1
|
Blodgett JM, Birch JM, Musella M, Harkness F, Kaushal A. What Works to Improve Wellbeing? A Rapid Systematic Review of 223 Interventions Evaluated with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scales. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15845. [PMID: 36497919 PMCID: PMC9737992 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) is a commonly used scale of mental wellbeing focusing entirely on the positive aspect of mental health. It has been widely used in a broad range of clinical and research settings, including to evaluate if interventions, programmes or pilots improve wellbeing. We aimed to systematically review all interventions that used WEMWBS and evaluate which interventions are the most effective at improving wellbeing. METHODS Eligible populations included children and adults, with no health or age restrictions. Any intervention study was eligible if the wellbeing outcome was measured using the 7 or 14-item WEMWBS scale assessed both pre- and post-intervention. We identified eligible intervention studies using three approaches: a database search (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PyschInfo and Web of Science from January 2007 to present), grey literature search, and by issuing a call for evidence. Narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis of standardised mean differences in the intervention group were used to summarise intervention effects on WEMWBS score. RESULTS We identified 223 interventions across 209 studies, with a total of 53,834 participants across all studies. Five main themes of interventions were synthesised: psychological (n = 80); social (n = 54); arts, culture and environment (n = 29); physical health promotion (n = 18); and other (n = 28). Psychological interventions based on resilience, wellbeing or self-management techniques had the strongest effect on wellbeing. A broad range of other interventions were effective at improving mental wellbeing, including other psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy, psychoeducation and mindfulness. Medium to strong effects were also seen for person-centred support/advice (social), arts-based, parenting (social) and social prescribing interventions. However, a major limitation of the evidence was that only 75 (36%) of studies included a control group. CONCLUSIONS WEMWBS has been widely used to assess wellbeing across a diverse range of interventions, settings and samples. Despite substantial heterogeneity in individual intervention design, delivery and groups targeted, results indicate that a broad range of intervention types can successfully improve wellbeing. Methodological changes, such as greater use of control groups in intervention evaluation, can help future researchers and policy makers further understand what works for mental wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Blodgett
- Kohlrabi Consulting, Manchester SK4 3HJ, UK
- Institute of Sport Exercise & Health, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London W1T 7HA, UK
| | - Jack M. Birch
- Kohlrabi Consulting, Manchester SK4 3HJ, UK
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK
| | | | | | - Aradhna Kaushal
- Kohlrabi Consulting, Manchester SK4 3HJ, UK
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh V, Kumar A, Gupta S. Mental Health Prevention and Promotion-A Narrative Review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:898009. [PMID: 35958637 PMCID: PMC9360426 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.898009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Extant literature has established the effectiveness of various mental health promotion and prevention strategies, including novel interventions. However, comprehensive literature encompassing all these aspects and challenges and opportunities in implementing such interventions in different settings is still lacking. Therefore, in the current review, we aimed to synthesize existing literature on various mental health promotion and prevention interventions and their effectiveness. Additionally, we intend to highlight various novel approaches to mental health care and their implications across different resource settings and provide future directions. The review highlights the (1) concept of preventive psychiatry, including various mental health promotions and prevention approaches, (2) current level of evidence of various mental health preventive interventions, including the novel interventions, and (3) challenges and opportunities in implementing concepts of preventive psychiatry and related interventions across the settings. Although preventive psychiatry is a well-known concept, it is a poorly utilized public health strategy to address the population's mental health needs. It has wide-ranging implications for the wellbeing of society and individuals, including those suffering from chronic medical problems. The researchers and policymakers are increasingly realizing the potential of preventive psychiatry; however, its implementation is poor in low-resource settings. Utilizing novel interventions, such as mobile-and-internet-based interventions and blended and stepped-care models of care can address the vast mental health need of the population. Additionally, it provides mental health services in a less-stigmatizing and easily accessible, and flexible manner. Furthermore, employing decision support systems/algorithms for patient management and personalized care and utilizing the digital platform for the non-specialists' training in mental health care are valuable additions to the existing mental health support system. However, more research concerning this is required worldwide, especially in the low-and-middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Snehil Gupta
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Bhopal, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsutsumi A, Shimazu A, Yoshikawa T. Proposed guidelines for primary prevention for mental health at work: an update. ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1539/eohp.2019-0007-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Akizumi Tsutsumi
- Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | | | - Toru Yoshikawa
- National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan (JNIOSH)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gayed A, LaMontagne AD, Milner A, Deady M, Calvo RA, Christensen H, Mykletun A, Glozier N, Harvey SB. A New Online Mental Health Training Program for Workplace Managers: Pre-Post Pilot Study Assessing Feasibility, Usability, and Possible Effectiveness. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5:e10517. [PMID: 29970359 PMCID: PMC6053610 DOI: 10.2196/10517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health has become the leading cause of sickness absence in high-income countries. Managers can play an important role in establishing mentally healthy workplaces and coordinating their organization's response to a mentally ill worker. OBJECTIVE This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and likely effectiveness of a newly developed online training program for managers called HeadCoach. HeadCoach aims to build managers' confidence in supporting the mental health needs of staff and promote managerial behavior most likely to result in a more mentally healthy workplace. METHODS In total, 66 managers from two organizations were invited to participate in this pre-post pilot study of HeadCoach, which was made available to managers to complete at their own pace over a 4-week period. Data were collected at baseline and post intervention via an online research platform. The difference in mean scores for each outcome between these two time points was calculated using paired samples t tests. RESULTS Of all the invited managers, 59.1% (39/66) participated in the trial, with complete pre-post data available for 56.4% (22/39) of the participants. The majority of respondents reported positive engagement with the program. During the study period, managers' knowledge regarding their role in managing mental health issues (P=.01) and their confidence in communicating with employees regarding mental illness (P<.001) significantly increased. In addition, a significant increase was observed from the baseline in managers' self-reported actions to use strategies to prevent and decrease stress among their team members (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS Although caution is needed due to the absence of a control group, preliminary results of this study suggest that HeadCoach could be a feasible, acceptable, and efficient method of training managers in best workplace practices to help support the mental health needs of their staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimée Gayed
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
| | - Anthony D LaMontagne
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Allison Milner
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Deady
- Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rafael A Calvo
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arnstein Mykletun
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.,Department of Mental Health and Suicide, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Community Medicine,, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.,Centre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.,Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nick Glozier
- Brain and Mind Centre and Central Clinical School, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Samuel B Harvey
- Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gayed A, Bryan BT, Petrie K, Deady M, Milner A, LaMontagne AD, Calvo RA, Mackinnon A, Christensen H, Mykletun A, Glozier N, Harvey SB. A protocol for the HeadCoach trial: the development and evaluation of an online mental health training program for workplace managers. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18:25. [PMID: 29378536 PMCID: PMC5789544 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1603-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within high income countries, mental health is now the leading cause of long term sickness absence in the workplace. Managers are in a position to make changes and decisions that have a positive effect on the wellbeing of staff, the recovery of employees with mental ill health, and potentially prevent future mental health problems. However, managers report addressing workplace mental health issues as challenging. The aim of the HeadCoach trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed online training intervention to determine whether it is able to build managers' confidence to better support individuals within their teams who are experiencing mental ill health, and the confidence to promote manager behaviour likely to result in a more mentally healthy workplace. METHODS/DESIGN We will conduct a cluster randomised control trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of HeadCoach, an online training intervention for managers with a focus on the mental health of their employees, compared to a waitlist control. The target sample is 168 managers, and their direct employees. Managers and employees will be assessed at baseline and at 4-month follow up. Managers will have an additional, intermediate assessment 6-weeks post-baseline. The primary outcome is change from baseline in managers' self-reported confidence when dealing with mental health issues within their team and promoting a mentally healthy workplace. The difference between the intervention and waitlist control groups will be assessed using linear mixed effects repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of variance (ANOVA). Secondary managerial outcomes include mental health literacy, attitudes towards mental health issues in the workplace and managerial behaviour in dealing with mental health matters with their staff. Employee outcomes will be perceived level of manager support, engagement, psychological distress, and rates of sickness absence and presenteeism. DISCUSSION To our knowledge this will be the first RCT of a purely online training intervention developed specifically for managers that promotes confidence to both support staff experiencing mental ill health and create a mentally healthy work environment. If successful, this intervention has the potential to provide an effective and efficient method of training managers in workplace mental health and to enhance employee wellbeing. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000279325.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimée Gayed
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
| | - Bridget T. Bryan
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW Australia
| | - Katherine Petrie
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW Australia
| | - Mark Deady
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW Australia
| | - Allison Milner
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anthony D. LaMontagne
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC Australia
| | - Rafael A. Calvo
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW Australia
- Centre for Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Arnstein Mykletun
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
- Department of Mental Health and Suicide, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
- Centre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
- Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nicholas Glozier
- Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Samuel B. Harvey
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|