioners (43%) and neonatologists (31%) with > 5 years of experience (87%). Level 3 and 4 NICUs represented 63% of responses. Units varied widely in many discharge criteria and in their adherence to CPS guidelines. Most of the units (81%) lack written discharge guidelines; 60% do not have a dedicated discharge coordinator, and 45% do not have a post-discharge clinic. Only 25% routinely teach parents CPR and only half of the surveyed units provide parental support programs.   Conclusion: There is a significant heterogeneity in discharge practices of preterm infants among Canadian NICUs. This survey provides a basis for benchmarking and knowledge sharing. What is Known: • Discharging preterm infants from the NICU impacts preterm infants, their families, and NICUs. • All efforts should ensure a safe transfer of care to parents, decrease the length of stay, better utilize resources, and improve parents' satisfaction. What is New: • The discharge criteria of preterm infants vary widely among NICUs. • This survey provides benchmark information and exposes the need to better standardize discharge practices and the subsequent support for infants and parents.

Monitoring of Infants Discharged Home with Medical Devices

Preterm infants and term infants with complex medical conditions are often discharged home with technological support. There is a scarcity of evidence-based guidelines for post-discharge management of these infants at high risk. Common diagnoses necessitating the need for respiratory support and/or monitoring devices include apnea of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia for preterm infants, and upper airway anomalies, central nervous system disorders, and neuromuscular disorders for term infants. Some infants who are unable to receive complete oral feeds for various reasons are sometimes discharged home with nasogastric or gastrostomy tube feeds. For safe patient care at home and reduction of emergency department visits, there should be proper transition of care from hospital to primary care provider, and appropriate instruction of caregivers for care of the infant including teaching about medications, feeding, and management of medical devices. Primary care providers should be aware of these common supportive devices and their complications to provide timely intervention if needed. [Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(2):e88-e92.].

The History of Home Cardiorespiratory Monitoring

Home cardiorespiratory monitoring has changed significantly since it was first introduced in the 1970s. It has improved from a simple alarm system to a sophisticated piece of equipment capable of monitoring the patient's electrocardiogram, respiratory effort, and oxygen saturations. In addition, the indications for using a monitor have also changed. The home monitor was initially used to reduce the incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Although there were several studies demonstrating the reduction of SIDS rates in communities where apnea programs existed, none was a prospective, double-blinded study or had adequate numbers to be clinically significant. Therefore, the American Academy of Pediatrics took the stance that monitors were not an effective way to reduce SIDS. However, when used appropriately, as part of a complete program (ie, the monitor is just one of many clinically based modalities), by a clinician with expertise in interpreting download tracings, home cardiorespiratory monitoring can be a useful, lifesaving, and economical tool to observe infants who are at increased risk of sudden death or increased morbidity secondary to intermittent hypoxia. [Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(8):e303-e308.].