1
|
Schneider T, Leemann B, Nicastro N, Schnider A. Long-Term Outcome of Motor Functional Neurological Disorder After Rehabilitation. J Clin Neurol 2024; 20:493-500. [PMID: 39227332 PMCID: PMC11372205 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Functional neurological disorder (FND) is defined as the presence of neurological symptoms that are inconsistent with a neurological disease. We performed a single-center retrospective study aimed at determining the long-term outcome of FND patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation and the predictors of a good outcome. METHODS A multidisciplinary graded exercise program was provided with one or two daily physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions on 5 days each week, as well as weekly psychological support. Outcome was assessed using the motor part of the Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM; maximum score of 91) at admission, discharge, and follow-up, with the last assessment performed by phone interview. RESULTS The 30 included patients were aged 43.6±14.7 years (mean±standard deviation), comprised 70% females, and received a mean of 4 weeks of rehabilitation. The admission FIM score (80.2±8.3) was significantly lower than the discharge FIM score (86.9±4.6; p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No notable difference was observed between discharge and follow-up FIM scores (85.5±8.5, p=0.54). The mean follow-up of the 36-month FIM scores at discharge and follow-up was dichotomized as a good outcome in cases where all items were scored ≥6 (functional independence). Binomial logistic regression showed that absence of a comorbid psychiatric disorder (p=0.039, odds ratio=10.7) was a predictive factor for a good outcome at follow-up. Other variables (e.g., sex and age) were not significant predictors of clinical outcome (all p≥0.058). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest inpatient intensive rehabilitation for motor FND is effective and produces favorable long-term results. Further studies with larger groups are warranted so that the management protocols can be standardized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibault Schneider
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Beatrice Leemann
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Nicastro
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Armin Schnider
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saunders C, Bawa H, Aslanyan D, Coleman F, Jinadu H, Sigala N, Medford N. Treatment outcomes in the inpatient management of severe functional neurological disorder: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Neurol Open 2024; 6:e000675. [PMID: 38979396 PMCID: PMC11227748 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a heterogeneous condition; severe forms can be disabling. Multidisciplinary treatment and rehabilitation are recommended for severe FND, but there remains a lack of evidence for its efficacy and lack of understanding of the predictors and components of recovery. Methods We report clinical outcome data for an inpatient cohort with severe FND. Clinical Global Impression Improvement with treatment is the primary outcome measure. Admission and discharge measures (Euroqol quality of life measures, Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory, Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale, Illness Perception Questionnaire (Revised) and Functional Mobility Scale) are reported as secondary outcomes. Results We describe an FND cohort (n=52) with chronic illness (mean symptom duration 9.7 years). At admission, there were clinically relevant levels of depression, anxiety and depersonalisation derealisation. At the time of discharge, most (43/52) patients' global condition had improved. Measures of mobility, depression and quality of life also significantly improved while at discharge, symptoms were experienced as more understandable and less distressing than at admission. An admission measure of patient confidence in treatment was predictive of eventual clinical outcome. Conclusions The most frequent outcome of inpatient rehabilitation is global improvement, even when symptoms are chronic and severe, reflected in measurable changes in both physical and psychological functioning. Significant levels of depersonalisation derealisation seen in this patient group suggest that routine enquiry into such experiences could help personalise FND treatment approaches. Patient confidence in treatment is key in determining clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Saunders
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hetashi Bawa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Daron Aslanyan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Frances Coleman
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen Jinadu
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natasha Sigala
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Nick Medford
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Finkelstein SA, Carson A, Edwards MJ, Kozlowska K, Lidstone SC, Perez DL, Polich G, Stone J, Aybek S. Setting up Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment Services: Questions and Answers. Neurol Clin 2023; 41:729-743. [PMID: 37775201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
Functional neurologic disorder (FND) is commonly encountered across outpatient and inpatient medical settings. Given the potential for a high burden of disability in some patients and mounting evidence for the efficacy of FND-specific multidisciplinary treatment services, expanding clinical services for this population is a necessity. In this perspective article, we discuss considerations for creating FND services, including the types of services that exist, how to start, how to identify appropriate referrals, and how to develop and monitor individualized treatment plans. In addition, we discuss how this effort can be done sustainably - balancing patient needs with limited healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Finkelstein
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alan Carson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 50 Little France Cres, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
| | - Mark J Edwards
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Kasia Kozlowska
- Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Psychological Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Cn Hawkesbury Road, Hainsworth Street, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Sarah C Lidstone
- Integrated Movement Disorders Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Centre, Room 3-131, 550 University Avenue, Toronto ON M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - David L Perez
- Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ginger Polich
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 1st Avenue, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Jon Stone
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 50 Little France Cres, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
| | - Selma Aybek
- Faculté des Sciences et de Médecine, Université de Fribourg, Bureau 2.106d, Chemin du Musée 5, 1700 Fribourg, Suisse
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rauline G, Hingray C, Carle-Toulemonde G, Hubsch C, El Hage W, Conejero I, Samalin L, Garcin B, Gharib A. [Validated care programs for patients with functional neurological disorders]. L'ENCEPHALE 2023:S0013-7006(23)00087-8. [PMID: 37400332 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common cause of persistent and disabling neurological symptoms. Diagnostic delay may lead to no treatment, inappropriate treatment or even iatrogenic symptoms. Yet, several treatments significantly reduce physical symptoms and improve functioning in FND patients even though not all patients respond to the currently available treatments. This review aims to describe the range of evidence-based rehabilitative and/or psychological therapeutic approaches available for FND patients. The most effective treatments are multidisciplinary and coordinated; using an outpatient or inpatient setting. Building a network of FND-trained healthcare professionals around the patient is an essential aspect of optimal patient management. Indeed, a supportive environment coupled with a collaborative therapeutic relationship improves understanding of FND and appears to help patients engage in appropriate treatments. Patients need to be invested in their own care and have to understand that recovery may depend on their commitment. The conventional treatment combines psychoeducation, physical rehabilitation and psychotherapy (cognitive and behavioral therapy, hypnosis, psychodynamic interpersonal therapy). Early referral of patients to physical therapy is recommended; however, the optimal parameters of treatment, duration and intensity are unknown and seem to vary with the severity and chronicity of symptoms. The goal is to minimize self-awareness by diverting attention or by stimulating automatically generated movements with non-specific and gradual exercises. The use of compensatory technical aids should be avoided as much as possible. Psychotherapeutic management should encourage self-evaluation of cognitive distortions, emotional reactions and maladaptive behaviors while empowering the patient in managing symptoms. Symptom management can use anchoring strategies to fight against dissociation. The aim is to connect to the immediate environment and to enrich one's sensoriality. The psychological interventions should then be adapted to the individual psychopathology, cognitive style and personality functioning of each patient. There is currently no known curative pharmacological treatment for FND. The pharmacological approach rather consists of progressively discontinuing medication that was introduced by default and that could lead to undesirable side effects. Finally, neurostimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation) can be effective on motor FND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Coraline Hingray
- Pôle universitaire du Grand Nancy, CPN/unité neuropsychiatrique, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Guilhem Carle-Toulemonde
- Cabinet de psychosomatique et stimulation magnétique transcrânienne, clinique Saint-Exupery, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile Hubsch
- Parkinson Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Foundation Adolphe-de-Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Wissam El Hage
- CHRU de Tours, clinique psychiatrique universitaire, Tours, France
| | - Ismaël Conejero
- Département de psychiatrie adulte, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Ludovic Samalin
- Département de psychiatrie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, université de Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal (UMR 6602), Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Béatrice Garcin
- Service de neurologie, hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, 125, rue de Stalingrad, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Axelle Gharib
- Centre bipol-AIR 9, rue Abraham-Bloch, 69007 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kelmanson AN, Kalichman L, Treger I. Physical Rehabilitation of Motor Functional Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20105793. [PMID: 37239521 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Functional Neurological Disorders (FNDs) are one of the most common and disabling neurological disorders, affecting approximately 10-30% of patients in neurology clinics. FNDs manifest as a range of motor, sensory, and cognitive symptoms that are not explained by organic disease. This narrative review aims to assess the current state of knowledge in physical-based rehabilitation for motor/movement FNDs in the adult population, with the goal of improving research and medical care for this patient population. To ensure optimal outcomes for patients, it is critical to consider several domains pertaining to FNDs, including which field of discipline they should belong to, how to investigate and test, methods for rating outcome measures, and optimal courses of treatment. In the past, FNDs were primarily treated with psychiatric and psychological interventions. However, recent literature supports the inclusion of physical rehabilitation in the treatment of FNDs. Specifically, physical-based approaches tailored to FNDs have shown promising results. This review utilized a comprehensive search of multiple databases and inclusion criteria to identify relevant studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayelet N Kelmanson
- Department of Physical Therapy, Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Leonid Kalichman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Iuly Treger
- Department of Rehabilitation, Soroka Medical Center, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
- Department of Medicine, Faculty for Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gandolfi M, Sandri A, Geroin C, Bombieri F, Riello M, Menaspà Z, Bonetto C, Smania N, Tinazzi M. Improvement in motor symptoms, physical fatigue, and self-rated change perception in functional motor disorders: a prospective cohort study of a 12-week telemedicine program. J Neurol 2022; 269:5940-5953. [PMID: 35809125 PMCID: PMC9552134 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11230-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are highly disabling conditions associated with long-term disability, poor quality of life, and economic burden on health and social care. While multidisciplinary 5-days rehabilitation programs have been shown to reduce motor and non-motor symptoms, long-term management and monitoring in FMDs remain an unmet need. AIM To compare a 12-weeks telemedicine program against a 12-weeks self-management program after a 5-days rehabilitation program for improving motor, non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and perception of change in patients with FMDs. METHODS The study population was 64 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of FMDs who underwent a 5-days in-person rehabilitation program followed by either a self-management (the first 32 patients) or a telemedicine program (the latter 32 patients). Validated measures of motor and non-motor symptoms such as fatigue and pain, quality of life, perception of change, gait, and postural control were recorded before (T0), after completion of rehabilitation (T1), and then again at 3 months (T2). RESULTS Improvement at 3-month follow-up assessment of motor symptoms (p < 0.001), physical fatigue (p = 0.028), and self-rated change perception (p = 0.043) was greater in the telemedicine group. No different between-groups effect was found on other dimensions of fatigue, pain, physical and mental health, and gait and postural control. CONCLUSIONS Long-term management and expert monitoring of patients with FMDs via telemedicine may enhance long-term outcomes in motor symptoms and physical fatigue, with a positive long-term impact on self-rated health perception of change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marialuisa Gandolfi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Angela Sandri
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Christian Geroin
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Bombieri
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marianna Riello
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Zoe Menaspà
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Bonetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Smania
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|