1
|
Gauly J, Court R, Seers K, Currie G, Grove A. In which context and for whom can interventions improve leadership of surgical trainees, surgeons and surgical teams and why: a realist review protocol. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:16. [PMID: 37881463 PMCID: PMC10593322 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13364.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Improving effective leadership of individuals, groups, and healthcare organisations is essential for improving surgical performance and indirectly improving health outcomes for patients. Numerous systematic reviews have been conducted which seek to determine the effectiveness of specific leadership interventions across a range of disciplines and healthcare outcomes. The purpose of this realist review is to systematically synthesise the literature which examines in which context and for whom leadership interventions improve leadership of surgeons, surgical teams, and trainees. Methods Several approaches will be used to iteratively search the scientific and grey literature to identify relevant evidence. Selected articles will inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain in which context and for whom interventions can improve leadership of surgical trainees, surgeons, and surgical teams. Next, empirical studies will be searched systematically in order to test and, where necessary, refine the theory. Once theoretical saturation has been achieved, recommendations for advancing leadership in surgery will be developed. Stakeholder and patient and public consultations will contribute to the development of the programme theory. The review will be written up according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards publication standards. No ethical review will be required for the conduct of this realist review. Discussion The knowledge gained from this review will provide evidence-based guidance for those planning or designing leadership interventions in surgery. The recommendations will help policymakers, educationalists, healthcare providers, and those delivering or planning leadership development programmes across the surgical disciplines to design interventions that are acceptable to the surgical community and successful in improving surgical leadership.PROSPERO registration: CRD42021230709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gauly
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Rachel Court
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kate Seers
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme Currie
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Amy Grove
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmed A, van den Muijsenbergh METC, Vrijhoef HJM. Person-centred care in primary care: What works for whom, how and in what circumstances? HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e3328-e3341. [PMID: 35862510 PMCID: PMC10083933 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This rapid realist review aims to explain how and why person-centred care (PCC) in primary care works (or not) among others for people with low health literacy skills and for people with a diverse ethnic and socioeconomic background, and to construct a middle-range programme theory (PT). Peered reviewed- and non-peer-reviewed literature (Jan 2013-Feb 2021) reporting on PCC in primary care was included. Selection and appraisal of documents were based on relevance and rigour according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) criteria. Data on context, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO) were extracted. Based on the extracted data, CMO configurations were identified per source publication. Configurations containing all three constructs (CMO) were included in the PT. The middle-range PT demonstrates that healthcare professionals (HCPs) should be trained and equipped with the knowledge and skills to communicate effectively (i.e. in easy-to-understand words, emphatically, checking whether the patient understands everything, listening attentively) tailored to the wishes, needs and possibilities of the patient, which may lead to higher satisfaction. This way the patient will be more involved in the care process and in the shared decision-making process, which may result in improved concordance, and an improved treatment approach. A respectful and empathic attitude of the HCP plays an important role in establishing a strong therapeutic relationship and improved health (system) outcomes. Together with a good accessibility of care for patients, setting up a personalised care plan with all involved parties may positively affect the self-management skills of patients. Good collaboration within the team and between different domains is desirable to ensure good care coordination. The coherence of items related to PCC in primary care should be considered to better understand its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anam Ahmed
- Panaxea b.vAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Maria E. T. C. van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
- Department of Prevention and CarePharos: Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Program Prevention and CareUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef
- Panaxea b.vAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Patient & CareMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Law RJ, Langley J, Hall B, Burton C, Hiscock J, Williams L, Morrison V, Lemmey AB, Lovell-Smith C, Gallanders J, Cooney J, Williams NH. Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in primary care: the Function First realist synthesis with co-design. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
As people age and accumulate long-term conditions, their physical activity and physical function declines, resulting in disability and loss of independence. Primary care is well placed to empower individuals and communities to reduce this decline; however, the best approach is uncertain.
Objectives
To develop a programme theory to explain the mechanisms through which interventions improve physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in different primary care contexts, and to co-design a prototype intervention.
Data sources
Systematic literature searches of relevant databases with forwards and backwards citation tracking, grey literature searches and further purposive searches were conducted. Qualitative data were collected through workshops and interviews.
Design
Realist evidence synthesis and co-design for primary care service innovation.
Setting
Primary care in Wales and England.
Participants
Stakeholders included people with long-term conditions, primary care professionals, people working in relevant community roles and researchers.
Methods
The realist evidence synthesis combined evidence from varied sources of literature with the views, experiences and ideas of stakeholders. The resulting context, mechanism and outcome statements informed three co-design workshops and a knowledge mobilisation workshop for primary care service innovation.
Results
Five context, mechanism and outcome statements were developed. (1) Improving physical activity and function is not prioritised in primary care (context). If the practice team culture is aligned to the elements of physical literacy (mechanism), then physical activity promotion will become routine and embedded in usual care (outcome). (2) Physical activity promotion is inconsistent and unco-ordinated (context). If specific resources are allocated to physical activity promotion (in combination with a supportive practice culture) (mechanism), then this will improve opportunities to change behaviour (outcome). (3) People with long-term conditions have varying levels of physical function and physical activity, varying attitudes to physical activity and differing access to local resources that enable physical activity (context). If physical activity promotion is adapted to individual needs, preferences and local resources (mechanism), then this will facilitate a sustained improvement in physical activity (outcome). (4) Many primary care practice staff lack the knowledge and confidence to promote physical activity (context). If staff develop an improved sense of capability through education and training (mechanism), then they will increase their engagement with physical activity promotion (outcome). (5) If a programme is credible with patients and professionals (context), then trust and confidence in the programme will develop (mechanism) and more patients and professionals will engage with the programme (outcome). A prototype multicomponent intervention was developed. This consisted of resources to nurture a culture of physical literacy, materials to develop the role of a credible professional who can promote physical activity using a directory of local opportunities and resources to assist with individual behaviour change.
Limitations
Realist synthesis and co-design is about what works in which contexts, so these resources and practice implications will need to be modified for different primary care contexts.
Conclusions
We developed a programme theory to explain how physical activity could be promoted in primary care in people with long-term conditions, which informed a prototype intervention.
Future work
A future research programme could further develop the prototype multicomponent intervention and assess its acceptability in practice alongside existing schemes before it is tested in a feasibility study to inform a future randomised controlled trial.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018103027.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Val Morrison
- School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Andrew B Lemmey
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | | | - Jennifer Cooney
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Nefyn H Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brocklehurst P, Hoare Z, Woods C, Williams L, Brand A, Shen J, Breckons M, Ashley J, Jenkins A, Gough L, Preshaw P, Burton C, Shepherd K, Bhattarai N. Dental therapists compared with general dental practitioners for undertaking check-ups in low-risk patients: pilot RCT with realist evaluation. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Many dental ‘check-ups’ in the NHS result in no further treatment. The patient is examined by a dentist and returned to the recall list for a further check-up, commonly in 6 or 12 months’ time. As the oral health of regular dental attenders continues to improve, it is likely that an increasing number of these patients will be low risk and will require only a simple check-up in the future, with no further treatment. This care could be delivered by dental therapists. In 2013, the body responsible for regulating the dental profession, the General Dental Council, ruled that dental therapists could see patients directly and undertake check-ups and routine dental treatments (e.g. fillings). Using dental therapists to undertake check-ups on low-risk patients could help free resources to meet the future challenges for NHS dentistry.
Objectives
The objectives were to determine the most appropriate design for a definitive study, the most appropriate primary outcome measure and recruitment and retention rates, and the non-inferiority margin. We also undertook a realist-informed process evaluation and rehearsed the health economic data collection tool and analysis.
Design
A pilot randomised controlled trial over a 15-month period, with a realist-informed process evaluation. In parallel, we rehearsed the health economic evaluation and explored patients’ preferences to inform a preference elicitation exercise for a definitive study.
Setting
The setting was NHS dental practices in North West England.
Participants
A total of 217 low-risk patients in eight high-street dental practices participated.
Interventions
The current practice of using dentists to provide NHS dental check-ups (treatment as usual; the control arm) was compared with using dental therapists to provide NHS dental check-ups (the intervention arm).
Main outcome measure
The main outcome measure was difference in the proportion of sites with bleeding on probing among low-risk patients. We also recorded the number of ‘cross-over’ referrals between dentists and dental therapists.
Results
No differences were found in the health status of patients over the 15 months of the pilot trial, suggesting that non-inferiority is the most appropriate design. However, bleeding on probing suffered from ‘floor effects’ among low-risk patients, and recruitment rates were moderately low (39.7%), which suggests that an experimental design might not be the most appropriate. The theory areas that emerged from the realist-informed process evaluation were contractual, regulatory, institutional logistics, patients’ experience and logistics. The economic evaluation was rehearsed and estimates of cost-effectiveness made; potential attributes and levels that can form the basis of preference elicitation work in a definitive study were determined.
Limitations
The pilot was conducted over a 15-month period only, and bleeding on probing appeared to have floor effects. The number of participating dental practices was a limitation and the recruitment rate was moderate.
Conclusions
Non-inferiority, floor effects and moderate recruitment rates suggest that a randomised controlled trial might not be the best evaluative design for a definitive study in this population. The process evaluation identified multiple barriers to the use of dental therapists in ‘high-street’ practices and added real value.
Future work
Quasi-experimental designs may offer more promise for a definitive study alongside further realist evaluation.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70032696.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zoe Hoare
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Chris Woods
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Andrew Brand
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jing Shen
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Matthew Breckons
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Alison Jenkins
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Philip Preshaw
- Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Faculty of Dentistry, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Karen Shepherd
- Patient and public involvement representative, Bangor, UK
| | - Nawaraj Bhattarai
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burton CR, Williams L, Bucknall T, Fisher D, Hall B, Harris G, Jones P, Makin M, Mcbride A, Meacock R, Parkinson J, Rycroft-Malone J, Waring J. Theory and practical guidance for effective de-implementation of practices across health and care services: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Health-care systems across the globe are facing increased pressures to balance the efficient use of resources and at the same time provide high-quality care. There is greater requirement for services to be evidence based, but practices that are of limited clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness still occur.
Objectives
Our objectives included completing a concept analysis of de-implementation, surfacing decision-making processes associated with de-implementing through stakeholder engagement, and generating an evidence-based realist programme theory of ‘what works’ in de-implementation.
Design
A realist synthesis was conducted using an iterative stakeholder-driven four-stage approach. Phase 1 involved scoping the literature and conducting stakeholder interviews to develop the concept analysis and an initial programme theory. In Phase 2, systematic searches of the evidence were conducted to test and develop this theory, expressed in the form of contingent relationships. These are expressed as context–mechanism–outcomes to show how particular contexts or conditions trigger mechanisms to generate outcomes. Phase 3 consisted of validation and refinement of programme theories through stakeholder interviews. The final phase (i.e. Phase 4) formulated actionable recommendations for service leaders.
Participants
In total, 31 stakeholders (i.e. user/patient representatives, clinical managers, commissioners) took part in focus groups and telephone interviews.
Data sources
Using keywords identified during the scoping work and concept analysis, searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in May 2018. The databases searched were the Cochrane Library, Campbell Collaboration, MEDLINE (via EBSCOhost), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via EBSCOhost), the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library and the following databases via the ProQuest platform: Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Sciences Database and Sociological Abstracts. Alerts were set up for the MEDLINE database from May 2018 to December 2018. Online sources were searched for grey literature and snowballing techniques were used to identify clusters of evidence.
Results
The concept analysis showed that de-implementation is associated with five main components in context and over time: (1) what is being de-implemented, (2) the issues driving de-implementation, (3) the action characterising de-implementation, (4) the extent that de-implementation is planned or opportunistic and (5) the consequences of de-implementation. Forty-two papers were synthesised to identify six context–mechanism–outcome configurations, which focused on issues ranging from individual behaviours to organisational procedures. Current systems can perpetuate habitual decision-making practices that include low-value treatments. Electronic health records can be designed to hide or remove low-value treatments from choice options, foregrounding best evidence. Professionals can be made aware of their decision-making strategies through increasing their attention to low-value practice behaviours. Uncertainty about diagnosis or patients’ expectations for certain treatments provide opportunities for ‘watchful waiting’ as an active strategy to reduce inappropriate investigations and prescribing. The emotional component of clinician–patient relationships can limit opportunities for de-implementation, requiring professional support through multimodal educational interventions. Sufficient alignment between policy, public and professional perspectives is required for de-implementation success.
Limitations
Some specific clinical issues (e.g. de-prescribing) dominate the de-implementation evidence base, which may limit the transferability of the synthesis findings. Any realist inquiry generates findings that are essentially cumulative and should be developed through further investigation that extends the range of sources into, for example, clinical research and further empirical studies.
Conclusions
This review contributes to our understanding of how de-implementation of low-value procedures and services can be improved within health-care services, through interventions that make professional decision-making more accountable and the prominence of a whole-system approach to de-implementation. Given the whole-system context of de-implementation, a range of different dissemination strategies will be required to engage with different stakeholders, in different ways, to change practice and policy in a timely manner.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017081030.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Tracey Bucknall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Denise Fisher
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Gill Harris
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK
| | - Peter Jones
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Matthew Makin
- North Manchester Care Organisation, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Anne Mcbride
- Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John Parkinson
- School of Psychology, College of Human Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Justin Waring
- School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wharrad H, Sarre S, Schneider J, Maben J, Aldus C, Argyle E, Arthur A. In-PREP: a new learning design framework and methodology applied to a relational care training intervention for healthcare assistants. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1010. [PMID: 33148232 PMCID: PMC7643258 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05836-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 'Older People's Shoes' is a training intervention designed for healthcare assistants (HCAs) to improve the relational care of older people in hospital. The intervention formed part of a broader evaluation, in this paper we describe its development from a learning design and methodological perspective. METHODS Learning theory and an instructional design model were key components of the In-PREP (Input, Process, Review and Evaluation, Product) development methodology used in the design of the 'Older People's Shoes' training intervention to improve the delivery of relational care by front-line hospital staff. An expert panel, current evidence, and pedagogical theory were used to co-design a training programme tailored to a challenging work environment and taking account of trainees' diverse educational experience. Peer review and process evaluation were built into the development model. RESULTS In-PREP provided a methodological scaffold for producing evidence-based, peer-reviewed, co-designed training. The product, 'Older People's Shoes', involved a one-day Train the Trainers event, followed by delivery of a two-day, face-to-face training programme by the trainers, with accompanying handbooks underpinned by a range of digital resources. Evaluation found the approach met learner needs, was applicable in practice and won approval from trainers. DISCUSSION In-PREP enables high quality learning content, alignment with learner needs and a product that is relevant, practical and straightforward to implement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Wharrad
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK.
| | - Sophie Sarre
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, London, UK
| | - Justine Schneider
- School of Law and Social Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jill Maben
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Clare Aldus
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Elaine Argyle
- School of Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anthony Arthur
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Assis LDO, de Castro PMA, Rodrigues EAA, Santos LC, Sampaio RF, Assis MG. Training Program for Care Professionals in Nursing Homes: Effectiveness and Feasibility. J Gerontol Nurs 2020; 46:37-47. [PMID: 33095891 DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20201012-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to analyze the effectiveness and feasibility of a training program for care professionals at two nursing homes, investigating the impact on their beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge regarding aging. Twenty-three formal caregivers at a private nursing home and 10 formal caregivers at a philanthropic nursing home participated in the training program, which consisted of five weekly meetings, each lasting 1.5 hours. Characterization of the sample was performed and effectiveness and feasibility of the intervention were analyzed. The training program improved participants' knowledge about older adults; however, their attitudes and beliefs regarding old age were not affected. Results also indicated that the intervention program was feasible at both nursing homes. The positive results of the study underscore the importance of training and continuing education of professionals who work with older adults, especially staff at nursing homes. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(11), 37-47.].
Collapse
|
8
|
Cameron J, Humphreys C, Kothari A, Hegarty K. Exploring the knowledge translation of domestic violence research: A literature review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2020; 28:1898-1914. [PMID: 32614128 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
There is growing recognition of the links between knowledge translation, policy and practice, particularly in the domestic violence research area. A literature review applying a systematic approach with a realist lens was the preferred methodology. The review answered the following question: What are the mechanisms of change in research networks which 'work' to support knowledge translation? A search of eight electronic databases for articles published between 1960 and 2018 was completed, with 2,999 records retrieved, 2,869 records excluded and 130 full-text articles screened for final inclusion in the review. The inclusion criteria were purposefully broad, including any study design or data source (including grey literature) with a focus on domestic violence knowledge translation. The analysis of included studies using a realist lens identified the mechanisms of change to support knowledge translation. A disaggregation of the included studies identified five theories focused on the following outcomes: (1) develop key messages, (2) flexible evidence use, (3) strengthen partnerships, (4) capacity building and (5) research utilisation. This review adds to our understanding of knowledge translation of domestic violence research. The mechanisms of change identified may support knowledge translation of research networks. Further research will focus on exploring the potential application of these program theories with a research network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqui Cameron
- Department of Social Work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Cathy Humphreys
- Department of Social Work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Anita Kothari
- School of Health Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Kelsey Hegarty
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Law RJ, Williams L, Langley J, Burton C, Hall B, Hiscock J, Morrison V, Lemmey A, Partridge R, Lovell-Smith C, Gallanders J, Williams N. 'Function First-Be Active, Stay Independent'-promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions by primary care: a protocol for a realist synthesis with embedded co-production and co-design. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035686. [PMID: 32041865 PMCID: PMC7045082 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with long-term conditions typically have reduced physical functioning, are less physically active and therefore become less able to live independently and do the things they enjoy. However, assessment and promotion of physical function and physical activity is not part of routine management in primary care. This project aims to develop evidence-based recommendations about how primary care can best help people to become more physically active in order to maintain and improve their physical function, thus promoting independence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study takes a realist synthesis approach, following RAMESES guidance, with embedded co-production and co-design. Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories about physical activity and physical function for people with long-term conditions, based on a review of the scientific and grey literature, and two multisector stakeholder workshops using LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. Stage 2 will involve focused literature searching, data extraction and synthesis to provide evidence to support or refute the initial programme theories. Searches for evidence will focus on physical activity interventions involving the assessment of physical function which are relevant to primary care. We will describe 'what works', 'for whom' and 'in what circumstances' and develop conjectured programme theories using context, mechanism and outcome configurations. Stage 3 will test and refine these theories through individual stakeholder interviews. The resulting theory-driven recommendations will feed into Stage 4 which will involve three sequential co-design stakeholder workshops in which practical ideas for service innovation in primary care will be developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Healthcare and Medical Sciences Academic Ethics Committee (Reference 2018-16308) and NHS Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 approval (References 256 729 and 262726) have been obtained. A knowledge mobilisation event will address issues relevant to wider implementation of the intervention and study findings. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and formal and informal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018103027.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca-Jane Law
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Joseph Langley
- Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Service, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK
| | - Val Morrison
- School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Andrew Lemmey
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Rebecca Partridge
- Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | | | | | - Nefyn Williams
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivas C, Vigurs C, Cameron J, Yeo L. A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD013135. [PMID: 31254283 PMCID: PMC6598804 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013135.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intimate partner abuse (including coercive control, physical, sexual, economic, emotional and economic abuse) is common worldwide. Advocacy may help women who are in, or have left, an abusive intimate relationship, to stop or reduce repeat victimisation and overcome consequences of the abuse. Advocacy primarily involves education, safety planning support and increasing access to different services. It may be stand-alone or part of other services and interventions, and may be provided within healthcare, criminal justice, social, government or specialist domestic violence services. We focus on the abuse of women, as interventions for abused men require different considerations. OBJECTIVES To assess advocacy interventions for intimate partner abuse in women, in terms of which interventions work for whom, why and in what circumstances. SEARCH METHODS In January 2019 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, 12 other databases, two trials registers and two relevant websites. The search had three phases: scoping of articles to identify candidate theories; iterative recursive search for studies to explore and fill gaps in these theories; and systematic search for studies to test, confirm or refute our explanatory theory. SELECTION CRITERIA Empirical studies of any advocacy or multi-component intervention including advocacy, intended for women aged 15 years and over who were experiencing or had experienced any form of intimate partner abuse, or of advocates delivering such interventions, or experiences of women who were receiving or had received such an intervention. Partner abuse encompasses coercive control in the absence of physical abuse. For theory development, we included studies that did not strictly fit our original criteria but provided information useful for theory development. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four review authors independently extracted data, with double assessment of 10% of the data, and assessed risk of bias and quality of the evidence. We adopted RAMESES (Realist and meta-narrative evidence syntheses: evolving standards) standards for reporting results. We applied a realist approach to the analysis. MAIN RESULTS We included 98 studies (147 articles). There were 88 core studies: 37 focused on advocates (4 survey-based, 3 instrument development, 30 qualitative focus) and seven on abused women (6 qualitative studies, 1 survey); 44 were experimental intervention studies (some including qualitative evaluations). Ten further studies (3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 intervention process evaluation, 1 qualitative study, 2 mixed methods studies, 2 surveys of women, and 1 mixed methods study of women and staff) did not fit the original criteria but added useful information, as befitting a realist approach. Two studies are awaiting classification and three are ongoing.Advocacy interventions varied considerably in contact hours, profession delivering and setting.We constructed a conceptual model from six essential principles based on context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) patterns.We have moderate and high confidence in evidence for the importance of considering both women's vulnerabilities and intersectionalities and the trade-offs of abuse-related decisions in the contexts of individual women's lives. Decisions should consider the risks to the woman's safety from the abuse. Whether actions resulting from advocacy increase or decrease abuse depends on contextual factors (e.g. severity and type of abuse), and the outcomes the particular advocacy intervention is designed to address (e.g. increasing successful court orders versus decreasing depression).We have low confidence in evidence regarding the significance of physical dependencies, being pregnant or having children. There were links between setting (high confidence), and potentially also theoretical underpinnings of interventions, type, duration and intensity of advocacy, advocate discipline and outcomes (moderate and low confidence). A good therapeutic alliance was important (high confidence); this alliance might be improved when advocates are matched with abused women on ethnicity or abuse experience, exercise cultural humility, and remove structural barriers to resource access by marginalised women. We identified significant challenges for advocates in inter-organisational working, vicarious traumatisation, and lack of clarity on how much support to give a woman (moderate and high confidence). To work effectively, advocates need ongoing training, role clarity, access to resources, and peer and institutional support.Our provisional model highlights the complex way that factors combine and interact for effective advocacy. We confirmed the core ingredients of advocacy according to both women and advocates, supported by studies and theoretical considerations: education and information on abuse; rights and resources; active referral and liaising with other services; risk assessment and safety planning. We were unable to confirm the impact of complexity of the intervention (low confidence). Our low confidence in the evidence was driven mostly by a lack of relevant studies, rather than poor-quality studies, despite the size of the review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Results confirm the core ingredients of advocacy and suggest its use rests on sound theoretical underpinnings. We determined the elements of a good therapeutic alliance and how it might be improved, with a need for particular considerations of the factors affecting marginalised women. Women's goals from advocacy should be considered in the contexts of their personal lives. Women's safety was not necessarily at greatest risk from staying with the abuser. Potentially, if undertaken for long enough, advocacy should benefit an abused woman in terms of at least one outcome providing the goals are matched to each woman's needs. Some outcomes may take months to be determined. Where abuse is severe, some interventions may increase abuse. Advocates have a challenging role and must be supported emotionally, through provision of resources and through professional training, by organisations and peers.Future research should consider the different principles identified in this review, and study outcomes should be considered in relation to the mechanisms and contexts elucidated. More longitudinal evidence is needed. Single-subject research designs may help determine exactly when effect no longer increases, to determine the duration of longitudinal work, which will likely differ for vulnerable and marginalised women. Further work is needed to ascertain how to tailor advocacy interventions to cultural variations and rural and resource-poor settings. The methods used in the included studies may, in some cases, limit the applicability and completeness of the data reported. Economic analyses are required to ascertain if resources devoted to advocacy interventions are cost-effective in healthcare and community settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Rivas
- University College LondonDepartment of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education18 Woburn SquareLondonUKWC1H 0NR
| | - Carol Vigurs
- University College LondonDepartment of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education18 Woburn SquareLondonUKWC1H 0NR
| | - Jacqui Cameron
- The University of MelbourneDepartment of Social Work, Melbourne School of Health SciencesMelbourneVICAustralia
- Finders UniversityNational Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA)AdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Lucia Yeo
- University College LondonDepartment of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education18 Woburn SquareLondonUKWC1H 0NR
- KK Women's and Children's HospitalDepartment of Child DevelopmentSingaporeSingapore229899
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Eldh AC, Cox K, Crichton N, Harvey G, Hawkes C, Kitson A, McCormack B, McMullan C, Mockford C, Niessen T, Slater P, Titchen A, van der Zijpp T, Wallin L. A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar. Implement Sci 2018; 13:138. [PMID: 30442165 PMCID: PMC6238283 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Facilitation is a promising implementation intervention, which requires theory-informed evaluation. This paper presents an exemplar of a multi-country realist process evaluation that was embedded in the first international randomised controlled trial evaluating two types of facilitation for implementing urinary continence care recommendations. We aimed to uncover what worked (and did not work), for whom, how, why and in what circumstances during the process of implementing the facilitation interventions in practice. METHODS This realist process evaluation included theory formulation, theory testing and refining. Data were collected in 24 care home sites across four European countries. Data were collected over four time points using multiple qualitative methods: observation (372 h), interviews with staff (n = 357), residents (n = 152), next of kin (n = 109) and other stakeholders (n = 128), supplemented by facilitator activity logs. A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process focused on realist theory refinement and testing. RESULTS The content and approach of the two facilitation programmes prompted variable opportunities to align and realign support with the needs and expectations of facilitators and homes. This influenced their level of confidence in fulfilling the facilitator role and ability to deliver the intervention as planned. The success of intervention implementation was largely dependent on whether sites prioritised their involvement in both the study and the facilitation programme. In contexts where the study was prioritised (including release of resources) and where managers and staff support was sustained, this prompted collective engagement (as an attitude and action). Internal facilitators' (IF) personal characteristics and abilities, including personal and formal authority, in combination with a supportive environment prompted by managers triggered the potential for learning over time. Learning over time resulted in a sense of confidence and personal growth, and enactment of the facilitation role, which resulted in practice changes. CONCLUSION The scale and multi-country nature of this study provided a novel context to conduct one of the few trial embedded realist-informed process evaluations. In addition to providing an explanatory account of implementation processes, a conceptual platform for future facilitation research is presented. Finally, a realist-informed process evaluation framework is outlined, which could inform future research of this nature. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled trials ISRCTN11598502 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Rycroft-Malone
- Bangor Institute for Health and Medical Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Kate Seers
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Ann Catrine Eldh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Nursing, Linkoping, and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Linkopings University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karen Cox
- Fontys School of People and Health Studies, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola Crichton
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London, SE1 0AA UK
| | - Gill Harvey
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Claire Hawkes
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Alison Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Brendan McCormack
- Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Theo Niessen
- Fontys School of People and Health Studies, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Slater
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Rd Belfast, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Angie Titchen
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, UK
| | - Teatske van der Zijpp
- Fontys School of People and Health Studies, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Wallin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Nursing, Linkoping, and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Linkopings University, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Burton CR, Rycroft-Malone J, Williams L, Davies S, McBride A, Hall B, Rowlands AM, Jones A, Fisher D, Jones M, Caulfield M. NHS managers’ use of nursing workforce planning and deployment technologies: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPolicy and reviews of health-care safety and quality emphasise the role of NHS managers in ensuring safe, good-quality patient care through effective staffing. Guidance requires that NHS managers combine professional judgement with evidence-based workforce planning and deployment tools and technologies (WPTs). Evidence has focused on the effectiveness of WPTs, but little is known about supporting their implementation, or the impact of using WPTs across settings.ObjectivesThe review answered the following question: ‘NHS managers’ use of workforce planning and deployment technologies and their impacts on nursing staffing and patient care: what works, for whom, how and in what circumstances?’.DesignA realist synthesis was conducted. A programme theory was formulated and expressed as hypotheses in the form of context, mechanisms and outcomes; this considered how, through using WPTs, particular conditions produced responses to generate outcomes. There were four phases: (1) development of a theoretical territory to understand nurse workforce planning and deployment complexity, resulting in an initial programme theory; (2) retrieval, review and synthesis of evidence, guided by the programme theory; (3) testing and refinement of the programme theory for practical application; and (4) actionable recommendations to support NHS managers in the implementation of WPTs for safe staffing.ParticipantsNHS managers, patient and public representatives and policy experts informed the programme theory in phase 1, which was validated in interviews with 10 NHS managers. In phase 3, 11 NHS managers were interviewed to refine the programme theory.ResultsWorkforce planning and deployment tools and technologies can be characterised functionally by their ability to summarise and aggregate staffing information, communicate about staffing, allocate staff and facilitate compliance with standards and quality assurance. NHS managers need to combine local knowledge and professional judgement with data from WPTs for effective staffing decisions. WPTs are used in a complex workforce system in which proximal factors (e.g. the workforce satisfaction with staffing) can influence distal factors (e.g. organisational reputation and potential staff recruitment). The system comprises multiple organisational strategies (e.g. professional and financial), which may (or may not) align around effective staffing. The positive impact of WPTs can include ensuring that staff are allocated effectively, promoting the patient safety agenda within an organisation, learning through comparison about ‘what works’ in effective staffing and having greater influence in staffing work. WPTs appear to have a positive impact when they visibly integrate data on needs and resources and when there is technical and leadership support. A collaborative process appears to be best for developing and implementing WPTs, so that they are fit for purpose.LimitationsThe evidence, predominantly from acute care, often lacked detail on how managers applied professional judgement to WPTs for staffing decisions. The evidence lacked specificity about how managers develop skills on communicating staffing decisions to patients and the public.Conclusions and recommendationsThe synthesis produced initial explanations of the use and impact of WPTs for decision-making and what works to support NHS managers to use these effectively. It is suggested that future research should further evaluate the programme theory.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016038132.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Burton
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jo Rycroft-Malone
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Siân Davies
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Anne McBride
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Beth Hall
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Adrian Jones
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK
| | - Denise Fisher
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Margaret Jones
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Maria Caulfield
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Turner A, Mulla A, Booth A, Aldridge S, Stevens S, Begum M, Malik A. The international knowledge base for new care models relevant to primary care-led integrated models: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [PMID: 29972636 DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe Multispecialty Community Provider (MCP) model was introduced to the NHS as a primary care-led, community-based integrated care model to provide better quality, experience and value for local populations.ObjectivesThe three main objectives were to (1) articulate the underlying programme theories for the MCP model of care; (2) identify sources of theoretical, empirical and practice evidence to test the programme theories; and (3) explain how mechanisms used in different contexts contribute to outcomes and process variables.DesignThere were three main phases: (1) identification of programme theories from logic models of MCP vanguards, prioritising key theories for investigation; (2) appraisal, extraction and analysis of evidence against a best-fit framework; and (3) realist reviews of prioritised theory components and maps of remaining theory components.Main outcome measuresThe quadruple aim outcomes addressed population health, cost-effectiveness, patient experience and staff experience.Data sourcesSearches of electronic databases with forward- and backward-citation tracking, identifying research-based evidence and practice-derived evidence.Review methodsA realist synthesis was used to identify, test and refine the following programme theory components: (1) community-based, co-ordinated care is more accessible; (2) place-based contracting and payment systems incentivise shared accountability; and (3) fostering relational behaviours builds resilience within communities.ResultsDelivery of a MCP model requires professional and service user engagement, which is dependent on building trust and empowerment. These are generated if values and incentives for new ways of working are aligned and there are opportunities for training and development. Together, these can facilitate accountability at the individual, community and system levels. The evidence base relating to these theory components was, for the most part, limited by initiatives that are relatively new or not formally evaluated. Support for the programme theory components varies, with moderate support for enhanced primary care and community involvement in care, and relatively weak support for new contracting models.Strengths and limitationsThe project benefited from a close relationship with national and local MCP leads, reflecting the value of the proximity of the research team to decision-makers. Our use of logic models to identify theories of change could present a relatively static position for what is a dynamic programme of change.ConclusionsMultispecialty Community Providers can be described as complex adaptive systems (CASs) and, as such, connectivity, feedback loops, system learning and adaptation of CASs play a critical role in their design. Implementation can be further reinforced by paying attention to contextual factors that influence behaviour change, in order to support more integrated working.Future workA set of evidence-derived ‘key ingredients’ has been compiled to inform the design and delivery of future iterations of population health-based models of care. Suggested priorities for future research include the impact of enhanced primary care on the workforce, the effects of longer-term contracts on sustainability and capacity, the conditions needed for successful continuous improvement and learning, the role of carers in patient empowerment and how community participation might contribute to community resilience.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016039552.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Turner
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Abeda Mulla
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shiona Aldridge
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Sharon Stevens
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Mahmoda Begum
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Anam Malik
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arthur A, Aldus C, Sarre S, Maben J, Wharrad H, Schneider J, Barton G, Argyle E, Clark A, Nouri F, Nicholson C. Can Health-care Assistant Training improve the relational care of older people? (CHAT) A development and feasibility study of a complex intervention. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOlder people account for an increasing proportion of those receiving NHS acute care. The quality of health care delivered to older people has come under increased scrutiny. Health-care assistants (HCAs) provide much of the direct care of older people in hospital. Patients’ experience of care tends to be based on the relational aspects of that care including dignity, empathy and emotional support.Objective(s)We aimed to understand the relational care training needs of HCAs caring for older people, design a relational care training intervention for HCAs and assess the feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the new intervention against HCA training as usual (TAU).Design(1) A telephone survey of all NHS hospital trusts in England to assess current HCA training provision, (2) focus groups of older people and carers, (3) semistructured interviews with HCAs and other care staff to establish training needs and inform intervention development and (4) a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting(1) All acute NHS hospital trusts in England, and (2–4) three acute NHS hospital trusts in England and the populations they serve.Participants(1) Representatives of 113 out of the total of 161 (70.2%) NHS trusts in England took part in the telephone survey, (2) 29 older people or carer participants in three focus groups, (3) 30 HCA and 24 ‘other staff’ interviewees and (4) 12 wards (four per trust), 112 HCAs, 92 patients during the prerandomisation period and 67 patients during the postrandomisation period.InterventionsFor the feasibility trial, a training intervention (Older People’s Shoes™) for HCAs developed as part of the study was compared with HCA TAU.Main outcome measuresPatient-level outcomes were the experience of emotional care and quality of life during patients’ hospital stay, as measured by the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaires. HCA outcomes were empathy, as measured by the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, and attitudes towards older people, as measured by the Age Group Evaluation and Description Inventory. Ward-level outcomes were the quality of HCA–patient interaction, as measured by the Quality of Interaction Scale.Results(1) One-third of trust telephone survey participants reported HCA training content that we considered to be ‘relational care’. Training for HCAs is variable across trusts and is focused on new recruits. The biggest challenge for HCA training is getting HCAs released from ward duties. (2) Older people and carers are aware of the pressures that ward staff are under but good relationships with care staff determine whether or not their experience of hospital is positive. (3) HCAs have training needs related to ‘difficult conversations’ with patients and relatives; they have particular preferences for learning styles that are not always reflected in available training. (4) In the feasibility trial, 187 of the 192 planned ward observation sessions were completed; the response to HCA questionnaires at baseline and at 8 and 12 weeks post randomisation was 64.2%, 46.4% and 35.7%, respectively, and 57.2% of eligible patients returned completed questionnaires.LimitationsThis was an intervention development and feasibility study so no conclusions can be drawn about the clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the intervention.ConclusionsThe intervention had high acceptability among nurse trainers and HCA learners. Viability of a definitive trial is conditional on overcoming specific methodological (patient recruitment processes) and contextual (involvement of wider ward team) challenges.Future workMethods to ease the burden of questionnaire completion without compromising ethics or methodological rigour need to be explored.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN10385799.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 5, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Arthur
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Clare Aldus
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sophie Sarre
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Maben
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Heather Wharrad
- School of Health Sciences, Queen’s Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Justine Schneider
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Garry Barton
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Elaine Argyle
- School of Health Sciences, Queen’s Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Fiona Nouri
- School of Health Sciences, Queen’s Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Caroline Nicholson
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|