Molecular Imaging of Stem Cells

Nanotechnology in Immunotherapy for Type 1 Diabetes: Promising Innovations and Future Advances

Diabetes is a chronic condition which affects the glucose metabolism in the body. In lieu of any clinical “cure,” the condition is managed through the administration of pharmacological aids, insulin supplements, diet restrictions, exercise, and the like. The conventional clinical prescriptions are limited by their life-long dependency and diminished potency, which in turn hinder the patient’s recovery. This necessitated an alteration in approach and has instigated several investigations into other strategies. As Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is known to be an autoimmune disorder, targeting the immune system in activation and/or suppression has shown promise in reducing beta cell loss and improving insulin levels in response to hyperglycemia. Another strategy currently being explored is the use of nanoparticles in the delivery of immunomodulators, insulin, or engineered vaccines to endogenous immune cells. Nanoparticle-assisted targeting of immune cells holds substantial potential for enhanced patient care within T1D clinical settings. Herein, we summarize the knowledge of etiology, clinical scenarios, and the current state of nanoparticle-based immunotherapeutic approaches for Type 1 diabetes. We also discuss the feasibility of translating this approach to clinical practice.

Advanced clinical imaging for the evaluation of stem cell based therapies

Introduction: As stem cell treatments reach closer to the clinic, the need for appropriate noninvasive imaging for accurate disease diagnosis, treatment planning, follow-up, and early detection of complications, is constantly rising. Clinical radiology affords an extensive arsenal of advanced imaging techniques, to provide anatomical and functional information on the whole spectrum of stem cell treatments from diagnosis to follow-up.Areas covered: This manuscript aims at providing a critical review of major published studies on the utilization of advanced imaging for stem cell treatments. Uses of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and positron emission tomography (PET) are reviewed and interrogated for their applicability to stem cell imaging.Expert opinion: A wide spectrum of imaging methods have been utilized for the evaluation of stem cell therapies. The majority of published techniques are not clinically applicable, using methods exclusively applicable to animals or technology irrelevant to current clinical practice. Harmonization of preclinical methods with clinical reality is necessary for the timely translation of stem cell therapies to the clinic. Methods such as diffusion weighted MRI, hybrid imaging, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound hold great promise and should be routinely incorporated in the evaluation of patients receiving stem cell treatments.

Noninvasive in vivo cell tracking using molecular imaging: A useful tool for developing mesenchymal stem cell-based cancer treatment

Mounting evidence has emphasized the potential of cell therapies in treating various diseases by restoring damaged tissues or replacing defective cells in the body. Cell therapies have become a strong therapeutic modality by applying noninvasive in vivo molecular imaging for examining complex cellular processes, understanding pathophysiological mechanisms of diseases, and evaluating the kinetics/dynamics of cell therapies. In particular, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown promise in recent years as drug carriers for cancer treatment. They can also be labeled with different probes and tracked in vivo to assess the in vivo effect of administered cells, and to optimize therapy. The exact role of MSCs in oncologic diseases is not clear as MSCs have been shown to be involved in tumor progression and inhibition, and the exact interactions between MSCs and specific cancer microenvironments are not clear. In this review, a multitude of labeling approaches, imaging modalities, and the merits/demerits of each strategy are outlined. In addition, specific examples of the use of MSCs and in vivo imaging in cancer therapy are provided. Finally, present limitations and future outlooks in terms of the translation of different imaging approaches in clinics are discussed.