1
|
Jaywant A, Keenan A. Pathophysiology, Assessment, and Management of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment, Depression, and Fatigue. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2024; 35:463-478. [PMID: 38514230 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Post-stroke cognitive impairment, depression, and fatigue are common, persistent, and disabling. This review summarizes current knowledge on the pathophysiology, assessment, and management of these debilitating neuropsychiatric sequelae of stroke. We briefly review evolving knowledge on the neural mechanisms and risk factors for each condition. We describe patient-reported outcome measures and clinician rating techniques that can be used to assist in screening and comprehensive assessment. We then discuss behavioral and pharmacologic management strategies. Heterogeneity of stroke remains a challenge in management and new research is still needed to optimize and personalize treatments for stroke survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Jaywant
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Alexandra Keenan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Veen R, Königs M, Bakker S, van Iperen A, Peerdeman S, Bet PM, Oosterlaan J. Pharmacotherapy to Improve Cognitive Functioning After Acquired Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:971-987. [PMID: 38294196 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Cognitive impairments, common sequelae of acquired brain injury (ABI), significantly affect rehabilitation and quality of life. Currently, there is no solid evidence-base for pharmacotherapy to improve cognitive functioning after ABI, nevertheless off-label use is widely applied in clinical practice. This meta-analysis and meta-regression aims to quantitatively aggregate the available evidence for the effects of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of cognitive impairments following ABI. We conducted a comprehensive search of Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for randomized controlled and crossover trials. Meta-analytic effects were calculated for each pharmaceutical agent and targeted neuromodulator system. Cognitive outcome measures were aggregated across cognitive domains. Of 8,216 articles, 41 studies (4,434 patients) were included. The noradrenergic agent methylphenidate showed a small, significant positive effect on cognitive functioning in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; k = 14, d = 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.56, P = 0.003). Specifically, methylphenidate was found to improve cognitive functions related to executive memory, baseline speed, inhibitory control, and variability in responding. The cholinergic drug donepezil demonstrated a large effect size, albeit based on a limited number of studies (k = 3, d = 1.68, P = 0.03). No significant effects were observed for other agents. Additionally, meta-regression analysis did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity in treatment response. Our meta-analysis supports the use of methylphenidate for enhancing cognitive functioning in patients with TBI. Although donepezil shows potential, it warrants further research. These results could guide clinical decision making, inform practice guidelines, and direct future pharmacotherapeutic research in ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud van der Veen
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Marsh Königs
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Bakker
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries van Iperen
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Peerdeman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre M Bet
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Oosterlaan
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang J, Song Z, Gui C, Jiang G, Cheng W, You W, Wang Z, Chen G. Treatments to post-stroke depression, which is more effective to HAMD improvement? A network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1035895. [PMID: 36601053 PMCID: PMC9806231 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1035895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a common mental health problem after cerebrovascular accidents. There are several treatments that have been shown to be effective in treating post-stroke depression. However, it is not clear which treatment is more effective. Methods: In this meta-analysis, an appropriate search strategy was used to search eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different treatments to treat patients with Post-stroke depression published up to December 2021 from the CNKI, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. We assessed the mean difference or odds ratio between each treatment and placebo and summarized them as the average and 95% confidence interval (CI) by conducting Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: By constructing a Bayesian network meta-analysis, we found that acupuncture combined with fluoxetine (vs placebo MD, -8.9; 95% CI, [-15, -2.9]) or paroxetine (vs placebo MD,-8.5; 95% CI, [-15, -2.5]) was the most effective for change in Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) at the end of the 4th week. For change in Hamilton depression scale at the end of the 8th week, rTMS combined with paroxetine (vs placebo MD, -13; 95% CI, [-17, -7.9]) had the greatest amount of change. The efficacy of medication combined with adjuvant therapy was also superior for the percentage of patients with Hamilton depression scale change over 50%. Discussion: The combination of antidepressants with adjuvant therapy may enhance the efficacy of antidepressants and achieve better results than antidepressant monotherapy in both Hamilton depression scale changes at the end of week 4 or 8 and 50% Hamilton depression scale improvement rate. Acupuncture combined with fluoxetine treatment was more effective in the treatment of post-stroke depression at week 4, while rTMS combined with paroxetine was more effective at week 8. Further research is needed to determine whether acupuncture combined with fluoxetine is better than rTMS combined with paroxetine for post-stroke depression at week 8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhong Wang
- *Correspondence: Zhong Wang, ; Wanchun You,
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhen K, Shi H, Zhang X, Liu X, Li W, Si G, Jia H, Guo D. Efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in the treatment of post-stroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol 2022; 13:981476. [PMID: 36408491 PMCID: PMC9672349 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.981476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post-stroke depression is the most common neuropsychiatric disorder after stroke, which seriously affects patients' post-stroke recovery and quality of life, and is prone to recurrence of stroke and death. Buyang Huanwu Decoction is effective in treating post-stroke depression, but there is a lack of scientific systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in treating post-stroke depression. Methods A total of eight databases were searched by two investigators from Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, and CBM to collect randomized controlled trials that applied BHD to PSD from the time of database construction to May 2022. Data analysis was performed using Review mange5.4. Results A total of 15 studies with 1,242 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the antidepressant drug control group, the change value of the HAMD scale in the Buyang Huanwu Decoction group was significantly lower [p < 0.00001, SMD = −0.85, 95% CI (−1.10, −0.61)]; after subgroup analysis, the effect of BHD for 4 weeks was the most significant; the total clinical effective rate was significantly increased [p = 0.001, RR = 1.33, 95% CI (1.12, 1.57)]; neurological deficit score [p = 0.002, SMD = −1.03, 95% CI (−1.67, −0.39)], the incidence of adverse reactions [p = 0.02, RR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.20, 0.89)], and adverse reaction scale scores [p < 0.00001, MD = −3.58, 95%CI (−4.09, −3.08)] were significantly lower. Conclusion Compared with antidepressants, the Buyang Huanwu Decoction is more effective and safer in the treatment of post-stroke depression patients. However, more high-quality studies are needed to further support the above conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Zhen
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Hongshuo Shi
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Xuecheng Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangyi Liu
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Wenwen Li
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Guomin Si
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongling Jia
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- Hongling Jia
| | - Dong Guo
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Dong Guo
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kalbouneh HM, Toubasi AA, Albustanji FH, Obaid YY, Al‐Harasis LM. Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e025868. [PMID: 35730636 PMCID: PMC9333390 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.025868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Several studies investigated the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving poststroke recovery; thus, we have decided to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs in poststroke recovery. Methods and Results In this meta-analysis we searched the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The studies were included if they were placebo-controlled trials in design and reported SSRIs' effects on poststroke depression, anxiety, disability, dependence, motor abilities, and cognitive functions. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The search yielded 44 articles that included 16 164 patients, and about half of the participants were treated with SSRIs. Our results showed that SSRIs had a significant effect on preventing depression (weighted mean difference [WMD], -7.05 [95% CI, -11.78 to -2.31]), treating depression according to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (WMD, -1.45 [95% CI, -2.77 to -0.14]), anxiety (relative risk, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]), dependence (WMD, 8.86 [95% CI, 1.23-16.48]), motor abilities according to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (WMD, -0.79 [95% CI, -1.42 to -0.15]), and cognitive functions (WMD, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.12-1.89]). On the other hand, no significant effect of SSRIs on disability was observed. Additionally, we found that treating with SSRIs increased the risk of seizures (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.13-1.83]), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms or bleeding between SSRIs and a placebo. Conclusions Our study showed that SSRIs are effective in preventing and treating depression, and improving anxiety, motor function, cognitive function, and dependence in patients after stroke. These benefits were only reproducible with the citalopram subanalysis but not fluoxetine. Further well-conducted placebo-controlled trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of citalopram among patients after stroke. Registration URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021285766.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba M. Kalbouneh
- Department of AnatomyFaculty of MedicineUniversity of JordanAmmanJordan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Retraction notice regarding several articles published in Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2022; 40:289-290. [PMID: 37154191 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-239001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
|
7
|
Legg LA, Rudberg AS, Hua X, Wu S, Hackett ML, Tilney R, Lindgren L, Kutlubaev MA, Hsieh CF, Barugh AJ, Hankey GJ, Lundström E, Dennis M, Mead GE. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD009286. [PMID: 34780067 PMCID: PMC8592088 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009286.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might theoretically reduce post-stroke disability by direct effects on the brain. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2012 and last updated in 2019. OBJECTIVES To determine if SSRIs are more effective than placebo or usual care at improving outcomes in people less than 12 months post-stroke, and to determine whether treatment with SSRIs is associated with adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 7 January 2021), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, 7 January 2021), MEDLINE (1946 to 7 January 2021), Embase (1974 to 7 January 2021), CINAHL (1982 to 7 January 2021), PsycINFO (1985 to 7 January 2021), and AMED (1985 to 7 January 2021). PsycBITE had previously been searched (16 July 2018). We searched clinical trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting stroke survivors within the first year. The intervention was any SSRI, at any dose, for any period, and for any indication. The comparator was usual care or placebo. Studies reporting at least one of our primary (disability score or independence) or secondary outcomes (impairments, depression, anxiety, quality of life, fatigue, cognition, healthcare cost, death, adverse events and leaving the study early) were included in the meta-analysis. The primary analysis included studies at low risk of bias. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data on demographics, stroke type and, our pre-specified outcomes, and bias sources. Two review authors independently extracted data. We used mean difference (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed bias risks and applied GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We identified 76 eligible studies (13,029 participants); 75 provided data at end of treatment, and of these two provided data at follow-up. Thirty-eight required participants to have depression to enter. The duration, drug, and dose varied. Six studies were at low risk of bias across all domains; all six studies did not need participants to have depression to enter, and all used fluoxetine. Of these six studies, there was little to no difference in disability between groups SMD -0.0; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.05; 5 studies, 5436 participants, high-quality evidence) or in independence (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.03; 5 studies, 5926 participants; high-quality evidence) at the end of treatment. In the studies at low risk of bias across all domains, SSRIs slightly reduced the average depression score (SMD 0.14 lower, 95% CI 0.19 lower to 0.08 lower; 4 studies; 5356 participants, high-quality evidence) and there was a slight reduction in the proportion with depression (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86; 3 studies, 5907 participants, high-quality evidence). Cognition was slightly better in the control group (MD -1.22, 95% CI -2.37 to -0.07; 4 studies, 5373 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Only one study (n = 30) reported neurological deficit score (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -1.12 to 0.33; low-quality evidence). SSRIs resulted in little to no difference in motor deficit (SMD 0.03, -0.02 to 0.08; 6 studies, 5518 participants, moderate-quality evidence). SSRIs slightly increased the proportion leaving the study early (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.40; 6 studies, 6090 participants, high-quality evidence). SSRIs slightly increased the outcome of a seizure (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.98; 6 studies, 6080 participants, moderate-quality evidence) and a bone fracture (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.41; 6 studies, 6080 participants, high-quality evidence). One study at low risk of bias across all domains reported gastrointestinal side effects (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.33, to 8.83; 1 study, 30 participants). There was no difference in the total number of deaths between SSRI and placebo (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.24; 6 studies, 6090 participants, moderate quality evidence). SSRIs probably result in little to no difference in fatigue (MD -0.06; 95% CI -1.24 to 1.11; 4 studies, 5524 participants, moderate-quality of evidence), nor in quality of life (MD 0.00; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02, 3 studies, 5482 participants, high-quality evidence). When all studies, irrespective of risk of bias, were included, SSRIs reduced disability scores but not the proportion independent. There was insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis of outcomes at end of follow-up. Several small ongoing studies are unlikely to alter conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high-quality evidence that SSRIs do not make a difference to disability or independence after stroke compared to placebo or usual care, reduced the risk of future depression, increased bone fractures and probably increased seizure risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn A Legg
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Paisley, UK
| | - Ann-Sofie Rudberg
- Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xing Hua
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Simiao Wu
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Maree L Hackett
- Professor, Program Head, Mental Health, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Russel Tilney
- Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Linnea Lindgren
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mansur A Kutlubaev
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russian Federation
| | - Cheng-Fang Hsieh
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Amanda J Barugh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Graeme J Hankey
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Erik Lundström
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Dennis
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian E Mead
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|