Two conditions to fully recover dynamic canal function in unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction patients

Vestibular rehabilitation improves spontaneous nystagmus normalization in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy

Introduction

Spontaneous nystagmus (SN) can be observed after acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUVP). The slow phase eye velocity of the SN progressively decreases in darkness as the result of rebalanced neurophysiological activity between both vestibular nuclei, a process that can take several months. Although this compensatory process can occur spontaneously, there is poor evidence that vestibular rehabilitation (VR) can facilitate the process.

Methods

We documented the natural time course of SN reduction in patients with AUVP, as well as the effects of VR by means of a unilateral rotation paradigm. In a retrospective study (Study 1: n = 126 AUVP patients), we compared the time course of the SN reduction in patients with VR (n = 33) and without VR (n = 93). In a prospective study (Study 2: n = 42 AUVP patients), we compared the effects of early VR (n = 22; initiated within the first two weeks of symptoms onset) or late VR (n = 20; initiated after the second week of symptoms onset) on the time course of the SN reduction.

Results

Study 1 showed shorter median time of SN normalization in patients with VR compared to patients without VR (14 days and 90 days, respectively). Study 2 showed that AUVP patients with early and late VR had a similar median time of SN normalization. The SN slow phase eye velocity was significantly decreased as early as the end of the first VR session in both groups, and kept decreasing at each subsequent VR session. In the early VR group, 38% of the patients had slow phase eye velocity below 2°/s after the first VR session, 100% after the fifth session. Similar findings were observed in the late VR group.

Discussion

Taken together, these results indicate that VR with a unidirectional rotation paradigm speeds up the normalization of SN. This effect seems independent of the time between symptoms onset and commencement of VR, but early intervention is recommended to speed up the SN reduction.

Subjective perception of activity level: A prognostic factor for developing chronic dizziness after vestibular schwannoma resection?

Introduction

A vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection causes an acute unilateral vestibular deafferentation resulting in acute postoperative symptoms. Despite the expected resolution of most of the symptoms, due to central vestibular compensation, more than one out of four patients develop chronic dizziness. Several predictive factors, such as age and tumor size, have been suggested. Despite its potential effect on the process of central vestibular compensation, the level of physical activity after VS resection was not yet considered. Therefore, the association between the level of physical activity and chronic dizziness after VS resection will be investigated.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 66 patients who underwent a retro-sigmoid VS resection between October 2001 and February 2007. Patients were assessed before surgery and at 9 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. At 9 weeks, patients were asked to report their level of physical activity (PA) during the past week by using a visual analogue scale and their balance performance was assessed by four standing balance conditions with eyes closed and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Based on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) score at 6 months, patients were divided in a chronic dizziness group (DHI > 30) and non-chronic dizziness group (DHI-score ≤ 30). Age, sex, Koos classification, preoperative vestibular function, treatment group, balance performance, and level of PA were compared between both groups and used as independent variables in linear regression analyses with the DHI score at 6 months as dependent variable.

Results

The chronic dizzy patients revealed to have significantly lower levels of PA (p < 0.001) and worse static and dynamic balance performance (p = 0.023 and p = 0.041, respectively) 9 weeks after surgery. After elimination, the multiple regression analysis resulted in a model with two variables (PA level, TUG) which significantly predicted the DHI score (F_2,42 = 6.581; R² = 0.239; p = 0.003).

Conclusion

This study revealed associations between (1) the level of PA and balance performance in the subacute phase and (2) chronic dizziness after VS resection. Assessment of the level of PA and balance performance during the subacute phase, which can be performed in a non-invasive and non-time-consuming way, might therefore provide prognostic information after VS resection.

Posture Deficits and Recovery After Unilateral Vestibular Loss: Early Rehabilitation and Degree of Hypofunction Matter

Postural instability and balance impairment are disabling symptoms in patients with acute unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is known to improve the vestibular compensation process, but (1) its effect on posture recovery remains poorly understood, (2) little is known about when VR must be done, and (3) whether the degree of vestibular loss matters is uncertain. We analyzed posture control under static (stable support) and dynamic (unstable support) postural tasks performed in different visual conditions [eye open (EO); eyes closed (EC); and optokinetic stimulation] using dynamic posturography. Non-linear analyses of the postural performance (wavelet transform, diffusion analysis, and fractal analysis) were performed in two groups of patients with UVH subjected to the same VR program based on the unidirectional rotation paradigm and performed either early (first 2 weeks) or later (fifth to the sixth week) after vertigo attack. Distribution of the angular horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) gain values recorded on the hypofunction side before rehabilitation differentiated two distinct sub-groups (cluster analysis) with aVOR gains below or above 0.20. The postural performance of the four sub-groups of patients with UVH (early rehabilitation with aVOR gain <0.20: n = 25 or gain >0.20: n = 19; late rehabilitation with aVOR gain <0.20: n = 15 or gain >0.20: n = 10) tested before VR showed significantly altered postural parameters compared with healthy controls. Greater instability, higher energy to control posture, larger sway without feedback corrections, and lower time of automatic control of posture were observed in static conditions. The four sub-groups recovered near-normal postural performance after VR in the EO and EC conditions, but still exhibited altered postural performance with optokinetic stimulation. In dynamic posturography conditions and before VR, the percentage of patients able to perform the postural tasks with EC and optokinetic stimulation was significantly lower in the two sub-groups with aVOR gain <0.20. After VR, the improvement of the postural parameters depended on the stage of rehabilitation and the degree of vestibular hypofunction. The best balance function recovery was found in the sub-group with early VR and pre-rehabilitation aVOR gain above 0.20, the worst in the sub-group with late rehabilitation and aVOR gain below 0.20. These differences were seen when the vestibular input remains the main sensory cue to control balance, that is, on unstable support without vision or altered visual motion cues. These findings extend to dynamic balance recovery the crucial roles of early rehabilitation and degree of vestibular hypofunction which we have already highlighted for vestibulo-ocular reflex recovery.