1
|
Stallmach A, von Müller L, Storr M, Link A, Konturek PC, Solbach PC, Weiss KH, Wahler S, Vehreschild MJGT. [Fecal Microbiota Transfer (FMT) in Germany - Status and Perspective]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:490-499. [PMID: 37187187 DOI: 10.1055/a-2075-2725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is a treatment to modulate the gastrointestinal microbiota. Its use in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is established throughout Europe and recommended in national and international guidelines. In Germany, the FMT is codeable in the hospital reimbursement system. A comprehensive survey on the frequency of use based on this coding is missing so far. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY Reports of the Institute for Hospital Remuneration (InEK), the Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS), and hospital quality reports 2015-2021 were examined for FMT coding and evaluated in a structured expert consultation. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2021, 1,645 FMT procedures were coded by 175 hospitals. From 2016 to 2018, this was a median of 293 (274-313) FMT annually, followed by a steady decline in subsequent years to 119 FMT in 2021. Patients with FMT were 57.7% female, median age 74 years, and FMT was applied colonoscopically in 72.2%. CDI was the primary diagnosis in 86.8% of cases, followed by ulcerative colitis in 7.6%. DISCUSSION In Germany, FMT is used less frequently than in the European comparison. One application hurdle is the regulatory classification of FMT as a non-approved drug, which leads to significantly higher costs in manufacturing and administration and makes reimbursement difficult. The European Commission recently proposed a regulation to classify FMT as a transplant. This could prospectively change the regulatory situation of FMT in Germany and thus contribute to a nationwide offer of a therapeutic procedure recommended in guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Alexander Link
- Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - Peter C Konturek
- Thüringen-Klinik Saalfeld Georgius Agricola GmbH, Saalfeld, Deutschland
| | | | - Karl Heinz Weiss
- Krankenhaus Salem der Evang. Stadtmission Heidelberg gGmbH, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | | | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- Medizinische Klinik 2, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porcari S, Maida M, Bibbò S, McIlroy J, Ianiro G, Cammarota G. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as Emerging Treatment in European Countries 2.0. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2024; 1435:85-99. [PMID: 38175472 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42108-2_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients in the world. Although several antibiotics effectively treat CDI, some individuals may not respond to these drugs and may be cured by transplanting stool from healthy donors. FMT has demonstrated extraordinary cure rates for the cure of CDI recurrences.Moreover, FMT has also been investigated in other disorders associated with the alteration of gut microbiota, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where the alterations of the gut microbiota ecology have been theorized to play a causative role. Although FMT is currently not recommended to cure IBD patients in clinical practice, several studies have been recently carried out with the ultimate goal to search new therapeutic options to patients.This review summarizes data on the use of FMT for the treatment of both CDI and IBD, with a special attention to highlight studies conducted in European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Porcari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Stefano Bibbò
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - James McIlroy
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gianluca Ianiro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chakraborty C, Bhattacharya M, Lee SS. Current Status of Microneedle Array Technology for Therapeutic Delivery: From Bench to Clinic. Mol Biotechnol 2023:10.1007/s12033-023-00961-2. [PMID: 37987985 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-023-00961-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, microneedle (MN) patches have emerged as an alternative technology for transdermal delivery of various drugs, therapeutics proteins, and vaccines. Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand the status of MN-based therapeutics. The article aims to illustrate the current status of microneedle array technology for therapeutic delivery through a comprehensive review. However, the PubMed search was performed to understand the MN's therapeutics delivery status. At the same time, the search shows the number no of publications on MN is increasing (63). The search was performed with the keywords "Coated microneedle," "Hollow microneedle," "Dissolvable microneedle," and "Hydrogel microneedle," which also shows increasing trend. Similarly, the article highlighted the application of different microneedle arrays for treating different diseases. The article also illustrated the current status of different phases of MN-based therapeutics clinical trials. It discusses the delivery of different therapeutic molecules, such as drug molecule delivery, using microneedle array technology. The approach mainly discusses the delivery of different therapeutic molecules. The leading pharmaceutical companies that produce the microneedle array for therapeutic purposes have also been discussed. Finally, we discussed the limitations and future prospects of this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiranjib Chakraborty
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Adamas University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700126, India.
| | - Manojit Bhattacharya
- Department of Zoology, Fakir Mohan University, Vyasa Vihar, Balasore, Odisha, 756020, India
| | - Sang-Soo Lee
- Institute for Skeletal Aging & Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University-Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, 24252, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Detection of Newly Secreted Antibodies Predicts Non-recurrence in Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection. J Clin Microbiol 2022; 60:e0220121. [PMID: 35107301 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02201-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Within eight weeks of primary Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as many as 30% of patients develop recurrent disease with the associated risks of multiple relapses, morbidity, and economic burden. There are no clear clinical correlates or validated biomarkers that can predict recurrence during primary infection. This study demonstrates the potential of a simple test for identifying hospitalized CDI patients at low risk for disease recurrence. Methods: Forty-six hospitalized CDI patients were enrolled at Emory University Hospitals. Serum and a novel matrix from circulating plasmablasts called "Medium Enriched for Newly Synthesized Antibodies" (MENSA) samples were collected during weeks 1, 2, and 4. Antibodies specific for ten C. difficile antigens were measured in each sample Results: Among the 46 C. difficile-infected patients, nine (19.5%) experienced recurrence within eight weeks of primary infection. Among the 37 non-recurrent patients, 23 (62%; 23/37) had anti-C. difficile MENSA antibodies specific for any of the three toxin antigens: TcdB-CROP, TcdBvir-CROP, and/or CDTb. Positive MENSA responses occurred early (within the first 12 days post-symptom onset), including six patients who never seroconverted. A similar trend was observed in serum responses, but they peaked later and identified fewer patients (51%; 19/37). In contrast, none (0%; 0/9) of the patients who subsequently recurred after hospitalization produced antibodies specific for any of the three C. difficile toxin antigens. Thus, patients with a negative early MENSA response against all three C. difficile toxin antigens had a 19-fold greater relative risk of recurrence. Discussion: MENSA and serum levels of IgA and/or IgG antibodies for three C. difficile toxins have prognostic potential. These immunoassays measure nascent immune responses that reduce the likelihood of recurrence thereby providing a biomarker of protection from recurrent CDI. Patients who are positive by this immunoassay are unlikely to suffer recurrence. Early identification of patients at-risk for recurrence by negative MENSA creates opportunities for targeted prophylactic strategies that can reduce the incidence, cost and morbidity due to recurrent CDI.
Collapse
|
5
|
Michailidis L, Currier AC, Le M, Flomenhoft DR. Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:802-814. [PMID: 34815646 PMCID: PMC8596209 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown excellent efficacy in treating Clostridioides difficile infection, as well as promise in several other diseases. The heightened interest is accompanied by concerns over adverse events (AE) and safety. To further understand that in FMT, we performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of high-quality, prospective randomized controlled trials FMT. METHODS Studies were selected based on predefined exclusion criteria and were assessed for quality. Only prospective, randomized, controlled studies of high quality were included in the final analysis. Data were extracted on demographics, AE, indication, delivery method and follow-up duration. RESULTS Out of 334 articles reviewed, 9 high quality studies with 756 FMTs were selected for final analysis. The pooled rate of AE was 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.642) as they were reported by 112 patients who received FMT. The SAE rate was 5.3% (95%CI 3.1-8.8%). The most common AE reported was abdominal pain, followed by diarrhea. The most common SAE was Clostridium difficile infection. Upper gastrointestinal tract delivery was associated with a higher rate of total AE, but not SAE. CONCLUSIONS Based on the selected studies, the AE rate of FMT is 39.3%, with most AE being mild and self-limiting. SAE were uncommon at 5.3%, and many were only possibly related to the FMT. Adherence to standardized reporting of AE as well as longitudinal studies and registries will help further clarify the safety of FMT in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprinos Michailidis
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
- Correspondence to: Lamprinos Michailidis, MD, University of Kentucky College of Medicine 800 Rose Street Room MN649, Lexington, KY 40536, USA, e-mail:
| | - Alden C. Currier
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michelle Le
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Deborah R. Flomenhoft
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stallmach A, Steube A, Grunert P, Hartmann M, Biehl LM, Vehreschild MJGT. Fecal Microbiota Transfer. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:31-38. [PMID: 32031511 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is increasingly being used in Ger- many, as in other countries, for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). FMT is now being performed both for research and in individual patients outside of clinical trials. No compulsory standards have been established to date for donor screening or for the method of fecal transfer. Given the potential dangers of FMT, this would seem to be urgently necessary. METHODS This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search, including the reports of consensus conferences from Germany and abroad. RESULTS Because of its high efficacy, FMT is the treatment of choice for rCDI. It is largely free of adverse side effects, even in immune-deficient patients, as long as comprehensive and repeated donor screening has been carried out, with extensive clinical and microbiological testing and with the use of structured questionnaires. The ingestion of frozen, encapsulated microbiota is just as effective as other modes of delivery for the treatment of rCDI. CONCLUSION Encapsulation of the fecal microbiome (FM) and storage at -20°C is the method of choice, because it can be standardized with the necessary quality controls and it is readily available. Patients with rCDI should undergo FMT by orally ingesting the capsules. There are ongoing research efforts to identify the active e FM. It is not yet clear when the ultimate goal of recombinant production can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Stallmach
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; University Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yalchin M, Segal JP, Mullish BH, Quraishi MN, Iqbal TH, Marchesi JR, Hart AL. Gaps in knowledge and future directions for the use of faecal microbiota transplant in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2019; 12:1756284819891038. [PMID: 31803254 PMCID: PMC6878609 DOI: 10.1177/1756284819891038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has now been established into clinical guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Its therapeutic application in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is currently at an early stage. To date, there have been four randomized controlled trials for FMT in IBD and a multitude of observational studies. However, significant gaps in our knowledge regarding optimum methods for FMT preparation, technical aspects and logistics of its administration, as well as mechanistic underpinnings, still remain. In this article, we aim to highlight these gaps by reviewing evidence and making key recommendations on the direction of future studies in this field. In addition, we provide an overview of the current evidence of potential mechanisms of FMT in treating IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Yalchin
- St Mark’s Hospital, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Department, Harrow HA1 UJ, UK
| | - Jonathan P. Segal
- St Mark’s Hospital, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Department, Harrow, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Benjamin H. Mullish
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Mohammed Nabil Quraishi
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - Tariq H. Iqbal
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - Julian R. Marchesi
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Ailsa L. Hart
- St Mark’s Hospital, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Department, Harrow, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peri R, Aguilar RC, Tüffers K, Erhardt A, Link A, Ehlermann P, Angeli W, Frank T, Storr M, Glück T, Sturm A, Rosien U, Tacke F, Bachmann O, Solbach P, Stallmach A, Goeser F, Vehreschild MJ. The impact of technical and clinical factors on fecal microbiota transfer outcomes for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in Germany. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:716-722. [PMID: 31210950 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619839918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is highly effective in the treatment and prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) with cure rates of about 80% after a single treatment. Nevertheless, the reasons for failure in the remaining 20% remain largely elusive. The aim of the present study was to investigate different potential clinical predictors of response to FMT in Germany. Methods Information was extracted from the MicroTrans Registry (NCT02681068), a retrospective observational multicenter study, collecting data from patients undergoing FMT for recurrent or refractory CDI in Germany. We performed binary logistic regression with the following covariates: age, gender, ribotype 027, Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group score, immunosuppression, preparation for FMT by use of proton pump inhibitor, antimotility agents and bowel lavage, previous recurrences, severity of CDI, antibiotic induction treatment, fresh or frozen FMT preparation, and route of application. Results Treatment response was achieved in 191/240 evaluable cases (79.6%) at day 30 (D30) post FMT and 78.1% at day 90 (D90) post FMT. Assessment of clinical predictors for FMT failure by forward and confirmatory backward-stepwise regression analysis yielded higher age as an independent predictor of FMT failure (p = 0.001; OR 1.060; 95%CI 1.025-1.097). Conclusion FMT in Germany is associated with high cure rates at D30 and D90. No specific pre-treatment, preparation or application strategy had an impact on FMT success. Only higher age was identified as an independent risk factor for treatment failure. Based on these and external findings, future studies should focus on the assessment of microbiota and microbiota-associated metabolites as factors determining FMT success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie Peri
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
| | - Rebeca Cruz Aguilar
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
| | - Kester Tüffers
- Department II of Internal Medicine, St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Andreas Erhardt
- Department II of Internal Medicine, St. Petrus Hospital, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Alexander Link
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Ehlermann
- Department of Internal Medicine, SRH Kurpfalzkrankenhaus Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Angeli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kempten-Oberallgäu Clinic, Kempten, Germany
| | - Thorsten Frank
- Department of Internal Medicine II, St. Katharinen Hospital, Frechen, Germany
| | - Martin Storr
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, and Center of Endoscopy, Starnberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Glück
- Department of Internal Medicine, Trostberg Clinic, Trostberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Sturm
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, DRK Kliniken Westend, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Rosien
- Visceral Medical Center, Israelitic Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Oliver Bachmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Solbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Stallmach
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology), University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Felix Goeser
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria Jgt Vehreschild
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany These authors contributed equally
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramai D, Zakhia K, Ofosu A, Ofori E, Reddy M. Fecal microbiota transplantation: donor relation, fresh or frozen, delivery methods, cost-effectiveness. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:30-38. [PMID: 30598589 PMCID: PMC6302197 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has evolved into a robust and efficient means for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Our narrative review looks at the donor selection, preparation, delivery techniques and cost-effectiveness of FMT. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Databases, for studies that compared the biological effects of donor selection, fresh or frozen fecal preparation, and various delivery techniques. We also evaluated the cost-effectiveness and manually searched references to identify additional relevant studies. Overall, there is a paucity of studies that directly compare outcomes associated with related and non-related stool donors. However, inferences from prior studies indicate that the success of FMT does not depend on the donor-patient relationship. Over time, the use of unrelated donors has increased because of the formation of stool banks and the need to save processing time and capital. However, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the optimal freezing time before microbial function declines. Several FMT techniques have been developed, such as colonoscopy, enema, nasogastric or nasojejunal tubes, and capsules. The comparable and high efficacy of FMT capsules, combined with their convenience, safety and aesthetically tolerable mode of delivery, makes it an attractive option for many patients. Cost-effective models comparing these various approaches support the use of FMT via colonoscopy as being the best strategy for the treatment of recurrent CDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Department of Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Academic Affiliate of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Brooklyn (Daryl Ramai)
| | - Karl Zakhia
- Department of Medicine, Elmhurst Medical Center, Queens (Karl Zakhia)
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Academic Affiliate of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Brooklyn (Andrew Ofosu, Emmanuel Ofori, Madhavi Reddy), New York, USA
| | - Emmanuel Ofori
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Academic Affiliate of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Brooklyn (Andrew Ofosu, Emmanuel Ofori, Madhavi Reddy), New York, USA
| | - Madhavi Reddy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Academic Affiliate of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Brooklyn (Andrew Ofosu, Emmanuel Ofori, Madhavi Reddy), New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ianiro G, Maida M, Burisch J, Simonelli C, Hold G, Ventimiglia M, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G. Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6:1232-1244. [PMID: 30288286 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618780762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Protocols for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) through faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are still not standardised. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of different FMT protocols for rCDI according to routes, number of infusions and infused material. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched through 31 May 2017. Studies offering multiple infusions if a single infusion failed to cure rCDI were included. Data were combined through a random effects meta-analysis. Results Fifteen studies (1150 subjects) were analysed. Multiple infusions increased efficacy rates overall (76% versus 93%) and in each route of delivery (duodenal delivery: 73% with single infusion versus 81% with multiple infusions; capsule: 80% versus 92%; colonoscopy: 78% versus 98% and enema: 56% versus 92%). Duodenal delivery and colonoscopy were associated, respectively, with lower efficacy rates (p = 0.039) and higher efficacy rates (p = 0.006) overall. Faecal amount ≤ 50 g (p = 0.006) and enema (p = 0.019) were associated with lower efficacy rates after a single infusion. The use of fresh or frozen faeces did not influence outcomes. Conclusions Routes, number of infusions and faecal dosage may influence efficacy rates of FMT for rCDI. These findings could help to optimise FMT protocols in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ianiro
- Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Johan Burisch
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark
| | - Claudia Simonelli
- Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Georgina Hold
- St George & Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sidney, Australia
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- Section of Internal Medicine, Villa Sofia - V. Cervello Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The human intestinal microbiome has important metabolic and immunological functions for the host and is part of the defense against pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract. Antibiotics, probiotics, dietary measures, such as prebiotics, and the relatively newly established method of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT, also known as fecal microbiome transfer) all influence the intestinal microbiome. The FMT procedure comprises the transmission of fecal microorganisms from a healthy donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a patient. The aim of this intervention is to restore a normal microbiome in patients with diseases associated with dysbiosis. The only indication for FMT is currently multiple recurrence of Clostridium difficile infections. Approximately 85% of affected patients can be successfully treated by FMT compared to only about 30% treated conventionally with vancomycin. Other possible therapeutic applications are chronic inflammatory and functional bowel diseases, insulin resistance and morbid obesity but these have to be evaluated further in clinical trials. Knowledge on the optimal donor, the best dosage and the most appropriate route of administration is still limited. A careful donor selection is necessary. The implementation of FMT in Germany is subject to the Medicines Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG) with a duty of disclosure and personal implementation by the attending physician. By documentation in a central register long-term effects and side effects of FMT have to be evaluated.
Collapse
|
12
|
Duarte-Chavez R, Wojda TR, Zanders TB, Geme B, Fioravanti G, Stawicki SP. Early Results of Fecal Microbial Transplantation Protocol Implementation at a Community-based University Hospital. J Glob Infect Dis 2018; 10:47-57. [PMID: 29910564 PMCID: PMC5987372 DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_145_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Clostridium difficile (CD) is a serious and increasingly prevalent healthcare-associated infection. The pathogenesis of CD infection (CDI) involves the acquisition of CD with a concurrent disruption of the native gut flora. Antibiotics are a major risk although other contributing factors have also been identified. Clinical management combines discontinuation of the offending antibiotic, initiation of CD-specific antibiotic therapy, probiotic agent use, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and surgery as the “last resort” option. The aim of this study is to review short-term clinical results following the implementation of FMT protocol (FMTP) at our community-based university hospital. Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board and Infection Control Committee approvals, we implemented an institution-wide FMTP for patients diagnosed with CDI. Prospective tracking of all patients receiving FMT between July 1, 2015, and February 1, 2017, was conducted using REDCap™ electronic data capture system. According to the FMTP, indications for FMT included (a) three or more CDI recurrences, (b) two or more hospital admissions with severe CDI, or (c) first episode of complicated CDI (CCDI). Risk factors for initial infection and for treatment failure were assessed. Patients were followed for at least 3 months to monitor for cure/failure, relapse, and side effects. Frozen 250 mL FMT samples were acquired from OpenBiome (Somerville, MA, USA). After 4 h of thawing, the liquid suspension was applied using colonoscopy, beginning with terminal ileum and proceeding distally toward mid-transverse colon. Monitored clinical parameters included disease severity (Hines VA CDI Severity Score or HVCSS), concomitant medications, number of FMT treatments, non-FMT therapies, cure rates, and mortality. Descriptive statistics were utilized to outline the study results. Results: A total of 35 patients (mean age 58.5 years, 69% female) were analyzed, with FMT-attributable primary cure achieved in 30/35 (86%) cases. Within this subgroup, 2/30 (6.7%) patients recurred and were subsequently cured with long-term oral vancomycin. Among five primary FMT failures (14% total sample), 3 (60%) achieved medical cure with long-term oral vancomycin therapy and 2 (40%) required colectomy. For the seven patients who either failed FMT or recurred, long-term vancomycin therapy was curative in all but two cases. For patients with severe CDI (HVCSS ≥3), primary and overall cure rates were 6/10 (60%) and 8/10 (80%), respectively. Patients with CCDI (n = 4) had higher HVCSS (4 vs. 3) and a mortality of 25%. Characteristics of patients who failed initial FMT included older age (70 vs. 57 years), female sex (80% vs. 67%), severe CDI (80% vs. 13%), and active opioid use during the initial infection (60% vs. 37%) and at the time of FMT (60% vs. 27%). The most commonly reported side effect of FMT was loose stools. Conclusions: This pilot study supports the efficacy and safety of FMT administration for CDI in the setting of a community-based university hospital. Following FMTP implementation, primary (86%) and overall (94%) nonsurgical cure rates were similar to those reported in other studies. The potential role of opioids as a modulator of CDI warrants further clinical investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Duarte-Chavez
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Thomas R Wojda
- Department of Family Medicine, Warren Hospital, St. Luke's University Health Network, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas B Zanders
- Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Berhanu Geme
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Gloria Fioravanti
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schmidt-Hieber M, Bierwirth J, Buchheidt D, Cornely OA, Hentrich M, Maschmeyer G, Schalk E, Vehreschild JJ, Vehreschild MJGT. Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients: 2017 updated evidence-based guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2018; 97:31-49. [PMID: 29177551 PMCID: PMC5748412 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-017-3183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Cancer patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal complications. In this manuscript, we update our 2013 guideline on the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). An expert group was put together by the AGIHO to update the existing guideline. For each sub-topic, a literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, and strengths of recommendation and the quality of the published evidence for major therapeutic strategies were categorized using the 2015 European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) criteria. Final recommendations were approved by the AGIHO plenary conference. Recommendations were made with respect to non-infectious and infectious gastrointestinal complications. Strengths of recommendation and levels of evidence are presented. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients is mandatory. Evidence-based recommendations are provided in this updated guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Schmidt-Hieber
- Clinic for Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology and Palliative Care, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Bierwirth
- Deutsches Beratungszentrum für Hygiene, BZH GmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | - D Buchheidt
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology - Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - O A Cornely
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, ZKS Köln, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Hentrich
- Department III for Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - G Maschmeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Ernst-von-Bergmann Klinikum, Potsdam, Germany
| | - E Schalk
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J J Vehreschild
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Infectious diarrhea is one of the most common diseases. This article summarizes the current state of the diagnostics and treatment and includes the most important pathogens, i.e. Norovirus, Rotavirus, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella and pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infections caused by toxin-producing strains of Clostridium difficile are described in more detail due to the increasing importance. Symptomatic therapy is still the most important component of treatment. Empirical antibiotic therapy is reserved for severely ill patients with a high stool frequency, fever, bloody diarrhea, underlying immune deficiency or significant comorbidities. Increasing bacterial resistance (in particular against fluoroquinolones) has to be considered. Motility inhibitors are not recommended for infections due to Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, C. difficile infections (CDI) and severe enterocolitis caused by other pathogens. The macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin can reduce the recurrence rate of CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) currently provides a reserve treatment option for multiple recurrences of CDI and is subject to the Medicines Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG) in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lübbert
- Fachbereich Infektions- und Tropenmedizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie und Rheumatologie, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Infektionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - R Mutters
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Krankenhaushygiene, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
[Individualized treatment strategies for Clostridium difficile infections]. Internist (Berl) 2017; 58:675-681. [PMID: 28589214 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-017-0268-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Upon hospitalization, up to 15.5% of patients are already colonized with a toxigenic Clostridium difficile strain (TCD). The rate of asymptomatic colonization is 0-3% in healthy adults and up to 20-40% in hospitalized patients. The incidence and mortality of C. difficile infection (CDI) has significantly increased during recent years. Mortality lies between 3 and 14%. CDI is generally caused by intestinal dysbiosis, which can be triggered by various factors, including antibiotics or immune suppressants. If CDI occurs, ongoing antibiotic therapy should be discontinued. The choice of treatment is guided by the clinical situation: Mild courses of CDI should be treated with metronidazole. Oral vancomycin is suitable as a first-line therapy of mild CDI occurring during pregnancy and lactation, as well as in cases of intolerance or allergy to metronidazole. Severe courses should be treated with vancomycin. Recurrence should be treated with vancomycin or fidaxomicin. Multiple recurrences should be treated with vancomycin or fidaxomicin; if necessary, a vancomycin taper regimen may also be used. An alternative is fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), with healing rates of more than 80%. Bezlotoxumab is the first available monoclonal antibody which neutralizes the C. difficile toxin B, and in combination with an antibiotic significantly reduces the rate of a new C. difficile infection compared to placebo. A better definition of clinical and microbiota-associated risk factors and the ongoing implementation of molecular diagnostics are likely to lead to optimized identification of patients at risk, and an increasing individualization of prophylactic and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming, toxin-secreting bacillus. It is transmitted via a fecal-oral route and can be found in 1-3 % of the healthy population. Symptoms caused by C. difficile range from uncomplicated diarrhea to a toxic megacolon. The incidence, frequency of recurrence, and mortality rate of C. difficile infections (CDIs) have increased significantly over the past few decades. The most important risk factor is antibiotic treatment in elderly patients and patients with severe comorbidities. There is a screening test available to detect C. difficile-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), which is produced by both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains. To confirm CDIs, it is necessary to test for toxins in a fresh, liquid stool sample via polymerase chain reaction or an enzyme-coupled immune adsorption test. If CDIs are diagnosed, then ongoing antibiotic treatment should be ended. Metronidazole is used to treat mild cases, and vancomycin is recommended for severe cases. Vancomycin or fidaxomicin should be used to treat recurrences (10-25 % of patients). In cases with several recurrences, a treatment option is fecal microbiome transfer (FMT). The cure rate following FMT is approximately 80 %. The treatment of severe and complicated CDI with a threatening toxic megacolon remains problematic. The degree of evidence of medicated treatment in this situation is low; the significance of metronidazole i. v. as an additional therapeutic measure is controversial. Tigecycline i. v. is an alternative option. Surgical treatment must be considered in patients with a toxic megacolon or an acute abdomen.
Collapse
|