1
|
Chen S, Zhang W, Wang D, Chen Z. How robot-assisted gait training affects gait ability, balance and kinematic parameters after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 60:400-411. [PMID: 38647534 PMCID: PMC11261306 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08354-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gait ability is often cited by stroke survivors. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) can help stroke patients with lower limb motor impairment regain motor coordination. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase were systematically searched until September 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials presenting: stroke survivors as participants; RAGT as intervention; conventional rehabilitation as a comparator; gait assessment, through scales or quantitative parameters, as outcome measures. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-seven publications involving 1167 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in speed, cadence, spatial symmetry, and changes in joint mobility angles between the RAGT group and the control group. In addition, RAGT was associated with changes in affected side step length (SMD=0.02, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.03; P<0.0001), temporal symmetry (SMD=-0.38, 95% CI: -0.6, -0.16; P=0.0006], Six-Minute Walk Test (SMD=25.14, 95% CI: 10.19, 40.09; P=0.0010] and Functional Ambulation Categories (SMD=0.32, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.63; P=0.04). According to the PEDro scale, 19 (70.4%) studies were of high quality and eight were of moderate quality (29.6%). CONCLUSIONS Taken together, the review synthesis showed that RAGT might have a potential role in the recovery of walking dysfunction after stroke. However, its superiority over conventional rehabilitation requires further research. Additionally, it may provide unexpected benefits that the effects of RAGT with different types or treatment protocols were further compared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shishi Chen
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Rehabilitation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wanying Zhang
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Rehabilitation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dingyu Wang
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhaoming Chen
- Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China -
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sebastián-Romagosa M, Cho W, Ortner R, Sieghartsleitner S, Von Oertzen TJ, Kamada K, Laureys S, Allison BZ, Guger C. Brain-computer interface treatment for gait rehabilitation in stroke patients. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1256077. [PMID: 37920297 PMCID: PMC10618349 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1256077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) as rehabilitation tools for chronically ill neurological patients has become more widespread. BCIs combined with other techniques allow the user to restore neurological function by inducing neuroplasticity through real-time detection of motor-imagery (MI) as patients perform therapy tasks. Twenty-five stroke patients with gait disability were recruited for this study. Participants performed 25 sessions with the MI-BCI and assessment visits to track functional changes during the therapy. The results of this study demonstrated a clinically significant increase in walking speed of 0.19 m/s, 95%CI [0.13-0.25], p < 0.001. Patients also reduced spasticity and improved their range of motion and muscle contraction. The BCI treatment was effective in promoting long-lasting functional improvements in the gait speed of chronic stroke survivors. Patients have more movements in the lower limb; therefore, they can walk better and safer. This functional improvement can be explained by improved neuroplasticity in the central nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Woosang Cho
- g.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Schiedlberg, Austria
| | - Rupert Ortner
- g.tec Medical Engineering Spain SL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | - Kyousuke Kamada
- Department for Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
- Hokashin Group Megumino Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Steven Laureys
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- CERVO Brain Research Center, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Brendan Z. Allison
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Christoph Guger
- g.tec Medical Engineering Spain SL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- g.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Schiedlberg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang J, Gong Y, Yu L, Peng L, Cui Y, Huang H. Effect of exoskeleton robot-assisted training on gait function in chronic stroke survivors: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074481. [PMID: 37709309 PMCID: PMC10503387 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Numbers of research have reported the usage of robot-assisted gait training for walking restoration post-stroke. However, no consistent conclusion has been reached yet about the efficacy of exoskeleton robot-assisted training (ERAT) on gait function of stroke survivors, especially during the chronic period. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the efficacy of ERAT on gait function for chronic stroke survivors. DESIGN This review followed the Participant, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome principle. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were systematically searched until December 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included and these RCTs took patients who had a chronic stroke as participants, exoskeleton robot-assisted gait training as intervention, regular rehabilitation therapy as comparison and gait-related functional assessments as outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction and synthesis used the reporting checklist for systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The risk of bias and methodological quality of included studies were evaluated by two independent investigators under the guidance of Cochrane risk of bias. RESULTS Out of 278 studies, a total of 10 studies (n=323, mean age 57.6 years, 63.2% males) were identified in this systematic review. According to the Cochrane risk of bias, the quality of these studies was assessed as low risk. Six studies reported favourable effects of ERAT on gait function involving gait performance, balance function and physical endurance, and the ERAT group was significantly superior when compared with the control group. In contrast, the other four trials showed equal or negative effects of ERAT considering different study designs. All the included studies did not claim any serious adverse events. CONCLUSION ERAT could be an efficient intervention to improve gait function for individuals who had a chronic stroke. However, more rigorously designed trials are required to draw more solid evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023410796.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinchao Yang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Gong
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Yu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Laiying Peng
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuanfen Cui
- Department of Pain Management, Wuhan No 1 Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Hailong Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyu T, Yan K, Lyu J, Zhao X, Wang R, Zhang C, Liu M, Xiong C, Liu C, Wei Y. Comparative efficacy of gait training for balance outcomes in patients with stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1093779. [PMID: 37077566 PMCID: PMC10106590 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1093779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGrowing evidence suggests that gait training can improve stroke patients’ balance outcomes. However, it remains unclear which type of gait training is more effective in improving certain types of balance outcomes in patients with stroke. Thus, this network meta-analysis (NMA) included six types of gait training (treadmill, body-weight-supported treadmill, virtual reality gait training, robotic-assisted gait training, overground walking training, and conventional gait training) and four types of balance outcomes (static steady-state balance, dynamic steady-state balance, proactive balance, and balance test batteries), aiming to compare the efficacy of different gait training on specific types of balance outcomes in stroke patients and determine the most effective gait training.MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until 25 April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of gait training for the treatment of balance outcomes after stroke were included. RoB2 was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to evaluate the effect of gait training on four categories of balance outcomes.ResultA total of 61 RCTs from 2,551 citations, encompassing 2,328 stroke patients, were included in this study. Pooled results showed that body-weight-support treadmill (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.01, 0.58]) and treadmill (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI [0.00, 0.49]) could improve the dynamic steady-state balance. Virtual reality gait training (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.10, 0.71]) and body-weight-supported treadmill (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.02, 0.80]) demonstrated better effects in improving balance test batteries. However, none of included gait training showed a significant effect on static steady-state balance and proactive balance.ConclusionGait training is an effective treatment for improving stroke patients’ dynamic steady-state balance and balance test batteries. However, gait training had no significant effect on static steady-state balance and proactive balance. To achieve maximum efficacy, clinicians should consider this evidence when recommending rehabilitation training to stroke patients. Considering body-weight-supported treadmill is not common for chronic stroke patients in clinical practice, the treadmill is recommended for those who want to improve dynamic steady-state balance, and virtual reality gait training is recommended for those who want to improve balance test batteries.LimitationMissing evidence in relation to some types of gait training is supposed to be taken into consideration. Moreover, we fail to assess reactive balance in this NMA since few included trials reported this outcome.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42022349965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Lyu
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Kang Yan
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaxuan Lyu
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xirui Zhao
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Ruoshui Wang
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chaoyang Zhang
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Liu
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Xiong
- L3 & Maintenance Solutions, SUSE Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Chengjiang Liu
- Department of General Medicine, Affiliated Anqing First People’s Hospital of Anhui Medical University, HeFei, Anhui, China
| | - Yulong Wei
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Yulong Wei,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loro A, Borg MB, Battaglia M, Amico AP, Antenucci R, Benanti P, Bertoni M, Bissolotti L, Boldrini P, Bonaiuti D, Bowman T, Capecci M, Castelli E, Cavalli L, Cinone N, Cosenza L, Di Censo R, Di Stefano G, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Filippetti M, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Invernizzi M, Jonsdottir J, Lentino C, Massai P, Mazzoleni S, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Morelli S, Morone G, Nardone A, Panzeri D, Petrarca M, Posteraro F, Santamato A, Scotti L, Senatore M, Spina S, Taglione E, Turchetti G, Varalta V, Picelli A, Baricich A. Balance Rehabilitation through Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Post-Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci 2023; 13:brainsci13010092. [PMID: 36672074 PMCID: PMC9856764 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Balance impairment is a common disability in post-stroke survivors, leading to reduced mobility and increased fall risk. Robotic gait training (RAGT) is largely used, along with traditional training. There is, however, no strong evidence about RAGT superiority, especially on balance. This study aims to determine RAGT efficacy on balance of post-stroke survivors. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PeDRO databases were investigated. Randomized clinical trials evaluating RAGT efficacy on post-stroke survivor balance with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) or Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were searched. Meta-regression analyses were performed, considering weekly sessions, single-session duration, and robotic device used. RESULTS A total of 18 trials have been included. BBS pre-post treatment mean difference is higher in RAGT-treated patients, with a pMD of 2.17 (95% CI 0.79; 3.55). TUG pre-post mean difference is in favor of RAGT, but not statistically, with a pMD of -0.62 (95%CI - 3.66; 2.43). Meta-regression analyses showed no relevant association, except for TUG and treatment duration (β = -1.019, 95% CI - 1.827; -0.210, p-value = 0.0135). CONCLUSIONS RAGT efficacy is equal to traditional therapy, while the combination of the two seems to lead to better outcomes than each individually performed. Robot-assisted balance training should be the focus of experimentation in the following years, given the great results in the first available trials. Given the massive heterogeneity of included patients, trials with more strict inclusion criteria (especially time from stroke) must be performed to finally define if and when RAGT is superior to traditional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Loro
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: or
| | - Margherita Beatrice Borg
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Battaglia
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Angelo Paolo Amico
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Polyclinic of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Antenucci
- Rehabilitation Unit, Castel San Giovanni Hospital, 29015 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Paolo Benanti
- Theology Department, Pontifical Gregorian University, 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Bertoni
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Luciano Bissolotti
- Casa di Cura Domus Salutis, Fondazione Teresa Camplani, 25100 Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Boldrini
- Robotic Rehabilitation Section, Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine (SIMFER), 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatella Bonaiuti
- Robotic Rehabilitation Section, Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine (SIMFER), 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Bowman
- Neurorehabilitation Department, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Capecci
- Experimental and Clinic Medicine Department, Università Politecnica delle Marche (UNIVPM), 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Enrico Castelli
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | - Loredana Cavalli
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Centro Giusti, 50125 Florence, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Cinone
- Unit of Spasticity and Movement Disorders, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | - Lucia Cosenza
- Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Rehabilitation, “Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo” National Hospital, 15122 Alessandria, Italy
| | - Rita Di Censo
- Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Di Stefano
- Robotic Rehabilitation Section, Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine (SIMFER), 00187 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Draicchio
- Dipartimento Medicina, Epidemiologia, Igiene del Lavoro e Ambientale, Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), 00192 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Falabella
- Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (FISH), 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Mirko Filippetti
- Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Silvia Galeri
- Neurorehabilitation Department, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Physical and Mental Health and Prevention Medicine, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Grigioni
- Department of New Technologies in Public Healthcare, Italian National Institute of Health (ISS), 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Invernizzi
- Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15122 Alessandria, Italy
| | - Johanna Jonsdottir
- Neurorehabilitation Department, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Lentino
- Rehabilitation Unit, Santa Corona Hospital, 17027 Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Perla Massai
- Tuscany Rehabilitation Clinic, 52025 Montevarchi, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56025 Pontedera, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzon
- Azienda Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria Euganea (AULSS 6), 35100 Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Molteni
- Rehabilitation Department, Valduce Villa Beretta Hospital, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy
| | - Sandra Morelli
- Department of New Technologies in Public Healthcare, Italian National Institute of Health (ISS), 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Nardone
- Pediatric, Diagnostical and Clinical-Surgical Sciences Department, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Istituto Clinico-Scientifico Maugeri SPA IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniele Panzeri
- Pediatric Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Italy
| | - Maurizio Petrarca
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Santamato
- Unit of Spasticity and Movement Disorders, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | - Lorenza Scotti
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Michele Senatore
- Italian Association of Occupational Therapists (AITO), 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Spina
- Unit of Spasticity and Movement Disorders, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | - Elisa Taglione
- Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), 56048 Volterra, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Varalta
- Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Picelli
- Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessio Baricich
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazzucchelli M, Mazzoleni D, Campanini I, Merlo A, Mazzoli D, Melegari C, Colombo V, Cerulli S, Piscitelli D, Perin C, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, Calabro RS, Carmignano SM, Cassio A, Chisari C, Dalise S, Fundaro C, Gazzotti V, Stampacchia G, Boldrini P, Mazzoleni S, Posteraro F, Benanti P, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Morone G, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Bonaiuti D. Evidence-based improvement of gait in post-stroke patients following robot-assisted training: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 51:595-608. [PMID: 36502342 DOI: 10.3233/nre-220024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recovery of walking after stroke is a priority goal for recovering autonomy. In the last years robotic systems employed for Robotic Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) were developed. However, literature and clinical practice did not offer standardized RAGT protocol or pattern of evaluation scales. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the use of RAGT in post-stroke, following the CICERONE Consensus indications. METHODS The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro, including studies with the following criteria: 1) adult post-stroke survivors with gait disability in acute/subacute/chronic phase; 2) RAGT as intervention; 3) any comparators; 4) outcome regarding impairment, activity, and participation; 5) both primary studies and reviews. RESULTS Sixty-one articles were selected. Data about characteristics of patients, level of disability, robotic devices used, RAGT protocols, outcome measures, and level of evidence were extracted. CONCLUSION It is possible to identify robotic devices that are more suitable for specific phase disease and level of disability, but we identified significant variability in dose and protocols. RAGT as an add-on treatment seemed to be prevalent. Further studies are needed to investigate the outcomes achieved as a function of RAGT doses delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniele Mazzoleni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabella Campanini
- Department of Neuromotor and Rehabilitation, LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, San Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Andrea Merlo
- Department of Neuromotor and Rehabilitation, LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, San Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Sol et Salus Ospedale Privato Accreditato, Rimini, Italy
| | - Davide Mazzoli
- Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Sol et Salus Ospedale Privato Accreditato, Rimini, Italy
| | | | | | - Simona Cerulli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Piscitelli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Cecilia Perin
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,San Donato Group, Istituti Clinici Zucchi, Monza, Italy
| | - Elisa Andrenelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emiliana Bizzarini
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Spinal Cord Unit, Gervasutta Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASU FC), Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Cassio
- Spinal Cord Unit and Intensive Rehabilitation Medicine, Ospedale di Fiorenzuola d'Arda, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Carmelo Chisari
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Neurorehabiltation Section, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefania Dalise
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Neurorehabiltation Section, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cira Fundaro
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS Montescano, Pavia, Italy
| | - Valeria Gazzotti
- Centro Protesi Vigorso di Budrio, Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Boldrini
- Italian Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SIMFER), Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Posteraro
- Department of Rehabilitation, Versilia Hospital - AUSL12, Viareggio, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Castelli
- Department of Paediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Draicchio
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Falabella
- Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (FAIP Onlus), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Grigioni
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzon
- Rehabilitation Unit, ULSS (Local Health Authority) Euganea, Camposampiero Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Molteni
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Petrarca
- Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARlab), IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Picelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Senatore
- Associazione Italiana dei Terapisti Occupazionali (AITO), Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin M, Wang H, Yang C, Liu W, Niu J, Vladareanu L. Human-Robot Cooperative Strength Training Based on Robust Admittance Control Strategy. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:7746. [PMID: 36298097 PMCID: PMC9611061 DOI: 10.3390/s22207746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
A stroke is a common disease that can easily lead to lower limb motor dysfunction in the elderly. Stroke survivors can effectively train muscle strength through leg flexion and extension training. However, available lower limb rehabilitation robots ignore the knee soft tissue protection of the elderly in training. This paper proposes a human-robot cooperative lower limb active strength training based on a robust admittance control strategy. The stiffness change law of the admittance model is designed based on the biomechanics of knee joints, and it can guide the user to make force correctly and reduce the stress on the joint soft tissue. The controller will adjust the model stiffness in real-time according to the knee joint angle and then indirectly control the exertion force of users. This control strategy not only can avoid excessive compressive force on the joint soft tissue but also can enhance the stimulation of quadriceps femoris muscles. Moreover, a dual input robust control is proposed to improve the tracking performance under the disturbance caused by model uncertainty, interaction force and external noise. Experiments about the controller performance and the training feasibility were conducted with eight stroke survivors. Results show that the designed controller can effectively influence the interaction force; it can reduce the possibility of joint soft tissue injury. The robot also has a good tracking performance under disturbances. This control strategy also can enhance the stimulation of quadriceps femoris muscles, which is proved by measuring the muscle electrical signal and interaction force. Human-robot cooperative strength training is a feasible method for training lower limb muscles with the knee soft tissue protection mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musong Lin
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
- Academy for Engineering & Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Congliang Yang
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
| | - Wenjie Liu
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
| | - Jianye Niu
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
- Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science of Ministry of Education, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
| | - Luige Vladareanu
- Robotics and Mechatronics Department, Institute of Solid Mechanics of Romanian Academy, 010141 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giovannini S, Iacovelli C, Brau F, Loreti C, Fusco A, Caliandro P, Biscotti L, Padua L, Bernabei R, Castelli L. RObotic-Assisted Rehabilitation for balance and gait in Stroke patients (ROAR-S): study protocol for a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:872. [PMID: 36224575 PMCID: PMC9558956 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06812-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stroke, the incidence of which increases with age, has a negative impact on motor and cognitive performance, quality of life, and the independence of the person and his or her family, leading to a number of direct and indirect costs. Motor recovery is essential, especially in elderly patients, to enable the patient to be independent in activities of daily living and to prevent falls. Several studies have shown how robotic training associated with physical therapy influenced functional and motor outcomes of walking after stroke by improving endurance and walking strategies. Considering data from previous studies and patients’ needs in gait and balance control, we hypothesized that robot-assisted balance treatment associated with physical therapy may be more effective than usual therapy performed by a physical therapist in terms of improving static, dynamic balance and gait, on fatigue and cognitive performance. Methods This is an interventional, single-blinded, preliminary randomized control trial. Twenty-four patients of both sexes will be recruited, evaluated, and treated at the UOC Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS in Rome from January to December 2022. Patients will be randomized into two groups: the experimental group will perform specific rehabilitation for balance disorder using the Hunova® robotic platform (Movendo Technology srl, Genoa, IT) for 3 times a week, for 4 weeks (12 total sessions), and for 45 min of treatment, in addition to conventional treatment, while the conventional group (GC) will perform only conventional treatment as per daily routine. All patients will undergo clinical and instrumental evaluation at the beginning and end of the 4 weeks of treatment. Conclusions The study aims to evaluate the improvement in balance, fatigue, quality of life, and motor and cognitive performance after combined conventional and robotic balance treatment with Hunova® (Movendo Technology srl, Genoa, IT) compared with conventional therapy alone. Robotic assessment to identify the most appropriate and individualized rehabilitation treatment may allow reducing disability and improving quality of life in the frail population. This would reduce direct and indirect social costs of care and treatment for the National Health Service and caregivers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05280587. Registered on March 15, 2022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06812-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Giovannini
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. .,UOS Riabilitazione Post-Acuzie, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Chiara Iacovelli
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Brau
- UOS Riabilitazione Post-Acuzie, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Loreti
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Augusto Fusco
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione Ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Caliandro
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Biscotti
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Geriatric Care Promotion and Development Centre (C.E.P.S.A.G), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Padua
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,UOC Neuroriabilitazione Ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Bernabei
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Letizia Castelli
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin YN, Huang SW, Kuan YC, Chen HC, Jian WS, Lin LF. Hybrid robot-assisted gait training for motor function in subacute stroke: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:99. [PMID: 36104706 PMCID: PMC9476570 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is a practical treatment that can complement conventional rehabilitation by providing high-intensity repetitive training for patients with stroke. RAGT systems are usually either of the end-effector or exoskeleton types. We developed a novel hybrid RAGT system that leverages the advantages of both types. Objective This single-blind randomized controlled trial evaluated the beneficial effects of the novel RAGT system both immediately after the intervention and at the 3-month follow-up in nonambulatory patients with subacute stroke. Methods We recruited 40 patients with subacute stroke who were equally randomized to receive conventional rehabilitation either alone or with the addition of 15 RAGT sessions. We assessed lower-extremity motor function, balance, and gait performance by using the following tools: active range of motion (AROM), manual muscle test (MMT), the Fugl–Meyer Assessment (FMA) lower-extremity subscale (FMA-LE) and total (FMA-total), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) balance and gait subscores, and the 3-m and 6-m walking speed and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests. These measurements were performed before and after the intervention and at the 3-month follow-up. Results Both groups demonstrated significant within-group changes in the AROM, MMT, FMA-LE, FMA-total, PASS, BBS, POMA, TUG, and 3-m and 6-m walking speed tests before and after intervention and at the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.05). The RAGT group significantly outperformed the control group only in the FMA-LE (p = 0.014) and total (p = 0.002) assessments. Conclusion Although the novel hybrid RAGT is effective, strong evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness relative to controls in those with substantial leg dysfunction after stroke remains elusive. Trial registration The study was registered with an International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN, ISRCTN15088682. Registered retrospectively on September 16, 2016, at https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15088682
Collapse
|
10
|
Aprile I, Conte C, Cruciani A, Pecchioli C, Castelli L, Insalaco S, Germanotta M, Iacovelli C. Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Gait Training Combined with Robotic Balance Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175162. [PMID: 36079092 PMCID: PMC9457020 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, the use of robotic technology in gait and balance rehabilitation of stroke patients has been introduced, with positive results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic gait and trunk rehabilitation compared to robotic gait training alone on balance, activities, and participation measures in patients with subacute stroke. The study was a randomized, controlled, single blind, parallel group clinical trial. Thirty-six patients with first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke event were enrolled, and they were randomized in two groups: Gait Group (GG), where they received only robotic treatment for gait rehabilitation through an end-effector system, and Gait/Trunk Group (GTG) where they performed end-effector gait rehabilitation and balance with a robotic platform, 3 times/week for 12 sessions/month. At the end of the study, there was an improvement in balance ability in both groups. Instead, the lower limb muscle strength and muscle tone significantly improved only in the GTG group, where we found a significant reduction in the trunk oscillations and displacement during dynamic exercises more than the GG group. The robotic platform which was added to the gait robotic treatment offers more intense and controlled training of the trunk that positively influences the tone and strength of lower limb muscles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Aprile
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - Carmela Conte
- Laboratorio di Analisi del Movimento, Policlinico Italia Piazza del Campidano 6, 00162 Rome, Italy
| | - Arianna Cruciani
- High Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Letizia Castelli
- High Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Chiara Iacovelli
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Model Analysis and Experimental Study of Lower Limb Rehabilitation Training Device Based on Gravity Balance. MACHINES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/machines10070514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
More hemiplegia patients tend to use equipment for rehabilitation training due to the lack of physical therapists and the low effect of manual training. Nowadays, lower limb rehabilitation training devices for patients in grade 2 of the Medical Research Council (MRC-2) scale are still scarce and have some issues of poor autonomy and cannot relieve the muscle weakness of patients. To address these problems, a prototype based on gravity balance was designed with the combination of springs and linkages to enable patients to passively experience the rehabilitation training in the state of balancing the gravity of lower limbs. The motion of the mechanism was analyzed to obtain the functional relation between the motor rotation angle and the joints’ angle. Based on the principle of constant potential energy, a gravity balance mathematical model of the device was established, analyzed, and simulated. Moreover, through the training experiment, the results show that when subjects in three different weights were trained under the rehabilitation device with and without gravity balance, the required torques of the motor and EMG signal strength of the knee and hip joints decreased by a degree of significance, which verified the effectiveness of the device’s gravity balancing characteristics for MRC-2 patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Design and Simulation Analysis of a Robot-Assisted Gait Trainer with the PBWS System. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2021; 2021:2750936. [PMID: 34820074 PMCID: PMC8608511 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2750936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In response to the ever-increasing demand of lower limb rehabilitation, this paper presents a novel robot-assisted gait trainer (RGT) to assist the elderly and the pediatric patients with neurological impairments in the lower limb rehabilitation training (LLRT). The RGT provides three active degrees of freedom (DoF) to both legs that are used to implement the gait cycle in such a way that the natural gait is not significantly affected. The robot consists of (i) the partial body weight support (PBWS) system to assist patients in sit-to-stand transfer via the precision linear rail system and (ii) the bipedal end-effector (BE) to control the motions of lower limbs via two mechanical arms. The robot stands out for multiple modes of training and optimized functional design to improve the quality of life for those patients. To analyze the performance of the RGT, the kinematic and static models are established in this paper. After that, the reachable workspace and motion trajectory are analyzed to cover the motion requirements and implement natural gait cycle. The preliminary results demonstrate the usability of the robot.
Collapse
|
13
|
Adaptive Admittance Control Scheme with Virtual Reality Interaction for Robot-Assisted Lower Limb Strength Training. MACHINES 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/machines9110301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Muscle weakness is the primary impairment causing mobility difficulty among stroke survivors. Millions of people are unable to live normally because of mobility difficulty every year. Strength training is an effective method to improve lower extremity ability but is limited by the shortage of medical staff. Thus, this paper proposes a robot-assisted active training (RAAT) by an adaptive admittance control scheme with virtual reality interaction (AACVRI). AACVRI consists of a stiffness variable admittance controller, an adaptive controller, and virtual reality (VR) interactions. In order to provide human-robot reality interactions corresponding to virtual scenes, an admittance control law with variable stiffness term was developed to define the mechanics property of the end effector. The adaptive controller improves tracking performances by compensating interaction forces and dynamics model deviations. A virtual training environment including action following, event feedback, and competition mechanism is utilized for improving boring training experience and engaging users to maintain active state in cycling training. To verify controller performances and the feasibility of RAAT, experiments were conducted with eight subjects. Admittance control provides desired variable interactions along the trajectory. The robot responds to different virtual events by changing admittance parameters according to trigger feedbacks. Adaptive control ensures tracking errors at a low level. Subjects were maintained in active state during this strength training. Their physiological signals significantly increased, and interaction forces were at a high level. RAAT is a feasible approach for lower limb strength training, and users can independently complete high-quality active strength training under RAAT.
Collapse
|
14
|
Li DX, Zha FB, Long JJ, Liu F, Cao J, Wang YL. Effect of Robot Assisted Gait Training on Motor and Walking Function in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Random Controlled Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30:105807. [PMID: 33895428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted gait training has been confirmed to have beneficial effect on the rehabilitation of stroke patients. An exoskeleton robot, named BEAR-H1, is designed to help stroke patients with walking disabilities. METHODS 17 subjects in experimental group and 15 subjects in control group completed the study. The experimental group received 30 minutes of BEAR-H1 assisted gait training(BAGT), and the control group received 30 minutes of conventional training, 5 times/week for 4weeks. All subjects were evaluated with 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment for lower extremity (FMA-LE), Functional Ambulatory Classification (FAC), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and gait analysis at baseline and after 4 weeks intervention. RESULTS The improvements of 6MWT, FMA-LE, gait speed, cadence, step length and cycle duration in BAGT group were more noticeable than in the control group. However, there was no difference in the assessment of MAS between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that BAGT is an effective intervention to improve the motor and walking ability during 4 weeks training for subacute stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Xia Li
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| | - Fu-Bing Zha
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| | - Jian-Jun Long
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| | - Fang Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| | - Jia Cao
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| | - Yu-Long Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Infarinato F, Romano P, Goffredo M, Ottaviani M, Galafate D, Gison A, Petruccelli S, Pournajaf S, Franceschini M. Functional Gait Recovery after a Combination of Conventional Therapy and Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training Is Not Associated with Significant Changes in Muscle Activation Pattern: An EMG Preliminary Study on Subjects Subacute Post Stroke. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11040448. [PMID: 33915808 PMCID: PMC8066552 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11040448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT) appears to be a promising stroke rehabilitation in terms of clinical outcomes. The literature on surface ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) assessment in o-RAGT is limited. This paper aimed to assess muscle activation patterns with sEMG in subjects subacute post stroke after training with o-RAGT and conventional therapy. Methods: An observational preliminary study was carried out with subjects subacute post stroke who received 15 sessions of o-RAGT (5 sessions/week; 60 min) in combination with conventional therapy. The subjects were assessed with both clinical and instrumental evaluations. Gait kinematics and sEMG data were acquired before (T1) and after (T2) the period of treatment (during ecological gait), and during the first session of o-RAGT (o-RAGT1). An eight-channel wireless sEMG device acquired in sEMG signals. Significant differences in sEMG outcomes were found in the BS of TA between T1 and T2. There were no other significant correlations between the sEMG outcomes and the clinical results between T1 and T2. Conclusions: There were significant functional gains in gait after complex intensive clinical rehabilitation with o-RAGT and conventional therapy. In addition, there was a significant increase in bilateral symmetry of the Tibialis Anterior muscles. At this stage of the signals from the tibialis anterior (TA), gastrocnemius medialis (GM), rectus femoris (RF), and biceps femoris caput longus (BF) muscles of each lower extremity. sEMG data processing extracted the Bilateral Symmetry (BS), the Co-Contraction (CC), and the Root Mean Square (RMS) coefficients. Results: Eight of 22 subjects in the subacute stage post stroke agreed to participate in this sEMG study. This subsample demonstrated a significant improvement in the motricity index of the affected lower limb and functional ambulation. The heterogeneity of the subjects’ characteristics and the small number of subjects was associated with high variability research, functional gait recovery was associated with minimal change in muscle activation patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Infarinato
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Paola Romano
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Michela Goffredo
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0652252319
| | - Marco Ottaviani
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Daniele Galafate
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Annalisa Gison
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Simone Petruccelli
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Sanaz Pournajaf
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Marco Franceschini
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy; (F.I.); (P.R.); (M.O.); (D.G.); (A.G.); (S.P.); (S.P.); (M.F.)
- Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Molteni F, Guanziroli E, Goffredo M, Calabrò RS, Pournajaf S, Gaffuri M, Gasperini G, Filoni S, Baratta S, Galafate D, Le Pera D, Bramanti P, Franceschini M. Gait Recovery with an Overground Powered Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Subacute Stroke Subjects. Brain Sci 2021; 11:104. [PMID: 33466749 PMCID: PMC7830339 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT) provides intensive gait rehabilitation. This study investigated the efficacy of o-RAGT in subacute stroke subjects, compared to conventional gait training. METHODS A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted on 75 subacute stroke subjects (38 in the Experimental Group (EG) and 37 in the Control Group (CG)). Both groups received 15 sessions of gait training (5 sessions/week for 60 min) and daily conventional rehabilitation. The subjects were assessed at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the training period with the primary outcome of a 6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT), the Modified Ashworth Scale of the Affected lower Limb (MAS-AL), the Motricity Index of the Affected lower Limb (MI-AL), the Trunk Control Test (TCT), Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC), a 10 Meters Walking Test (10MWT), the modified Barthel Index (mBI), and the Walking Handicap Scale (WHS). RESULTS The 6MWT increased in both groups, which was confirmed by both frequentist and Bayesian analyses. Similar outcomes were registered in the MI-AL, 10MWT, mBI, and MAS-AL. The FAC and WHS showed a significant number of subjects improving in functional and community ambulation in both groups at T2. CONCLUSIONS The clinical effects of o-RAGT were similar to conventional gait training in subacute stroke subjects. The results obtained in this study are encouraging and suggest future clinical trials on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Molteni
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, 23845 Lecco, Italy; (F.M.); (E.G.); (M.G.); (G.G.)
| | - Eleonora Guanziroli
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, 23845 Lecco, Italy; (F.M.); (E.G.); (M.G.); (G.G.)
| | - Michela Goffredo
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (S.P.); (D.G.); (D.L.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
- Neurorobotic Rehabilitation, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, 98124 Messina, Italy; (R.S.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Sanaz Pournajaf
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (S.P.); (D.G.); (D.L.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Marina Gaffuri
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, 23845 Lecco, Italy; (F.M.); (E.G.); (M.G.); (G.G.)
| | - Giulio Gasperini
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, 23845 Lecco, Italy; (F.M.); (E.G.); (M.G.); (G.G.)
| | - Serena Filoni
- Fondazione Centri di Riabilitazione Padre Pio Onlus, 71013 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Silvano Baratta
- SCRIN Trevi Dipartimento di Riabilitazione USL Umbria 2, 06039 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Daniele Galafate
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (S.P.); (D.G.); (D.L.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Domenica Le Pera
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (S.P.); (D.G.); (D.L.P.); (M.F.)
| | - Placido Bramanti
- Neurorobotic Rehabilitation, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, 98124 Messina, Italy; (R.S.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Marco Franceschini
- Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (S.P.); (D.G.); (D.L.P.); (M.F.)
- Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:CD006185. [PMID: 33091160 PMCID: PMC8189995 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006185.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electromechanical- and robot-assisted gait-training devices are used in rehabilitation and might help to improve walking after stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2007 and previously updated in 2017. OBJECTIVES Primary • To determine whether electromechanical- and robot-assisted gait training versus normal care improves walking after stroke Secondary • To determine whether electromechanical- and robot-assisted gait training versus normal care after stroke improves walking velocity, walking capacity, acceptability, and death from all causes until the end of the intervention phase SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 6 January 2020); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020 Issue 1), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE in Ovid (1950 to 6 January 2020); Embase (1980 to 6 January 2020); the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to 20 November 2019); the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED; 1985 to 6 January 2020); Web of Science (1899 to 7 January 2020); SPORTDiscus (1949 to 6 January 2020); the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; searched 7 January 2020); and the engineering databases COMPENDEX (1972 to 16 January 2020) and Inspec (1969 to 6 January 2020). We handsearched relevant conference proceedings, searched trials and research registers, checked reference lists, and contacted trial authors in an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials and randomised controlled cross-over trials in people over the age of 18 years diagnosed with stroke of any severity, at any stage, in any setting, evaluating electromechanical- and robot-assisted gait training versus normal care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants walking independently at follow-up. MAIN RESULTS We included in this review update 62 trials involving 2440 participants. Electromechanical-assisted gait training in combination with physiotherapy increased the odds of participants becoming independent in walking (odds ratio (random effects) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51 to 2.69; 38 studies, 1567 participants; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%; high-quality evidence) and increased mean walking velocity (mean difference (MD) 0.06 m/s, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.10; 42 studies, 1600 participants; P = 0.004; I² = 60%; low-quality evidence) but did not improve mean walking capacity (MD 10.9 metres walked in 6 minutes, 95% CI -5.7 to 27.4; 24 studies, 983 participants; P = 0.2; I² = 42%; moderate-quality evidence). Electromechanical-assisted gait training did not increase the risk of loss to the study during intervention nor the risk of death from all causes. Results must be interpreted with caution because (1) some trials investigated people who were independent in walking at the start of the study, (2) we found variation between trials with respect to devices used and duration and frequency of treatment, and (3) some trials included devices with functional electrical stimulation. Post hoc analysis showed that people who are non-ambulatory at the start of the intervention may benefit but ambulatory people may not benefit from this type of training. Post hoc analysis showed no differences between the types of devices used in studies regarding ability to walk but revealed differences between devices in terms of walking velocity and capacity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS People who receive electromechanical-assisted gait training in combination with physiotherapy after stroke are more likely to achieve independent walking than people who receive gait training without these devices. We concluded that eight patients need to be treated to prevent one dependency in walking. Specifically, people in the first three months after stroke and those who are not able to walk seem to benefit most from this type of intervention. The role of the type of device is still not clear. Further research should consist of large definitive pragmatic phase 3 trials undertaken to address specific questions about the most effective frequency and duration of electromechanical-assisted gait training, as well as how long any benefit may last. Future trials should consider time post stroke in their trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Mehrholz
- Department of Public Health, Dresden Medical School, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Thomas
- Wissenschaftliches Institut, Klinik Bavaria Kreischa, Kreischa, Germany
| | - Joachim Kugler
- Department of Public Health, Dresden Medical School, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Pohl
- Neurological Rehabilitation, Helios Klinik Schloss Pulsnitz, Pulsnitz, Germany
| | - Bernhard Elsner
- Department of Public Health, Dresden Medical School, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Klochkov AS, Zimin AA, Khizhnikova AE, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA. Effect of robot-assisted gait training on biomechanics of ankle joint in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. BULLETIN OF RUSSIAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2020. [DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2020.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The key factor promoting post-stroke gait disturbances is motor impairment of the ankle joint (AJ) which results in pathological synergies. Robotic devices used for gait training are equipped with hip and knee joint actuators. However, there is no consensus in the literature on their effect on AJ movements. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training on AJ movements in patients with post-stroke paresis. The study recruited 22 hemispheric stroke survivors. They motor function was assessed using clinical scales and motion capture analysis. All patients received 11 robot-assisted gait training session. After rehabilitation, the total score on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale increased from 146.5 to 152 points (p < 0.05); for the lower limb, the score increased from 18 to 20.5 points (p < 0.05). The muscle tone of ankle extensors decreased from 2.5 to 2.0 points on the modified Ashworth scale (p < 0.05). The duration of the stance phase increased from 28.0 to 33.5% relative to the total gait cycle (GC). The main difference in the GC structure before and after rehabilitation is the presence of 3 GC parts instead of 5, suggesting consolidation of patients’ goniograms at 1-61% of GC. Comparison of joint angles before and after rehabilitation revealed that only the interquartile ranges (IR) were different (р < 0.05). The authors conclude that robot-assisted training with knee and hip joint actuators indirectly affects the kinematic parameters of AJ by promoting a shift towards the average gait kinematics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AS Klochkov
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - AA Zimin
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - NA Suponeva
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - MA Piradov
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A 4-DOF Workspace Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot: Mechanism Design, Human Joint Analysis and Trajectory Planning. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/app10134542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Most of currently rehabilitation robots cannot achieve the adduction/abduction (A/A) training of the hip joint and lack the consideration of the patient handling. This paper presents a four degrees of freedom (DOF) spatial workspace lower limb rehabilitation robot, and it could provide flexion/extension (F/E) training to three lower limb joints and A/A training to the hip joint. The training method is conducting the patient’s foot to complete the rehabilitation movement, and the patient could directly take training on the wheelchair and avoid frequent patient handling between the wheelchair and the rehabilitation device. Because patients own different joint range of motions (ROM), an analysis method for obtaining human joint motions is proposed to guarantee the patient’s joint safety in this training method. The analysis method is based on a five-bar linkage kinematic model, which includes the human lower limb. The human-robot hybrid kinematic model is analyzed according to the Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) method, and a variable human-robot workspace based on the user is proposed. Two kinds of trajectory planning methods are introduced. The trajectory planning method and the human joint analysis method are validated through the trajectory tracking experiment of the prototype.
Collapse
|