The role of radiation therapy in the management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas in elderly patients: clinical and surgical outcome analysis in a large series

PURPOSE

The increased life expectancy in the general population is causing rapid growth of the number of elderly patients. Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are one of those tumors whose incidence increases with age. Pituitary surgery in elderly has usually been considered riskier than in the younger population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of a large series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for PAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for PAs in our institution. Inclusion criteria were: 65 years of age or more, and no previous pituitary surgery. Surgical outcomes of patients aged <70 years (group 1) was compared to those aged 70 years or more (group 2) at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients met the inclusion criteria. Clinically, 230 (68.5%) patients had a non-functioning PAs. Among the remaining 106 patients with a hormone-secreting PA, 57 (53.8%) had acromegaly, 39 (36.8%) Cushing's disease, 5 patients (4.7%) had a prolactinoma, and 5 a thyrotropin-secreting PA (4.7%). Mortality rate was 1.5%. Groups 1 and 2 showed no significantly different surgery-related complication, visual recovery, radical surgery, and remission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of PAs in the elderly has been considered riskier than in the younger population. Our results demonstrated that transsphenoidal surgery is a safe and effective treatment for PAs. No statistically significant differences in terms of outcome were found in two group ages, showing that, when clinically indicated, transsphenoidal surgery can be performed even in very old subjects.

Single fraction and multisession Gamma Knife radiosurgery for craniopharyngioma

PURPOSE

The optimal management of residual or recurring craniopharyngioma is still a matter of debate even though adjuvant radiation therapy plays a crucial role. Aim of our study is to report the results of single fraction or multisession Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with craniopharyngioma.

METHODS

We included 50 consecutive patients treated from 1994 to 2016. All patients had at least one post GKRS magnetic resonance imaging reviewed at our center. Vital status of all patients was assessed at the end of 2016.

RESULTS

There were 29 males (58.0%) and 21 females (42.0%). Mean age was 41.5 ± 2.8 year. Single session GKRS was delivered in 29 patients (58.0%). The mean tumor volume was 2.15 ± 0.3 cm³ and the mean prescription dose to the tumor margin was 14.3 ± 0.3 Gy. During a mean follow-up of 74.6 ± 8.4 months, seven patients (14.0%) had recurrence of disease. The 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survivals were 90.3% (95% CI, 81.0-99.6%) and 78.4% (95% CI, 59.9-96.9%), respectively. Multisession GKRS was not less effective than single fraction GKRS. Eighteen of the 28 patients (64.3%) had a tumor volume decrease of at least 10%. No serious side effects occurred after GKRS treatment, except for one case of mild visual worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS was effective for controlling the growth of residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma. Serious side effects were uncommon. Multisession GKRS seems a very promising tool to allow performing GKRS even in patients with large residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma.

Ischemic stroke after radiation therapy for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review

Radiation therapy is widely used for the treatment of residual and recurrent pituitary adenomas and proved to effectively control tumor growth. However, it is suggested that this treatment might result in an increased risk of ischemic stroke. This review aims to evaluate the radiotherapy-related risk of stroke in pituitary adenoma patients. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for current literature on ischemic stroke risk after radiotherapy in pituitary adenoma, in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Two authors independently selected eligible studies and extracted data. The New Castle Ottawa-scale was used for quality assessment. Out of 264 publications, 11 studies were selected, including 4394 irradiated patients. Incidence of ischemic stroke ranged from 0 to 11.6% (mean 6.7%). While one large, long term follow-up study showed a threefold increased risk of stroke after radiation therapy, another nationwide study of high quality found no significant difference in stroke risk after irradiation. Four studies, which applied stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or Gamma-knife surgery (GKS), found no ischemic strokes. Included studies described different radiation techniques and regimens and different lengths of follow-up. In conclusion, complications of cerebral ischemia after radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma are infrequently reported. Moreover, after correction for several confounders, no significant difference in ischemic stroke rate between irradiated and non-irradiated patients could be identified.

Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas

The introduction of the endoscope to transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not new and it has been abandoned in the past. Now, after some technological advances has been proposed again as an advancement in this field. However, there is still a debate on this topic and some authors consider endoscopic surgery a form of developing surgery in an evolution step. The use of the endoscope to visualize the sella has been suggested to offer a better visualization as well as an improved range of motion compared to the operating microscope. However, the real advantage in terms of efficacy and safety is still matter of debate. The conversion to microsurgery has been reported in a significant number of cases, particularly in recurrences, where the difficulties of reoperation require more skill. There is evidence in recent studies that the endonasal and bleeding complications are significantly higher in endoscopic approaches than in microscopic ones. In particular, patient discomfort, smell, and taste impairment are higher with the endoscopic method compared with microscopic approaches. At present pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is not a cost effective technology. In fact, the operative time is longer than in microscopic approaches and the number of surgeons required for the procedure is usually double compared to microscopic approaches. This paper will outline on the basis of the data available in literature the reasons why, at present, the pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery should not be yet considered the standard technique for transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas.