Place of Death Trends and Utilization of Outpatient Palliative Care at the End of Life

[Care for dying patients in the emergency department]

Patients at the end of life frequently receive care in emergency departments. Emergency physicians are faced with caring for both patients who pass away suddenly following an acute illness or injury despite rescue efforts, as well as those who are dying from a chronic condition or high age. To provide proper care and respect the patients' wishes regarding invasive treatments, emergency physicians should be knowledgeable about advance directives and have effective communication skills when delivering bad news to patients and their family. In addition, a basic understanding of palliative care is necessary for physicians to effectively manage symptoms.

[Places of death of COVID-19 patients: an observational study based on evaluated death certificates from the city of Muenster, Germany (2021)]

INTRODUCTION

The places of death of COVID-19 patients have so far hardly been investigated in Germany.

METHODS

In a places of death study in Westphalia (Germany), statistical evaluations were carried out in the city of Muenster on the basis of all death certificates from 2021. Persons who had died with or from a COVID-19 infection were identified by medical information on cause of death and analyzed with descriptive statistical methods using SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 4044 death certificates were evaluated, and 182 deceased COVID-19 patients were identified (4.5%). In 159 infected patients (3.9%), the viral infection was fatal, whereby the distribution of places of death was as follows: 88.1% in hospital (57.2% in the intensive care unit; 0.0% in the palliative care unit), 0.0% in hospice, 10.7% in nursing homes, 1.3% at home, and 0.0% in other places. All infected patients < 60 years and 75.4% of elderly patients ≥ 80 years died in hospital. Only two COVID-19 patients, both over 80 years old, died at home. COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes (17) affected mostly elderly female residents. Ten of these residents had received end-of-life care from a specialized outpatient palliative care team.

DISCUSSION

The majority of COVID-19 patients died in hospital. This can be explained by the rapid course of the disease with a high symptom burden and the frequent young age of the patients. Inpatient nursing facilities played a certain role as a place of death in local outbreaks. COVID-19 patients rarely died at home. Infection control measures may be one reason why no patients died in hospices or palliative care units.

[Palliative and Hospice Care in Nursing Homes: Discrepancies Between Theoretical Framework and Everyday Practice]

OBJECTIVES

Despite the existence of a legislative framework, palliative care and hospice support in nursing homes vary widely. Although most nursing homes have palliative care concepts by now, they are rarely integrated into everyday practice. This study aims to examine differences in palliative and hospice care and to determine the causes of discrepancies between theoretical framework and everyday practice.

METHODS

Based on a pilot project, in depth structural and process analyses of two nursing homes in urban and rural areas in North Rhine-Westphalia were conducted. In addition, three nursing homes of an extended group of providers as well as an expert advisory board was included to minimize (provider-) specific characteristics and to expand findings.

RESULTS

Although the proportion of palliative residents and their average age was comparable, analyses revealed significant differences between the nursing homes regarding the palliative length of stay (213.2 days vs. 88.6 days) as well as the mortality rate of palliative residents among all death cases (26% vs. 63.6%). Furthermore, internal processes within the nursing homes differed vastly despite similar concepts and procedural instructions. As a result, palliative care formally started at an earlier stage in nursing home X. Besides that, the identification of palliative care situations, as well as communication, organizational processes and the inclusion of cooperation partners, took place without fixed structures and was based on the subjective handling of staff members in both facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

It turns out to be challenging for nursing homes to implement theoretical framework into everyday practice. To facilitate this process, aside from practicable assessments, defined responsibilities and organizational support, financing concepts at health policy level need to be established.

Palliative care and new technologies. The use of smart sensor technologies and its impact on the Total Care principle

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is an integral part of health care, which in term has become increasingly technologized in recent decades. Lately, innovative smart sensors combined with artificial intelligence promise better diagnosis and treatment. But to date, it is unclear: how are palliative care concepts and their underlying assumptions about humans challenged by smart sensor technologies (SST) and how can care benefit from SST?

AIMS

The paper aims to identify changes and challenges in palliative care due to the use of SST. In addition, normative guiding criteria for the use of SST are developed.

METHODS

The principle of Total Care used by the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) forms the basis for the ethical analysis. Drawing on this, its underlying conceptions of the human and its socio-ethical aspects are examined with a phenomenological focus. In the second step, the advantages, limitations, and socio-ethical challenges of using SST with respect to the Total Care principle are explored. Finally, ethical-normative requirements for the application of SST are derived.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

First, SST are limited in their measurement capabilities. Second, SST have an impact on human agency and autonomy. This concerns both the patient and the caregiver. Third, some aspects of the Total Care principle are likely to be marginalized due to the use of SST. The paper formulates normative requirements for using SST to serve human flourishing. It unfolds three criteria according to which SST must be aligned: (1) evidence and purposefulness, (2) autonomy, and (3) Total Care.

Characteristics and place of death in home care recipients in Germany - an analysis of nationwide health insurance claims data

Background

Most care-dependent people live at home, where they also would prefer to die. Unfortunately, this wish is often not fulfilled. This study aims to investigate place of death of home care recipients, taking characteristics and changes in care settings into account.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of all home-care receiving people of a German statutory health insurance who were at least 65 years and who deceased between January 2016 and June 2019. Next to the care need, duration of care, age, sex, and disease, care setting at death and place of death were considered. We examined the characteristics by place of care, the proportion of dying in hospital by care setting and characterised the deceased cohort stratified by their actual place of death.

Results

Of 46,207 care-dependent people initially receiving home care, 57.5% died within 3.5 years (n = 26,590; mean age: 86.8; 66.6% female). More than half of those moved to another care setting before death with long-term nursing home care (32.3%) and short-term nursing home care (11.7%) being the most frequent transitions, while 48.1% were still cared for at home. Overall, 36.9% died in hospital and in-hospital deaths were found most often in those still receiving home care (44.7%) as well as care in semi-residential arrangements (43.9%) at the time of death. People who died in hospital were younger (mean age: 85.5 years) and with lower care dependency (low care need: 28.2%) as in all other analysed care settings.

Conclusion

In Germany, changes in care settings before death occur often. The proportion of in-hospital death is particularly high in the home setting and in semi-residential arrangements. These settings should be considered in interventions aiming to decrease the number of unwished care transitions and hospitalisations at the end of life.

Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care—Clinical Course and Predictors for Living at Home Until Death

BACKGROUND

Specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) is an important component of the palliative medicine care concept in Germany. Its purpose is to improve the out-of-hospital care of patients who cannot be adequately cared for by their primary care physicians and in the setting of general outpatient palliative care (GOPC).

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of anonymized routine treatment data, we analyzed the characteristics of SOPC patients overall and with specific diseases, and depicted them both numerically and graphically. We also carried out a regression analysis of the factors affecting whether or not patients will be able to die in a home environment.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 14 460 patients who were treated by 14 different SOPC teams in the North Rhine area of Germany in 2017 and 2018. The majority of patients who died were able to live at home until death (85.9%); only a small percentage died as inpatients (7.7%). The symptom burden shortly before death was less than at the beginning of treatment. The factors displaying a statistically significant association with dying at home were: more advanced age (aOR 0.96; 95% CI: [0.95; 0.96]), female sex (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: [0.74; 0.98]), and house calls at night (aOR 0.60; 95% CI: [0.51; 0.71]).

CONCLUSION

SOPC met its declared objectives of limiting distressing symptoms and enabling patients to live at home until death.

The frequency and time point of outpatient palliative care integration for people before death: an analysis of health insurance data in Lower Saxony, Germany

Aim

This study aimed to analyse the number of deceased people who received different types of outpatient palliative care, the length of time prior to death that care was initiated, and their palliative care trajectory including the rate of hospital death.

Subject and methods

Data on 35,514 adults insured by the statutory health insurance who died in 2017 in Lower Saxony, Germany, were analysed. The study examined the provision of three different types of outpatient palliative care: general (GPC), intermediate (IPC) and specialised palliative care (SPC). In addition, oncological palliative care services (OS) were considered. Descriptive analyses include frequencies, timing and duration of these services, the number of inpatient hospital stays and hospital deaths.

Results

Prior to death, 31.4% of the deceased received outpatient palliative care: 21.3% GPC, 6.4% GPC with IPC and/or SPC and/or OS; and 3.7% IPC and/or SPC and/or OS, but no GPC. On average, GPC and OS were initiated 9 months and SPC 3 months prior to death. Six percent of the analytic sample received outpatient palliative care more than 2 years before death. Compared to those without outpatient palliative care, patients who received outpatient palliative care had more and longer inpatient hospital stays, but less frequently died in hospital.

Conclusion

Early outpatient palliative care took place in a minor percentage of deceased. Outpatient palliative care starts late before death for most patients, but enables more people not to die in hospital. However, significantly fewer people receive outpatient palliative care relative to current demand estimates. This is particularly true of general outpatient palliative care.