The Safety of Antirheumatic Drugs

Treatment Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising globally. In Germany, these conditions affect 0.7% of the population, or approximately 600 000 patients. Treatment strategies have become more diversified as a result of an improved understanding of disease pathogenesis. It remains unclear how the currently available drugs should best be used in each individual patient.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to phase III and IV trials and to the German and European guidelines on the treatment of IBD.

RESULTS

An improved understanding of the immunological mechanisms of disease underlies the current treatment strategies in patients with IBD. For those with a complex clinical course, monoclonal antibodies against pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-12/IL-23, IL-23) and cell adhesion molecules (α4β7) are of established therapeutic value, along with "small molecules" such as JAK inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. The numerous studies that have been performed, only a few of which have been head-to-head comparison trials, and the (network) meta-analyses that have been published to date do not imply that any single one of these drugs can be considered the universal, primary treatment for all patients with IBD. In this review, we discuss the available substances and certain important differential-therapeutic aspects of the treatment of IBD.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of a patient with IBD must take his or her prior treatment(s) and comorbidities into account, along with individual patient characteristics and treatment goals. Rational decision-making is required on the basis of the mechanism of action and the side-effect profile of the various drugs that are now available for use.

Paradox inflammatory reaction such as appendicitis epiploica and diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon under ongoing immunosuppression after previous liver transplantation (LTx)

Objective

Inflammatory reactions caused by immunosuppression appear a particular interesting disease due to its very specific and partly unclear etiopathogenesis.Based on clinical case-specific management experiences and selective references from the literature, the rare case of an acute intraabdominal inflammation as unusual complication or side effect (at the gastrointestinal [GI] tract) of the ongoing immunosuppressive medication using Mycophenolate mofetil and Tacrolimus after previous liver transplantation is to be illustrated.

Case presentation

Medical history (hx): 1) Current: A 68-years old male patient underwent abdominal CT scan because of pain in the left lower abdomen with the suspicious diagnosis of diverticulitis leading to initiation of antibiotic therapy 24 h prior to the transferral to the own hospital for adequate liver transplantation (LTx) follow-up investigation. 2) Medication contained Sitagliptin 1 × 100 mg, Omeprazol 1 × 40 mg, Mesalazin 500 mg 3 × 2, Movicol 1 (on demand), Mycophenolate mofetil 2 × 500 mg, Tacrolimus 2 × 1 mg and Hydrochlorothiazid 1 × 2.5 mg. 3) Additional diagnoses included arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and urinary bladder diverticle. 4) Previous surgical intervention profile comprises resection of liver segments IV/V due to HCC (2011), orthotopic liver transplantation because of HCC caused by alcohol-induced liver cirrhosis (2013) and an intervertebral disc operation (2018). Physical examination of the abdomen revealed marked tenderness in the lower left quadrant. The abdominal wall was soft and there were no defensive tension and no peritonism. The patient was in good general condition and nutritional status. He was cardiopulmonarily stable and oriented to all qualities. Diagnostic measures showed a CRP of 38.0 (normal range, < 5) mg/L and a white blood cell count within normal range. Leading diagnoses were found using abdominal CT scan, which demonstrated an extended diverticulosis and an appendicitis epiploica within the immediate subperitoneal region of the left lower abdomen with an oval fat isodense structure in the region of the sigmoid colon with surrounding inflammatory imbibition and pronounced intestinal wall. Suspicious diagnosis was the 1st episode of an uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon associated with an appendicitis epiploica. Therapeutic approach was given by conservative therapy with infusion therapy, analgesia as well as inital "n. p. o." and following initiation of oral nutrition. In addition, calculated antibiotic therapy with Cefuroxime and Clont was initiated. Clinical course was uneventful, with discharge on the eighth day of hospital stay with no pathological findings and substantial improvement in clinical and laboratory findings. Further advice consisted of clinical and laboratory follow-up control investigations by the family practitioner and nutritional counselling. In addition, a colonoscopy should be performed within four months.

Conclusions

The described case i) is either one of the many side effects of the immunosuppressive medication Mycophenolate mofetil and Tacrolimus listed as "colonic inflammation" and "gastrointestinal inflammation", respectively, or ii) can be considered an inflammatory response of a susceptible (gastro-)intestinal mucosa or the whole intestinal wall to microbes or microbial particles or agents caused by transplantation-associated immunosuppressive medication.

Development of Diphenyl carbonate-Crosslinked Cyclodextrin Based Nanosponges for Oral Delivery of Baricitinib: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacokinetic Studies

Background

The aim of the present investigation is to prepare baricitinib (BAR)-loaded diphenyl carbonate (DPC) β-cyclodextrin (βCD) based nanosponges (NSs) to improve the oral bioavailability.

Methods

BAR-loaded DPC-crosslinked βCD NSs (B-DCNs) were prepared prepared by varying the molar ratio of βCD: DPC (1:1.5 to 1:6). The developed B-DCNs loaded with BAR were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ZP), % yield and percent entrapment efficiency (%EE).

Results

Based on the above evaluations, BAR-loaded DPC βCD NSs (B-CDN3) was optimized with mean size (345.8±4.7 nm), PDI (0.335±0.005), Yield (91.46±7.4%) and EE (79.1±1.6%). The optimized NSs (B-CDN3) was further confirmed by SEM, spectral analysis, BET analysis, in vitro release and pharmacokinetic studies. The optimized NSs (B-CDN3) showed 2.13 times enhancement in bioavailability in comparison to pure BAR suspension.

Conclusion

It could be anticipated that NSs loaded with BAR as a promising tool for release and bioavailability for the treatment of rheumatic arthritis and Covid-19.