Quality of life and functional outcomes after surgery for spinal metastases: Results of a cohort study

Surgical options for metastatic spine tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Surgical treatments for metastatic spine tumors have evolved tremendously over the last decade. Improvements in immunotherapies and other medical treatments have led to longer life expectancy in cancer patients. This, in turn, has led to an increase in the incidence of metastatic spine tumors. Spine metastases remain the most common type of spine tumor. In this study, we systematically reviewed all available literature on metastatic spine tumors and spinal instability within the last decade. We also performed further systematic reviews on cervical metastatic tumors, thoracolumbar metastatic tumors, and minimally invasive surgery in metastatic spine tumors. Lastly, the results from the systematic reviews were presented to an expert panel at the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) meeting, and their consensus was also presented.

Short-term outcomes after spinal surgery for metastatic breast cancer: A single-center analysis

Background

Advances in detection and breast cancer treatment lead to higher survival rates, with more patients living with spine metastases. Those surgeries are palliative; however, they can improve the quality of life (QOL).

Objective

The aim of this study is to report pain and neurological function outcomes after surgery for spinal metastatic disease of breast cancer patients of a single institution. Complications were recorded.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective, single-center, single-arm study was performed. Consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery were included. We analyzed demographic, surgical, histopathological, and clinical data.

Results

Seventeen women were included. Three patients (17.6%) did not present pre- and postoperative pain (n = 3), 6 (35.3%) had pain in both situations, and 8 (47.1%) were pain-free postoperatively (P = 0.013). Ten (58.8%) patients had preoperative deficits: 3 (30%) did not improve and 7 (70%) improved after surgery. Six cases (35.2%) did not present preoperative deficits and did not get worse (n = 6). The Frankel classification after the following time showed that 11 patients (64.7%) remained stable after surgery and 5 patients (29.4%) got better. A single patient (5.6%) had deterioration of strength. Two patients (11.7%) had intraoperative complications.

Conclusions

Pain was significantly improved by surgery, with also a possibly positive effect on functionality. Considering the low complication rates, surgery is still a useful tool in the management of spinal metastases in breast cancer patients and may be related to better QOL.

Short-term assessment of functional outcomes and quality of life after thoracic and lumbar spinal metastasis surgery

Background

Because of improvements in initial tumor identification and treatment, as well as longer life expectancies, more people are receiving diagnoses for spinal metastases.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess early functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after surgical management of patients with spinal metastases.

Patients and Methods

In this prospective cohort study, a total of 33 patients with thoracic and lumbar spine metastases who underwent surgical management between November 2021 and August 2023 were followed up for 1 year or until death. Oswestry Disability Index and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status were used for the functional outcome; QOL was assessed using European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions (EuroQOL-5D). Scores were recorded preoperatively, 4 weeks postoperatively, and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

The mean age was 52.12 ± 13.4 years (range: 23-70 years), 22 (66.7%) were females, and 11 (33.3%) were males. Patients were divided into three groups according to the revised Katagiri score: 12 (36.4%) patients were at low risk (0-3), 18 (54.5%) patients were at intermediate risk (4-6), and 3 (9.1%) patients were at high risk (7-10). The mean survival was 5.44 ± 3.46 months (range 1-13), and there was no perioperative death (within 1 month postoperative). Sixteen (48.5%) patients survived for more than 1 year and 17 (51.5%) patients died from different causes related to the natural history of tumor metastasis.

Conclusion

Following surgical treatment of the spinal metastases, improvements in QoL and functional results were seen in the short-term. For patients with a projected life expectancy of longer than 3 months, surgery is a good alternative.

Predictors for quality of life, pain and functional outcomes after surgical treatment of metastatic disease in the spine

BACKGROUND

While predictors for postoperative survival in spine tumour patients have been identified, there is limited evidence for predictors of postoperative Quality of Life (QoL), pain and functional outcome.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients, who had undergone surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases between June 2016 and April 2019, were interviewed preoperatively and during follow-ups at three, six and 12 months using the EQ-5D-3L, COMI, and ODI questionnaires. Differences in means exceeding the specific Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) values were considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent of the patients were reported dead after 12 months. Only one metastasis compared to multiple metastases has 7.9 the Odds for an improved EQ-5D-3L score at three months. No neoadjuvant metastatic irradiation has 6.8 the Odds for the improvement at that time against performed radiation. A preoperative ODI score between 50.1 and 100 has 22.0 times the odds compared to the range from 0 to 50 for an improved EQ-5D-3L after three months, and 12.5 times the odds in favour of improved COMI after three months, and 13.6 times the odds for improvement of ODI at the three-month follow-up. A preoperative COMI score ranging from 5.0 to 10 has 21 times the odds of a COMI between 0 and 5 for an improved EQ-5D-3L score and 11 times the odds for an improved ODI after 12 months. Other predictors showed no statistically significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

An improvement in QoL, pain and spinal function after 12 months can be predicted by a subjective preoperative poor health condition. Impaired spinal function before surgery, a singular metastasis and no previous irradiation is predictive of improved spinal function and quality of life three months after surgery.

Quality of life and its selected determinants in the group of patients with surgically treated spinal tumors

Introduction

Spinal metastases are a common manifestation of advanced neoplastic disease. Destructive neoplastic lesions within the axial skeleton cause unrelieved pain and nervous system disorders involving spinal stenosis and other neural structures. The development of new systemic therapies, radiotherapy and minimally invasive spinal surgeries has increased patients' quality of life by minimising pain and neurological disorders due to vertebral neoplastic infiltration. The aim of the study was to assess the patients' quality of life before and after spine stabilisation surgery with spinal cord decompression to relieve the pressure associated with neoplastic destruction.

Materials and Methods

The study involved 115 subjects with spinal metastases in the preoperative period and 3-4 months after the surgery based on the inclusion criteria (metastatic spinal tumour, sensorimotor dysfunction). The data were collected using the following tools: the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL-Rotterdam Symptom Checklist), Acceptance Illness Scale (AIS scale), Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL scale) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The correlation coefficient was calculated using Spearman's rho assuming the significance level at α = 0.05 (p<0.05).

Results

A higher quality of life was found after surgery (p<0.001) in terms of experiencing physical symptoms (30.7 ± 11.96 points before surgery vs. 20.91 ± 13.00 points after surgery) and psychological symptoms (43.98 ± 14.82 points before surgery vs. 31.35 ± 14.86 points after surgery). The activity level of the subjects also improved (p<0.001; 36.56 ± 22.43 points to 43.55 ± 20.40 points). The level of disease acceptance in the study group was higher after the surgery compared to the preoperative assessment. The subjects with a high level of disease acceptance presented a higher quality of life postoperatively. The independence of the subjects in performing everyday activities after the operation influenced the quality of life, in terms of somatic symptoms (p=0.006), mental symptoms (p=0.001) and activity (p<0.001). Along with the improvement in functional capacity, the quality of life in terms of symptoms and activity levels increased.

Conclusion

The study showed that spinal cord decompression surgery improves the quality of life of patients by reducing neurological dysfunction, increasing the acceptance of the disease and the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Sociodemographic variables did not affect the quality of life of the respondents.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire

Background context

Patients with spinal metastases always have a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease- and treatment-related adverse outcomes. The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) has been verified and validated in English for patients with spinal metastases but not in Chinese.

Purpose

This paper aimed to complete the cross-cultural adaptation of the Chinese version of the SOSGOQ, to verify its reliability and validity, and to report on the HRQoL of Chinese patients with spinal metastases.

Study design/setting

This is a single-center, prospective, observational cross-sectional study.

Patient sample

Seventy-six patients were enrolled in this study.

Outcome measures

The SOSGOQ is made up of five HRQoL domains (physical function, neurological function, pain, mental health, social function) and post-therapy questions. The EQ-5D 3L questionnaire covers five items in mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain discomfort, and anxiety-depression, each with three answer options. The SF-36 comprises 36 items divided into eight domains.

Methods

A single-center, prospective, observational cross-sectional study involving patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery was conducted. HRQoL was evaluated using the Chinese version of the SOSGOQ, the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), and the EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Demographic, tumor, symptom, and treatment data, as well as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) information, were collected. Internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, concurrent validity, and clinical validity were used to evaluate reliability. A Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between variables.

Results

This study enrolled 76 patients, with a mean age of 55.8 years. The kidney was the most common primary tumor site, and the thoracic spine was the most affected. The internal consistency of the overall SOSQOQ (0.907) was higher than the EQ-5D (0.819), and all items of the SOSQOQ had a high convergent validity (>0.40). The SOSGOQ was significantly correlated with the EQ-5D in respective domains (p < 0.001) and overall score (p < 0.001), whereas the SF-36 was related to the overall SOSGOQ score and most domains. Total SOSGOG was significantly sensitive to changes in ECOG (p = 0.017), prior surgery (p = 0.001), and tumor type (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

The SOSGOQ is a reliable and effective tool for evaluating HRQoL in patients with spinal metastases, with high sensitivity and specificity. Surgical treatment can significantly improve patients’ HRQoL.

Neurologic, functional, and survival outcomes following surgical management of metastatic breast cancer to the spine

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic spinal tumors commonly arise from primary breast cancer. We assessed outcomes and identified associated variables for patients who underwent surgical management for spinal metastases of breast cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients surgically treated for spinal metastases of breast cancer. Neurologic and functional outcomes were analyzed via Frankel scale and Karnofksy Performance Status (KPS) scores, respectively. Variables associated with Frankel and KPS scores after surgery were identified. Multivariable analysis was used to assess predictors for postoperative survival.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were identified. There was no significant difference in Frankel scores postoperatively and at last follow-up. KPS scores (P = 0.002) significantly improved at last follow-up. Preoperative non-ambulation and postprocedural complications were associated with non-ambulation postoperatively. Postprocedural complications and disease-free interval (DFI) < 24 and < 60 months were associated with functional impairment at last follow-up. Current smoking status at the time of surgery (P = 0.021) and triple negative (negative immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2) breast cancer (P = 0.038) were significantly associated with shortened postoperative survival.

CONCLUSION

When indicated, surgery for spinal metastases of breast cancer leads to preservation of neurologic status and long-term functional improvement. Preoperative ambulatory status and postprocedural complications were associated with ambulatory status after surgery, while postprocedural complications and shortened DFI were associated with functional status after surgery.Current smoking status at the time of surgery and triple negative breast cancer are negative predictors for postoperative survival after metastatic breast cancer to the spine.

Quality of Life and Mental Health Status Among Cancer Patients With Metastatic Spinal Disease

This study aimed to investigate the quality of life and mental health status and further to identify relevant risk factors among advanced cancer patients with spine metastases. This study prospectively included and analyzed 103 advanced cancer patients with spine metastases. Patient's basic information, lifestyles, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, therapeutic strategies, economic conditions, quality of life, anxiety, and depression were collected. Patient's quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G), and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Subgroup analysis was performed based on different age groups, and a multivariate analysis was performed to test the ability of 20 potential risk factors to predict quality of life, anxiety, and depression. The mean total FACT-G score was only 61.38 ± 21.26. Of all included patients, 52.43% had skeptical or identified anxiety and 53.40% suffered from skeptical or identified depression. Patients had an age of 60 or more and <70 years had the lowest FACT-G score (54.91 ± 19.22), highest HADS anxiety score (10.25 ± 4.22), and highest HADS depression score (10.13 ± 4.94). After adjusting all other potential risk factors, age was still significantly associated with quality of life (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.38–0.86, p < 0.01) and depression (OR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.00–2.42, p = 0.05) and almost significantly associated with anxiety (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 0.94–2.43, p = 0.08). Besides, preference to eating vegetables, time since knowing cancer diagnosis, surgical treatment at primary cancer, hormone endocrine therapy, and economic burden due to cancer treatments were found to be significantly associated with the quality of life. A number of comorbidities and economic burden due to cancer treatments were significantly associated with anxiety. Advanced cancer patients with spine metastases suffer from poor quality of life and severe anxiety and depression, especially among patients with an age of 60 or more and <70 years. Early mental health care and effective measures should be conducted to advanced cancer patients with spine metastases, and more attention should be paid to take care of patients with an age of 60 or more and <70 years in terms of their quality of life and mental health status.

Current trends in incidence, characteristics, and surgical management of metastatic breast cancer to the spine: A National Inpatient Sample analysis from 2005 to 2014

Management of metastatic breast cancer to the spine (MBCS) incorporates a multimodal approach. Improvement in screening and nonsurgical therapies may alter the trends in surgical management of MBCS. The objective of this study is to assess trends in surgical management of MBCS and short-term outcomes based on the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The NIS database was queried for patients with MBCS who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2014. The weighted frequencies of spinal decompression alone, spinal stabilization +/- decompression, and vertebral augmentation were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the effect of patient characteristics on outcomes stratified by procedure. The most common procedure performed was vertebral augmentation (11,114, 53.4%), followed by stabilization +/- decompression (6,906, 33.2%) and then decompression alone (3,312, 13.4%). The total population-adjusted rate of surgical management for MBCS remained stable, while the rate of spinal stabilization increased (P < 0.001) and vertebral augmentation decreased (p < 0.003). The risk of complication increased with spinal stabilization and decompression compared to vertebral augmentation procedures in those with fewer comorbidities. This relative increase in risk abated in patients with higher numbers of pre-operative comorbidities. Any single complication was associated with increases in length of stay, cost, and mortality. The rate of in-hospital interventions remained stable over the study period. Stratified by procedure, the rate of stabilizations increased with a concomitant decrease in vertebral augmentations, which suggests that patients who require hospitalization for MBCS are becoming more likely to represent advanced cases that are not amenable to palliative vertebral augmentation procedures.