Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part I: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS.

METHODS

A panel of four rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for drafting the document, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN] levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques).

RESULTS

46 recommendations were drawn up, addressing five main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the first 21, referring to the areas of: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of primary APS. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

An update of the SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to partI, related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A partII has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to obstetric SAF and special situations.

Revisiting the activated protein C-protein S-thrombomodulin ternary pathway: Impact of new understanding on its laboratory investigation

Although suspected conceptually in the 60 s, Protein C and Protein S activities in hemostasis were investigated and reported from the mid-80 s, followed by the discovery of Thrombomodulin, an endothelial cell membrane associated protein, playing the most important heamostatic role. These 3 proteins act in regulating thrombogenesis and protecting against thrombo-embolic events. When blood is activated, any trace of circulating thrombin is captured by Thrombomodulin in the microcirculation, making thrombin become an anticoagulant through its capacity to activate Protein C to Activated Protein C, which operates as a sentinel in blood coagulation, in the form of a complex with free Protein S, to block any new blood activation site, and more especially circulating activated Factors V and VIII. Protein S not only acts as the Activated Protein C cofactor, but also as the cofactor of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor. In addition, it has some functions in the complement pathway through its binding to C4b-BP. Another capability of activated protein C is to lower fibrinolytic activity, as the Activated Protein C Inhibitor is also known as Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 3. The Protein C-Protein S system becomes less efficient in the presence of mutated Factor V (Factor V-Leiden or other variants), which is resistant to its inactivating effect. Other pathologies linked to this system concern the development of allo- or auto-antibodies to Protein S or to thrombin, which can generate severe thrombotic complications in affected patients. Some antithrombotic drugs have originated from this regulatory system. Protein C or Protein S concentrates are used for treating deficient patients. Activated Protein C (especially in patients with sepsis) or Thrombomodulin are proposed as antithrombotic medications. Most importantly, congenital or acquired Protein C or Protein S deficiencies are associated with severe recurrent thrombotic events. From the clinical standpoint most of the patients are heterozygous, as homozygosity is almost incompatible with life in the absence of a continuous and efficient treatment. Laboratory investigation of this highly complex system involves many different specialized assays for measuring these 3 proteins' activities, their antigenic content or their genetic sequence. The Protein S in-vitro anticoagulant activity is weak and contrasts with its high antithrombotic role in-vivo, showing that diagnostic assays have not yet succeeded in reproducing all the natural mechanisms for evidencing the anticoagulant role of Protein S. This paradoxal notion is discussed and illustrated in this manuscript as well is a revisit of the major characteristics and pathophysiological functions of the Protein C-Protein S-Thrombomodulin system; the associated pathologies; and the main laboratory tools available for clinical diagnosis. In respect to future perspectives, we also focused on developing more significant and relevant assays, especially for Protein S, thanks to the understanding of its biological roles.

The role of antiphospholipid antibodies toward the protein C/protein S system in venous thromboembolic disease

The association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and antibodies anti-Protein C (PC)/Protein S (PS) is still uncertain. We performed a case-control study to determine the risk of VTE related to the presence of these auto-antibodies considered independently of the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) or anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACA). One hundred thirty-five patients with idiopathic VTE and 164 healthy subjects were enrolled. Anti-PC and anti-PS antibodies (both IgG and IgM) were assessed using commercially available ELISA kits. Among cases there was a higher prevalence of elevated anti-PC IgM antibodies than in controls (OR 2.44, 95%CI 1.00-5.94). The presence of anti-PC IgG and anti-PS IgG and IgM antibodies was also higher in cases than in controls, but the difference was not statistically significant. Only five patients had both anti-PC or anti-PS antibodies and LAC or ACA. We performed a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showing that anti-PC IgM>958 percentile was a significant predictor of VTE after adjustment for LAC or ACA (OR 2.52, 95%CI 1.01-6.24)). Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.