Utilization of the Expanded Disability Status Scale as a distinctive instrument for walking impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis with mild disability

Examining the Sensory Processing Skills and Occupational Performance of People with Multiple Sclerosis

This study aimed to compare sensory processing skills and occupational performance between participants with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. Eighty participants were enrolled in this study, 40 with multiple sclerosis and 40 with healthy controls. Participants were between 18 and 65 years of age and asked to complete the Adult Sensory Profile, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. The findings of the study revealed that participants with multiple sclerosis had a lower ability to register sensory input, a higher sensory sensitivity, and avoidance, as well as lower levels of performance and satisfaction in their daily occupations, compared to the healthy controls (p < 0.05). People with multiple sclerosis often experience difficulties with sensory processing and occupational performance in daily life. More research and practice are needed on the role of sensory processing and occupational performance in daily life in people with multiple sclerosis.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Coping With the Disease and Affecting Cognitive, Physical, and Psychosocial Factors in People with Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between coping mechanisms in people with multiple sclerosis (MS, pwMS) and cognitive, physical, and psychosocial factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, disability, personality, stigma, quality of life, depression, and anxiety.

METHOD

One hundred and two pwMS were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. Coping with the MS Scale (CMSS), including seven subscales, which are problem-solving, physical assistance, acceptance, avoidance, personal health control, energy conservation, and emotional release, was used to measure coping. Anxiety and depression levels, stigma, neuropsychological symptoms, and personality were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), EuroQol-5D Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D), Quality of Life in Neurological Diseases (NeuroQoL) -Stigma Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ), and Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Abbreviated Form (EKA-GGK), respectively.

RESULTS

There was a weak statistically significant positive correlation between the physical support subscale and age and the disease duration and a strong positive correlation with EDSS (r = .214, p = .035; r = .213, p = .036; r = .582, p ≤ .0001, respectively). There was a moderate negative relationship between the physical support subscale and the EQ-5D mobility, self-care, pain, and health subscales (r = -.434, p = .000; r = -.482, p = .000; r = -.526, p ≤ .001, respectively), a weak negative correlation with anxiety, and a strong negative relationship with usual activities (r = -.379, p ≤ .001; r = -.243, p = .017; r = -.384, p ≤ .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

It has been shown that coping with MS can be affected by cognitive, physical, and psychosocial factors.

The Preference-Based Multiple Sclerosis Index: an assessment of its psychometric properties and translation into Turkish

PURPOSE

To translate Preference-Based Multiple Sclerosis Index (PBMSI) into Turkish, investigate its psychometric properties and differences between its two scoring algorithms: PBMSI-Rating Scale (PBMSI-RS) and PBMSI-Standard Gamble (PBMSI-SG).

METHODS

An expert committee supervised the translation process. Psychometric properties were evaluated in 104 people with multiple sclerosis. Exploratory common factor analysis was used to investigate structural validity. Convergent validity was assessed by formulating hypotheses about correlations between PBMSI and other HRQL measures, disability level, walking-related measures, and MS symptoms. Known-groups validity was assessed against different measures of disability and walking capacity. Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC95%).

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed one factor (Eigenvalue = 2.46). PBMSI-RS and PBMSI-SG correlated significantly with other measures (p < .001). Both could differentiate between individuals with different levels of disability and walking capacity (p < .05, d  ≥  0.50). Relative test-retest reliability was moderate for PBMSI-RS (ICC = 0.75) and good for PBMSI-SG (ICC = 0.83). SEM and MDC95% values were 0.16 and 0.44 for PBMSI-RS and 0.10 and 0.28 for PBMSI-SG, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Turkish version of PBMSI has good psychometric properties to assess health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. PBMSI-SG should be preferred over PBMSI-RS.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealth-related quality of life is often used as a primary or secondary endpoint in multiple sclerosis research.The Preference-Based Multiple Sclerosis Index is the first preference-based health-related quality of life measure developed in multiple sclerosis using patient preferences.Preference-Based Multiple Sclerosis Index was translated to Turkish and demonstrated good psychometric properties, including structural, convergent, known-groups validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.Professionals working in the field of multiple sclerosis research and rehabilitation may benefit from using the Preference-Based Multiple Sclerosis Index as it is a short and psychometrically robust instrument.

Quantifying the relationship between disability progression and quality of life in patients treated for NMOSD: Insights from the SAkura studies

BACKGROUND

To date, no specific scales have been developed to explore the impact of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)-related disability on quality of life (QoL). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the EuroQol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D) have been used to assess disability and QoL, respectively, in patients with NMOSD. However, there is limited evidence surrounding their use in this condition. We compared EDSS and EQ-5D data across two clinical trials to quantify the relationship between disability and QoL in patients with NMOSD.

METHODS

SAkuraSky (NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (NCT02073279) were Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-assignment studies of satralizumab, administered in combination with baseline immunosuppressants (SAkuraSky) or as monotherapy (SAkuraStar). EDSS and EQ-5D were assessed at baseline and at 24-week intervals thereafter. The relationship between disability and QoL was assessed by estimating EQ-5D utilities (UK tariff) for each incremental EDSS category. A repeated-measures linear model was used to regress health utilities on EDSS score-derived health states.

RESULTS

Overall, 176 patients underwent at least one EDSS assessment and completed an EQ-5D survey and were included in this analysis. There was a clear association between mean EQ-5D score and EDSS score, with decreases in QoL being observed at each incremental increase in disability. The relationship between EDSS and EQ-5D score remained consistent across the different treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results, generated from high-quality clinical trial data, demonstrated a strong and consistent relationship between disability and QoL in patients with NMOSD.

Split-Belt Training but Not Cerebellar Anodal tDCS Improves Stability Control and Reduces Risk of Fall in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic potential of multiple sessions of training on a split-belt treadmill (SBT) combined with cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on gait and balance in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Twenty-two PwMS received six sessions of anodal (PwMS_real, n = 12) or sham (PwMS_sham, n = 10) tDCS to the cerebellum prior to performing the locomotor adaptation task on the SBT. To evaluate the effect of the intervention, functional gait assessment (FGA) scores and distance walked in 2 min (2MWT) were measured at the baseline (T0), day 6 (T5), and at the 4-week follow up (T6). Locomotor performance and changes of motor outcomes were similar in PwMS_real and PwMS_sham independently from tDCS mode applied to the cerebellum (anodal vs. sham, on FGA, p = 0.23; and 2MWT, p = 0.49). When the data were pooled across the groups to investigate the effects of multiple sessions of SBT training alone, significant improvement of gait and balance was found on T5 and T6, respectively, relative to baseline (FGA, p < 0.001 for both time points). The FGA change at T6 was significantly higher than at T5 (p = 0.01) underlining a long-lasting improvement. An improvement of the distance walked during the 2MWT was also observed on T5 and T6 relative to T0 (p = 0.002). Multiple sessions of SBT training resulted in a lasting improvement of gait stability and endurance, thus potentially reducing the risk of fall as measured by FGA and 2MWT. Application of cerebellar tDCS during SBT walking had no additional effect on locomotor outcomes.

MAM-36 and ABILHAND as outcome measures of multiple sclerosis hand disability: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Impaired upper limb functionality and dexterity are common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and lead to increased dependency and reduced quality of life.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the Manual Abilites Measure 36 (MAM-36) and the ABILHAND questionnaire to recognize an involvement of the upper limbs in PwMS, and to compare their results with those of other patient reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating disability, functional independence, symptoms of anxiety and depression, fatigue and quality of life.

DESIGN

The study design was observational.

SETTING

The setting of the study was outpatient.

POPULATION

The study population included fifty-one PwMS (mean age of 56.31 years, age range of 33-82 years, 72.5% of patients were females).

METHODS

For each patient were collected MAM-36, ABILHAND questionnaire, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Functional Independence measure (FIM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and Life Satisfaction Index (LSI).

RESULTS

A strong correlation between MAM-36 and the ABILHAND questionnaire (Spearman r: 0.79; P<0.0001) were found. We obtained a significant correlation between MAM-36 and EDSS (Spearman r: -0.5; P=0.0002), FIM (Spearman r: 0.55; P<0.0001); we did not observe a correlation with MFIS (Spearman r: -0.33; P=0.02); moreover we found a similar trend between ABILHAND and EDSS (Spearman r: -0.47; P=0.0005), FIM (Spearman r: 0.61; P<0.0001), MFIS (Spearman r: -0.41; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In PwMS the assessment of upper limbs is fundamental since it closely related to the level of disability of the person. Both MAM-36 and ABILHAND Questionnaire are equally able to detect upper limb dysfunctions in PwMS.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Both MAM-36 and ABILHAND can be used for upper limbs evaluation, within a multidimensional approach that seems to be the best way to evaluate PwMS.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) in people with multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) has been used to assess subjective upper limb function in people with several neurological and non-neurological diseases. Besides, the MAM-36 is one of the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The aim was to translate and conduct cross-cultural adaptation of the MAM-36 into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties in pwMS.

METHODS

The MAM-36 was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish. Two hundred pwMS were recruited for the psychometric study. Hand skills, handgrip strength, upper limb spasticity, disability level, and quality of life were evaluated by the validated performance-based tests and questionnaires including the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) which is a validated MS-specific PROM to assess upper limb function.

RESULTS

MAM-36 was significantly correlated with the performance-based tests and questionnaires, EDSS, age, and disease duration (p < 0.05). MAM-36 and AMSQ were strongly correlated (r_s = - 0.90, p < 0.01). PwMS with spasticity had significantly lower MAM-36 scores compared to those without spasticity (p < 0.01). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97) was high.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of MAM-36 has been found as a valid and reliable method for measuring upper limb function in pwMS.

The mediating effect of health-related hardiness on the degree of physical disability and perceived stress in Chinese female patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare and chronic disease of the central nervous system. The characteristics and main symptoms of recurrent NMOSD lead to an increase in psychological stress and accelerate a decline in the patients' quality of life. The incidence of NMOSD in the Chinese population is much higher than that for other countries and the majority of NMOSD patients are female. In general, there are sex differences in the perception and management of stress, with females experiencing higher levels of perceived stress than males. Thus, we should be concerned about the psychological issues experienced by Chinese female NMOSD patients. Health-related hardness is a psychological adjustment factor that could affect perceptions of illness that impact on NMOSD patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mediating role of health-related hardiness on physical disability and perceived stress in Chinese NMOSD female patients.

METHODS

Participants were 68 females patients with NMOSD treated at the Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China, between March and September 2018. Patients were evaluated for their degree of physical disability, perceived stress, and health-related hardiness. Measures included the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Health-related Hardiness Scale (HRHS). Pearson's correlation analyses and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

Findings indicated a positive correlation between the PSS and EDSS (r = 0.735, P < 0.001) and a negative correlation between the PSS and HRHS total score (r = -0.441, P < 0.001). After adjusting for the confounding factors, the EDSS was found to have a positive predictive effect on the PSS (β = 2.743, P = 0.000), and the HRHS was found to have a negative predictive effect on the PSS (β = -0.152, P = 0.04). Mediation analysis showed a direct effect of the EDSS on the PSS, and as a mediating variable for health-related hardiness (α = -1.928, b = -0.152, c = 2.743, c' = 2.481), which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mediating effect of health-related hardiness accounted for 10.68% of the total effect.

CONCLUSIONS

As a mediating variable, health-related hardiness indirectly affected perceived stress caused by physical disability and improved health-related hardiness. This was beneficial in reducing psychological stress and promoting mental health in NMOSD female patients.

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient determined disease steps scale in persons with multiple sclerosis

Background: Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale is a patient-reported outcome measure to assess disability in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This scale can be used as an alternative to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as it is a costly, more time-consuming, and clinician-based method. This study aimed to conduct Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of PDDS and investigate its psychometric properties.Methods: Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of PDDS was conducted. Its psychometric properties including validity (i.e. content, criterion, and construct) and test-retest reliability (relative and absolute) were investigated in 100 pwMS.Results: PDDS had a significant strong correlation with EDSS (r_s = 0.61, p < .001). Regression model to predict EDSS scores from PDDS scores was significant (p < .001, R² = 0.67). Both PDDS and EDSS were significantly correlated with age, disease duration, walking speed and endurance, perceived impact of MS on walking, functional mobility, working memory and information processing speed, visual memory, manual dexterity, and health-related quality of life (p < .05). No significant difference was observed in the correlation coefficients of PDDS and EDSS (p > .05). Relative test-retest reliability was found high [ICC = 0.99 (95%CI = 0.99, 0.99)]. Absolute test-retest reliability was high as the Bland-Altman analyses showed no significant systematic bias between the repeated assessments. A narrow range of the limits of agreement indicated that PDDS had high stability and low variation between first and second assessments.Conclusion: Turkish version of PDDS presented high validity and test-retest reliability in pwMS.

Performance Measures for Upper Extremity Functions in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

Recent studies suggest that upper extremity dysfunction is a quite common symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS), and affects adversely the activities of daily living even in the early stages of the disease. It is an undeniable fact that assessment is a crucial component for a disease management. The performance is defined as "what an individual does in his or her current environment" according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Performance measures for upper extremity have been used relatively recent in persons with MS. ABILHAND, Manual Ability Measurement (MAM), Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure, and Motor Activity Log are commonly used perceived performance measures for upper extremity functions in persons with MS. Because of their modern psychometric properties, ABILHAND and MAM stands out from other measures. Only available actual performance measures for upper extremity functions in persons with MS are accelerometers. In addition to their advantages, they have some disadvantages waiting to be solved.