The preserve of primary care physicians

Prevalence of Spirometry Testing among Patients with Asthma and COPD in German General Practices

The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of spirometry testing among patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practices (GPs) in Germany. This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA), This retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients with at least one confirmed asthma or COPD diagnosis in one of those 50 general practices in Germany between January 2020, and January 2021, as well as at least one visit to these general practices between January 2021, and January 2022. The main outcomes of the study aimed to ascertain the proportion of spirometry testing among asthma and COPD patients between January 2021, and January 2022, overall, and separately, in men, women, six age groups (≤30, 31−40, 41−50, 51−60, 61, 70, >70), and patients who received at least one prescription of anti-asthma or anti-COPD drugs. This study included 8835 patients with asthma only, 5597 with COPD only, and 1897 with both asthma and COPD diagnoses. Of these, 27.2% of COPD patients, 7% of asthma patients, and 54.7% of asthma + COPD patients, received spirometry testing during the study period. Among COPD and asthma + COPD patients, the prevalence of spirometry testing was much higher in women than in men (COPD: 31.6% vs. 23.2%; asthma + COPD: 59.6% vs. 46.3%) and much higher in treated than in non-treated patients (COPD: 31.7% vs. 15.0%; asthma + COPD: 57.5% vs. 27.8%). The prevalence of spirometry testing was relatively low among COPD and asthma patients followed in GP practices, but usually higher in female patients, treated patients, and patients suffering from both asthma and COPD.

Costs of outpatient and inpatient MRSA screening and treatment strategies for patients at elective hospital admission - a decision tree analysis

Background

Nosocomial infections are among the most common complications in hospitals. A major part is caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). MRSA is still the most prominent and frequent MDRO. The early detection of carriers of multidrug-resistant bacteria is an effective measure to reduce nosocomial infections caused by MDRO. For patients who are planning to go to the hospital, an outpatient screening for MDRO and pre-hospital decolonization is recommended. However, the effectiveness of such pre-admission MDRO management in preparation for a planned hospital stay has not yet been sufficiently scientifically examined from an economic perspective.

Methods

A decision tree will be used to develop scenarios for MDRO screening and treatment in the context of the outpatient and inpatient sectors using MRSA-positive patients as an example. Subsequently, the expected costs for the respective strategy are presented.

Results

The decision tree analysis shows that the expected costs of outpatient MRSA management are €8.24 and that of inpatient MRSA management are €672.51.

Conclusion

The forward displacement of the MRSA screening to the ambulatory sector and any subsequent outpatient decolonization for patients with a planned hospitalization is the most cost-effective strategy and should become a standard benefit. Excluding opportunity costs, the expected costs of inpatient MRSA management are €54.94.