Predicting upper extremity motor improvement following therapy using EEG-based connectivity in chronic stroke

PSIs of EEG With Refined Frequency Decomposition Could Prognose Motor Recovery Before Rehabilitation Intervention

Stroke often leads to permanent impairment in motor function. Accurate and quantitative prognosis of potential motor recovery before rehabilitation intervention can help healthcare centers improve resources organization and enable individualized intervention. The context of this paper investigated the potential of using electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity (FC) measures as biomarkers for assessing and prognosing improvement of Fugl-Meyer Assessment in upper extremity motor function ( ∆FMU) among participants with chronic stroke. EEG data from resting and motor imagery task were recorded from 13 participants with chronic stroke. Three functional connectivity methods, which were Pearson correlation measure (PCM), weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) and phase synchronization index (PSI), were investigated, under three regions of interest (inter-hemispheric, intra-hemispheric, and whole-brain), in two statues (resting and motor imagery), with 15 refined center frequencies. We applied correlation analysis to identify the optimal center frequencies and pairs of synchronized channels that were consistently associated with ∆FMU . Predictive models were generated using regression analysis algorithms based on optimized center frequencies and channel pairs identified from the proposed analysis method, with leave-one-out cross-validation. We found that PSI in the Alpha band (with center frequency of 9Hz) was the most sensitive FC measures for prognosing motor recovery. Strong and significant correlations were identified between the predictions and actual ∆FMU scores both in the resting state ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], N=13) and motor imagery ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], N=13). Our results suggested that EEG connectivity measured with PSI in resting state could be a promising biomarker for quantifying motor recovery before motor rehabilitation intervention.

Electroencephalography-based parietofrontal connectivity modulated by electroacupuncture for predicting upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke

BACKGROUND

Predicting motor recovery in stroke patients is essential for effective rehabilitation planning and goal setting. However, intervention-specific biomarkers for such predictions are limited. This study investigates the potential of electroacupuncture (EA) - induced brain network connectivity as a prognostic biomarker for upper limb motor recovery in stroke.

METHODS

A randomized crossover and prospective observational study was conducted involving 40 stroke patients within 30 days of onset. Patients underwent both EA and sham electroacupuncture (SEA) interventions. Simultaneously, resting electroencephalography signals were recorded to assess brain response. Patients' motor function was monitored for 3 months and categorized into Poor and proportional (Prop) recovery groups. The correlations between the targeted brain network of parietofrontal (PF) functional connectivity (FC) during the different courses of the 2 EA interventions and partial least squares regression models were constructed to predict upper limb motor recovery.

RESULTS

Before the EA intervention, only ipsilesional PF network FC in the beta band correlated with motor recovery (r = -0.37, P = .041). Post-EA intervention, significant correlations with motor recovery were found in the beta band of the contralesional PF network FC (r = -0.43, P = .018) and the delta and theta bands of the ipsilesional PF network FC (delta: r = -0.59, P = .0004; theta: r = -0.45, P = .0157). No significant correlations were observed for the SEA intervention (all P > .05). Specifically, the delta band ipsilesional PF network FC after EA stimulation significantly differed between Poor and Prop groups (t = 3.474, P = .002, Cohen's d = 1.287, Poor > Prop). Moreover, the partial least squares regression model fitted after EA stimulation exhibited high explanatory power (R2 = 0.613), predictive value (Q2 = 0.547), and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE = 0.192) for predicting upper limb proportional recovery compared to SEA.

CONCLUSION

EA-induced PF network FC holds potential as a robust prognostic biomarker for upper limb motor recovery, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Associating Functional Neural Connectivity and Specific Aspects of Sensorimotor Control in Chronic Stroke

Hand sensorimotor deficits often result from stroke, limiting the ability to perform daily living activities. Sensorimotor deficits are heterogeneous among stroke survivors. Previous work suggests a cause of hand deficits is altered neural connectivity. However, the relationships between neural connectivity and specific aspects of sensorimotor control have seldom been explored. Understanding these relationships is important for developing personalized rehabilitation strategies to improve individual patients' specific sensorimotor deficits and, thus, rehabilitation outcomes. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that specific aspects of sensorimotor control will be associated with distinct neural connectivity in chronic stroke survivors. Twelve chronic stroke survivors performed a paretic hand grip-and-relax task while EEG was collected. Four aspects of hand sensorimotor grip control were extracted, including reaction time, relaxation time, force magnitude control, and force direction control. EEG source connectivity in the bilateral sensorimotor regions was calculated in α and β frequency bands during grip preparation and execution. Each of the four hand grip measures was significantly associated with a distinct connectivity measure. These results support further investigations into functional neural connectivity signatures that explain various aspects of sensorimotor control, to assist the development of personalized rehabilitation that targets the specific brain networks responsible for the individuals' distinct sensorimotor deficits.

Effect of the Trunk and Upper Limb Passive Stabilization on Hand Movements and Grip Strength Following Various Types of Strokes—An Observational Cohort Study

Almost half of the patients surveyed report impaired function of the upper limbx and handx after stroke. The effect of the passive trunk and shoulder stabilization on the recovery of coordinated hand movement is unclear. This study examined whether passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder could improve the functional state of the hands after various types of strokes. It is an observational prospective cohort study conducted at the Rehabilitation Clinic in two parallel groups of patients with four different types of strokes (hemorrhagic and ischemic of the brain, similar to the cerebellum). A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Patients were examined in various positions: sitting without a backrest with the upper limb adjacent to the body, supine with the upper limb perpendicular to the body, and supine with the arm stabilized in relation to the patient’s body. Hand Tutor devices and a hand dynamometer were used for the measurements. The frequency and maximum range of motion as well as the grip strength were measured in three different positions of the trunk and upper limb. Passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder showed more statistically significant differences in Group II. In group II, both in patients after hemorrhagic stroke (wrist Hz p = 0.019; wrist ROM p = 0.005; Hz F5 p = 0.021; Hz F4 p = 0.016; Hz F3 p = 0.019; Hz F2 p = 0.021) and ischemic stroke (p = 0.001 for wrist Hz, wrist ROM, Hz F from 5 to F2; and ROM F1; ROM F3 p = 0.009; ROM F2 p = 0.010), and hemorrhagic cerebellum, improvement of parameters was observed. Stabilization of the upper limb and passive stabilization of the trunk improved the frequency and range of movements in the radiocarpal joint and in the fingers of patients after stroke, regardless of the type of stroke.

Neuroplasticity after upper-extremity rehabilitation therapy with sensory stimulation in chronic stroke survivors

This study investigated the effect of using subthreshold vibration as a peripheral sensory stimulation during therapy on cortical activity. Secondary analysis of a pilot triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. Twelve chronic stroke survivors underwent 2-week upper-extremity task-practice therapy. Half received subthreshold vibratory stimulation on their paretic wrist (treatment group) and the other half did not (control). EEG connectivity and event-related de-/resynchronization for the sensorimotor network during hand grip were examined at pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up. Statistically significant group by time interactions were observed for both connectivity and event-related spectral perturbation. For the treatment group, connectivity increased at post-intervention and decreased at follow-up. Event-related desynchronization decreased and event-related resynchronization increased at post-intervention, which was maintained at follow-up. The control group had the opposite trend for connectivity and no change in event-related spectral perturbation. The stimulation altered cortical sensorimotor activity. The findings complement the clinical results of the trial in which the treatment group significantly improved gross manual dexterity while the control group did not. Increased connectivity in the treatment group may indicate neuroplasticity for motor learning, while reduced event-related desynchronization and increased event-related resynchronization may indicate lessened effort for grip and improved inhibitory control. EEG may improve understanding of neural processes underlying motor recovery.

Concomitant sensory stimulation during therapy to enhance hand functional recovery post stroke

Background

Post-stroke hand impairment is prevalent and persistent even after a full course of rehabilitation. Hand diminishes stroke survivors’ abilities for activities of daily living and independence. One way to improve treatment efficacy is to augment therapy with peripheral sensory stimulation. Recently, a novel sensory stimulation, TheraBracelet, has been developed in which imperceptible vibration is applied during task practice through a wrist-worn device. The objective of this trial is to determine if combining TheraBracelet with hand task practice is superior to hand task practice alone.

Methods

A double-blind randomized controlled trial will be used. Chronic stroke survivors will undergo a standardized hand task practice therapy program (3 days/week for 6 weeks) while wearing a device on the paretic wrist. The device will deliver TheraBracelet vibration for the treatment group and no vibration for the control group. The primary outcome is hand function measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test. Other outcomes include the Box and Block Test, Action Research Arm Test, upper extremity use in daily living, biomechanical measure of the sensorimotor grip control, and EEG-based neural communication.

Discussion

This research will determine clinical utility of TheraBracelet to guide future translation. The TheraBracelet stimulation is delivered via a wrist-worn device, does not interfere with hand motion, and can be easily integrated into clinical practice. Enhancing hand function should substantially increase stroke survivors' independence and quality of life and reduce caregiver burden.

Trial registration

NCT04569123. Registered on September 29, 2020

Effect of Sensory Impairment on Hand Functional Improvement with Therapy and Sensory Stimulation

Sensory impairment may impact individual stroke survivors' motor recovery as well as their response to peripheral sensory stimulation treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of sensory impairment level of individual stroke survivors on motor improvement with therapy and peripheral sensory stimulation. A secondary analysis of a pilot triple-blind randomized controlled trial was used. Twelve chronic stroke survivors were randomly assigned to the treatment group receiving peripheral sensory stimulation or the control group receiving no stimulation during 2-week hand task practice therapy. Sensory impairment level was quantified as the pre-intervention sensory threshold. Motor improvement was assessed as change in the Box and Block Test score from pre- to post-intervention. The association between sensory impairment level and motor improvement was examined using a regression analysis, accounting for groups. This study found that participants with better sensation (i.e., with lower sensory threshold) had better motor improvement than patients with worse sensation (i.e., with higher sensory threshold). Sensory impairment level did not alter the effect of peripheral sensory stimulation. These findings suggest that the level of sensory impairment may predict recovery potentials and direct rehabilitation treatment for stroke survivors.