Bolus versus continuous feedings following treatment for medical necrotizing enterocolitis

Nutritional management after necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation in preterm infants

Nutritional management of preterm infants recovering from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or focal intestinal perforation (FIP) is challenging, especially in infants managed surgically. The logistics of how, when, and what to feed are unclear and current nutritional practices are primarily based on physiological principles and consensus opinion in individual units, rather than high-quality evidence. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the literature on nutritional management after NEC or FIP in preterm infants: when to restart enteral nutrition, type of enteral nutrition to use, and how to advance nutrition. We also discuss treatment of micronutrient deficiencies, cholestasis, replacement of stoma losses, and optimal time of stoma closure. In conclusion, there are in sufficient high-quality studies available to provide evidence-based recommendations on the best nutritional practice after NEC or FIP in preterm infants. A local or national consensus based early nutrition guideline agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team including pediatric surgeons, pediatricians/neonatologists, nurses, and nutritionists is recommended. Further studies are urgently needed. IMPACT: There is no good quality evidence or nutritional standard across neonatal units treating infants after medical or surgical NEC or FIP. With this review we hope to start providing some consistency across patients and between providers treating patients with NEC and FIP. Mother's own milk is recommended when restarting enteral nutrition after NEC or FIP. In the absence of high-quality evidence, a consensus based early nutrition guideline agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team is recommended. Nutritional research projects are urgently needed in NEC and FIP patients.

Risk factors associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common life-threatening gastrointestinal emergency in prematurity. The pathophysiology is multifactorial and remains incompletely understood. Early diagnosis and treatment could reduce the risk of mortality and morbidity. We aimed to identify factors associated with NEC in preterm newborns.

METHOD

This case-control study included all preterm newborns presenting with NEC and managed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 in the neonatal intensive care unit of Nancy. For each case, two controls were matched according to three criteria: gestational age (WG), date of birth, and mode of delivery. Antenatal, peripartum, and postnatal risk factors prior to NEC were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 292 infants were involved in the study, 113 of whom had NEC. Mean gestational age for newborns with NEC was 29 WG, and mean birth weight, 1340 g. Only early-onset infection was identified as a significant risk factor for NEC (15% vs. 6.6% for infection p<0.04, and 28.3% vs. 16.4% p<0.02 for infection and sepsis, NEC vs. controls, respectively). Late-onset feeding and initial continuous enteral feeding were significantly associated with the occurrence of more severe NEC (p<0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study are consistent with intestinal dysbiosis being a risk factor for NEC. Early-onset infection was found to be a significant risk factor. Enteral feeding practice may also be associated with NEC.

Comparison of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Pre-mature Infants vs. Term-Born Infants With Congenital Heart Disease

Purpose: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious illness that occurs among premature infants and term-born infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). Prior studies have suggested these two groups may experience different disease entities. We sought to evaluate if there are differences in disease characteristics between these two populations. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of infants treated for Bells stage 2-3 NEC from 2011 to 2020 was performed. Demographic information, CHD diagnoses and clinical data were recorded. Prior to data analysis, patients were divided into two groups: term-born patients with CHD (TC) and premature patients without CHD (PT). Results: 99 patients were analyzed-23 TC patients and 76 PT patients. Platelet counts (222.7 ± 176.1 vs. 310.2 ± 174.5 cells/uL, P = 0.03) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (53.6 ± 81.7 vs. 117.6 ± 90.4 mg/L, P < 0.001) were significantly higher among the PT group. In addition, PT patients were more likely to develop pneumatosis (30.4 vs. 68.4%, P = 0.002) than TC patients. NEC-specific mortality was similar between both groups of patients. Conclusions: When compared to TC patients, PT patients had higher CRP levels, higher platelet counts and more commonly developed pneumatosis. These factors may point toward a difference in disease pathophysiology regarding NEC development in premature patients vs. term-born patients with CHD.