Feasibility and efficacy of addition of individualized-dose lenalidomide to chlorambucil and rituximab as first-line treatment in elderly and FCR-unfit patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Maintenance low-dose fixed duration lenalidomide and rituximab following bendamustine and rituximab induction in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma

Lenalidomide (LEN) and rituximab (RTX) have independently improved progression-free survival (PFS) in CLL, leading to interest in use of LEN + RTX (R2) following induction chemoimmunotherapy. Patients with previously untreated CLL received bendamustine + RTX (BR) for 6 cycles, then 24 cycles of R2. LEN dosing was 5-10 mg daily; RTX was given odd cycles (12 doses). The primary endpoint is PFS; secondary endpoints are response and overall survival. Thirty-six patients enrolled, median age 64.5 years. Twenty-nine received R2; 12 completed a full course R2 (33.3%), 5 completed R2 with premature discontinuation of LEN. Dose reductions/holds were most often for neutropenia. Complete response was achieved in 33.3%. After median >4 years follow-up, 2-year and 3-year PFS were 86.1% and 69.4%. Five-year overall survival was 92.3%. R2 maintenance may improve PFS after BR induction, and a lower dose of 5 mg/day and ≤1 year of R2 may be most tolerable (NCT00974233).

Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoproliferative disease in adults and currently remains incurable. As the progression-free period shortens after each successive treatment, strategies such as maintenance therapy are needed to improve the degree and duration of response to previous therapies. Monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, and targeted therapies are among the available options for maintenance therapy. People with CLL who achieve remission after previous therapy may choose to undergo medical observation or maintenance therapy to deepen the response. Even though there is widespread use of therapeutic maintenance agents, the benefits and harms of these treatments are still uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects and safety of maintenance therapy, including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, immunomodulatory drug therapy, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and B-cell lymphoma-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for individuals with CLL.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with no language or publication status restrictions. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three trials registers in January 2022 together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs with prospective identification of participants. We excluded cluster-randomised trials, cross-over trial designs, and non-randomised studies. We included studies comparing maintenance therapies with placebo/observation or head-to-head comparisons.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes using the GRADE approach: overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM), treatment discontinuation (TD), and all adverse events (AEs).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 RCTs (2393 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including seven trials comparing anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (rituximab or ofatumumab) with observation in 1679 participants; three trials comparing immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide) with placebo/observation in 693 participants; and one trial comparing anti-CD 52 mAbs (alemtuzumab) with observation in 21 participants. No comparisons of novel small molecular inhibitors were found. The median age of participants was 54.1 to 71.7 years; 59.5% were males. The type of previous induction treatment, severity of disease, and baseline stage varied among the studies. Five trials included early-stage symptomatic patients, and three trials included advanced-stage patients (Rai stage III/IV or Binet stage B/C). Six trials reported a frequent occurrence of cytogenic aberrations at baseline (69.7% to 80.1%). The median follow-up duration was 12.4 to 73 months. The risk of selection bias in the included studies was unclear. We assessed overall risk of performance bias and detection bias as low risk for objective outcomes and high risk for subjective outcomes. Overall risk of attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias was low. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): rituximab or ofatumumab maintenance versus observation Anti-CD20 mAbs maintenance likely results in little to no difference in OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.20; 1152 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increases PFS significantly (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.73; 1255 participants; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to observation alone. Anti-CD20 mAbs may result in: an increase in grade 3/4 AEs (rate ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.71; 1284 participants; 5 studies; low-certainty evidence); little to no difference in TRM (risk ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.71; 1189 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence); a slight reduction to no difference in TD (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.20; 1321 participants; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence); and an increase in all AEs (rate ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47; 1321 participants; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared to the observation group. One RCT reported that there may be no difference in HRQoL between the anti-CD20 mAbs (ofatumumab) maintenance and the observation group (mean difference -1.70, 95% CI -8.59 to 5.19; 480 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). Immunomodulatory drug (IMiD): lenalidomide maintenance versus placebo/observation IMiD maintenance therapy likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.35; 461 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.73; 461 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. Regarding harms, IMiD maintenance therapy may result in an increase in grade 3/4 AEs (rate ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.38; 400 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) and may result in a slight increase in TRM (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.29; 458 participants; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. The evidence for the effect on TD compared to placebo is very uncertain (risk ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05; 400 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). IMiD maintenance therapy probably increases all AEs slightly (rate ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.54; 458 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/observation. No studies assessed HRQoL. Anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): alemtuzumab maintenance versus observation Maintenance with alemtuzumab may have little to no effect on PFS, but the evidence is very uncertain (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95; 21 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). We did not identify any study reporting the outcomes OS, HRQoL, grade 3/4 AEs, TRM, TD, or all AEs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently moderate- to very low-certainty evidence available regarding the benefits and harms of maintenance therapy in people with CLL. Anti-CD20 mAbs maintenance improved PFS, but also increased grade 3/4 AEs and all AEs. IMiD maintenance had a large effect on PFS, but also increased grade 3/4 AEs. However, none of the above-mentioned maintenance interventions show differences in OS between the maintenance and control groups. The effects of alemtuzumab maintenance are uncertain, coupled with a warning for drug-related infectious toxicity. We found no studies evaluating other novel maintenance interventions, such as B-cell receptor inhibitors, B-cell leukaemia-2/lymphoma-2 inhibitors, or obinutuzumab.

The Role of Long Noncoding RNAs in Progression of Leukemia: Based on Chromosomal Location

Long non-coding RNA [LncRNA] dysregulation has been seen in many human cancers, including several kinds of leukemia, which is still a fatal disease with a poor prognosis. LncRNAs have been demonstrated to function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes in leukemia. This study covers current research findings on the role of lncRNAs in the prognosis and diagnosis of leukemia. Based on recent results, several lncRNAs are emerging as biomarkers for the prognosis, diagnosis, and even treatment outcome prediction of leukemia and have been shown to play critical roles in controlling leukemia cell activities, such as proliferation, cell death, metastasis, and drug resistance. As a result, lncRNA profiles may have superior predictive and diagnostic potential in leukemia. Accordingly, this review concentrates on the significance of lncRNAs in leukemia progression based on their chromosomal position.

Secondary primary malignancies after treatment with chemo-immunotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with CLL: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), therapy-related cytotoxicity and the resulting immunodeficiency are thought to contribute to the development of secondary primary malignancies (SPM). Here we analyzed clinical trial data on the occurrence of SPM following chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) regimens in treatment-naïve CLL patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted covering multiple databases between 2003-2019. Data from relevant clinical trials on the proportion of patients with SPMs were extracted. Then the number of SPM patients/person-years was calculated by taking into account the trials' follow-up time. Finally, a random-effects meta-analysis to pool the rates from individual studies was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 22 studies reporting SPM data available for analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated that the number of SPM patients/1000 person-years was 24 (95%CI: 19-29). Results from trials with cancer-specific data indicated 19 (95%CI: 14-26) solid and 9 (95%CI: 6-12) hematological SPM patients/1000 person-years. These estimations did not change significantly when sub-groups were analysed by CIT regimens.

CONCLUSION

Although pooling data with the intention to analyze adverse event rates is challenging, our study concluded that in case of CIT regimens, SPM should be considered an important adverse outcome. Different regimens showed similar trends; however, other clinical and demographic factors have a profound impact in this respect.

Lenalidomide abrogates the survival effect of bone marrow stromal cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

In the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) the microenvironment plays an important role, as it produces survival signals and mediates drug resistance. Lenalidomide, which has immunomodulatory effect, can enhance the activation of T-, NK-cells and endothelial cells, however there are no data available whether it can modulate bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). In our study, we investigated the effects of lenalidomide on BMSCs and CLL cells. CLL cells were cultured alone or with BMSCs and were treated with lenalidomide. Apoptosis, immunophenotype, and cytokine secretion of BMSCs and CLL cells were determined by flow cytometry. Lenalidomide slightly increased the apoptosis of CLL cells and abrogated the anti-apoptotic effect of BMSCs on CLL cells. Lenalidomide treatment decreased the expression of antigens on CLL cells, which mediate the interactions with the microenvironment. Interestingly, lenalidomide enhanced the expression of IRF4 and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86. The secretion of several cytokines was not changed significantly by lenalidomide. CD49d-negative CLL cases were more sensitive to lenalidomide treatment. Our results suggest that lenalidomide has a limited effect on BMSCs, but it renders CLL cells more immunogenic and unresponsive to survival signals provided by BMSCs.

Randomized controlled trial of individualized, low dose, fixed duration lenalidomide maintenance versus observation after frontline chemo-immunotherapy in CLL

Lenalidomide maintenance after frontline chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been standard due to the availability of novel therapies, though these remain out of reach for most in low-middle income countries. This single-center, open-label study randomized CLL patients (non-deletion 17p) after frontline therapy to lenalidomide maintenance (dose-escalated 2.5-10mg, 20/28 days per cycle for six months) or observation (2:1 allocation). Forty patients were included over 2018-2020. At a median follow-up of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) with lenalidomide was not significantly different than observation (26 vs. 18 months, p = 0.4). Patients with minimal residual disease >10^-2 had a trend toward better PFS with lenalidomide (19 vs. 7 months, p = 0.07). Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 16.7% of patients on lenalidomide. Quality of life was comparable between the two arms. Low dose, fixed duration lenalidomide maintenance is not an effective strategy after frontline CIT in CLL.

Monoclonal Antibodies, Bispecific Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncohematology

Background:

The therapeutic outcomes and the prognosis of patients with various hematologic malignancies are not always ideal with the current standard of care.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to analyze the results of the use of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates for the therapy of malignant hemopathies.

Methods:

A mini-review was achieved using the articles published in Web of Science and PubMed between January 2017 and January 2020 and the new patents were made in this field.

Results:

Naked monoclonal antibodies have improved the therapeutic results obtained with standard of care, but they also have side effects and the use of some of them can lead to the loss of the target antigen through trogocytosis, which explains the resistance that occurs during therapy. The results obtained with naked monoclonal antibodies have been improved by a better monoclonal antibody preparation, the use of bispecific antibodies (against two antigens on the target cell surface or by binding both surface antigen on target cells and T-cell receptor complex, followed by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes activation and subsequent cytolysis of the target cell), the use of monoclonal or bispecific constructs in frontline regimens, combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy, including through the use of antibody-drug conjugates (which provides a targeted release of a chemotherapeutic agent).

Conclusion:

Immunotherapy and immuno-chemotherapy have improved the outcome of the patients with malignant hemopathies through a targeted, personalized therapy, with reduced systemic toxicity, which in some cases can even induce deep complete remissions, including minimal residual disease negativity.

Immune Dysfunctions and Immune-Based Therapeutic Interventions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by a wide range of tumor-induced alterations, which affect both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune response, and accumulate during disease progression. In recent years, the development of targeted therapies, such as the B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors and the Bcl-2 protein inhibitor venetoclax, has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of CLL. Despite their remarkable anti-tumor activity, targeted agents have some limitations, which include the development of drug resistance mechanisms and the inferior efficacy observed in high-risk patients. Therefore, additional treatments are necessary to obtain deeper responses and overcome drug resistance. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which exploits immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia effect to eradicate tumor cells, currently represents the only potentially curative therapeutic option for CLL patients. However, due to its potential toxicities, HSCT can be offered only to a restricted number of younger and fit patients. The growing understanding of the complex interplay between tumor cells and the immune system, which is responsible for immune escape mechanisms and tumor progression, has paved the way for the development of novel immune-based strategies. Despite promising preclinical observations, results from pilot clinical studies exploring the safety and efficacy of novel immune-based therapies have been sometimes suboptimal in terms of long-term tumor control. Therefore, further advances to improve their efficacy are needed. In this context, possible approaches include an earlier timing of immunotherapy within the treatment sequencing, as well as the possibility to improve the efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents by administering them in combination with other anti-tumor drugs. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of main immune defects affecting patients with CLL, also describing the complex networks leading to immune evasion and tumor progression. From the therapeutic standpoint, we will go through the evolution of immune-based therapeutic approaches over time, including i) agents with broad immunomodulatory effects, such as immunomodulatory drugs, ii) currently approved and next-generation monoclonal antibodies, and iii) immunotherapeutic strategies aiming at activating or administering immune effector cells specifically targeting leukemic cells (e.g. bi-or tri-specific antibodies, tumor vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and checkpoint inhibitors).

Proteomic markers with prognostic impact on outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients under chemo-immunotherapy: results from the HOVON 109 study

Despite recent identification of several prognostic markers, there is still a need for new prognostic parameters able to predict clinical outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Here, we aimed to validate the prognostic ability of known (proteomic) markers measured pretreatment and to search for new proteomic markers that might be related to treatment response in CLL. To this end, baseline serum samples of 51 CLL patients treated with chemo-immunotherapy were analyzed for 360 proteomic markers, using Olink technology. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 23 months (range: 1.25-60.9). Patients with high levels of sCD23 (>11.27, p = 0.026), sCD27 (>11.03, p = 0.04), SPINT1 (>1.6, p = 0.001), and LY9 (>8.22, p = 0.0003) had a shorter EFS than those with marker levels below the median. The effect of sCD23 on EFS differed between immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene-mutated and unmutated patients, with the shortest EFS for unmutated CLL patients with sCD23 levels above the median. Taken together, our results validate the prognostic impact of sCD23 and highlight SPINT1 and LY9 as possible promising markers for treatment response in CLL patients.

Evolution in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: should MRD negativity be the goal?

Advances in the molecular biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and development of molecularly targeted therapies have resulted in treatment innovations. Therapeutic approaches for previously untreated CLL/SLL patients are changing from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) to molecularly targeted drugs. The aim of therapy for CLL patients has been to control the disease; however, FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) has improved outcomes and reduced the high incidence of undetectable minimum/measurable residual disease (MRD) in previously untreated CLL patients with no 17p deletion/TP53 disruption and mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGHV). Patients achieving undetectable MRD in the bone marrow are expected to be cured. BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors are effective for CLL/SLL patients. However, atrial fibrillation and bleeding are associated with the BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, while tumor lysis syndrome is an adverse event (AE) of the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax. Although these novel targeted drugs are very useful, they are also expensive. Emergence of resistant clones of CLL cells must also be addressed. Therefore, treatments of indefinite duration until progression have been replaced by fixed-duration treatments. This review introduces advances in the treatment of previously untreated CLL/SLL patients in Europe and the United States.

Engaging Cytotoxic T and NK Cells for Immunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by an acquired immune dysfunction. CLL cells affect the phenotype and function of the entire spectrum of innate and adaptive immune cells, including monocytes, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, leading to a tumor-supportive environment and reduced immunosurveillance. Novel immunotherapies like immune checkpoint blockade, bi- and tri-specific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells use the patients' immune system to induce therapeutic responses. Although these novel immunotherapies showed impressive results in several B cell lymphomas, responses in CLL were often disappointing. The strong immunomodulatory effect of CLL is believed to play a pivotal role in the low response rates to these immunotherapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize how CLL influences the function of non-malignant lymphocytes, with a special focus on T and NK cells, two important cellular mediators for immunotherapy. Secondly, we provide a short overview of the activity of several immunotherapeutics in CLL, and discuss how novel strategies may overcome the disappointing response rates in CLL.