Tyrosine kinase inhibitors improve long-term outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

A review of immunotargeted therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: making progress in chemotherapy-free regimens

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PH + ALL) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality of B-ALL in adults and is associated with poor prognosis. Previously, the only curative treatment option in PH + ALL was allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Since 2000, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy, represented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib, has become the first-line treatment for PH + ALL. Currently, the remission rate and survival rate of Imatinib are superior to those of simple chemotherapy, and it can also improve the efficacy of transplantation. More recently, some innovative immune-targeted therapy greatly improved the prognosis of PH + ALL, such as Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin. For patients with ABL1 mutations and those who have relapsed or are refractory to other treatments, targeted oral small molecule drugs, monoclonal antibodies, Bispecific T cell Engagers (BiTE), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells immunotherapy are emerging as potential treatment options. These new therapeutic interventions are changing the treatment landscape for PH + ALL. In summary, this review discusses the current advancements in targeted therapeutic agents shift in the treatment strategy of PH + ALL towards using more tolerable chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation regimens confers better disease outcomes and might obviate the need for HSCT.

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: ten frequently asked questions

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between imatinib and dasatinib prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although the prognosis of Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has improved with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and stem cell transplantation, prevention of relapse after transplantation remains a concern. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of TKI prophylaxis with imatinib and dasatinib on long-term outcomes after transplantation.

METHODS

Patients with Ph+ ALL who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at first complete remission (CR1) and received TKI prophylaxis after allo-HSCT were included in this retrospective analysis. Two cohorts were established based on the choice of TKI prophylaxis: the imatinib (Ima) and dasatinib (Das) cohorts. The survival and safety outcomes of these cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients in the Ima cohort and 50 in the Das cohort were included. After a median follow-up of 50.6 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality rate, and overall survival in the Ima and Das cohorts were 16.1% and 12.5%, 5.2% and 9.8%, and 86.5% and 77.6%, respectively, with no statistical differences. The cumulative incidence of mild chronic graft-versus-host disease was higher in the Das cohort. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (64.7% vs. 69.5%). The Das cohort had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (25.5% vs. 2.3%) and gastrointestinal reaction (48.9% vs. 31.4%) than the Ima cohort. The proportion of patients treated on schedule was significantly lower in the Das cohort than in the Ima cohort, and drug intolerance was the main reason for protocol violation.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with Ph+ ALL undergoing allo-HSCT in CR1, imatinib prophylaxis achieved long-term outcomes similar to those of dasatinib.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a haematological malignancy characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature lymphoid cells. Over past decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of ALL, resulting in remarkable improvements in its diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Since the advent of chemotherapy, ALL has been the platform to test for innovative approaches applicable to cancer in general. For example, the advent of omics medicine has led to a deeper understanding of the molecular and genetic features that underpin ALL. Innovations in genomic profiling techniques have identified specific genetic alterations and mutations that drive ALL, inspiring new therapies. Targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies, have shown promising results in subgroups of patients while minimizing adverse effects. Furthermore, the development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy represents a breakthrough in ALL treatment, resulting in remarkable responses and potential long-term remissions. Advances are not limited to treatment modalities alone. Measurable residual disease monitoring and ex vivo drug response profiling screening have provided earlier detection of disease relapse and identification of exceptional responders, enabling clinicians to adjust treatment strategies for individual patients. Decades of supportive and prophylactic care have improved the management of treatment-related complications, enhancing the quality of life for patients with ALL.

Stem cell allografting for chronic Myeloid leukemia in the tyrosine kinase era - forgotten but not gone

Due to the remarkable success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is not first-line treatment for delivering durable, long-term survival. Consequently, alloSCT is reserved for patients with TKI-resistant or TKI-intolerant chronic phase CML (CP-CML) and advanced phase CML (AP-CML). Advances in transplant technology, such as high-resolution HLA typing, introduction of reduced intensity conditioning and increased alternative donor availability, coupled with improved supportive care, have significantly reduced transplant-related mortality and expanded the pool of transplant-eligible patients. Refinement of conditioning regimens, innovative use of post-transplant cellular and pharmacological therapies, and judicious post-transplant monitoring are important strategies for reducing risk of relapse. Given its potential to cure, alloSCT will invariably remain a key part of the treatment algorithm. This article reviews the data underpinning the role and outcomes of alloSCT and provides an update on current recommendations.

TIF1β activates leukemic transcriptional program in HSCs and promotes BCR::ABL1-induced myeloid leukemia

TIF1β/KAP1/TRIM28, a chromatin modulator, both represses and activates the transcription of genes in normal and malignant cells. Analyses of datasets on leukemia patients revealed that the expression level of TIF1β was increased in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at the blast crisis and acute myeloid leukemia. We generated a BCR::ABL1 conditional knock-in (KI) mouse model, which developed aggressive myeloid leukemia, and demonstrated that the deletion of the Tif1β gene inhibited the progression of myeloid leukemia and showed longer survival than that in BCR::ABL1 KI mice, suggesting that Tif1β drove the progression of BCR::ABL1-induced leukemia. In addition, the deletion of Tif1β sensitized BCR::ABL1 KI leukemic cells to dasatinib. The deletion of Tif1β decreased the expression levels of TIF1β-target genes and chromatin accessibility peaks enriched with the Fosl1-binding motif in BCR::ABL1 KI stem cells. TIF1β directly bound to the promoters of proliferation genes, such as FOSL1, in human BCR::ABL1 cells, in which TIF1β and FOSL1 bound to adjacent regions of chromatin. Since the expression of Fosl1 was critical for the enhanced growth of BCR::ABL1 KI cells, Tif1β and Fosl1 interacted to activate the leukemic transcriptional program in and cellular function of BCR::ABL1 KI stem cells and drove the progression of myeloid leukemia.

Ponatinib as a Prophylactic or Pre-Emptive Strategy to Prevent Cytological Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Transplanted in Complete Cytological Remission

The administration of TKIs after Allo-SCT in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) remains controversial, and the TKI approach (prophylactic, pre-emptive or salvage) is still heterogeneous in transplant centers. In this context, very little is known about the feasibility and safety of third-generation TKIs. In this paper, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ponatinib (PONA) administered after Allo-SCT to prevent cytologic relapse of Ph + ALL. This is a multicenter observational study including 48 patients (pts) with Ph + ALL (median age 49 years) who received PONA after Allo-SCT while in complete cytological remission (cCR); 26 (54%) had positive minimal residual disease (MRD pos) before Allo-SCT. PONA was administered after Allo-SCT prophylactically (starting with MRD neg) in 26 pts or pre-emptively (starting with MRD pos post-SCT and without hematological relapse) in 22 pts. Patients treated prophylactically with PONA started treatment earlier, at a median of 4.3 months (range 1.5-6) after Allo-SCT, than those treated pre-emptively, who started PONA at a median of 7.4 months (range 2-63) after Allo-SCT (p = 0.01). The median starting dose of PONA was 30 mg/day (range 15-45). A dose reduction was required in 10/48 (21%) of cases, but a permanent discontinuation of PONA, due to toxicity, was required in only 5/48 pts (10.5%). No deaths due to PONA-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. The median follow-up time after Allo-SCT was 34 months (range 7.7-118). At the last follow-up, the median duration of PONA therapy was 22 months (range 2-100). The 5-year OS and RFS after Allo-SCT were 92% and 71%, respectively. The 5-year RFS after Allo-SCT of pts who received PONA prophylaxis was 95%, and it was 57% for those who received PONA pre-emptively (log-rank p = 0.02). In conclusion, this multicenter analysis of 48 patients with Ph + ALL undergoing Allo-SCT while in CcR, although with the caution of the retrospective data, supports the feasibility of PONA maintenance strategy after Allo-SCT with a low rate of discontinuations (10.5%) due to PONA-related AE.

Total body irradiation versus thiotepa/busulfan-based conditioning regimens for myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens are generally recommended for allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Recent evidence suggests that modern chemotherapy-based regimens may be as effective. This multicenter retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of myeloablative allo-HSCT with thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (TTB) to TBI-based conditioning. Between 2002 to 2018, 63 and 114 patients received TTB- and TBI-based conditioning regimens, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was lower in the TBI cohort compared to the TTB cohort (30% [95% CI, 22-38] versus 47% [95% CI, 36-59]; P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified T-ALL, Ph-negative B-ALL, and measurable residual disease associated with a higher relapse risk. The 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapsed mortality (NRM) was significantly lower with TTB (12% [95% CI, 5-20]) compared to TBI (25% [95% CI, 18-33]) (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found TBI conditioning, older age, and advanced stages of ALL at transplantation associated with a higher NRM. No statistical difference was seen in overall survival (49% [95% CI, 40-58] and 46% [95% CI, 35-60]) in the TBI and TTB groups, respectively; P = 0.9). The study suggests that TTB-based conditioning may be a promising option for ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT, as it resulted in similar OS and lower NRM than TBI-based conditioning.

Management of ALL in adults: 2024 ELN recommendations from a European expert panel

ABSTRACT

Experts from the European Leukemia Net (ELN) working group for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia have identified an unmet need for guidance regarding management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from diagnosis to aftercare. The group has previously summarized their recommendations regarding diagnostic approaches, prognostic factors, and assessment of ALL. The current recommendation summarizes clinical management. It covers treatment approaches, including the use of new immunotherapies, application of minimal residual disease for treatment decisions, management of specific subgroups, and challenging treatment situations as well as late effects and supportive care. The recommendation provides guidance for physicians caring for adult patients with ALL which has to be complemented by regional expertise preferably provided by national academic study groups.

Reduced-intensity allogenic transplantation for children and adolescents with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Survival rates of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph+ALL) have improved considerably with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); however, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) continues to play an important role. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have been widely applied particularly for older patients, but their validity for children and adolescents with Ph+ALL has not been investigated. In this study, data from patients receiving HSCT for de novo Ph+ALL in first or second remission at ages younger than 25 years and with a history of pre-HSCT TKI therapy were retrospectively collected through the nationwide registry in Japan. In 265 patients who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 33 patients receiving RIC, 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 67.3% and 79.8%, respectively (p = 0.142). Multivariate analysis of LFS, focusing on patients with good performance status, identified RIC as a significant prognostic factor for LFS (hazard ratio 0.32, p = 0.032), as well as older age, higher leukocyte count at diagnosis, and disease with additional chromosomal abnormalities. These trends were similar when we focused on patients who received prophylactic post-HSCT TKI treatment, as 5-year LFS was 81.0% for MAC and 84.4% for RIC (p = 0.748). In summary, HSCT with RIC regimen showed at least comparable LFS to HSCT with MAC regimen, and RIC was an independent favorable prognostic factor on multivariate analysis adjusting potential prognostic factors. While patient numbers were limited, our data suggest that RIC may be safely applied in this group, particularly combined with prophylactic post-HSCT TKI maintenance therapy.

Philadelphia Chromosome Positive and Philadelphia-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents: Current Management, Controversies and Emerging Concepts

Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) is an uncommon subtype of ALL in children, seen in 2-5% cases. Diagnostic evaluation includes conventional karyotyping and detection of BCR-ABL1 translocation by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). For children, the frontline management includes combination of intensive chemotherapy along with imatinib (300-340 mg/m2/d) or dasatinib (60-80 mg/m2/d). Imatinib/dasatinib should be introduced in induction as soon as results for BCR-ABL are available. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is essential; multi-parametric flowcytometry and immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor rearrangement PCR are the preferred methods. Intrathecal therapy with at least 12 doses of methotrexate is adequate for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, but cranial radiation is necessary for CNS3 involvement. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission may be considered in high-risk cases (persistent MRD positivity/induction failure). Maintenance therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in children is debatable, with potential concerns for long term adverse effects. At relapse, the choice of TKI is guided by the presence of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain resistance mutations, although the frequency of resistance mutations in children are lower. Allogeneic HSCT is essential for consolidation in second remission, if not done. Ph-like ALL is a newly recognized molecular entity, with gene expression profile similar to Ph+ALL and poor survival outcomes. In resource-constrained settings, a stepwise cost-effective diagnostic evaluation should be considered among high-risk patients without recurrent genetic abnormalities. Current treatment strategies remain similar to Ph-negative ALL. Enrolment in clinical trials is encouraged for such children to evaluate potential targeted agents in this subtype.

Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed

Despite the dramatic improvements in outcomes for the majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients over the past 2 decades, a similar improvement has not been observed in the more advanced stages of the disease. Blast phase CML (BP-CML), although infrequent, remains poorly understood and inadequately treated. Consequently, the key initial goal of therapy in a newly diagnosed patient with chronic phase CML continues to be prevention of disease progression. Advances in genomic investigation in CML, specifically related to BP-CML, clearly demonstrate we have only scratched the surface in our understanding of the disease biology, a prerequisite to devising more targeted and effective therapeutic approaches to prevention and treatment. Importantly, the introduction of the concept of "CML-like" acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has the potential to simplify the differentiation between BCR::ABL1-positive ALL from de novo lymphoid BP-CML, optimizing monitoring and therapeutics. The development of novel treatment strategies such as the MATCHPOINT approach for BP-CML, utilizing combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin in addition to dose-modified ponatinib, may also be an important step in improving treatment outcomes. However, identifying patients who are high risk of transformation remains a challenge, and the recent 2022 updates to the international guidelines may add further confusion to this area. Further work is required to clarify the identification and treatment strategy for the patients who require a more aggressive approach than standard chronic phase CML management.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults: Therapeutic Options and Challenges in 2023

The therapeutic landscape of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for adults has dramatically changed over the past 2 decades; the emergence of newer generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and incorporation of targeted immunotherapies into front-line therapy have significantly improved outcomes to the point where an argument can be made that this entity may no longer be considered a high-risk ALL subgroup. In this review article, we discuss different front-line regimens (both intensive and deintensified regimens including chemotherapy-free regimens). We also review disease monitoring strategies, discuss the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and discuss the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape for patients with relapsed disease.

A pilot study of implication of machine learning for relapse prediction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The posttransplant relapse in Ph-positive ALL increases the risk of death. There is an unmet need for instruments to predict the risk of relapse and plan prophylaxis. In this study, we analyzed posttransplant data by machine learning algorithms. Seventy-four Ph-positive ALL patients with a median age of 30 (range 18-55) years who previously underwent allo-HSCT, were retrospectively enrolled. Ninety-three percent of patients received prophylactic/preemptive TKIs after allo-HSCT. The values of the BCR::ABL1 level at serial assessments and over variables were collected in specified intervals after allo-HSCT. They were used to model relapse risk with several machine-learning approaches. GBM proved superior to the other algorithms and provided a maximal AUC score of 0.91. BCR::ABL1 level before and after allo-HSCT, prediction moment, and chronic GvHD had the highest value in the model. It was shown that after Day + 100, both error rates do not exceed 22%, while before D + 100, the model fails to make accurate predictions. As a result, we determined BCR::ABL1 levels at which the relapse risk remains low. Thus, the current BCR::ABL1 level less than 0.06% in patients with chronic GvHD predicts low risk of relapse. At the same time, patients without chronic GVHD after allo-HSCT should be classified as high risk with any level of BCR::ABL1. GBM model with posttransplant laboratory values of BCR::ABL1 provides a high prediction of relapse after allo-HSCT in the era of TKIs prophylaxis. Validation of this approach is warranted.

Dasatinib with intensive chemotherapy in de novo paediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (CA180-372/COG AALL1122): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The outcome of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia significantly improved with the combination of imatinib and intensive chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib, a second-generation ABL-class inhibitor, with intensive chemotherapy in children with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

METHODS

CA180-372/COG AALL1122 was a joint Children's Oncology Group (COG) and European intergroup study of post-induction treatment of Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL) open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Eligible patients (aged >1 year to <18 years) with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and performance status of at least 60% received EsPhALL chemotherapy plus dasatinib 60 mg/m² orally once daily from day 15 of induction. Patients with minimal residual disease of at least 0·05% after induction 1B or who were positive for minimal residual disease after the three consolidation blocks were classified as high risk and allocated to receive haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission. The remaining patients were considered standard risk and received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy compared with external historical controls. The trial was considered positive if one of the following conditions was met: superiority over chemotherapy alone in the AIEOP-BFM 2000 high-risk group; or non-inferiority (with a margin of -5%) or superiority to imatinib plus chemotherapy in the EsPhALL 2010 cohort. All participants who received at least one dose of dasatinib were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01460160, and recruitment is closed.

FINDINGS

Between March 13, 2012, and May 27, 2014, 109 patients were enrolled at 69 sites (including 51 COG sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia, and 18 EsPhALL sites in Italy and the UK). Three patients were ineligible and did not receive dasatinib. 106 patients were treated and included in analyses (49 [46%] female and 57 [54%] male; 85 [80%] White, 13 [12%] Black or African American, five [5%] Asian, and three [3%] other races; 24 [23%] Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). All 106 treated patients reached complete remission; 87 (82%) were classified as standard risk and 19 (18%) met HSCT criteria and were classified as high risk, but only 15 (14%) received HSCT in first complete remission. The 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone (65·5% [90% Clopper-Pearson CI 57·7 to 73·7] vs 49·2% [38·0 to 60·4]; p=0·032), and was non-inferior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (59·1% [51·8 to 66·2], 90% CI of the treatment difference: -3·3 to 17·2), but not superior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (65·5% vs 59·1%; p=0·27). The most frequent grade 3-5 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=93) and bacteraemia (n=21). Nine remission deaths occurred, which were due to infections (n=5), transplantation-related (n=2), due to cardiac arrest (n=1), or had an unknown cause (n=1). No dasatinib-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Dasatinib plus EsPhALL chemotherapy is safe and active in paediatric Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. 3-year event-free survival was similar to that of previous Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trials despite the limited use of HSCT in first complete remission.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has improved over time with the incorporation of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment landscape as well as the recent approval of immunotherapeutic agents allowing a larger proportion of patients to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) which is still considered a potential curative approach. However, relapse post-transplant is still occurring and constitutes a common cause of treatment failure in B-ALL. The present review aims to discuss the novel strategies and therapies used to prevent and overcome relapse post allo-HCT in patients with ALL, focusing on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome positive B-ALL, the role of innovative agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin, and finally the role of cellular therapy.

Effects of different types of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation donors on Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia during the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Matched donor (MD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently the preferred choice of treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) patients who have achieved complete remission. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of allo-HSCTs from different donor types for Ph+ ALL patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

Studies in EMBASE and MEDLINE between inception and December 2020 were identified using search terms related to "Ph+ ALL" and "HSCT." Eligible studies were studies with Ph+ ALL patients who received a TKI and allo-HSCT. The primary outcomes of interest-the overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS)-needed to be reported. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to combine the effect estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each donor type.

RESULTS

Fourteen cohort studies were identified for the meta-analysis. Haploidentical (HID)-HSCT for Ph+ ALL patients resulted in a superior RFS to MD-HSCT, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.57 (95% CI, 1.05-2.32; I2 = 0%). However, HID-HSCT and MD-HSCT had comparable OS. Furthermore, HID-HSCT group had a significantly lower relapse rate than MD-HSCT group. On the other hand, the risks of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were higher for HID-HSCT and pooled OR of chronic GvHD rate. The OS and RFS of matched sibling-HSCT, matched unrelated-HSCT, and cord blood-HSCT were comparable with those of HID-HSCT.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that HID-HSCT is as effective as MD-HSCT in Ph+ ALL patients.

Chemotherapy with the use of next-generation TKIs based on MRD has the potential to avoid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treatment for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as postremission treatment is recommended for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in current guidelines. However, comparisons of later generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy with allo-HSCT have yielded similar outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate allo-HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) versus chemotherapy for adult Ph+ ALL in the TKI era.

METHODS

Pooled assessment of the hematologic and molecular complete response rates was performed after 3-month TKI treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with allo-HSCT. The effect of measurable residual disease status on survival benefit was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine retrospective and prospective single-arm cohort studies involving 5054 patients were included. Combined HRs indicated that in the general population, allo-HSCT favorably influenced DFS and OS. Achieving complete molecular remission (CMR) within 3 months after starting induction was a favorable survival prognostic factor regardless of whether the patient had undergone allo-HSCT. Among the patients with CMR, survival rates in the nontransplant subgroup were comparable with those in the transplant subgroup, with the estimated 5-year OS of 64% versus 58% and 5-year DFS of 58% versus 51%, respectively. The use of next-generation TKIs results in a higher proportion of patients achieving CMR (ponatinib 82% vs. imatinib 53%), while improving survival in nontransplant patients.

CONCLUSION

Our novel findings suggest that combination chemotherapy plus TKIs leads to a comparable survival benefit as with allo-HSCT for MRD-negative (CMR) patients. This study provides novel evidence for allo-HSCT indications for Ph+ ALL in CR1 in the TKI era.

Management of children and adolescents with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase: International pediatric CML expert panel recommendations

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia has improved significantly with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and treatment guidelines based on numerous clinical trials are available for chronic phase disease. However for CML in the blast phase (CML-BP), prognosis remains poor and treatment options are much more limited. The spectrum of treatment strategies for children and adolescents with CML-BP has largely evolved empirically and includes treatment principles derived from adult CML-BP and pediatric acute leukemia. Given this heterogeneity of treatment approaches, we formed an international panel of pediatric CML experts to develop recommendations for consistent therapy in children and adolescents with this high-risk disease based on the current literature and national standards. Recommendations include detailed information on initial diagnosis and treatment monitoring, differentiation from Philadelphia-positive acute leukemia, subtype-specific selection of induction therapy, and combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Given that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation currently remains the primary curative intervention for CML-BP, we also provide recommendations for the timing of transplantation, donor and graft selection, selection of a conditioning regimen and prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease, post-transplant TKI therapy, and management of molecular relapse. Management according to the treatment recommendations presented here is intended to provide the basis for the design of future prospective clinical trials to improve outcomes for this challenging disease.

Prophylactic or preemptive tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Prevention of disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains a major concern. Maintenance therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after allo-HCT has been used to reduce the incidence of relapse. Two main strategies are employed for using TKIs after allo-HCT: prophylactic TKI therapy, which is given before measurable residual disease (MRD) detection, and preemptive TKI therapy, which is given after MRD detection. These strategies both have advantages and disadvantages in terms of treatment efficacy, adverse events, adherence, and socioeconomic factors. In addition, many issues remain to be resolved because of the lack of large prospective studies on how to use TKIs after allo-HCT. These include indications for prophylactic and preemptive TKI therapy, timing of initiation, frequency of MRD monitoring, TKI selection, dose, and treatment duration. While the current available evidence is extremely limited, this article will discuss these issues after summarizing some representative and recent studies. It will also share a novel indicator that can be used to visualize the reversible transition between molecular relapse and remission by TKI therapy.

Autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is an option for elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively compared results of RIC-allo-HCT from either a matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 209) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 209) with autologous (auto, n = 142) HCT for patients aged 55 years or more treated in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2018. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years were 34% for RIC-allo-HCT versus 39% for auto-HCT (p = 0.11) while overall survival (OS) rates were 42% versus 45% (p = 0.23), respectively. The incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 41% versus 51% (p = 0.22) and 25% versus 10% (p = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate model, using auto-HCT as reference, the risk of NRM was increased for MSD-HCT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, p = 0.02) and MUD-HCT (HR = 3.08, p < 0.001), which for MUD-HCT translated into a decreased chance of LFS (HR = 1.55, p = 0.01) and OS (HR = 1.62, p = 0.008). No significant associations were found with respect to the risk of relapse. We conclude that for patients with ALL in CR1, aged above 55 years, auto-HCT may be considered a transplant option alternative to RIC-allo-HCT, although its value requires verification in prospective trials.

How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

How I treat with maintenance therapy after allogeneic HCT

Disease relapse is the leading cause of failure for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Maintenance therapy administered after allo-HCT is a promising strategy to reduce the incidence of relapse and enhance the curative potential of allo-HCT. Research investigations and clinical applications of this approach have greatly increased in recent years, with an expanding number of available therapeutic agents to introduce in the posttransplant setting. However, many questions and challenges remain regarding the feasibility and clinical impact of maintenance. In this article, we present four common case scenarios addressing select available therapeutic agents as a framework to review published data and ongoing studies and describe our current standard practice in the rapidly evolving field of maintenance therapy after allo-HCT.

Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine conditioning-regimen is a promising approach for older adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation

For acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, total body irradiation (TBI)- based conditioning regimens are the first choice specially in young population. However, several studies have shown an equivalence in clinical outcomes with thiotepa-based conditioning regimen. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the outcome of adult ALL patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with a thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) myeloablative conditioning regimen with reduced toxicity. Fifty-five patients received a TBF regimen. The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 17 to 72.4). Most patients had a diagnosis of B-ALL (93%) with 7% having T-ALL. Two - and 5-year overall survival was 73.2% and 64%, respectively. At 2 years, leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were 59.5% and 57.6%, and at 5 years, 53.4% and 51.8%, respectively. The 5-year non-relapse mortality was 15%. The day 180 cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 38.2% and 5.5%, respectively. At 2 years, the CI of chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD was 16.9% and 1.9%, respectively. Our study results do suggest that using TBF as the conditioning regimen in adult ALL patients is a promising option with acceptable toxicity.

The role of allogeneic transplant for adult Ph+ ALL in CR1 with complete molecular remission: a retrospective analysis

Historically, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with poor outcomes, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended in first complete remission (CR1). However, in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, rapid attainment of a complete molecular remission (CMR) is associated with excellent outcomes without allo-HCT, suggesting transplant may not be required for these patients. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively identified adult patients with Ph+ ALL treated with induction therapy, including TKIs, and attained CMR within 90 days of diagnosis at 5 transplant centers in the United States. We compared outcomes of those who did and did not receive allo-HCT in first remission. We identified 230 patients (allo-HCT: 98; non-HCT: 132). The allo-HCT cohort was younger with better performance status. On multivariable analysis (MVA), allo-HCT was not associated with improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.63-1.73) or relapse-free survival (aHR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.37) compared with non-HCT treatment. Allo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (aHR: 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62) but higher non-relapse mortality (aHR: 2.59; 95% CI, 1.37-4.89). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed results of MVA. Comparison of reduced-intensity HCT to non-HCT showed no statistically significant difference in any of the above endpoints. In conclusion, adult patients with Ph+ ALL who achieved CMR within 90 days of starting treatment did not derive a survival benefit from allo-HCT in CR1 in this retrospective study.

Real world outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation-A single institution experience

Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with a worse prognosis compared to Ph negative ALL. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has led to an improvement in response rates and survival, thus becoming a critical component of therapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Ph+ ALL patients treated at the University of Michigan who received TKI therapy pre- and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from April 2007 to November 2019. The study included 40 patients with Ph+ ALL (47.5% female) with a median age of 54 (24-69) years. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached, with a 5-year EFS of 61%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 5-year OS of 71%. There was no difference in 2-year EFS or OS for patients on pre-transplant imatinib or dasatinib (p = 0.16, 0.09, respectively), though definitive conclusions are challenging as post-transplant TKI therapy was variable. The incidence of any grade acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 62.5% (25/40) and any grade chronic GVHD was 77.5% (31/40). Complete molecular remission (CMR) was achieved in 57.5% of patients pre-transplant with no significant difference when stratified by induction TKI (p = 1). Achievement of CMR pre-HSCT showed a trend towards improved 2-year EFS (p=0.0198) but did not significantly change 2-year OS (p = 1). Patients receiving 1^st and 2^nd generation TKIs pre- and post-HSCT seem to have favorable outcomes, although type of TKI (pre-HSCT) did not significantly impact EFS or OS. In addition, attaining a CMR pre-transplant improved EFS, but did not change OS.

Modern Management Options for Ph+ ALL

Simple Summary

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has represented a major step forward in the therapy of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Recent improvements in the therapy are focused on early use of third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, their combination with immunotherapy, the refined indication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the optimal use and duration of maintenance therapy, and the management of patients with molecular or hematological relapse with combination of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, including cellular therapies. Improvements in the assessment of measurable residual disease and in the detection of mutations in the ABL1 domain are contributing to the better selection of the therapy for newly diagnosed as well as for relapsed or refractory patients.

Abstract

Impressive advances have been achieved in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) since the initial concurrent use of imatinib and standard chemotherapy. The attenuation of chemotherapy has proven to be equally effective and less toxic, the use of third generation TKI upfront has improved the frequency of complete molecular response and the survival rate, and the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immunotherapy has further increased the rate of molecular response to 70–80% after consolidation, which has been translated into a survival rate of 75–90% in recent trials. As a result of these improvements, the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being redefined. The methodology of measurable residual disease assessment and the detection of ABL1 mutations are also improving and will contribute to a more precise selection of the treatment for newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. Finally, new compounds combined with immunotherapeutic approaches, including cellular therapy, are being used as rescue therapy and will hopefully be included in first line therapy in the near future. This article will review and update the modern management of patients with Ph+ ALL.

Safety and outcomes of maintenance therapy with third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with T315I mutation

Studies using third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as maintenance therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) harboring the T315I mutation remain scarce. We conducted a cohort study to evaluate the safety and outcomes of ponatinib maintenance therapy after HCT in Ph+ALL patients with T315I mutation. BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations were assessed using direct sequencing. Twenty-six Ph+ALL patients with T315I mutation who received allogeneic HCT were enrolled. After HCT, ponatinib was administered as a prophylactic regimen (n = 12) or a preemptive therapy (n = 7). Seven patients did not receive maintenance therapy. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 69.4 % of patients with ponatinib maintenance, but most presented with mild toxicities. Serious non-hematological AEs were not observed. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse in patients receiving prophylactic ponatinib were 81.5 %, 91.7 %, and 18.5 %, respectively, whereas they were 39.8 %, 46.0 %, and 48.4 % in the total cohort, respectively. The measurable BCR-ABL transcripts in the first three months after HCT was associated with poor DFS and OS, even with ponatinib therapy. We concluded that maintenance therapy with ponatinib is safe after HCT. Patients with T315I mutation who received prophylactic regimen showed promising results with an acceptable relapse rate and encouraging survival. However, patients with measurable BCR-ABL transcripts early post-transplant had poor outcomes.

JAK2 Alterations in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Molecular Insights for Superior Precision Medicine Strategies

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer, arising from immature lymphocytes that show uncontrolled proliferation and arrested differentiation. Genomic alterations affecting Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) correlate with some of the poorest outcomes within the Philadelphia-like subtype of ALL. Given the success of kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, the discovery of activating JAK2 point mutations and JAK2 fusion genes in ALL, was a breakthrough for potential targeted therapies. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these alterations activate JAK2 and promote downstream signaling is poorly understood. Furthermore, as clinical data regarding the limitations of approved JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative disorders matures, there is a growing awareness of the need for alternative precision medicine approaches for specific JAK2 lesions. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms behind ALL-associated JAK2 mutations and JAK2 fusion genes, known and potential causes of JAK-inhibitor resistance, and how JAK2 alterations could be targeted using alternative and novel rationally designed therapies to guide precision medicine approaches for these high-risk subtypes of ALL.

Monoclonal antibodies: new chance in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to see the progress of several clinically-used monoclonal antibodies in treating ALL patients and how they improved patients' outcomes.

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, Elsevier and PubMed for relevant published studies, and summarized eligible evidence on the management of newly-diagnosed and relapsed or refractory ALL with monoclonal antibodies. Ongoing trials were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, prolonged patients' complete remission duration and overall survival when combined with hyper-CVAD regimen. Another anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Ofatumumab, was reported to have similar benefits. Blinatumomab allows endogenous CD3-positive cytotoxic T cells to target and eliminate CD19-positive blasts. FDA has approved its efficacy in patients with R/R B-ALL and eliminating minimal residual disease (MRD). It serves as a bridge to eradicate MRD before transplantation, and may also be a new choice for patients unable to undergo transplantation. An anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody named Inotuzumab Ozogamicin showed great improvement in patients' outcome, but its toxicity to liver is also worthy of our attention.

CONCLUSION

Monoclonal antibodies are proven to be a promising immunotherapeutic strategy to improve ALL patients' outcome in the long term. There's still a need for individualized treatment with effective and well-tolerated medicines.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01363128.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01466179.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02013167.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02000427.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01564784.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03677596.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01363297.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981628.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03094611.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01371630.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04224571.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02458014.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04546399.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02879695.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03913559.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03441061.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03739814.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02877303.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03698552.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04601584.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04684147.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04681105.

Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults

Simple Summary

Outcome of patients with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) dramatically improved during the past 20 years with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Their great efficacy in young and fit patients led to question our reliance on chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Moreover, these well-tolerated treatments can be safely administrated even in the elderly that represent the majority of Ph+ ALL patient. This review will focus on the recent changes of paradigm in the management of Ph+ ALL patients and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is the most common subtype of B-ALL in adults and its incidence increases with age. It is characterized by the presence of BCR-ABL oncoprotein that plays a central role in the leukemogenesis of Ph+ ALL. Ph+ ALL patients traditionally had dismal prognosis and long-term survivors were only observed among patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). However, feasibility of allo-HSCT is limited in this elderly population. Fortunately, development of increasingly powerful tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) from the beginning of the 2000′s dramatically improved the prognosis of Ph+ ALL patients with complete response rates above 90%, deep molecular responses and prolonged survival, altogether with good tolerance. TKIs became the keystone of Ph+ ALL management and their great efficacy led to develop reduced-intensity chemotherapy backbones. Subsequent introduction of blinatumomab allowed going further with development of chemo free strategies. This review will focus on these amazing recent advances as well as novel therapeutic strategies in adult Ph+ ALL.

20-Year Steady Increase in Survival of Adult Patients with Relapsed Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

PURPOSE

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the first cause of transplant failure in patients with Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In other hematologic malignancies, therapeutic advances resulted in significant improvement over time in survival of patients relapsing after transplant.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We compared outcomes at European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) participating centers of 899 adult patients with Ph+ ALL who relapsed between 2000 and 2019 after allo-HCT performed in first complete remission. Median follow-up for alive patients was 56 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 116 patients relapsed between 2000 and 2004, 225 between 2005 and 2009, 294 between 2010 and 2014, and 264 between 2015 and 2019. Patient and transplant characteristics were similar over the four time periods except for a progressive increase in unrelated donors, peripheral blood stem cells, reduced intensity conditioning, and in vivo T-cell depletion and a progressive decrease in total body irradiation. The 2-year overall survival (OS) after relapse increased from 27.8% for patients relapsing between 2000 and 2004 to 54.8% for 2015 and 2019 (P = 0.001). A second allo-HCT within 2 years after relapse was performed in 13.9% of patients resulting in a 2-year OS of 35.9%. In multivariate analysis, OS from relapse was positively affected by a longer time from transplant to relapse and the year of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a major progressive improvement in OS from posttransplant relapse for patients with Ph+ ALL over the years, likely multifactorial including transplant-related factors, posttransplant salvage, and improvement in supportive care. These large-scale real-world data can serve as a benchmark for future studies in this setting. See related commentary by Gale, p. 813.

What Is the Role of HSCT in Philadelphia-Chromosome-Positive and Philadelphia-Chromosome-Like ALL in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Era?

Previously, the outcome of paediatric Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL treated with conventional chemotherapy alone was poor, necessitating the use of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the best outcomes. The recent addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alongside the chemotherapy regimens for Ph+ ALL has markedly improved outcomes, replacing the need for HSCT for lower risk patients. An additional poor prognosis group of Philadelphia-chromosome-like (Ph-like) ALL has also been identified. This group also can be targeted by TKIs in combination with chemotherapy, but the role of HSCT in this population is not clear. The impact of novel targeted immunotherapies (chimeric antigen receptor T cells and bispecific or drug-conjugated antibodies) has improved the outcome of patients, in combination with chemotherapy, and made the role of HSCT as the optimal curative therapy for Ph+ ALL and Ph-like ALL less clear. The prognosis of patients with Ph+ ALL and persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of consolidation despite TKI therapy or with additional genetic risk factors remains inferior when HSCT is not used. For such high-risk patients, HSCT using total-body-irradiation-containing conditioning is currently recommended. This review aims to provide an update on the current and future role of HSCT for Ph+ ALL and addresses key questions related to the management of these patients, including the role of HSCT in first complete remission, MRD evaluation and related actions post HSCT, TKI usage post HSCT, and the putative role of HSCT in Ph-like ALL.

Blast and accelerated phase CML: room for improvement

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). With TKI therapy, the percentage of patients who progress to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML has decreased from more than 20% to 1% to 1.5% per year. Although AP- and BP-CML occur in a minority of patients, outcomes in these patients are significantly worse compared with chronic phase CML, with decreased response rates and duration of response to TKI. Despite this, TKIs have improved outcomes in advanced phase CML, particularly in de novo AP patients, but are often inadequate for lasting remissions. The goal of initial therapy in advanced CML is a return to a chronic phase followed by consideration for bone marrow transplantation. The addition of induction chemotherapy with TKI is often necessary for achievement of a second chronic phase. Given the small population of patients with advanced CML, development of novel treatment strategies and investigational agents is challenging, although clinical trial participation is encouraged in AP and BP patients, whenever possible. We review the overall management approach to advanced CML, including TKI selection, combination therapy, consideration of transplant, and novel agents.

Comparison of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and TKI combined with chemotherapy for adult philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study seeks to clarify whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is necessary for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in post-remission based on a comparison with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and limited the date range for the studies from January 2010 to August 2020. A hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed to assess overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), and an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was used to evaluate the ratio of non-relapsed mortality (NRM) and non-relapsed survival (NRS). All analyses were conducted with Stata software 16.0 and Revman 5.3.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, totaling 959 patients, were included in our analysis. Among those patients, 473 underwent allo-HSCT, and 486 received TKI plus chemotherapy. The pooled results showed no difference in OS between outcomes for patients receiving TKI plus chemotherapy and those treated with allo-HSCT (HR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.51-1.12], p = 0.16). Patients undergoing allo-HSCT did better than those receiving TKI plus chemotherapy regarding RFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.37-0.63], p = 0.00), and NRS (OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.25-5.57], p = 0.00). The NRM rate of the TKI plus chemotherapy group was significantly lower than the allo-HSCT group (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.51-3.59], p = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

TKI combined with chemotherapy can be considered a post-remission treatment option for adult Ph+ ALL patients who are ineligible for allo-HSCT. However, more prospective studies with large sample sizes should be carried out in the future.

Targeting the CDK6 Dependence of Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Ph+ ALL is a poor-prognosis leukemia subtype driven by the BCR-ABL1 oncogene, either the p190- or the p210-BCR/ABL isoform in a 70:30 ratio. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the drugs of choice in the therapy of Ph+ ALL. In combination with standard chemotherapy, TKIs have markedly improved the outcome of Ph+ ALL, in particular if this treatment is followed by bone marrow transplantation. However, resistance to TKIs develops with high frequency, causing leukemia relapse that results in <5-year overall survival. Thus, new therapies are needed to address relapsed/TKI-resistant Ph+ ALL. We have shown that expression of cell cycle regulatory kinase CDK6, but not of the highly related CDK4 kinase, is required for the proliferation and survival of Ph+ ALL cells. Comparison of leukemia suppression induced by treatment with the clinically-approved dual CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib versus CDK6 silencing revealed that the latter treatment was markedly more effective, probably reflecting inhibition of CDK6 kinase-independent effects. Thus, we developed CDK4/6-targeted proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) that preferentially degrade CDK6 over CDK4. One compound termed PROTAC YX-2-107, which degrades CDK6 by recruiting the Cereblon ubiquitin ligase, markedly suppressed leukemia burden in mice injected with de novo or TKI-resistant Ph+ ALL. The effect of PROTAC YX-2-107 was comparable or superior to that of palbociclib. The development of CDK6-selective PROTACs represents an effective strategy to exploit the “CDK6 dependence” of Ph+ ALL cells while sparing a high proportion of normal hematopoietic progenitors that depend on both CDK6 and CDK6 for their survival. In combination with other agents, CDK6-selective PROTACs may be valuable components of chemotherapy-free protocols for the therapy of Ph+ ALL and other CDK6-dependent hematological malignancies.

Newly proposed threshold and validation of white blood cell count at diagnosis for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: risk assessment of relapse in patients with negative minimal residual disease at transplantation-a report from the Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Working Group of the JSTCT

White blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis is the conventional prognostic factor in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). Nevertheless, little is known about the impact of WBC at diagnosis considering the minimal residual disease (MRD) status at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We evaluated adult patients with Ph⁺ ALL who achieved negative-MRD and received HCT in first complete remission between 2006 and 2018. The entire cohort was temporally divided into derivation (n = 258) and validation cohorts (n  =  366). Using a threshold of 15,000/μL, which was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the derivation cohort, high WBC was associated with an increased risk of hematological relapse in both the derivation cohort (25.3% vs. 11.6% at 7 years, P = 0.004) and the validation cohort (16.2% vs. 8.5% at 3 years, P = 0.025). In multivariate analyses, high WBC was a strong predictor of hematological relapse in the derivation cohort (HR, 2.52, 95%CI 1.32-4.80, P = 0.005) and in the validation cohort (HR, 2.32, 95%CI, 1.18-4.55; P = 0.015). In conclusion, WBC at diagnosis with a new threshold of 15,000/μL should contribute to better risk stratification in patients with negative-MRD at HCT.

Emerging tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction: The broadening of targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies markedly impacted on the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed the history of Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL. Nowadays, almost all Ph+ ALL patients treated with TKIs achieve a complete hematologic response, and most become minimal residual disease negative. In Ph- ALL, genomic profiling studies have identified a subtype associated with a high relapse risk and a transcriptional profile similar to that of Ph+ ALL, the so-called Ph-like ALL. Given the high prevalence of kinase-activating lesions in this subset, there is compelling evidence from experimental models and clinical observations favoring TKI administration.Areas covered: We discuss the main findings exploring the efficacy of TKIs in ALL.Expert opinion: The use of more potent TKIs will further enhance the inhibitory activity on leukemia cells and increase the possibility of eradicating the disease at a molecular level. In the future, 'combined' approaches of different inhibitors may be considered to prevent/avoid resistance and/or mutations. A rapid identification of Ph-like ALL patients is needed to propose early TKI-based intervention. Several questions remain open, including the initial TKI choice in Ph+ ALL and whether Ph-like ALL patients might benefit from immunotherapy.

Novel Indicators of Transplant Outcomes for PhALL: Current Molecular-Relapse-Free Survival

Molecular relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been thought to predict clinical relapse in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PhALL). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) administration after allo-HCT may dynamically change the status from molecular relapse to molecular remission, but these state changes cannot be accurately represented by conventional survival indicators such as relapse-free survival, where events are usually considered irreversible. We aimed to develop novel indicators of transplant outcomes for allo-HCT recipients with PhALL and to visualize current molecular-relapse-free survival (CMRFS) and current on-TKI status (CTKI), treating molecular relapse or TKI administration after allo-HCT as a reversible event. We retrospectively analyzed 286 patients with PhALL who received allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in order to develop the indicators. CMRFS was defined as the probability of molecular remission without clinical relapse or death at any time after allo-HCT. Similarly, CTKI was defined as the probability of TKI administration without clinical relapse or death at any time after allo-HCT. The 1- and 5-year CMRFS rates were 67% and 59%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 5-year conventional molecular relapse-free survival rates were 42% and 37%. The 1- and 5-year CTKI rates were 14% and 8%, respectively. In a post hoc analysis focusing on patients who had achieved a molecular complete remission within 6 weeks (n = 201), the 5-year CMRFS rate (71%) was similar to the 5-year conventional molecular relapse-free survival (molRFS) rate (70%) in the non-TKI group. On the other hand, the 5-year CMRFS rate in the TKI group was 61%, whereas the 5-year conventional molRFS rate was only 38%. CMRFS and CTKI might become useful indicators of transplant success in terms of survival, leukemia-free status, and treatment-free status at any time point. Future extension of these survival models to other clinical situations is warranted.

The impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

In the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still the most potential approach for cure of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). TKI plus chemotherapy has strikingly increased response rates and depth of response, and facilitated allo-HSCT, which decreases relapse and improves survival eventually. Meanwhile, for those with older age or comorbidities at diagnosis, TKI in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy or chemotherapy-free strategy reduces treatment-related mortality, deferred intensive chemotherapy increases molecular responses and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT improves survival finally. Of note, according to minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR/ABL1 kinase domain mutation screening, prophylactic or preemptive maintenance therapy with a sensitive TKI decreases relapse further. Regarding transplantation-related mortality and impaired quality of life related to complications of allo-HSCT, autologous-HSCT (auto-HSCT) among those with early and persistent molecular remission and the most potent TKI ponatinib plus intensive chemotherapy has exhibited non-inferior survival to allo-HSCT. Even so, risk-adapted strategy isn't available now. Lastly, outcomes of relapse after allo-HSCT are dismal due to TKIs exposure, and new therapeutic interventions combined with TKIs shed light on this thorny problem.

Molecular-based and antibody-based targeted pharmacological approaches in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction: Despite the significant survival improvement in childhood acutelymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 15-20% of patients continue to relapse; outcomes following relapse remain suboptimal and have room for further improvement. Advances in genomics have shed new insights on the biology of ALL, led to the discovery of novel genomically defined ALL subtypes, refined prognostic significance and revealed new therapeutic vulnerabilities.Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of the genomic landscape of childhood ALL and highlight recent advances in molecular-based and antibody-based pharmacological approaches in the treatment of childhood ALL, from emerging preclinical evidence to published results of completed clinical trials.Expert opinion: Molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies have expanded the horizons of ALL therapy and represent promising therapeutic avenues for high-risk and relapsed/refractory ALL. These novel therapies are now moving into frontline ALL therapy and may define new treatment paradigms that aim to further improve survival and reduce chemotherapy-related toxicities in the management of pediatric ALL.

Impact of TKIs post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL

How to best use tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of BCR-ABL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown but will almost certainly not be addressed by a definitive randomized trial. Saini and colleagues provide a large body of observational data to reinforce earlier circumstantial evidence favoring prophylactic use of TKIs for at least 2 years posttransplant.

Indications for Allogeneic HCT in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

OPINION STATEMENT

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults is associated with poor outcomes as compared to children when treated with chemotherapy, leading to a considerably inferior cure rate. Historically, consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) was routinely recommended for eligible adults with ALL in first complete remission (CR1) if a donor was available, since randomized studies showed superiority over continuing chemotherapy. With the increasing use of pediatric-inspired frontline regimens in young adults with ALL and the availability of novel salvage agents for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL that have high potential in inducing a second CR, the role of early alloHCT in the treatment paradigm for ALL needs to be reevaluated, and the decision should be individualized for each patient. Simultaneously, alloHCT has evolved considerably lately, and historical randomized studies that have proven the benefit of alloHCT in adults with ALL in CR1 did not included the increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning and haploidentical transplants, and therefore, data may not entirely apply. Nowadays, detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most prognostic determinant of ALL outcome and should be a major consideration in the decision to perform alloHcT in CR1. Nonetheless, other biological and clinical factors remain relevant and can support the complex decision-making. Such factors include high-risk leukemia genetics, the type of administered chemotherapy regimen and the ability of the patient to tolerate all key components of the regimen, and the availability of effective salvage therapies that allow alloHCT to be performed in CR2 in case of relapse after chemotherapy.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia and maintenance therapy: no time to waste

This article has a companion Counterpoint by Soiffer.

Allogeneic transplantation for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide

Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is standard of care for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The routine pretransplant and posttransplant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved outcomes, but the optimal conditioning regimen, donor type, and TKI remain undefined. The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with de novo Ph+ ALL who received alloBMT using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a component of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis from 2008 to 2018. Among transplants for Ph+ ALL, 69 (85%) were performed in CR1, and 12 (15%) were performed in second or greater remission (CR2+). The majority of transplants (58%) were HLA haploidentical. Nearly all patients (91.4%) initiated TKI posttransplant. For patients in CR1, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66%. The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning, absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) according to flow cytometry at transplant, and the use of dasatinib vs imatinib at diagnosis were associated with improved overall survival (OS) and RFS. Neither donor type nor recipient age ≥60 years affected RFS. When analyzing all transplants, alloBMT in CR1 (vs CR2+) and the absence of pretransplant MRD were associated with improved RFS. Most relapses were associated with the emergence of kinase domain mutations. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD at 1 year was 9%, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 8%. Nonmyeloablative alloBMT with PTCy for Ph+ ALL in an MRD-negative CR1 after initial treatment with dasatinib yields favorable outcomes.