Effectiveness of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Brain stimulation for patients with multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of therapeutic efficacy

Multiple sclerosis patients often experience various symptoms that can greatly impact their quality of life. There are various brain stimulation techniques that have been evaluated for their ability to reduce the symptoms of multiple sclerosis. However, there is inconsistency in the specific stimulation methods used and the symptoms targeted in the existing research. This umbrella review conducted in order to evaluate the effectiveness of brain stimulation and identify limitations and gaps for further research. In this umbrella review, we conducted a searched on Web of Knowledge, PubMed, and Scopus database. We specifically looked for reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that have investigated the effects of brain stimulation methods on symptoms of multiple sclerosis. All articles were examined by AMSTAR 2 (A Measure Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2). We identified 155 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Of those, five were qualitative studies and nine were meta-analyses. Among the included studies, four examined the use of deep brain stimulation, while ten investigated the therapeutic potential of noninvasive brain stimulation. Considering the heterogeneity of studies, the current evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be effective in treating pain and improving motor function, while transcranial direct current stimulation may be useful in alleviating fatigue and enhancing certain aspects of cognitive performance. Deep brain stimulation, on the other hand, appears to be effective in reducing tremors. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings and address the existing limitations in the field.

Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Approaches for the Management of Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain, Lhermitte's phenomenon, trigeminal neuralgia, and mixed pain. Neuropathic pain is a major concern for individuals with multiple sclerosis as it is directly linked to myelin damage in the central nervous system and the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis is challenging as the options available have limited efficacy and can cause unpleasant side effects. The literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies employed in the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacological options include cannabinoids, muscle relaxants (tizanidine, baclofen, dantrolene), anticonvulsants (benzodiazepines, gabapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine), antidepressants (duloxetine, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants), opioids (naltrexone), and botulinum toxin variants, which have evidence from various clinical trials. Non-pharmacological approaches for trigeminal neuralgia may include neurosurgical methods. Non-invasive methods, physical therapy, and psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction) may be recommended for patients with neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. The choice of treatment depends on the severity and type of pain as well as other factors, such as patient preferences and comorbidities. There is a pressing need for healthcare professionals and researchers to prioritize the development of better strategies for managing multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain.

Revolutionizing Neurological Disorder Treatment: Integrating Innovations in Pharmaceutical Interventions and Advanced Therapeutic Technologies

Neurological disorders impose a significant burden on individuals, leading to disabilities and a reduced quality of life. However, recent years have witnessed remarkable advancements in pharmaceutical interventions aimed at treating these disorders. This review article aims to provide an overview of the latest innovations and breakthroughs in neurological disorder treatment, with a specific focus on key therapeutic areas such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and stroke. This review explores emerging trends in drug development, including the identification of novel therapeutic targets, the development of innovative drug delivery systems, and the application of personalized medicine approaches. Furthermore, it highlights the integration of advanced therapeutic technologies such as gene therapy, optogenetics, and neurostimulation techniques. These technologies hold promise for precise modulation of neural circuits, restoration of neuronal function, and even disease modification. While these advancements offer hopeful prospects for more effective and tailored treatments, challenges such as the need for improved diagnostic tools, identification of new targets for intervention, and optimization of drug delivery methods will remain. By addressing these challenges and continuing to invest in research and collaboration, we can revolutionize the treatment of neurological disorders and significantly enhance the lives of those affected by these conditions.

Electrical stimulation therapy for pain and related symptoms in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy (EST) for pain, depression, fatigue, disability, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains uncertain. This study aims to analyze and discuss the efficacy of various EST treatments in alleviating pain among MS patients.

METHODS

The primary search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases until September 25, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with MS pain receiving EST compared with other therapies were included. Pain intensity, quality of life, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported. The mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated separately for outcomes to understand the mean effect size.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs containing 315 participants were included. The pooled data from 8 trials including 267 participants showed that the EST was superior in alleviating pain (MD = -1.75, 95 % CI -2.85--0.64, P = 0.002, I2=73 %) evaluated by the visual analog scale. In subgroup analysis, medium-term EST treatment showed the highest effect size compared to short-term and long-term treatment (MDmedium-term = -2.17, 95 % CI -3.51--0.84, P = 0.001, I2 = 0 %). However, no significant differences were found in terms of pain-related quality of life, depression, fatigue, and pain-related disability. No adverse events related to EST were reported. A high risk of bias was identified in three of the ten included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

EST is effective and safe for alleviating pain in MS, but it should be noted that limited sample sizes and methodological issues were present in the included studies. More robust assessment criteria and high-quality RCTs are required for patients with MS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42023406787. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=406787).

Home-Based Exercise to Improve Motor Functions, Cognitive Functions, and Quality of Life in People with Huntington's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Exercise in different settings has become a fundamental part of Huntington's disease (HD) management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effectiveness of home-based exercises (HBE) in HD. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of HBE on motor, cognitive, or health-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes in HD were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD), the 95% confidence interval, and p-values were calculated by comparing the outcomes change between HBE and control groups. Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The included RCTs prescribed different types of HBEs, i.e., aerobic strengthening, walking, balance, and fine motor exercises. The HBE protocol length was between 6 and 36 weeks. The meta-analyses showed a significant effect of HBE intervention on motor function measure by Unified Huntington Disease Rating and overall QoL measure by Short Form-36 post-treatment respectively, [SMD = 0.481, p = 0.048], [SMD = 0.378, p = 0.003]. The pooled analysis did not detect significant changes in cognition, gait characteristics, or functional balance scales. The current study shows the positive effect of HBE in HD, especially on motor function and QoL. No significant adverse events were reported. The current results support the clinical effect of HBE intervention on motor function and QoL in HD patients. However, these results should be taken with caution due to the limited available evidence. Well-designed clinical studies that consider the disease severity and stages are required in the future.

Integrated Cognitive Rehabilitation Home-Based Protocol to Improve Cognitive Functions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Cognitive impairment (CI) occurs in about 40-65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) during the disease course. Cognitive rehabilitation has produced non-univocal results in MS patients.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate whether an Integrated Cognitive Rehabilitation Program (ICRP) in MS patients might significantly improve CI.

METHODS

Forty patients with three phenotypes of MS were randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group (EG, n = 20), which participated in the ICRP for 10 weeks of training; and the control group (CG, n = 20). All participants' cognitive functions were assessed at three timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up) with the California Verbal Learning (CVLT), Brief Visuospatial Memory (BVMTR), Numerical Stroop, and Wisconsin tests.

RESULTS

When compared to CG patients, EG patients showed significant improvements in several measures of cognitive performance after ICRP, including verbal learning, visuospatial memory, attention, and executive functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based ICRP can improve cognitive functions and prevent the deterioration of patients' cognitive deficits. As an integrated cognitive rehabilitation program aimed at potentiation of restorative and compensatory mechanisms, this approach might suggest an effective role in preserving neuronal flexibility as well as limiting the progression of cognitive dysfunction in MS.