Effectiveness of subcutaneous low-dose alemtuzumab and rituximab combination therapy for steroid-resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease

Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab combined with cyclosporin A on B-cell dysregulation in chronic graft-versus-host disease

OBJECTIVE

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a significant complication following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, often necessitating therapeutic interventions such as rituximab (RTX) and cyclosporin A (CsA). This study aims to elucidate the mechanisms by which RTX and CsA jointly address B-cell dysregulation in cGVHD, providing a theoretical foundation and scientific rationale for the treatment and prognostic evaluation of this condition.

METHODS

A total of 30 cGVHD mouse models were established by subjecting recipient mice to total body irradiation followed by injection of a mixed suspension of bone marrow cells and splenocytes from donor mice. From Day 2 to Day 29 post-model establishment, the mice received subcutaneous administration of RTX and CsA. Throughout the study, body weight, clinical cGVHD scores, and survival rates were monitored. Blood samples were collected via the orbital venous plexus. Serum levels of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and pro-inflammatory factors were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the ratio of regulatory B cells (Bregs) in the blood sample was assessed via flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Mice with cGVHD exhibited a 14.5% decrease in body weight, elevated clinical scores, and more severe symptoms compared to the control group. Notably, all mice in both the cGVHD and control groups survived until the conclusion of the study. Induction of cGVHD resulted in B-cell dysregulation, evidenced by elevated serum BAFF levels and a decreased proportion of Bregs. However, treatment with RTX combined with CsA ameliorated B-cell dysregulation and significantly reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory factors in cGVHD mice, with decreases of 39.78% in TNF-α and 37.89% in IL-6.

CONCLUSION

The combination of RTX and CsA effectively mitigates B-cell dysregulation in cGVHD, thereby reducing the severity and progression of the disease.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II: Disease activity grading and therapeutic management

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of cGVHD. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

Low-dose rituximab in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major complication that puts patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at risk of death or infection. Currently, there is no gold standard for the first-line treatment of patients who do not respond to steroids, and there are several therapeutic options being evaluated in clinical trials for this disease to be used even in the first-line treatment for GvHD. There is evidence of the benefit of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at a standard dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly in the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus disease (SR-cGvHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of low-dose rituximab in a middle-income center in northeastern Mexico STUDY DESIGN: We report the experience of 26 patients with chronic graft-versus-graft disease who received low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks). We utilized the advances in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for diagnosis, scoring, trial design, and assessment of treatment response.

RESULTS

We obtained a 5-year overall survival of 23.6%, including four patients with complete response. The 1-year event-free survival was 70% for patients with rituximab. During the treatment, there were 3 hospitalizations, and the causes were: immune thrombocytopenia, a parapneumonic effusion, and a cerebral vascular event. The median length of hospital stay was twelve days.

CONCLUSION

A low dose of rituximab is an available and cost-effective option for patients with steroid-refractory cGvHD.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient's own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.

Cyclosporine A for the Prevention of Ocular Graft versus Host Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Is Safe and Feasible

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocular cyclosporine in the prevention of the development of ocular graft versus host disease (oGVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in comparison with historic data.

DESIGN

We developed a longitudinal, observational, prospective nonrandomized study. We evaluated the feasibility of prophylactic use of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) to prevent or decrease the incidence of oGVHD and compared this with historic data.

METHODS

Patients undergoing AHSCT were treated with prophylactic topical CsA for 12 months after engraftment, followed by serial ophthalmic evaluations, including the Schirmer test.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included. No serious adverse effects were reported. Poor adherence was documented in 15% of patients. In spite of observing extra-ocular GVHD (acute and chronic GVHD incidence of 50 and 45%, respectively), only 1 in 20 patients developed oGVHD over the 20-month follow-up for the entire cohort. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of oGVHD when compared to a historical cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical CsA as a prophylactic measure for oGVHD, administered over a period of 1 year after grafting, is safe and feasible and may decrease the incidence of ophthalmic manifestations of GVHD. These findings must be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Principles of alemtuzumab immunoablation in hematopoietic cell transplantation for non-malignant diseases in children: A review

Alemtuzumab is a humanized mAb targeted to CD52. Alemtuzumab is highly immunosuppressive with the ability to deplete T and B cells (in addition to other immune cell lines). A growing understanding of the PKs, dosing, and timing of administration of alemtuzumab has allowed for the study of its use as a conditioning agent for allogeneic HCT. The highly immunosuppressive properties of the drug are particularly appealing in the setting of non-malignant HCT, where GVHD provides no clinical benefit and relapse of malignancy is not applicable. In addition, the degree of immune suppression achieved with alemtuzumab has allowed for a reduction in the intensity of myeloablative cytotoxic agents included in some HCT conditioning regimens, allowing for fewer acute and late toxicities. This review paper will provide a comprehensive summary of the mechanism of action, PKs, dosing, and timing of alemtuzumab, a brief description of its use in various allogeneic HCT protocols for non-malignant conditions and a summary of the data regarding its use for GVHD therapy. The goal of this review was to provide an understanding as to how alemtuzumab might be safely incorporated into HCT conditioning regimens for children with non-malignant disease, allowing for expanded access to curative HCT therapy.

Graft-versus-host disease affecting oral cavity. A review

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is one of the most frequent and serious complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and is regarded as the leading cause of late mortality unrelated to the underlying malignant disease. GVHD is an autoimmune and alloimmune disorder that usually affects multiple organs and tissues, and exhibits a variable clinical course. It can manifest in either acute or chronic form. The acute presentation of GVHD is potentially fatal and typically affects the skin, gastrointestinal tract and liver. The chronic form is characterized by the involvement of a number of organs, including the oral cavity. Indeed, the oral cavity may be the only affected location in chronic GVHD. The clinical manifestations of chronic oral GVHD comprise lichenoid lesions, hyperkeratotic plaques and limited oral aperture secondary to sclerosis. The oral condition is usually mild, though moderate to severe erosive and ulcerated lesions may also be seen. The diagnosis is established from the clinical characteristics, though confirmation through biopsy study is sometimes needed. Local corticosteroids are the treatment of choice, offering overall response rates of close to 50%. Extracorporeal photopheresis and systemic corticosteroids in turn constitute second line treatment. Oral chronic GVHD is not considered a determinant factor for patient survival, which is close to 52% five years after diagnosis of the condition. Key words:Chronic graft-versus-host disease, oral chronic graft-versus-host disease, pathogenics, management, survival.

Review of therapies for the treatment of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease

Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease is a frequent complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, contributing to patient morbidity and mortality. Although an optimal treatment is not available, several systemic and topical or local therapies have shown efficacy in treating the disease. New therapies are being tested through clinical trials. This article examines the efficacy and safety of reported treatment modalities studied from 2006-2012. Nurses will encounter patients with oral chronic graft-versus-host disease suffering from pain, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Knowledge of new therapies found to be effective in managing these symptoms is imperative. Nurses play a key role in the assessment and management of this complex oral disease.

The emerging therapeutic role of antibody mixtures

A body of evidence suggests that a mixture of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be better than a single antibody. Several strategies have been developed to achieve multiple targeting, including the administration of two or more mAbs to the patient, bispecific antibodies and antibody mixtures. Recently, new antibody technologies based on a diverse array of antibodies binding to several different epitopes on any given antigen or antigens have been developed. One of the most promising is the Sympress™ manufacturing technology, which allows the production of an antibody mixture in just one bioreactor as a single drug substance. Recombinant antibody mixtures may be applicable to therapy of neoplastic, autoimmune and infectious diseases.

Monoclonal antibodies in neuroinflammatory diseases

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent an emerging and rapidly growing field of therapy in neuroinflammatory diseases. Adhesion molecule blockade by natalizumab represents the first approved mAb therapy in neurology, approved for therapy of highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). Removal of immune cells by anti-CD52 mAb alemtuzumab or anti-CD20 mAb rituximab are other prime examples with existing positive Phase II and Phase III trials. MS clearly represents the neuroinflammatory disease entity with the largest body of evidence. However, some of these approaches are currently investigated or translated for use in other, rare neuroinflammatory diseases, such as neuromyelitis optica (NMO), inflammatory neuropathies and (neuro)-muscular disorders.

AREAS COVERED

This review will highlight the most relevant therapeutic approaches involving mAbs in the field of neuroinflammatory diseases as published in peer-reviewed journals and presented on international meetings.

EXPERT OPINION

There is continuously growing evidence on the therapeutic relevance of mAbs in neuroinflammatory disorders. In MS meanwhile several studies have provided evidence for efficacy: In addition to natalizumab, approved in 2006, several other candidates are under development, the most eminent examples with the most advanced study programs being anti-CD52 alemtuzumab, anti-CD20 principles and anti-CD25 daclizumab. Other intriguing candidates are anti-IL-17 strategies, and interference with the complement pathway, partly also developed for other neuroinflammatory disorders.

Phase I study of alemtuzumab for therapy of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) carries a poor prognosis with no agreed upon algorithm for treatment. Because both B and T cells contribute to the pathophysiology of cGVHD, we conducted a phase I study in subjects with steroid-refractory cGVHD using the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab to transiently deplete most mononuclear subsets. Three regimens were investigated in a 3+3 dose-escalation design: 3 mg × 6 (dose level 1), 3 mg × 1, then 10 mg × 5 (dose level 2) and 3 mg × 1, 10 mg × 1, then 30 mg × 4 (dose level 3) administered over 4 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose of alemtuzumab was dose level 2. Thirteen patients were assessable for toxicities, which were primarily infectious and hematologic. Rates of infectious complications in the first 12 weeks were 0% at dose level 1 (n = 3), 50% at dose level 2 (1 death, n = 6), and 75% at dose level 3 (2 deaths, n = 4). Of 10 patients assessable for response, 7 (70%) responded at 12 weeks, with a 30% complete response rate. Four subjects reduced steroid dose or discontinued an immunosuppressant at 12 weeks. The median decrease in steroid dose at 1 year was 61.6%. Infectious complications occurred predominantly in the first 3 months after therapy, but full B and T cell recovery took well over 12 months. Immunophenotypic profiling revealed early recovery by natural killer cells and relative sparing of CD4+ and CD8+ central memory T cell subsets. Our study indicates that therapy with alemtuzumab for steroid-refractory cGVHD is tolerable with close attention to dosing and may be active in subjects who have failed multiple therapies. The pattern of lymphocyte recovery after alemtuzumab will inform the biology and future therapy of cGVHD. The use of alemtuzumab in the context of therapy for cGVHD deserves study in larger phase II trials.

Novel immunosuppression compounds and experimental therapies for chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a severe complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with a substantial impact on the quality of life and survival, still lacking with regard to an optimal therapeutic strategy. Corticosteroids are considered the standard of care for first-line treatment of chronic GVHD, but only a minority of the patients responds to them durably. Management of steroid-refractory chronic GVHD is not well defined. This review surveys novel treatment strategies, such as therapies that expand regulatory T cells, target B cells or target the processes implicated in fibrosis that may allow more effective control of chronic GVHD in the future. Most therapies are based solely on phase II trials or on retrospective analyses with a wide range of overall responses. Large, well-designed prospective studies are eagerly needed to establish better treatments, as well as valid biomarkers to identify the likelihood of the response to a drug in advance.