Improving the diagnosis and management of Lewy body dementia: the DIAMOND-Lewy research programme including pilot cluster RCT

The Care Needs of Patients With Cognitive Impairment in Late-Stage Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD), but care needs and resource use for those with significant cognitive impairment are not well established.

METHODS

675 participants with PD from the international Care of Late-Stage Parkinsonism (CLaSP) study were grouped into those without (n = 333, 49%) and with cognitive impairment (MMSE < 24/30 or diagnosis of dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment; n = 342, 51%) and their clinical features, care needs and healthcare utilisation compared. The relationship between cognition and healthcare consultations was investigated through logistic regression.

RESULTS

Cognitive impairment was associated with more motor and non-motor symptoms, less antiparkinsonian but higher rates of dementia and antipsychotic medication, worse subjective health status and greater caregiver burden. A considerable proportion did not have a pre-established cognitive diagnosis. Care needs were high across the whole sample but higher in the cognitive impairment group. Home care and care home use was higher in the cognitive impairment group. However, use of healthcare consultations was similar between the groups and significantly fewer participants with cognitive impairment had had recent PD Nurse consultations. Worse cognitive impairment was associated with lower frequency of recent PD nurse and multidisciplinary therapy consultation (physiotherapy, massage, occupational therapy, speech training and general nursing).

CONCLUSIONS

Those with cognitive impairment have more severe PD, higher care needs and greater social care utilisation than those with normal cognition, yet use of health care services is similar or less. Cognitive impairment appears to be a barrier to PD nurse and multidisciplinary therapy consultations. This challenges current models of care: alternative models of care may be required to serve this population.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Parkinson's disease is a long-term progressive health condition. Over time, many people with Parkinson's develop problems with thinking and memory, called cognitive impairment. This can negatively impact the daily lives of the person with Parkinson's and their caregiver. It is also thought to be a barrier to accessing healthcare. How people with Parkinson's who have cognitive impairment use healthcare and detail of their care needs is not well known.We analysed data from a large sample of people with advanced Parkinson's from six European countries to investigate their symptoms, care needs and healthcare use. We compared those with cognitive impairment to (342 people) to those without cognitive impairment (333 people).We found that those with cognitive impairment had more severe Parkinson's across a range of symptoms compared to those without cognitive impairment. They also had more care needs, reported their health status to be worse, and their caregivers experienced greater strain from caring. Whilst use of other healthcare services was similar between the two groups, those with cognitive impairment were less likely to have recently seen a Parkinson's nurse than those without cognitive impairment. Further analysis showed an association between cognitive impairment and not having seen a Parkinson's nurse or therapist recently, taking psychiatric symptoms, functional disability and care home residence into account. Therapists included were physiotherapy, massage, occupational therapy, speech training and general nursing. These findings highlight unmet need. We suggest that healthcare should be more targeted to help this group of people, given their higher care needs.

How do quantitative studies involving people with dementia report experiences of standardised data collection? A narrative synthesis of NIHR published studies

BACKGROUND

People with dementia are routinely included as research participants in trials and other quantitative studies in which they are invited to respond to standardised measures. This paper reviews the reporting of standardised data collection from people with dementia in reports published in the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Journals Library. The aim was to understand how the administration of standardised, self-report measures with people with dementia is reported in NIHR monographs and what could be learnt from this about the feasibility and acceptability of data collection approaches for future studies.

METHODS

This was a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Broad search terms (Dementia OR Alzheimer*) were used to search the NIHR Journals Library website in December 2021. All studies that used (or intended to use) standardised measures to collect research data directly from people with dementia were eligible for inclusion. Information was extracted (where reported) on the process of data collection, dementia severity, levels of missing data and the experiences and reflections of those involved.

RESULTS

Searches returned 42 records, from which 17 reports were assessed as eligible for inclusion, containing 22 studies. Response rates from participants with dementia in these studies varied considerably and appeared to be related to dementia severity and place of residence. Little information was reported on the process of data collection or the reasons for missing data, and most studies did not report the experiences of participants or those administering the measures. However, there was an indication from two studies that standardised data collection could provoke emotional distress in some participants with dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this review we identified both variation in levels of missing data and gaps in reporting which make it difficult to ascertain the reasons for this variation. We also identified potential risks to the well-being of participants with dementia which may be associated with the content of standardised measures and the context of data collection. Open reporting of and reflection upon data collection processes and the experiences of people involved is essential to ensure both the success of future data collection and the wellbeing of study participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with Research on Research https://ror-hub.org/study/2905/ .

Compound impact of cognitive and physical decline: A qualitative interview study of people with Parkinson's and cognitive impairment, caregivers and professionals

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease and is associated with poorer quality of life and increased caregiver distress, but little qualitative information is available on lived experiences of people with Parkinson's who also have cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the challenges of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's, triangulating the perspectives of people with Parkinson's, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 people with Parkinson's and cognitive impairment, 10 family caregivers and 27 healthcare professionals, using purposive sampling in the United Kingdom (2019-2021). Cognitive impairment was identified by healthcare professionals and required subjective symptoms. Relevant cognitive diagnoses were recorded. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

An overarching concept of the compound impact of cognitive and physical decline was developed, with six themes. Four themes describe the experience of living with cognitive impairment in Parkinson's: (1) Challenges in Daily Activities, (2) Psychological Impact and (3) Evolving Communication Difficulties together contributing to (4) Social Shift, encompassing a reduction in wider social activities but intensification of close relationships with increased dependence. A fifth theme (5) Living Well describes positive influences on these experiences, encompassing intrinsic motivation, self-management strategies and supportive relationships. Furthermore, underlying and shaping the whole experience was the sixth theme: (6) Preconceptions about Cognitive Impairment, describing fear and denial of symptoms and poor understanding of the nature of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's, with differences to other dementia pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive impairment superimposed on the existing challenges of Parkinson's has a multifaceted impact and makes living with the condition arduous. Increased understanding of the experiences of this group and employing the identified facilitators for living well may be able to improve patient and caregiver experiences.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Two people with Parkinson's and cognitive impairment and three caregivers contributed to the study. Between them they contributed throughout the entirety of the project, giving input at conceptualisation as well as advice and review of interview questions, participant information leaflets, recruitment, interpretation of findings and summaries of the project.

The high cost of care and limited evidence on cost-effective strategies for Lewy body dementia: systematic review of evidence

BACKGROUND

Lewy body dementia (LBD) is a prevalent yet frequently underdiagnosed form of dementia, accounting for up to 15% of all dementia cases.

AIMS

This study aims to increase awareness and advocacy for LBD by gathering and critically assessing the economic evidence, including the cost of illness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for managing LBD.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was undertaken with EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and EconLit. This search was supplemented by grey literature on Google Scholar and reviewing the reference lists of identified studies. The papers included in the review were published between 2008 and 2023, and involved participants with LBD (dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease dementia), which either addressed the cost of illness or conducted an economic evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirteen papers were included, comprising ten cost-of-illness studies and three economic evaluations. The cost of LBD tends to be higher than that of other forms of dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease, and these costs escalate more steeply as the disease progresses. These cost differences may not be solely influenced by the subtype of dementia, but possibly also by patient characteristics like physical and cognitive abilities. Cost-effectiveness of potential interventions for LBD is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite numerous drug trials and other interventions for dementia, very few have targeted LBD, let alone explored the cost-effectiveness of such therapies for LBD. This disparity highlights the urgent need for cost-effective strategies and interventions targeting LBD. We propose the establishment of universally accepted standards for LBD research.

T Lymphocytes and Their Potential Role in Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common neurodegenerative cause of dementia. People with DLB have an inferior prognosis compared to Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the diseases overlap in their neuropathology and clinical syndrome. It is imperative that we enhance our understanding of the aetiology and pathogenesis of DLB. The impact of peripheral inflammation on the brain in dementia has been increasingly explored in recent years, with T lymphocyte recruitment into brain parenchyma identified in AD and Parkinson's disease. There is now a growing range of literature emerging on the potential role of innate and adaptive immune cells in DLB, including T lymphocytes. In this review, we examine the profile of T lymphocytes in DLB, focusing on studies of post-mortem brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, and the blood compartment. We present an integrated viewpoint on the results of these studies by proposing how changes to the T lymphocyte profile in the brain and periphery may relate to each other. Improving our understanding of T lymphocytes in DLB has the potential to guide the development of disease-modifying treatments.

Delivering Optimal Care to People with Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Caregiver, and Professional Perspectives

Background

Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and associated with lower quality of life. Cognitive impairment in PD manifests differently to other dementia pathologies. Provision of optimal care requires knowledge about the support needs of this population.

Methods

Eleven people with PD and cognitive impairment (PwP), 10 family caregivers, and 27 healthcare professionals were purposively sampled from across the United Kingdom. Semistructured interviews were conducted in 2019-2021, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Cognitive impairment in PD conveyed increased complexity for clinical management and healthcare interactions, the latter driven by multifactorial communication difficulties. Techniques that helped included slow, simple, and single messages, avoiding topic switching. Information and emotional support needs were often unmet, particularly for caregivers. Diagnostic pathways were inconsistent and awareness of cognitive impairment in PD was poor, both contributing to underdiagnosis. Many felt that PwP and cognitive impairment fell through service gaps, resulting from disjointed, nonspecific, and underresourced services. Personalised care was advocated through tailoring to individual needs of PwP and caregivers facilitated by flexibility, time and continuity within services, and supporting self-management.

Conclusions

This study highlights unmet need for people with this complex condition. Clinicians should adapt their approach and communication techniques for this population and provide tailored information and support to both PwP and caregivers. Services need to be more streamlined and collaborative, providing more time and flexibility. There is a need for wider awareness and deeper understanding of this condition and its differences from other types of dementia.

Current Therapies and Drug Development Pipeline in Lewy Body Dementia: An Update

The term Lewy body dementia refers to either of two related diagnoses: dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Clinical management of Lewy body dementia is challenging. The current treatment options focus on relieving symptoms; no disease-modifying therapies are available. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs for the treatment of DLB, and there are only a few for PDD. Cholinesterase inhibitors are shown to be beneficial in improving cognitive symptoms in Lewy body dementia. Rivastigmine was approved by the FDA to treat PDD. Donepezil was approved in Japan as a treatment for DLB. Levodopa may provide modest benefit in treating motor symptoms and zonisamide in adjunct to low-dose levodopa helps with parkinsonism. Treatment of autonomic symptoms are based on symptomatic treatment with off-label agents. Our main objective in this article is to present an overview of the current pharmacological options available to treat the clinical features of DLB and PDD. When evaluating the existing management options for Lewy body dementia, it is difficult to fully separate PDD from DLB. However, we have attempted to identify whether the cited studies include patients with PDD and/or DLB. Moreover, we have provided an overview of the current drug pipeline in Lewy body dementia. All currently active trials are in phase I or II and most are focused on disease modification rather than symptomatic treatment. Phase II trial results for neflamapimod show promising results. Due to heterogeneity of symptoms and underlying pathophysiology, there is a need for new biomarker strategies and improved definitions of outcome measures for Lewy body dementia drug trials.