Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation

Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework

INTRODUCTION

Genomic medicine has features that make it preference sensitive and amenable to model-based health economic evaluation. Preferences of patients, caregivers, and clinicians related to the uptake and delivery of genomic medicine technologies and services that are not captured in health state utility weights can affect the intervention's cost-effectiveness and budget impact. However, there is currently no established or agreed-on approach for integrating preference information into economic evaluations. The objective of this study was to explore approaches for incorporating preferences into model-based economic evaluations of genomic medicine and to develop a conceptual framework to consider preferences in health economic models.

METHODS

We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis of published literature guided by the following question: how have preferences been incorporated into model-based economic evaluations of genomic medicine interventions? We integrated findings from the literature and expert opinion to develop a conceptual framework of ways in which preferences influence economic value in the context of genomic medicine.

RESULTS

Our synthesis included 14 articles. Revealed and stated preference data were used to estimate choice probabilities and to value outcomes. Our conceptual framework situates preference data in the context of health system, patient, clinician, and family characteristics. Preference data were sourced from clinicians, patients and families impacted by a condition or intervention, and the general public. Evaluations employed various types of models, including discrete event simulation, microsimulation, Markov, and decision tree models.

CONCLUSION

When evaluating the broad benefits and costs of implementing new interventions, sufficiently accounting for preferences in the form of model inputs and valuation of outcomes in economic evaluations is important to avoid biased implementation decisions. Incorporation of preference data may improve alignment between predicted and real-world uptake and more accurately estimate welfare impacts, and this study provides critical insights to support researchers who seek to incorporate preference information into model-based health economic evaluations.

Gynecological Insights into Lynch Syndrome-A Comprehensive Review of Cancer Screening and Prevention

Lynch syndrome, one of the most common genetic syndromes predisposing to cancer, is associated with a series of malignant conditions, among which the most frequent is colorectal cancer, but gynecologic cancers (especially endometrial) are also quite common. Despite the significant progress made in understanding this condition over time, there are still aspects in managing this condition that have not demonstrated clear benefits. This article aims to summarize the recommendations of international societies and present the latest developments in managing Lynch syndrome, focusing on gynecologic cancer screening and possible prevention strategies. Advances in genetic testing procedures and discoveries related to the association between oncological pathology frequency and the affected pathogenic variant type will probably lead to personalized medicine focused on the individual patient in the coming years. Although various screening methods for gynecological cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome have been used over time, they have not shown significant survival benefits. This highlights the need for studying and implementing new screening and diagnostic methods, which have been under investigation in recent years and are mentioned in this article.

Differential Receipt of Genetic Services Among Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Relatives: A Review of Challenges to Health Equity

Up to 14% of endometrial cancers and 23% of epithelial ovarian cancers are associated with genetic predispositions. Referral for genetic testing and counseling can significantly impact a patient's oncologic outcomes. However, significant disparities in genetic referral and testing exist within medically underserved and minority populations in the United States. These disparities in care and access to care are multifactorial, often involving patient-level, health care-level, and system-level factors. In this review, we focus on disparities in genetic testing among patients with ovarian and uterine cancer, and the missed opportunities for primary cancer prevention among their relatives.

First-degree family history of cancers in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma. Prevalence and prognostic impact

BACKGROUND

We aimed to study the impact of first-degree family history on patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 1990 to June 2016, comparing stage I endometrial cancer patients with and without a sporadic family history of cancers. We collected the patients' demographic information, tumor characteristics, and treatment plans. During the follow-up period, patient information on tumor recurrence and survival was collected. The chi-square test was used to assess the associations between categorical variables. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval (CI)).

RESULTS

Among the 1737 patients with stage I endometrial cancer, 709 had a positive first-degree family history of cancers and 1028 had negative family history (FH) of cancers. Patients with positive FH were more likely to be older, have stage IB disease, and receive adjuvant radiotherapy; however, the difference was not statistically significant. At 5 years follow up, patients with a positive family history had longer time to recurrence (TTR) than their negative FH counterparts. Maternal family history of cancer was the most common, followed by a sister's history of cancer, paternal history, brother's history, and offspring history of cancer. Breast, endometrial, and colon cancers are the most common cancers among first-degree relatives.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial cancer patients with sporadic first-degree FH of cancers share similar demographics and tumor characteristics compared to their counterpart with slightly increased likelihood to be older, with stage IB disease and have a longer TTR compared to their negative counterpart.

Gynaecological cancer surveillance for women with Lynch syndrome: systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation

Background

Lynch syndrome is an inherited condition which leads to an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Risk-reducing surgery is generally recommended to manage the risk of gynaecological cancer once childbearing is completed. The value of gynaecological colonoscopic surveillance as an interim measure or instead of risk-reducing surgery is uncertain. We aimed to determine whether gynaecological surveillance was effective and cost-effective in Lynch syndrome.

Methods

We conducted systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome, as well as a systematic review of health utility values relating to cancer and gynaecological risk reduction. Study identification included bibliographic database searching and citation chasing (searches updated 3 August 2021). Screening and assessment of eligibility for inclusion were conducted by independent researchers. Outcomes were prespecified and were informed by clinical experts and patient involvement. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted and results were synthesised narratively. We also developed a whole-disease economic model for Lynch syndrome using discrete event simulation methodology, including natural history components for colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer, and we used this model to conduct a cost-utility analysis of gynaecological risk management strategies, including surveillance, risk-reducing surgery and doing nothing.

Results

We found 30 studies in the review of clinical effectiveness, of which 20 were non-comparative (single-arm) studies. There were no high-quality studies providing precise outcome estimates at low risk of bias. There is some evidence that mortality rate is higher for surveillance than for risk-reducing surgery but mortality is also higher for no surveillance than for surveillance. Some asymptomatic cancers were detected through surveillance but some cancers were also missed. There was a wide range of pain experiences, including some individuals feeling no pain and some feeling severe pain. The use of pain relief (e.g. ibuprofen) was common, and some women underwent general anaesthetic for surveillance. Existing economic evaluations clearly found that risk-reducing surgery leads to the best lifetime health (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and is cost-effective, while surveillance is not cost-effective in comparison. Our economic evaluation found that a strategy of surveillance alone or offering surveillance and risk-reducing surgery was cost-effective, except for path_PMS2 Lynch syndrome. Offering only risk-reducing surgery was less effective than offering surveillance with or without surgery.

Limitations

Firm conclusions about clinical effectiveness could not be reached because of the lack of high-quality research. We did not assume that women would immediately take up risk-reducing surgery if offered, and it is possible that risk-reducing surgery would be more effective and cost-effective if it was taken up when offered.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome on clinical grounds, but modelling suggests that surveillance could be cost-effective. Further research is needed but it must be rigorously designed and well reported to be of benefit.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171098.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129713) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 41. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Clinical features and impact of p53 status on sporadic mismatch repair deficiency and Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer

The clinical features of sporadic mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) and Lynch syndrome (LS) in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer (EC) were examined by evaluating the prevalence and prognostic factors of LS and sporadic MMRd in patients with EC. Targeted sequencing of five LS susceptibility genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) was carried out in 443 patients with EC who were pathologically diagnosed with EC at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Pathogenic variants in these genes were detected in 16 patients (3.7%). Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins was undertaken in 337 of the 433 (77.9%) EC patients, and 91 patients (27.0%) showed absent expression of at least one MMR protein. The 13 cases of LS with MMR protein loss (93.8%) showed a favorable prognosis with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 100%, although there was no statistically significant difference between this group and the sporadic MMRd group (p = 0.27). In the MMRd without LS group, the 5-year OS rate was significantly worse in seven patients with an aberrant p53 expression pattern than in those with p53 WT (53.6% vs. 93.9%, log-rank test; p = 0.0016). These results suggest that p53 abnormalities and pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes could be potential biomarkers for the molecular classification of EC with MMRd.

Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Europe: first survey data analysis from 69 pathological academic and hospital labs

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the commonest gynecological cancer affecting women in Western populations. To predict patient risk, the 2020 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Female Genital Tract stressed the importance of integrated histo-molecular classification of the disease. This survey analysis poses attention on the most frequently used immunohistochemical and molecular markers adopted in daily categorization of ECs in European laboratories.

Methods

We analyzed data collected through questionnaires administered to 40 Italian, 20 Spanish, 3 Swiss and 6 United Kingdom (UK) laboratories. We collected information regarding daily practice in EC evaluation, specifically concerning mismatch repair status (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Summary and descriptive statistical analyses were carried out to evaluate the current practice of each laboratory.

Results

The results show that MMR status is mainly evaluated by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on most EC samples. The most frequent approach for the analysis of MMR status is IHC of four proteins (PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, MLH1). MSI analysis by molecular methods is uncommon but useful as a supplemental tool in specific conditions. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and BRAF V600 mutations analysis are performed in case of negative expression of MLH1/PMS2. Other markers (mainly p53 followed by POLE and PTEN) are investigated in particular in Spain and Switzerland in a consistent number of cases.

Conclusion

Guidelines consultation and standardization of laboratory procedures are efficient means for EC prognostic risk stratification and improving the quality of care.

Experimental and Meta-Analytic Validation of RNA Sequencing Signatures for Predicting Status of Microsatellite Instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important diagnostic and prognostic cancer biomarker. In colorectal, cervical, ovarian, and gastric cancers, it can guide the prescription of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In laboratory diagnostics of susceptible tumors, MSI is routinely detected by the size of marker polymerase chain reaction products encompassing frequent microsatellite expansion regions. Alternatively, MSI status is screened indirectly by immunohistochemical interrogation of microsatellite binding proteins. RNA sequencing (RNAseq) profiling is an emerging source of data for a wide spectrum of cancer biomarkers. Recently, three RNAseq-based gene signatures were deduced for establishing MSI status in tumor samples. They had 25, 15, and 14 gene products with only one common gene. However, they were developed and tested on the incomplete literature of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sampling and never validated experimentally on independent RNAseq samples. In this study, we, for the first time, systematically validated these three RNAseq MSI signatures on the literature colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 619), endometrial carcinoma (n = 533), gastric cancer (n = 380), uterine carcinosarcoma (n = 55), and esophageal cancer (n = 83) samples and on the set of experimental CRC RNAseq samples (n = 23) for tumors with known MSI status. We found that all three signatures performed well with area under the curve (AUC) ranges of 0.94-1 for the experimental CRCs and 0.94-1 for the TCGA CRC, esophageal cancer, and uterine carcinosarcoma samples. However, for the TCGA endometrial carcinoma and gastric cancer samples, only two signatures were effective with AUC 0.91-0.97, whereas the third signature showed a significantly lower AUC of 0.69-0.88. Software for calculating these MSI signatures using RNAseq data is included.