Treatment Options for Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms

[Statin intolerance-Statin tolerance]

BACKGROUND

Statins are the first-line treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, because the evidence regarding safety, tolerability, and reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is very good. For combination treatment several options are available. Nevertheless, LDL cholesterol values are often not sufficiently lowered. One reason is intolerance of the lipid-lowering medications.

OBJECTIVE

In addition to the study situation regarding statin tolerability, possible approaches to overcome intolerability are also shown.

RESULTS

In randomized trials adverse effects due to statin treatment are as rare as in the placebo groups. In clinical practice patients more frequently report complaints, particularly muscular symptoms. One important reason for intolerability is the nocebo effect. Complaints during treatment can lead to the fact that statins are not taken or are taken in insufficient doses. As a result, the LDL cholesterol level is insufficiently lowered with unfavorable effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is important to establish a tolerable treatment together with the patient on an individual basis. Information about the facts is one important aspect. In addition, a positively guided communication with the patient helps to reduce the nocebo effect.

CONCLUSION

Most adverse effects that patients attribute to statins are not caused by statins. This shows that other reasons are frequent and should be the focus of medical care. In this article international recommendations and personal experiences of a specialized lipid outpatient clinic are described.

Current Insights on Dyslipidaemia Management for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Malaysian Perspective

Dyslipidaemia is highly prevalent in the Malaysian population and is one of the main risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is recognised as the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy to reduce the disease burden of ASCVD. Framingham General CV Risk Score has been validated in the Malaysian population for CV risk assessment. The Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on the management of dyslipidaemia were last updated in 2017. Since its publication, several newer randomised clinical trials have been conducted with their results published in research articles and compared in meta-analysis. This underscores a need to update the previous guidelines to ensure good quality care and treatment for the patients. This review summarises the benefits of achieving LDL-C levels lower than the currently recommended target of < 1.8mmol/L without any safety concerns. In most high and very high-risk individuals, statins are the first line of therapy for dyslipidaemia management. However, certain high-risk individuals are not able to achieve the LDL-C goal as recommended in the guideline even with high-intensity statin therapy. In such individuals, lower LDL-C levels can be achieved by combining the statins with non-statin agents such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors. Emerging non-statin lipid-lowering therapies and challenges in dyslipidaemia management are discussed in this article. The review also summarises the recent updates on local and international guidelines for dyslipidaemia management.

[Sports cardiology : Which sport can be recommended for heart diseases?]

Within cardiology the field of sports cardiology has gradually increased in importance over the past 10 years. This is mainly due to the fact that the spectrum of issues relating to physical training in prevention and secondary prevention has expanded beyond classical cardiovascular rehabilitation. This spectrum affects above all adolescents and young adults with a manifest cardiac disease who want to continue being physically active and, in some cases strive for leisure and competitive sports. In addition, the group of patients with cardiac diseases who are still striving for top athletic performance even in old age and are looking for advice is continuously growing. In these cases, it is a matter of recommending physical training as a therapy strategy but also to protect the cardiovascular system. Dedicated recommendations for physical training must therefore also take individual aspects into consideration. In addition, the recommendation for the clearance for competitive sports is addressed in ambitious leisure and competitive sports. Patients ask about sport and training recommendations with cardiovascular risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, pathologies of the coronary arteries in the sense of a malformed outlet of coronary arteries, muscle bridges or coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathies and myocarditis as well as arrhythmia and cardiac valvular defects. This article discusses these diseases with the corresponding sport cardiological specific aspects and recommendations for physical training and competitive sports are given for each case.

[Statin intolerance and statin-associated muscular pain]

Statins are among the best studied drugs. Due to the extensive evidence regarding efficacy and safety, they are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy. While the tolerability of statins in large blinded studies is at the placebo level, so-called statin intolerance (SI) is a frequent and complex problem in everyday clinical practice. Statin-associated muscular pain (SAMS) is most commonly reported. In many cases SI is associated with inadequate lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C), thereby increasing the cardiovascular risk. The diagnosis of SAMS is based on the exclusion of possible alternative causes of muscular symptoms and the exclusion of nocebo effects through a diagnostic strategy of discontinuation of statin treatment, observation and assessment of symptoms, followed by renewed administration of a different statin initially at a low dose with subsequent dose increase. A large proportion of patients with SI and SAMS can take statins permanently and without discomfort by this approach. If LDL‑C lowering is insufficient, combination therapies are used. It is an important task of the prescribing physicians and all those involved in the treatment to increase the adherence to statins through appropriate communication. Numerous questions on SI remain open and are being addressed by an ongoing register.

[Modern lipid-lowering drugs-A means to counter the problem of undertreatment?]

BACKGROUND

An elevated low-density lipoproteincholesterol (LDL-C) level is one of the most important modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. Despite potent combination treatment, the LDL‑C target values are not achieved in many high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of the rationale for lowering LDL‑C, the current status of lipid-lowering treatment and established and novel approaches to lower LDL‑C.

CURRENT DATA

Based on the large outcome trials with ezetimibe and antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), the professional societies recommend LDL‑C target values depending on the individual cardiovascular risk. For patients with manifest atherosclerosis, the LDL‑C target value is < 55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L). The LDL‑C target values are only achieved in the minority of patients. The reasons for this include a lack of awareness among treating physicians, low medication adherence, restrictions in prescriptions and intolerance. On the basis of a healthy lifestyle, statins are the cornerstone of LDL-C-lowering treatment. If LDL‑C targets are not achieved, the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe is additionally recommended. As a third step, PCSK9 antibodies are added. A novel drug to lower LDL‑C is the orally available bempedoic acid, which acts on the same metabolic pathway as statins but is specifically activated in the liver and not in the skeletal muscle. Another novel drug is inclisiran, which acts as an intracellular PCSK9 inhibitor through RNA interference. Inclisiran is administered subcutaneously only every 6 months and has potential advantages regarding adherence. According to the new recommendations, active substances should be combined and fixed-dose combinations should be used early for lowering of LDL‑C.

CONCLUSION

Using established and novel LDL-C-lowering drugs, the recommended LDL‑C target values can be achieved in the majority of patients with a high cardiovascular risk.

The Risk of Muscular Events Among New Users of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins: an Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Statins are effective lipid-lowering drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but muscular adverse events can limit their use. Hydrophilic statins (pravastatin, rosuvastatin) may cause less muscular events than lipophilic statins (e.g. simvastatin, atorvastatin) due to lower passive diffusion into muscle cells.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of muscular events between statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses and to evaluate if hydrophilic statins are associated with a lower muscular risk than lipophilic statins.

DESIGN/SETTING

Propensity score-matched cohort study using data from the United Kingdom-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD.

PATIENTS

New statin users. Cohort 1: pravastatin 20-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs simvastatin 10-20 mg (lipophilic), cohort 2: rosuvastatin 5-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs atorvastatin 10-80 mg (lipophilic), and cohort 3: simvastatin 40-80 mg vs atorvastatin 10-20 mg.

MAIN MEASURES

The outcome was a first record of a muscular event (myopathy, myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis) during a maximum follow-up of 1 year.

KEY RESULTS

The propensity score-matched cohorts consisted of 1) 9,703, 2) 7,032, and 3) 37,743 pairs of statin users. Comparing the risk of muscular events between low-intensity pravastatin vs low-intensity simvastatin yielded a HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.64-1.16). In the comparison of moderate- to high-intensity rosuvastatin vs equivalent doses of atorvastatin, we observed a HR of 1.17 (95% CI 0.88-1.56). Moderate- to high-intensity simvastatin was associated with a HR of 1.33 (95% CI 1.16-1.53), when compared with atorvastatin at equivalent doses.

LIMITATIONS

We could not conduct other pairwise comparisons of statins due to small sample size. In the absence of a uniform definition on the comparability of statin doses, the applied dose ratios may not fully match with all literature sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not suggest a systematically lower risk of muscular events for hydrophilic statins when compared to lipophilic statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses.

Statin-Induced Autoimmune Necrotizing Myopathy

Statin therapy is a widely prescribed medication class for hypercholesterolemia. In statin-induced autoimmune myopathy, genetically predisposed and at-risk patients can develop antibodies against hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the key enzyme in the production of cholesterol. As a result, an autoimmune reaction causing weakness, myalgia, with possible severe rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, and myonecrosis also can occur. A 73-year-old female presented to clinic with myalgia and fatigue. She was on atorvastatin 20 mg/day for over 1 year, which she stopped 1 week prior to her initial presentation. Patient did experience rhabdomyolysis as well as a transaminitis. She underwent an autoimmune workup which was positive for HMG-CoA reductase antibodies. Patient was initially treated on a prednisone taper, starting dose 50 mg/day. Without remission of symptoms, methotrexate 15 mg/week was initiated.

Drug-induced Myopathies

Differential diagnosis of muscle pain and weakness is extensive, including neurological, vertebral, arthrogenic, vascular, traumatic, immunological, endocrine, genetic and infectious aetiologies, as well as medication or toxin-related causes. Muscles are highly sensitive to a large number of drugs, especially with high doses. Although many drug classes can cause toxic myopathy, a significant number of cases are caused by lipid-lowering drugs, long-term use of corticosteroids, and, most often, alcohol misuse. Some drug interactions, e.g. those that are metabolised via the enzyme CYP3A4, can increase the serum levels of the drugs and drug-induced toxicity. A careful history of patient's drug and alcohol consumption is therefore vital. Clinical symptoms depend on the drug, dosage and patient's sensitivity. They can vary from asymptomatic increase in serum levels of creatine kinase, mild myalgia and cramps to muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis, kidney failure and even death. The pathogenesis is often only partially known and multifactorial. Toxic myopathy is often reversible once the drug is discontinued, alternative drug therapy is started or a different dosage regimen is chosen. Complications such as acute kidney failure must be avoided, and analgesic therapy may be indicated.

[Diagnostics and treatment of statin-associated muscle symptoms]

Statins are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in Germany. Their benefits in lowering cardiovascular risk are beyond dispute. Nevertheless, many patients complain of side effects from statin therapy, including statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) in particular. Despite their relative frequency, it is difficult to objectively diagnose them, as the time until appearance of first symptoms, the nature of the complaints and the severity of muscle problems vary widely. This narrative review summarizes the causes of SAMS as well as new possibilities regarding their diagnosis and therapy.

PCSK9 Inhibitors in a German Single-Center Clinical Practice: Real-World Treatment of Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Over 68 Weeks

Aims

Several the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients at high/very high cardiovascular risk who are inadequately treated with maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs).

Objectives

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of the PCSK9i alirocumab and evolocumab in a single-center clinical practice for up to 68 weeks.

Methods

In this prospective, open-label study conducted in Germany, 635 enrolled patients were treated with alirocumab [75 or 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W)] or evolocumab (140 mg Q2W) according to European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > 1.81/2.59 mmol/L (70/100 mg/dL), depending on cardiovascular risk]. Investigators were able to adjust LLTs, including PCSK9i, according to their own clinical judgment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was LDL-C reduction from baseline to week 68.

Results

At baseline, approximately 50% of patients were statin intolerant, and approximately 90% reported a history of cardiovascular disease. LDL-C reductions remained generally unchanged from weeks 4 to 68 in each treatment group. At week 68, LDL-C mean percentage changes from baseline were − 41.7% (alirocumab 75 mg Q2W), − 53.7% (alirocumab 150 mg Q2W), and − 54.1% (evolocumab 140 mg Q2W). LDL-C reduction was 7.1% greater in patients receiving statins than in those not receiving statins because of statin intolerance (P < 0.0001). PCSK9i consistently improved levels of other lipoproteins throughout. Overall, 47.1% of patients reported adverse events at week 68.

Conclusions

Consistent with clinical trial findings, alirocumab and evolocumab improved lipid levels in a real-world setting in patients with high baseline LDL-C levels despite receiving maximally tolerated LLTs. PCSK9i were generally well-tolerated.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-020-00411-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[ESC guidelines on sports cardiology 2020 : Which sports can be performed with heart diseases?]

The guidelines for sports cardiology have recently been published for the first time by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). They address recommendations for leisure time exercise and competitive sports in athletes with cardiovascular diseases. The spectrum ranges from women during pregnancy, athletes with increased cardiovascular risk and risk factors or with a genetic predisposition, such as ion channelopathies, cardiomyopathies, congenital heart diseases as well as patients with valvular heart diseases, coronary heart disease, after myocardial infarction, with arrhythmia and with heart failure. A detailed cardiological evaluation of the athlete with heart disease is the basis for detailed and individually tailored recommendations with respect to the type of sport, mode, duration and intensity of physical exercise, physical training and the capability for competitive sports. Evidence from the current literature and the experience of the sports cardiologist are the basis for shared decision making between the sports cardiologist and the athlete/patient, which is becoming increasingly more important. Together, they will decide which sport can be practiced defining intensity and duration.

Cardiovascular Risk and Statin Therapy Considerations in Women

Despite major progress in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, women remain an underdiagnosed and insufficiently treated group, with higher hospitalization and death rates compared to men. Obesity, more frequently encountered in women, raises the risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases as women age. There are some differences based on sex regarding the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of dyslipidemia, as it has been observed that women are less frequently prescribed statins and, when they are, they receive lower doses, even after myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Real-life data show that, compared to men, women are at higher risk of non-adherence to statin treatment and are more predisposed to discontinue treatment because of side effects. Statin metabolism has some particularities in women, due to a lower glomerular filtration rate, higher body fat percentage, and overall faster statin metabolism. In women of fertile age, before initiating statin treatment, contraception methods should be discussed because statins may have teratogenic effects. Older women have a higher likelihood of polypharmacy, with greater potential for drug interactions when prescribing a statin.

Does the type of foam roller influence the recovery rate, thermal response and DOMS prevention?

PURPOSE

Supporting post-exercise recovery requires choosing not only the right treatment but also the equipment, in which the impact is not always clear. The study aimed to determine the effect of foam rolling on the rate of lactate removal and DOMS prevention and whether the type of foam roller is effective in the context of post-exercise recovery.

METHODS

This randomized trial enrolled 33 active healthy males divided into three groups of eleven individuals: foam rolling with a smooth (STH) or grid roller (GRID) or passive recovery (PAS). All the participants performed full squat jumps for one minute. Examination took place at rest (thermal imaging of skin temperature-[Tsk] and blood lactate-[LA]), immediately following exercise (Tsk & LA), immediately after recovery treatment (Tsk) and after 30 minutes of rest (Tsk & LA). Their pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after exercise.

RESULTS

The magnitude of lactate decrease depended on the type of recovery used. In the PAS group, the decrease in lactate concentration by 2.65 mmol/L following a half-hour rest was significantly lower than that in the other groups (STH vs. PAS p = 0.042 / GRID vs. PAS p = 0.025). For thermal responses, significant differences between both experimental groups were noted only 30 minutes after exercise. A significant decrease in pain in the STH group occurred between 48 and 96 hours, while the GRID group showed a systematic significant decrease in VAS values in subsequent measurements. Changes in VAS values in subsequent measurements in the PAS group were not statistically significant (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Foam rolling seems to be effective for enhancing lactate clearance and counteracting DOMS, but the type of foam roller does not seem to influence the recovery rate.

Kefir peptides alleviate high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis by attenuating macrophage accumulation and oxidative stress in ApoE knockout mice

In the past decade, the high morbidity and mortality of atherosclerotic disease have been prevalent worldwide. High-fat food consumption has been suggested to be an overarching factor for atherosclerosis incidence. This study aims to investigate the effects of kefir peptides on high-fat diet (HFD)-induced atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE^−/−) mice. 7-week old male ApoE^−/− and normal C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8). Atherosclerotic lesion development in ApoE^−/− mice was established after fed the HFD for 12 weeks compared to standard chow diet (SCD)-fed C57BL/6 and ApoE^−/− control groups. Kefir peptides oral administration significantly improved atherosclerotic lesion development by protecting against endothelial dysfunction, decreasing oxidative stress, reducing aortic lipid deposition, attenuating macrophage accumulation, and suppressing the inflammatory immune response compared with the HFD/ApoE^−/− mock group. Moreover, the high dose of kefir peptides substantially inhibited aortic fibrosis and restored the fibrosis in the aorta root close to that observed in the C57BL/6 normal control group. Our findings show, for the first time, anti-atherosclerotic progression via kefir peptides consumption in HFD-fed ApoE^−/− mice. The profitable effects of kefir peptides provide new perspectives for its use as an anti-atherosclerotic agent in the preventive medicine.

Effective atherosclerotic plaque inflammation inhibition with targeted drug delivery by hyaluronan conjugated atorvastatin nanoparticles

Atherosclerosis is associated with inflammation in the arteries, which is a major cause of heart attacks and strokes. Reducing the extent of local inflammation at atherosclerotic plaques can be an attractive strategy to combat atherosclerosis. While statins can exhibit direct anti-inflammatory activities, the high dose required for such a therapy renders it unrealistic due to their low systemic bioavailabilities and potential side effects. To overcome this, a new hyaluronan (HA)-atorvastatin (ATV) conjugate was designed with the hydrophobic statin ATV forming the core of the nanoparticle (HA-ATV-NP). The HA on the NPs can selectively bind with CD44, a cell surface receptor overexpressed on cells residing in atherosclerotic plaques and known to play important roles in plaque development. HA-ATV-NPs exhibited significantly higher anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages compared to ATV alone in vitro. Furthermore, when administered in an apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-knockout mouse model of atherosclerosis following a 1-week treatment regimen, HA-ATV-NPs markedly decreased inflammation in advanced atherosclerotic plaques, which were monitored through contrast agent aided magnetic resonance imaging. These results suggest CD44 targeting with HA-ATV-NPs is an attractive strategy to reduce harmful inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques.

Improving long-term adherence to statin therapy: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences in primary care

BACKGROUND

Statins substantially reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease when taken regularly. Though statins are generally well tolerated, current studies show that one-third of patients discontinue use of statins within 2 years. A qualitative approach may improve the understanding of attitudes and behaviours towards statins, the mechanisms related to discontinuation, and how they are managed in primary care.

AIM

To identify factors related to statin discontinuation and approaches for long-term statin adherence.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A qualitative study of German GPs' experiences with statin therapy in rural and urban settings in primary care.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews (n = 16) with purposefully recruited GPs were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic patient factors, the nocebo effect, patient attitudes towards primary prevention, and negative media coverage had significant impacts on statin therapy according to GPs. To overcome these barriers, GPs described useful strategies combining patient motivation and education with person-centred care. GPs used computer programs for individual risk-benefit analyses in the context of shared decision making. They encouraged patients with strong concerns or perceived side effects to continue therapy with a modified medication regimen combined with individual therapy goals.

CONCLUSION

GPs should be aware of barriers to statin therapy and useful approaches to overcome them. They could be supported by guideline recommendations that are more closely aligned to primary care as well as comprehensible patient information about lipid-lowering therapy. Future studies, exploring patients' specific needs and involving them in improving adherence behaviour, are recommended.

Cardiovascular Outcomes of PCSK9 Inhibitors: With Special Emphasis on Its Effect beyond LDL-Cholesterol Lowering

PCSK9 inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, are novel antihypercholesterolemic drugs. FDA first approved them in July 2015. PCSK9 protein (692-amino acids) was discovered in 2003. It plays a major role in LDL receptor degradation and is a prominent modulator in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) metabolism. PCSK9 inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that target PCSK9 protein in liver and inhibiting this protein leads to drastically lowering harmful LDL-C level in the bloodstream. Despite widespread use of the statin, not all the high-risk patients were able to achieve targeted level of LDL-C. Using PCSK9 inhibitors could lead to a substantial decrement in LDL-C plasma level ranging from 50% to 70%, either as a monotherapy or on top of statins. A large number of trials have shown robust reduction of LDL-C plasma level with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors as a monotherapy or in combination with statins in familial and nonfamilial forms of hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, PCSK9 inhibitors do not appear to increase the risk of hepatic and muscle-related side effects. PCSK9 inhibitors proved to be a highly potent and promising antihypercholesterolemic drug by decreasing LDL-R lysosomal degradation by PCSK9 protein. Statin drugs are known to have some pleiotropic effects. In this article, we are also focusing on the effects of PCSK9 inhibitor beyond LDL-C reduction like endothelial inflammation, atherosclerosis, its safety in patients with diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease, and its influence on neurocognition and stroke.

Physiological and therapeutic regulation of PCSK9 activity in cardiovascular disease

Ischemic heart disease is the main cause of death worldwide and is accelerated by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a potent circulating regulator of LDL-C through its ability to induce degradation of the LDL receptor (LDLR) in the lysosome of hepatocytes. Only in the last few years, a number of breakthroughs in the understanding of PCSK9 biology have been reported illustrating how PCSK9 activity is tightly regulated at several levels by factors influencing its transcription, secretion, or by extracellular inactivation and clearance. Two humanized antibodies directed against the LDLR-binding site in PCSK9 received approval by the European and US authorities and additional PCSK9 directed therapeutics are climbing up the phases of clinical trials. The first outcome data of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab reported a significant reduction in the composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and further outcome data are awaited. Meanwhile, it became evident that PCSK9 has (patho)physiological roles in several cardiovascular cells. In this review, we summarize and discuss the recent biological and clinical data on PCSK9, the regulation of PCSK9, its extra-hepatic activities focusing on cardiovascular cells, molecular concepts to target PCSK9, and finally briefly summarize the data of recent clinical studies.

[PCSK9 inhibitors : Recommendations for patient selection]

The 2 or 4‑week subcutaneous therapy with the recently approved antibodies alirocumab and evolocumab for inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in addition to statins and ezetimibe by 50-60 %. The therapy is well-tolerated. The safety profile in the published studies is comparable to placebo. Outcome data and information on long-term safety and the influence on cardiovascular events are not yet available but the results of several large trials are expected in 2016-2018. At present (spring 2016) PCSK9 inhibitors represent an option for selected patients with a high cardiovascular risk and high LDL-C despite treatment with the maximum tolerated oral lipid-lowering therapy. This group includes selected patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and high-risk individuals with statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS).

[Introduction of PCSK9 inhibitors : New perspectives in treatment and practical implementation]

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is of critical importance in the regulation of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-mediated metabolism of cholesterol. The discovery of mutations in the gene encoding PCSK9 in families with an autosomal dominant form of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), which were later shown to be "gain-of-function" mutations, led to the development of antibodies against PCSK9. The efficacy in markedly reducing levels of LDL-cholesterol and preliminary evidence for benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases indicated that special groups of patients can be more effectively treated. This includes forms of hypercholesterolemia refractory to conventional treatment as well as patients with FH and/or statin intolerance. Further information on long-term efficacy, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibition and possibilities of implementation in the healthcare system are awaited from ongoing clinical outcome trials, such as FOURIER, ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, SPIRE 1 and 2 involving more than 70,000 high-risk patients.