1
|
The impact of healthcare executive seniority on implementation of innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention. Health Policy 2022; 126:996-1001. [PMID: 35882588 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention play a key role in the survival of healthcare systems as well as the wellbeing of patients. Effective healthcare management is a critical factor in implementing hospital innovation. Healthcare executive (HE) personal and job characteristics such as age and seniority have been found to affect innovative decision-making. However, no study has yet investigated age and seniority effects on the propensity to implement innovation in health prevention strategies. This study fills the literature gap by providing evidence for the effect of HE age and seniority on the implementation of innovative methods for diagnosis and prevention. Predicated on 57 in-depth interviews with HEs, we employ mixed methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the model's goodness-of-fit. Results show that while HE age and number of years in the organization positively affect job tenure, job tenure, in turn, negatively affects willingness to implement innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention in hospitals. This study extends the Upper-Echelon Theory to health workforce management. Practical implications are discussed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sajid IM, Frost K, Paul AK. 'Diagnostic downshift': clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:141-148. [PMID: 34099498 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Numerous drivers push specialist diagnostic approaches down to primary care ('diagnostic downshift'), intuitively welcomed by clinicians and patients. However, primary care's different population and processes result in under-recognised, unintended consequences. Testing performs poorer in primary care, with indication creep due to earlier, more undifferentiated presentation and reduced accuracy due to spectrum bias and the 'false-positive paradox'. In low-prevalence settings, tests without near-100% specificity have their useful yield eclipsed by greater incidental or false-positive findings. Ensuing cascades and multiplier effects can generate clinician workload, patient anxiety, further low-value tests, referrals, treatments and a potentially nocebic population 'disease' burden of unclear benefit. Increased diagnostics earlier in pathways can burden patients and stretch general practice (GP) workloads, inducing downstream service utilisation and unintended 'market failure' effects. Evidence is tenuous for reducing secondary care referrals, providing patient reassurance or meaningfully improving clinical outcomes. Subsequently, inflated investment in per capita testing, at a lower level in a healthcare system, may deliver diminishing or even negative economic returns. Test cost poorly represents 'value', neglecting under-recognised downstream consequences, which must be balanced against therapeutic yield. With lower positive predictive values, more tests are required per true diagnosis and cost-effectiveness is rarely robust. With fixed secondary care capacity, novel primary care testing is an added cost pressure, rarely reducing hospital activity. GP testing strategies require real-world evaluation, in primary care populations, of all downstream consequences. Test formularies should be scrutinised in view of the setting of care, with interventions to focus rational testing towards those with higher pretest probabilities, while improving interpretation and communication of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Mohammed Sajid
- NHS West London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Kathleen Frost
- NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
| | - Ash K Paul
- NHS South West London Health and Care Partnership STP, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hudson DM. Letter to editor: Towards the vision … advancing MRI practice in the community setting. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:571. [PMID: 34895826 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D M Hudson
- InHealth Group, Beechwood Hall, Kingsmead Road, High Wycombe, Bucks, HP11 1JL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hudson D, Knapp K, Benwell M. An evaluation of MRI lumbar spine scans within a community-based diagnostic setting. Musculoskeletal Care 2020; 19:384-395. [PMID: 33278329 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With an ongoing move towards more management of patients within the community setting, demand for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing and commonly used in lower back conditions. There is well recorded overuse of MRI in this scenario which goes against evidence-based practice and adds to rising healthcare costs. METHODS The study was a retrospective review of lumbar spine MRI scans performed within a community-based setting over an 18-month period. The review took a randomised purposive sample of patients (n = 450); looking at adherence to, and relevance of, guidelines in managing lower back conditions. Data extracted provided information on demographics and prevalence of clinical presentation and report observations. RESULTS There is variation in practice and utlisation of MRI with this patient group which warrants further exploration. Results support inappropriate use, lacking adherence to guidelines and pathways, leading to unnecessary imaging. 46% of referrals were considered clinically justified with 38% of report findings considered abnormal and of clinical relevance. Chi-square and binomial logistic regression were used to assess the significance and relationship of any factors on referral justification and report outcome. No difference was found between type of referrer, with patient age and leg symptoms being significant factors. CONCLUSION The study highlights the opportunity to integrate better referral criteria to improve referral quality, its suitability and the relevance of final reports. In the current climate this would help manage appropriate use of imaging resources during the post COVID-19 pandemic recovery phase, as well as support recommendations regarding diagnostic reform and a move towards more community-based diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Knapp
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Benwell
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lamb CC, Wang Y. PHYSICIAN CHARACTERISTICS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2280-2289. [PMID: 32475713 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is recommended to improve healthcare quality. Physicians who use a rational decision-making style and patient-centric approach are more likely to incorporate SDM into clinical practice. This paper explores how certain physician characteristics such as gender, age, race, experience, and specialty explain patient participation. METHODS A multi-group structural equation model tested the relationship between physician decision-making styles, patient-centered care, physician characteristics, and patient participation in clinical treatment decisions. A survey was completed by 330 physicians who treat primary immunodeficiency. Sample group responses were compared between groups across specialty, age, race, experience, or gender. RESULTS A patient-centric approach was the main factor that encouraged SDM independent of physician decision-making style with both treatment protocols and product choices. The positive effect of patient-centrism is stronger for immunologists, more experienced physicians, or male physicians. A rational decision-making style increases participation for non-immunologists, older physicians, white physicians, less-experienced physicians and female physicians. CONCLUSION A patient-centric approach, rational decision-making and certain physician characteristics help explain patient participation in clinical decisions. Practice Implications Future SDM research and policy initiatives should focus on physician adoption of patient-centric approaches to chronic care diseases and the potential bias associated with physician characteristics and decision-making style.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Lamb
- BioSolutions Services, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, United States; Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Silberman College of Business, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey, United States; Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - Yunmei Wang
- Case Cardiovascular Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and Harrington Heart &Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Turner A, Mulla A, Booth A, Aldridge S, Stevens S, Begum M, Malik A. The international knowledge base for new care models relevant to primary care-led integrated models: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [PMID: 29972636 DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe Multispecialty Community Provider (MCP) model was introduced to the NHS as a primary care-led, community-based integrated care model to provide better quality, experience and value for local populations.ObjectivesThe three main objectives were to (1) articulate the underlying programme theories for the MCP model of care; (2) identify sources of theoretical, empirical and practice evidence to test the programme theories; and (3) explain how mechanisms used in different contexts contribute to outcomes and process variables.DesignThere were three main phases: (1) identification of programme theories from logic models of MCP vanguards, prioritising key theories for investigation; (2) appraisal, extraction and analysis of evidence against a best-fit framework; and (3) realist reviews of prioritised theory components and maps of remaining theory components.Main outcome measuresThe quadruple aim outcomes addressed population health, cost-effectiveness, patient experience and staff experience.Data sourcesSearches of electronic databases with forward- and backward-citation tracking, identifying research-based evidence and practice-derived evidence.Review methodsA realist synthesis was used to identify, test and refine the following programme theory components: (1) community-based, co-ordinated care is more accessible; (2) place-based contracting and payment systems incentivise shared accountability; and (3) fostering relational behaviours builds resilience within communities.ResultsDelivery of a MCP model requires professional and service user engagement, which is dependent on building trust and empowerment. These are generated if values and incentives for new ways of working are aligned and there are opportunities for training and development. Together, these can facilitate accountability at the individual, community and system levels. The evidence base relating to these theory components was, for the most part, limited by initiatives that are relatively new or not formally evaluated. Support for the programme theory components varies, with moderate support for enhanced primary care and community involvement in care, and relatively weak support for new contracting models.Strengths and limitationsThe project benefited from a close relationship with national and local MCP leads, reflecting the value of the proximity of the research team to decision-makers. Our use of logic models to identify theories of change could present a relatively static position for what is a dynamic programme of change.ConclusionsMultispecialty Community Providers can be described as complex adaptive systems (CASs) and, as such, connectivity, feedback loops, system learning and adaptation of CASs play a critical role in their design. Implementation can be further reinforced by paying attention to contextual factors that influence behaviour change, in order to support more integrated working.Future workA set of evidence-derived ‘key ingredients’ has been compiled to inform the design and delivery of future iterations of population health-based models of care. Suggested priorities for future research include the impact of enhanced primary care on the workforce, the effects of longer-term contracts on sustainability and capacity, the conditions needed for successful continuous improvement and learning, the role of carers in patient empowerment and how community participation might contribute to community resilience.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016039552.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Turner
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Abeda Mulla
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shiona Aldridge
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Sharon Stevens
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Mahmoda Begum
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Anam Malik
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murray TE, Halligan JJ, Lee MJ. Inefficiency, dignity and patient experience: is it time for separate outpatient diagnostics? Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170574. [PMID: 29039691 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
There is international and national variation in the location of diagnostic imaging centres relative to hospitals. Diagnostic cross-sectional imaging has traditionally been performed within a hospital, catering for both inpatient and outpatients. The resulting two-tiered system caters for emergent and complex inpatients, in addition to typically ambulatory outpatients. These outpatients are less complex, and often attend an acute hospital for the specific purpose of diagnostic imaging. In both the UK and the Republic of Ireland, outpatient radiology is often provided on-campus in state-funded hospitals, reflecting the allocation of resources nationally. In many other countries, hospitals provide acute and high-level care, with community centres addressing outpatients' clinical and diagnostic needs. Mixing inpatients and outpatients introduces variability into the scanning process, and many institutions struggle to provide for the very different needs of outpatients. Current strategies of mixing these two fundamentally different groups should be reassessed, and either in-hospital segregation or dedicated outpatient diagnostic imaging centres merit serious consideration in any future healthcare planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael J Lee
- 1 Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.,2 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin , Ireland
| |
Collapse
|