Behavioral treatment for post-traumatic headache after mild traumatic brain injury: Rationale and case series

Graded Exposure Therapy for Fear Avoidance Behaviour After Concussion (GET FAB): protocol for a multisite Canadian randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) negatively affect daily functioning and quality of life. Fear avoidance behaviour, a coping style in which people avoid or escape from activities or situations that they expect will exacerbate their symptoms, maybe a particularly potent and modifiable risk factor for chronic disability after mTBI. This study will evaluate the efficacy of graded exposure therapy (GET) for reducing persistent symptoms following mTBI, with two primary aims: (1) To determine whether GET is more effective than usual care; (2) to identify for whom GET is the most effective treatment option, by evaluating whether baseline fear avoidance moderates differences between GET and an active comparator (prescribed aerobic exercise). Our findings will guide evidence-based care after mTBI and enable better matching of mTBI patients to treatments.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a multisite randomised controlled trial with three arms. Participants (n=220) will be recruited from concussion clinics and emergency departments in three Canadian provinces and randomly assigned (1:2:2 ratio) to receive enhanced usual care, GET or prescribed aerobic exercise. The outcome assessment will occur remotely 14-18 weeks following baseline assessment, after completing the 12-week treatment phase. The primary outcome will be symptom severity (Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. All study procedures were approved by the local research ethics boards (University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University Health Network Research Ethics Board-Panel D). Operational approvals were obtained for Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Provincial Health Services Authority. If GET proves effective, we will disseminate the GET treatment manual and present instructional workshops for clinicians.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05365776.

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of post-traumatic headache secondary to mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis protocol of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Post-traumatic headache secondary to mild traumatic brain injury in patients has become an important factor in their prognosis. Due to the lack of effective pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological interventions such as acupuncture are considered to have greater potential. However, the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment have not been clearly demonstrated. The purpose of this meta-analysis protocol is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of headache secondary to mild traumatic brain injury.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Seven English and Chinese databases will be selected and searched according to their respective search methods, spanning the period from database creation to April 2022, and the languages will be limited to English and Chinese. Only randomized controlled trials will be included. Study selection, data collection, and risk of bias control will be performed by two independent investigators. Any disagreements will be referred to a third independent investigator for decision and documentation. Revman software will be used to complete our meta-analysis, and risk of bias assessment, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis will be performed to correct the results. Finally we will assess the reliability of our final results using the Recommended Guidelines Development Tool for Assessment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data for this study will be obtained from published journals, so no ethical review will be required. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and the findings will be further disseminated through presentation at an appropriate forum or conference.

Post-traumatic headache: Pathophysiology and management - A review

Background

Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common secondary headache due to traumatic brain injury. In the past, significant research has been conducted to understand the pathophysiology and treatment options for PTH. However, PTH still lacks evidence-based treatment, and most of the management depends on the primary phenotype observed in the patient.

Objective

The main objective of this review is to provide a single reference that covers the current understanding of the pathophysiology and the treatment options available for PTH.

Methods

A detailed literature search on PubMed was performed, and a narrative review was prepared.

Results

The pathophysiology of PTH is multifactorial. Acute PTH may be attributed to increased peripheral pain sensitization with impaired pain inhibiting pathways. Chronic or persistent PTH may be due to a chronic inflammatory response and peripheral as well as central sensitization. The mechanism responsible for the transition of acute to persistent PTH is unknown. The migraine-like phenotype is reported to be the most prevalent headache type seen in PTH. New targets for preventive treatment have been identified in recent years, such as neuropeptides like calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), nitric oxide, and glutamate. The preventive pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies employed for migraine (e.g. anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, onabotulinumtoxinA, physical therapy, cognitive and behavioral treatment, and neurostimulation techniques) have shown in preliminary studies that they are potentially efficacious, but large, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials are needed to further establish these as treatment options for PTH.

Conclusions

The lack of evidence-based treatment for PTH has created a need for future large trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of the currently employed treatments.

Neuropsychiatric Treatment for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Nonpharmacological Approaches

Postconcussive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)/concussion are common, disabling, and challenging to manage. Patients can experience a range of symptoms (e.g., mood disturbance, headaches, insomnia, vestibular symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction), and neuropsychiatric management relies heavily on nonpharmacological and multidisciplinary approaches. This article presents an overview of current nonpharmacological strategies for postconcussive symptoms including psychoeducation; psychotherapy; vestibular, visual, and physical therapies; cognitive rehabilitation; as well as more novel approaches, such as neuromodulation. Ultimately, treatment and management of mTBI should begin early with appropriate psychoeducation/counseling, and be tailored based on core symptoms and individual goals.

Models for Treating Post-traumatic Headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the treatment of post-traumatic headache (PTH) and how to choose pharmacotherapy based upon known pathophysiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preclinical models of traumatic brain injury are finally revealing some of the mechanisms of PTH, including the significant role that inflammatory neuropeptides like calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) play in the initiation and persistence of symptoms. To effectively treat post-traumatic headache (PTH), one needs to understand the pathophysiology behind the initiation and persistence of symptoms. Recent animal models are starting to elucidate these mechanisms, but effective treatment will also likely rely on the identification of patients who are most at risk for persistent PTH. Trials of early, targeted therapy for at-risk patients will be needed to validate these hypotheses. Additionally, high powered clinical trials are lacking in the field of persistent PTH for medications that are known to be effective in primary headache disorders. Effective treatment for persistent PTH also requires understanding how headache interacts with the complex nature of persistent post-concussion symptoms, as this disease often necessitates a multi-disciplinary approach. Regardless, with the knowledge gained by new PTH models cited in this paper, and an increasing availability of novel headache medications, more effective treatment models are on the horizon.

An updated brief overview on post-traumatic headache and a systematic review of the non-pharmacological interventions for its management

INTRODUCTION

Post-traumatic headache (PTH), a common type of headache secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or whiplash, carries a relevant burden on patients. PTH is still an undertreated condition because of limited pharmacological treatment options. Therefore, multimodal non-pharmacologic approaches, which account for comorbidities and biopsychosocial factors, are often used in PTH patients.

AREAS COVERED

After providing a brief overview of PTH, a systematic review was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations on recently published (2015-2020) papers on non-pharmacological interventions for PTH. We also collected data on ongoing trials on this topic. Studies and results are reviewed and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

PTH is one of the most common complications of TBI and accounts for almost 4% of symptomatic headache disorders. The most common clinical presentations of PTH are migraine-like or tension type (TTH)-like headache, neck pain, cognitive complaints, and psychological/psychiatric symptoms. Growing evidence suggests that combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, encompassing noninvasive neuromodulation, physical therapy, cognitive-behavioral treatment, and education, may be the best approaches for PTH and related comorbidities. Acute/preemptive pharmacological treatments for PTH include drugs used for migraine and TTH. When PTH management is multidisciplinary, the patient benefits most.

The Relation between Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache and PTSD: Similarities and Possible Differences

Post-traumatic headache (PTH) may be considered a secondary headache, which is linked to severe disability and psychosocial impairment. Interestingly, nearly 30% of subjects with persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH) also suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although existing studies demonstrated the existence of common pathophysiological characteristics in subjects with migraine and PPTH, the differences and similarities between these complex diseases are currently poorly understood and are yet to be comprehensively elucidated. Thus, the present review aimed to systematically investigate the nature of PPTH in the effort to better identify both the neurobiological and clinical aspects underlying this condition. Overall, the included studies reported that: (1) the predictors for persistent acute traumatic injury to the head were female gender, persistent symptoms related to mild post-traumatic brain injury (mTBI), PTSD, elevated inflammatory markers, prior mild traumatic brain injury, being injured while suffering from alcohol abuse; (2) static/dynamic functional connectivity differences, white matter tract abnormalities, and morphology changes were found between PPTH and migraine in brain regions involved in pain processing; and (3) clinical differences which were most prominent at early time points when they were linked to the increased risk of PPTH. Based on the selected reports, the relation between migraine and PPTH needs to be considered bidirectionally, but PTSD may play a critical role in this relation. The main implications of these findings, with a specific focus on PTSD, are discussed. Further longitudinal studies are needed to reveal the exact nature of this relation, as well as to clarify the distinct clinical characteristics of migraine, PPTH, and PTSD.